Lohan v. E-Trade
Actress Lindsay Lohan alleges a TV ad featuring a "milkaholic" baby named Lindsay used her name and personality for advertising purposes without her consent.
Irvin v. Mustafa
NFL Hall of Famer Michael Irvin files a countersuit against a woman who accused him of rape, alleging she is a "morally-bankrupt individual" who is trying to ruin his career.
Robbins v. Lower Merion SD
High-school student accuses a school
district of spying on him and other students
by remotely activating webcams contained in school-supplied laptops.
Peterson v. Grisham
10th Circuit finds John Grisham did not defame three Oklahoma law enforcement officials in a book about the wrongful convictions of two men for a rape-murder.
lc_search
LC_DayByDay

 Feb   March 10   Apr

SMTWTFS
   1  2  3  4  5  6
  7  8  910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031 
Julianna Walker Willis Technology
LC_BySubject
OnTheMap

rss

LC_ExtraPoints

• Owners of Who Dat?, Inc. sue the NFL and the New Orleans Saints for trademark infringement, seeking to protect the mark that "has become one of the most recognizable in all of America and quickly became well-known around the world."
Who Dat?, Inc. v. NFL Properties

• Army bomb disposal expert sues the makers of "The Hurt Locker" for plagiarizing his life story. The film is "nothing more than the exploitation of a real life honorable, courageous, and long serving member of our country’s armed forces, by greedy multi-billion dollar 'entertainment' corporations."
Sarver v. The Hurt Locker

• Former patient sues the Cincinnati hospital where he was sexually assaulted by a transgender nurse. The nurse's "employment while masquerading as a member of the female gender in a hospital environment involved an unreasonable risk of harm to others."
Evans v. University of Cincinnati

• Federal judge enjoins the City of Phoenix from enforcing a noise ordinance against "sound generated in the course of religious expression," finding the right of churches to ring bells outweighs "the City's interest in preserving the peace and tranquility of its neighborhoods."
St. Mark Roman Catholic Parish v. City of Phoenix

• 5th Circuit says a Texas city's junked vehicle ordinance applies to a cactus planter made out of wrecked Oldsmobile 88. "Irrespective of the intentions of its creators ... the car-planter is a utilitarian device, an advertisement, and ultimately a 'junked vehicle.'"
Kleinman v. City of San Marcos

• Oklahoma City bomber Terry Nichols notifies a federal judge that he has gone on hunger strike, saying he is "prepared to die if necessary because he is done allowing his body to be defiled by [ ] refined and dead foods."
Nichols v. Federal Bureau of Prisons

• Texas judge finds the makers of a film about Rin Tin Tin did not infringe on the trademarks of a breeder of German Shepherds. "Defendants['] title 'Finding Rin Tin Tin: The Adventure Continues" is a fair use of the term 'Rin Tin Tin.'"
Rin Tin Tin, Inc. v. First Look Studios

• Illinois appeals court says the contact sports exception to negligence liability does not apply to the case of an athletic trainer who was struck in the eye by a hockey puck while refilling water bottles. Michael Weisberg "suffered injuries as a result of alleged conduct that was not inherent to the sport of hockey."
Weisberg v. Chicago Steel




Alltop_125x125.jpg

ADVERT

Free no win no fee claims advice for personal injury.


Woman Wins $1.5M in STD Transmission Case Print

In what may be one of the larger verdicts of its kind, an Iowa jury has awarded $1.5 million to a woman who sued a man for infecting her with a sexually transmitted disease after telling her he was disease-free.

Karly Rossiter, 25, has been diagnosed with both strains of the human papillomavirus (HPV), one of which causes genital warts and the other cell abnormalities that can lead to cervical cancer. In a petition filed in March 2007, she alleged that Dr. Alan Evans, a Muscatine, Iowa, dentist, infected her during their 18-month relationship and failed to warn her to take appropriate steps to protect herself from infection.

Evans denied having HPV and Rossiter was not able to prove he actually knew he was infected. The FDA has not approved an HPV test for men and some men may have the virus without developing symptoms.

But after more than 10 hours of deliberations, a Muscatine County District Court jury last week found Evans liable for negligent transmission of HPV, awarding Rossiter $700,000 in compensatory damages and $800,000 in punitive damages.

“That's a lot of money for Iowa,” says Rossiter attorney Jeffrey R. Tronvold (Eells & Tronvold, Cedar Rapids, Iowa). Based on the average annual income in Muscatine County, the jury “gave her 30 years of work.”

Rossiter also alleged that Evans infected her with bacterial vaginitis. But that disease, unlike genital warts, is permanently curable.

Actual knowledge of infection is usually not a requirement for the tort of negligent infliction of an STD. Those who, "under the totality of the circumstances, have reason to know they are infected" may be liable under the standard of "constructive" knowledge.

But there does not appear to be any precedent for finding constructive knowledge of an HPV infection. In McPherson v. McPherson, 712 A.2d 1043 (1998), the Maine Supreme Judicial Court cleared a man of liability for infecting his wife with the virus, in part because –- like Evans -– he had no medical diagnosis of any STD.

