Perry v. Schwarzenegger
Judge strikes down California's same-sex marriage ban, finding that "Moral disapproval alone is an improper basis on which to deny rights to gay men and lesbians."
U.S. v. Arizona
Arizona judge enjoins enforcement of a new immigration law's requirement that police determine the immigration status of
every person who is arrested.
McGuire v. United Airlines
Michigan woman says a United Express flight crew locked her in a plane for nearly four hours after it landed because they failed to ensure that all passengers had disembarked.
R.H. v. Schenectady Sch. Dist.
Middle school student says he was suspended for wearing rosary beads because the rosary "is considered a gang-related symbol" and cannot be worn in school.
lc_search
LC_DayByDay

 Aug   September 10   Oct

SMTWTFS
   1  2  3  4
  5  6  7  8  91011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930 
Julianna Willis Technology
LC_BySubject
OnTheMap

rss

LC_ExtraPoints

• 9th Circuit says the U.S. may be held vicariously liable for the sexual harassment of asylum applicants by an INS officer. "California law makes the United States bear the cost of [Thomas] Powell’s conduct, unauthorized but incidental to the asylum system." Lu v. Powell

• Nevada man sues the Mormon church over a back injury he suffered performing baptisms for the dead. The church was negligent in not warning Daniel Dastrup that "the repetitive motion required for performing baptisms for the dead could cause serious damage to a person's back."
Dastrup v. LDS Church

• Attorney says he was harassed by his boss at a Newport Beach, Calif., law firm because refused to attend a seminar "where he would be stripped naked, not allowed to leave, be required to discuss details of his sex life, handle a wooden dildo, and potentially allow other men to touch his genitals."
Eggleston v. Bisnar/Chase

• Parents of a 10-year-old boy who witnessed a killer whale's fatal attack on a trainer sue Sea World Orlando for infliction of emotional distress. "Without question, it was reasonably foreseeable and in fact predictable that an attack such as this one by a killer whale with the tendencies of Tilikum was inevitable." Connell v. Sea World

• Denver judge dismisses Oklahoma City bomber Terry Nichols's civil rights claims against prison officials for denying him a high-fiber diet.
Nichols v. Federal Bureau of Prisons

• Illinois teenager with cerebral palsy sues the Special Olympics for refusing to let her play basketball with the help of a service dog.
Youngwith v. Special Olympics

• Montana judge sets aside a government decision removing protections for the northern Rocky Mountain gray wolf. The Endangered Species Act "was not intended to sow the dragon's teeth of strife or to plant the seeds of future conflicts that have given rise to this case."
Defenders of Wildlife v. Salazar

• San Francisco judge dismisses a cereal consumer's false advertising suit. "[T]here is nothing in the packaging or marketing of Cap’n Crunch that would in any way deceive a reasonable consumer into believing that the cereal contains or derives nutritional value from real fruit." Werbel v. PepsiCo

• Iowa judge says a sheriff denied the applications of a father and son for concealed weapons permits in retaliation for their political activism. "This is a great reminder that the First Amendment protects the sole individual who may be a gadfly, kook, weirdo, nut job, whacko, and spook, with the same force of protection as folks with more majoritarian and popular views." Dorr v. Weber

• 5th Circuit rules that a school district violated the religious freedom of a Native American boy by requiring him to wear his long hair in a bun on top of his head or in a braid tucked into his shirt. The boy "has a sincere religious belief in wearing his hair uncut and in plain view."
A.A. v. Needville Ind. Sch. Dist.




Alltop_125x125.jpg

ADVERT

Free no win no fee claims advice for personal injury.


ADVERT

For accident claims advice, visit a personal injury lawyer.


ADVERT

Injury Claims

"Barney" Owner No Longer "Enemy" for Web Site Print

 

Second Life "property"

A Pennsylvania attorney has further blurred the lines between reality and cyberspace by filing a first-of-its-kind property rights lawsuit that alleges a multiplayer online gaming company illegally seized his “virtual real estate.”

Marc S. Bragg of West Chester, Pa., is seeking relief in a real-world court for an alleged “conversion” or theft of property from the 3-D virtual world of Second Life, a “massively multiplayer role-playing game” (MMPORG) that boasts some 200,000 “residents” and 12,000 “profitable in-world business owners.”

Linden Labs, the San Francisco-based creator of Second Life, “intentionally, without Plaintiff's consent and without lawful justification, interfered with and destroyed Plaintiff's right of property,” the complaint says.

Bragg, who joined Second Life in late 2005 and uses the online name “Marc Woebegone,” had accumulated about $2,000 worth of virtual land, goods and currency when Linden canceled his account in May and effectively, he argues, converted his virtual property.

The company, however, claims Bragg breached Second Life’s terms of service agreement by using an “exploit” in the game –- that is, he had discovered how to hold an unauthorized auction of a property that was not yet for sale.

“Plaintiff knowingly violated the rules governing the purchase of computer services simulating 'real estate' use in Second Life,” Linden Labs founder Philip Rosedale says in a court brief.

Second Life's three-dimensional platform allows a player to create a persona or “avatar,” who can then explore the digital world and take part in everything from adult encounters to commercial transactions. The virtual commerce is conducted in “linden” dollars, which can be converted into U.S. dollars at online currency exchanges.

There are no virtual courts in Second Life, however, so Bragg filed suit in Chester County Court of Common Pleas. The case was recently transferred to federal court in Philadelphia.

