
• Student alleges a prank involving a bottle rocket and another student's anus backfired, causing him to fall off the deck of a frat house. Helmburg v. Alpha Tau Omega
• 5th Circuit reinstates a jury verdict finding a man employed by an engineering firm was sexually harassed by a male supervisor. "The text message 'I want cock' could be taken as an explicit sexual proposition." Cherry v. Shaw Coastal
• Massachusetts appeals court says the ex-wife of a man who fatally shot himself with a gun he had stolen cannot sue the gun's owner for wrongful death. "We conclude that public policy dictates that [Charles] Milot's criminal conduct acts as a bar to recovery." Ryan v. Hughes-Ortiz
• Pennsylvania woman alleges her former employer discriminated against her because she wore a fake penis to assist her in her female-to-male transition. "Plaintiff's use of the prosthetic device was concealed and in no way interfered with the ability of Plaintiff to do her job." Davis v. J&J Snack Foods
• Son of a woman charged with murdering her husband cannot use the proceeds from the victim's life insurance policy to fund his mother's criminal defense. "[A]llowing the distribution of these proceeds to a third party who has clear intentions to transfer part of these proceeds to her, undermines the principles underlying the Slayer’s Act and federal common law." In Re: Estate of Michael Burkland
• Oregon judge rules that a self-proclaimed "investigative blogger" is not "considered 'media' for the purposes of applying a negligence standard in a defamation claim." Obsidian Finance v. Cox
• Seattle judge says an actress cannot proceed anonymously in her suit against the IMDb.com website for publishing her age. "[W]hile Plaintiff may face public ridicule and embarrassment if she elects to go forward under her real name, the injury she fears is not severe enough to justify permitting her to proceed anonymously." Doe v. Amazon.com
• Family of an 11-year-old girl who was crushed by a boulder of ice says forest ranger negligence caused her death. Rangers "did not warn users of the risk of harm associated with the dangerous, unstable snow and ice" at the Big Four Ice Caves in Snohomish County, Wash. Tam v. U.S.
• 3rd Circuit dismisses a breach of data security case against a payroll-processing company. "Appellants' allegations of an increased risk of identity theft as a result of the security breach are hypothetical, future injuries." Reilly v. Ceridian Corp.
• Oregon judge denies First Amendment protections to a blogger. "Defendant cites no cases indicating that a self-proclaimed 'investigative blogger' is considered 'media' for the purposes of applying a negligence standard in a defamation claim." Obsidian Finance v. Cox
• A transsexual who was fired from her government job while she was in the process of becoming a woman wins her sex discrimination suit. "[A] government agent violates the Equal Protection Clause’s prohibition of sex-based discrimination when he or she fires a transgender or transsexual employee because of his or her gender non-conformity." Glenn v. Brumby
• New York man sues a Texas fertility clinic for wrongful insemination, alleging it failed to obtain his consent before using a sample of his sperm to impregnate his ex-girlfriend. Pressil v. Advanced Fertility
• Nebraska judge rules that school officials may have illegally disciplined students for wearing t-shirts in honor of a slain friend suspected of gang membership. "[Q]uestions of fact remain whether Plaintiffs’ speech occurred in a context likely to provoke gang violence or other disruptions of school activities." Kuhr v. Millard Public Sch. Dist.

|
|
Unsafe Undies? Thongs Ain't What They Used to Be |
|
 |
Macrida Patterson (right) with attorney Jason Buccat
It may be a bit early to add intimate clothing to the list of health hazards for women, but a rash of product liability lawsuits has hit Victoria's Secret, with plaintiffs alleging they were injured by defectively designed underwear.
At least four cases, including a proposed class action, have been filed over the past six months and one plaintiff, Macrida Patterson, appeared on national TV this week to describe her harrowing encounter with a Victoria's Secret thong –- a Sexy Little Thing low-rise v-string, to be precise.
Patterson's barebones complaint, filed June 9 in Los Angeles Superior Court, provides few details. But the L.A. traffic cop told the "Today Show" that a decorative metallic piece flew off the thong and struck her in the eye while she was changing in the locker room at work after her shift.
“I was putting on my underwear from Victoria’s Secret, and the metal popped into my eye,” she said. “It happened really quickly. I was in excruciating pain. I screamed. That’s what happened.”