According to Rossiter's petition, she met Evans in December 2004 when she went to his office for dental work. They began dating and sometime before the New Year, he “volunteered that he was free from any type of sexually transmitted disease.”

On New Year's Day 2005, the suit said, they had a sexual encounter with genital contact but “did not have intercourse.” Then a few days later,

Evans raised the topic of sexually transmitted diseases again, and specifically inquired as to whether Karly had ever been specifically tested for Human Papilloma Virus.

As a result of that inquiry, Rossiter went to her gynecologist and got tested. In April 2005, she learned that she could have the virus and about a year after the New Year's Day encounter with Evans she developed genital warts.

Tronvold questions why Evans would have asked Rossiter about being tested for HPV “if he didn't have something ... It's a bizarre question to ask somebody.” By not warning her to take precautions, he says, “he failed to do what a reasonable person would have done under the circumstances.”

The verdict form shows that $500,000 of Rossiter's compensatory damages was for future mental pain and suffering. The punitives were for Evans's "willful and wanton disregard" of her safety.

The jury rejected a battery claim which required the plaintiff to prove Evans deliberately infected her.

UPDATES

  • Evans filed a notice of appeal in November 2008.

  • As On Point reports here, the Iowa Court of Appeals affirmed the verdict in a Dec. 30, 2009 opinion.


  • COMMENT

  • "I have no idea why the jury seem[s] to have overlooked the testimony and medical records showing the lady had a bad pap [smear] two years before meeting the man ... Did anyone hear the male's testimony that he did not have sex with her until months AFTER her Jan. 11, 2005 positive HPV finding?” -- Ruth

  • "This seems like a fair decision. More importantly, it demonstrates that our existing tort laws are sufficient to cover even negligent, but unknowing, transmission of an STD. This should be another nail in the coffin for any calls to create a new legal scheme for 'intentional sex torts.'” -- Legal Satyricon

  • "[T]he notion that this infection is worth $1.5 million is beyond belief.” -- from Medskool.com



  • By Matthew Heller
    8/7/08


     
    rc_insidestories
    • Perfume Allergy Case Settles for $100,000

      A Detroit city planner with an allergy to perfume is savoring the sweet smell of legal success after the city agreed to pay her $100,000 and be more sensitive to the chemically sensitive.
      Read more...
    • Teen's Suit Puts Mug-Shot Publisher Against the Wall

      A new publication in Lincoln, Neb., milks mug shots for humor. But a teenager whose arrest photo appeared in Cuffed doesn't see the funny side of it and has sued the publisher for misappropriating his image.
      Read more...
    • BA Settles 'Reckless' Baggage Handling Suit

      Limiting its liability to a group of only 13 airline passengers, British Airways (NYSE: BAY) has settled a first-of-its kind lawsuit that accused the airline of being “inexcusably reckless” in its handling of passengers' baggage.
      Read more...
    • Judge Says "Gay" Still Defamatory in Texas

      What one court has called “a veritable sea change in social attitudes about homosexuality” has evidently not reached Texas where a judge ruled that an airport security guard can sue a radio show host for calling him “gay” on the air.
      Read more...
    • Mom Says Hospital Gave Her Wrong
      Baby to Nurse


      Because of a hospital's error, Jennifer Spiegel became an involuntary wet nurse to another woman's newborn son. Now she is suing the hospital for its malpractice in providing her with the wrong baby to breastfeed.
      Read more...
    • Case Over MySpace Page Chills Student Speech

      Several recent court rulings have been protective of off-campus student speech -– with the exception of a very shaky decision that a dissenting judge said “vests school officials with dangerously overbroad censorship discretion.”
      Read more...
    • Motorist Who Flipped off Cop Gets $50K From City

      The citation of a motorist for displaying his middle finger to a police officer -– what a judge described as a “somewhat innocuous” gesture -- turned out to be quite expensive for the City of Pittsburgh as it agreed to pay $50,000 to the bird-flipper.
      Read more...
    RC_OnFile

    Vance v. Rumsfeld
    Subject: Detainee abuse
    Document: Opinion

    Churchill v. Univ. of Colorado
    Subject: Academic freedom
    Document: ACLU amicus brief

    KBR/Halliburton v. Jones
    Subject: Sexual assault
    Document: Petition for review

    Olson v. Baron Cohen
    Subject: Verbal assault
    Document: Statement of decision

    North Face Apparel v. The South Butt
    Subject: Trademark infringement
    Document: Answer to complaint

    more

    RC_OnTrial

    Spears v. Allergan, Inc.
    Court: Orange County (Calif.) Superior
    Subject: Botox death
    Verdict: Defense

    Patterson v. Hudson Area Schools
    Court: USDC, E. Mich.
    Subject: Student harassment

    more


    RC_OnTheDocket

    McClain v. Pfizer, Inc.
    Date: 3/2/10
    Court: USDC, Conn.
    Hearing: Jury trial in case over unsafe lab conditions.

    Sherman v. McDonald's Corp.
    Date: 3/23/10
    Court: Washington County (Ark.) Circuit
    Hearing: Jury trial in case over nude photos.

    more