"Plaintiff held all title, interest and possessory rights to the virtual land ... that was acquired from Defendants," the suit says.

But one potential problem for Bragg is he does not appear to have a contract of sale confirming what property rights he actually had. Absent such a contract, he relies primarily on statements by Rosedale hyping Second Life property ownership to the media.

The property owned in Second Life, moreover, exists only in Linden's code and would therefore cease to exist if the company discontinued the game or went out of business.

If anything, Bragg blurs the lines between reality and cyberspace too much, at one point claiming that “no fine print provided by Defendants could possibly operate to suspend the laws of the United States inside of Second Life.” Does that mean those laws would apply in other MMPORGs like Ultima and World of Warcraft or, for that matter, in a game of Monopoly?

Whatever happens to Bragg’s complaint, the issue of property ownership within these games will likely surface again. Business Week recently featured a Second Life “real estate developer” who has already accumulated $250,000 worth of virtual property and makes her living from her virtual real estate business. If investors are going to keep buying into the game, they’re going to want to know exactly what they’re buying.

By Josh Saltzman (CNS)
11/28/06



A New York doctor is now free to poke fun at “Barney” on his Web site without fear of being sued for copyright infringement by the owner of the children's dinosaur character.

Dr. Stuart Frankel responded to Lyons Partnerships' legal threats by filing a declaratory relief action seeking judicial confirmation that his Barney parodies qualify as fair use. The dustyfeet.com site describes Barney as an evil merchandising scheme and features a picture of the purple dinosaur under the heading, “This is the enemy.”

As part of a settlement filed Nov. 27, Lyons has agreed not to sue Frankel and to pay his legal fees. "Hopefully Lyons Partnership has learned its lesson and will have more respect for fair use in the future," Frankel attorney Corynne McSherry of the Electronic Frontier Foundation said in a statement.

Frankel tells On Point he would have removed the "Barney" material from his site "if the 'Barney' people had asked me nicely in the first place ... It's nothing I care very much about. I was just practicing HTML coding and put up something that popped into my head that I thought would be mildly amusing for about two seconds."

"I will continue to maintain a fully 100% legal website," he adds, "but don't know whether 'Barney' will feature in it."

A settlement had been in the works since Lyons filed a motion to dismiss in September, arguing the case was essentially moot because it promised not to “make any claim directly or indirectly against Stuart Frankel ... for infringing any copyright.”

As recently as June, a Lyons attorney told Frankel in an e-mail that the materials he was using “are the intellectual property of Lyons Partnership” and it was “unlawful” to use them without Lyons' permission.

Frankel would almost certainly have won injunctive relief from a judge because parodies such as his usually qualify as fair use. Lyons now has effectively enjoined itself.

By Matthew Heller
11/28/06


 
rc_insidestories
  • Court Raps Judge Over 'Moral' Views in Adoption Case

    The Georgia Court of Appeals has rejected the reactionary views of a family court judge who ruled that a foster parent could not adopt a child because her out-of-wedlock relationship with a man was “immoral.”
    Read more...
  • Off With His Head! Woman Sues 'Mad Hatter' Actor

    Experimental theater clashes with premises liability law in the case of a Kentucky woman who claims she was injured while watching a performance of a circus-inspired play when one of the actors balanced his knee on her head.
    Read more...
  • Charity Worker Accuses CEO of Hypnotic Seduction

    A former charity worker may be pushing the limits of sexual harassment law by alleging that her boss required her to participate in “relaxation sessions” on his “magic couch” during which he hypnotized and molested her.
    Read more...
  • Appeal is Expert's Latest Challenge to Judges

    Expert witness Dr. David Egilman was previously successful in showing he had standing to appeal a judicial order in a case in which he was not a party — but that case may not help him in his latest challenge to a trial judge.
    Read more...
  • Plaintiff's Expert Files Appeal in 'Popcorn Lung' Lawsuit

    A controversial expert witness for plaintiffs has filed an unusual non-party appeal of a Washington state judge's decision finding his theory that snackers can contract lung disease from exposure to microwave popcorn is not scientifically sound.
    Read more...
  • Philly School Sued Over Race Attack on Student's Mom

    Taking civil rights law to what may be an extreme, an Asian-American woman is alleging a Philadelphia high school's tolerance of racism rendered her “helpless prey” to African-American students who attacked her when she picked her child up from the school.
    Read more...
  • 'McSteamy' Sex Tape Suit Cools off With Settlement

    Acting couple Eric Dane and Rebecca Gayheart have dropped a $1 million lawsuit against Gawker.com for publishing a videotape featuring them in a nude threesome with a friend after the gossip website agreed to take down the much-viewed posting.
    Read more...
RC_OnFile

Mohamed v. Jeppesen Dataplan
Subject: State secrets
Document: En banc opinion

Young v. Facebook
Subject: Discrimination
Document: Complaint

LaRocco v. McDonald's
Subject: Hot chocolate scalding
Document: Complaint

Stovell v. James
Subject: LeBron's paternity
Document: Motion to dismiss

Arnaout v. Warden
Subject: Muslim inmate prayer
Document: John Walker Lindh declaration

more

RC_OnTrial

McCourt v. McCourt
Court: L.A. Superior
Subject: Dodgers divorce

Pom Wonderful v. Welch Foods
Court: USDC, C. Calif.
Subject: False advertising

more


RC_OnTheDocket

McCourt v. McCourt
Date: 8/30/10
Court: L.A. Superior
Hearing: Dodgers divorce trial

more