Patterson attorney Jason J. Buccat said she suffered “three actual cuts to her cornea” and denied the case was one of those “crazy lawsuits” that tort reformers like to complain about.
"Victoria’s Secret does have its angels, but as we say, the devil is in the details," he said. "And the details here will definitely show there is a defective product, both in its design and its manufacture."
In Greenville, S.C., meanwhile, aspiring model Jessica Lang alleged in a state court complaint filed Jan. 25 that her Victoria's Secret bra was, in effect, a “booby trap.”
After feeling “discomfort in her breast,” she tried to take the bra off, but it “malfunctioned, lacerating Plaintiff's chest and left breast, nearly 6 inches wide and 6 inches deep.”
The case is now in federal court, with Lang correcting the extent of her alleged injury. The wound, she said in an amended complaint, was “3 inches x 1/4 inch deep, resulting in scarring.”
In the other recent cases,
-
A Parma, Ohio, woman is seeking to represent a class of plaintiffs who have suffered “adverse physical effects” from Victoria's Secret undergarments and intimate apparel including “allergic reactions, contact dermatitis, blistering, itching, hives, rashes, scarring, systemic reactions and other health concerns.” Ritter v. Victoria's Secret Stores.
-
A Bronx, N.Y., woman alleges that while wearing a Victoria's Secret bra, she “suffered severe personal injuries” attributable to the “defective nature” of the product. Ramos v. Victoria's Secret Stores.
By Matthew Heller 6/21/08
|
|
-
Jurors' Comments Fuel New Trial Bid in Bullying Case
Jurors may have opened the door to a new trial in a Maryland school bullying case by saying they returned a verdict for the defense because they were afraid of setting a bad precedent for school systems throughout the country.
Read more...
-
Abuse Victim Can Sue Ex-DA Over 'Sexting' Messages
A Wisconsin judge has protected a domestic violence victim from a rogue prosecutor, finding that she can sue him for sending her text messages in which he pressured her to have sex with him.
Read more...
-
Four Loko Maker Says Users Knew of Health Dangers
The maker of Four Loko has previewed its defense of a slew of product liability lawsuits, arguing that the physical effects of the energy drink's mixture of alcohol and caffeine — far from being an undisclosed risk to consumers — are precisely what made it so popular.
Read more...
-
Mortician Sued for Speaking Ill of the Dead
In a first-of-its-kind unprofessional conduct lawsuit, a woman has sued her former boss at a Michigan funeral home for making an indecent comment about the body of a dead man in front of her.
Read more...
-
'Next Friends' of Orcas Bid to Stop SeaWorld Slavery
An animal rights lawsuit against SeaWorld for enslaving five killer whales at its aquatic theme parks in San Diego and Orlando may sink even though humans are representing the orcas as their “next friends.”
Read more...
-
Jury Finds No Harm to Boy From Wrongful Circumcision
In a blow to supporters of male “genital integrity,” an Indiana jury has ruled that a doctor did not injure a boy by circumcising him when he was an infant even though his mother wanted him to be left intact.
Read more...
-
Guest Can Sue Motel 6 Over Attack by Woman's Pimp
A guest who paid for sex with a prostitute at a Motel 6 did not assume the risk of being attacked several hours later by the prostitute's pimp, a Pennsylvania judge has ruled in an unusual premises liability lawsuit against the motel operator.
Read more...
|
Marsh v. Air Tran Airways Subject: Roaches on a plane Document: Complaint
Classic Media v. J.G. Wentworth Subject: "Lassie" copyright Document: Complaint
Kardashian v. Old Navy Subject: Publicity rights Document: Complaint
McKee v. Laurion Subject: Doctor defamation Document: Opinion
Francis v. U.S. Subject: Bear attack Document: Decision
more
|
|
Doe v. Discovery Day Care Court: Miami-Dade Circuit Subject: Child molestation Verdict: $3,000,000
Hoback v. City of Chattanooga Court: USDC, E. Tenn. Subject: PTSD discrimination Verdict: $680,000
more
|
|
Brown v. Herbert Date: 12/16/11 Court: USDC, Utah Hearing: Motion to dismiss polygamy case
more
|
|
|