
• Owners of Who Dat?, Inc. sue the NFL and the New Orleans Saints for trademark infringement, seeking to protect the mark that "has become one of the most recognizable in all of America and quickly became well-known around the world." Who Dat?, Inc. v. NFL Properties
• Army bomb disposal expert sues the makers of "The Hurt Locker" for plagiarizing his life story. The film is "nothing more than the exploitation of a real life honorable, courageous, and long serving member of our country’s armed forces, by greedy multi-billion dollar 'entertainment' corporations." Sarver v. The Hurt Locker
• Former patient sues the Cincinnati hospital where he was sexually assaulted by a transgender nurse. The nurse's "employment while masquerading as a member of the female gender in a hospital environment involved an unreasonable risk of harm to others." Evans v. University of Cincinnati
• Federal judge enjoins the City of Phoenix from enforcing a noise ordinance against "sound generated in the course of religious expression," finding the right of churches to ring bells outweighs "the City's interest in preserving the peace and tranquility of its neighborhoods." St. Mark Roman Catholic Parish v. City of Phoenix
• 5th Circuit says a Texas city's junked vehicle ordinance applies to a cactus planter made out of wrecked Oldsmobile 88. "Irrespective of the intentions of its creators ... the car-planter is a utilitarian device, an advertisement, and ultimately a 'junked vehicle.'" Kleinman v. City of San Marcos
• Oklahoma City bomber Terry Nichols notifies a federal judge that he has gone on hunger strike, saying he is "prepared to die if necessary because he is done allowing his body to be defiled by [ ] refined and dead foods." Nichols v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
• Texas judge finds the makers of a film about Rin Tin Tin did not infringe on the trademarks of a breeder of German Shepherds. "Defendants['] title 'Finding Rin Tin Tin: The Adventure Continues" is a fair use of the term 'Rin Tin Tin.'" Rin Tin Tin, Inc. v. First Look Studios
• Illinois appeals court says the contact sports exception to negligence liability does not apply to the case of an athletic trainer who was struck in the eye by a hockey puck while refilling water bottles. Michael Weisberg "suffered injuries as a result of alleged conduct that was not inherent to the sport of hockey." Weisberg v. Chicago Steel

|
|
Paramedic Sued for MySpace Posting about Rape |
|
In what may be the first case of a health provider breaching confidentiality on MySpace, a Portland, Ore., rape victim has sued an ambulance paramedic who published details of the crime after transporting her to the hospital.
Simon Green was a member of an American Medical Response paramedic team that attended to the victim on Feb. 15. She had been raped and beaten by a stranger at her Southeast Portland apartment.
Oregon law protects “information of a personal nature such as ... that kept in a personal, medical or similar file” from public disclosure. But in a March 4 posting on his MySpace page, Green recalled how he had taken “a lady our age to the hospital after being raped at knife point, by a caucasian [sic] male of average build.”
While the paramedic did not disclose the victim's name or exact address, he provided the approximate location of the rape and detailed her description of the assailant. “All told he was in her apartment about an hour, and this very pretty, otherwise normal woman's life is irrepprably [sic] changed,” he said.
As a result of the posting, the woman alleges, “the media contacted [her] to question her about the assault” and she has suffered emotional distress and other damages of at least $1 million.
Green breached his duty to “protect the plaintiff from the unauthorized disclosure of her protected health information,” the complaint says, while his employer is liable for negligent hiring, training and supervision.
The fact that the media found the victim suggests Green disclosed enough in his posting to make her identifiable. And Oregon lists “emergency medical technician” among the health care providers covered by its “protected health information” law.
But some courts have declined to extend the physician-patient privilege to communications between a paramedic and a patient. Since ambulance technicians are not “physicians,” the Louisiana Supreme Court said in Med-Express v. Tarpley, 629 So.2d 331 (1993),
there is no privilege as to any type of communication made to them by the injured party nor as to any observations they may have made about the injured party's condition.
In Shulman v. Group W Productions, 51 Cal.App.4th 850 (1986), the California Court of Appeals found that a nurse on an airborne rescue team did not violate the physician-patient privilege because there was no evidence she “was working as the agent for or under the supervision of any physician while the rescue was in progress.”
Green could also raise the defense that his disclosures served the public's interest in crime prevention. “My advice: fight,” he recommended in his posting. “It's only a knife, and any rapist is a coward who will probably turn tail at any resistance.”
The case may turn out to be one of the more significant of at least 17 MySpace-related suits (see ) that have been filed in the past year or so.
By Matthew Heller 4/30/07
|
|
-
Perfume Allergy Case Settles for $100,000
A Detroit city planner with an allergy to perfume is savoring the sweet smell of legal success after the city agreed to pay her $100,000 and be more sensitive to the chemically sensitive.
Read more...
-
Teen's Suit Puts Mug-Shot Publisher Against the Wall
A new publication in Lincoln, Neb., milks mug shots for humor. But a teenager whose arrest photo appeared in Cuffed doesn't see the funny side of it and has sued the publisher for misappropriating his image.
Read more...
-
BA Settles 'Reckless' Baggage Handling Suit
Limiting its liability to a group of only 13 airline passengers, British Airways (NYSE: BAY) has settled a first-of-its kind lawsuit that accused the airline of being “inexcusably reckless” in its handling of passengers' baggage.
Read more...
-
Judge Says "Gay" Still Defamatory in Texas
What one court has called “a veritable sea change in social attitudes about homosexuality” has evidently not reached Texas where a judge ruled that an airport security guard can sue a radio show host for calling him “gay” on the air.
Read more...
-
Mom Says Hospital Gave Her Wrong Baby to Nurse
Because of a hospital's error, Jennifer Spiegel became an involuntary wet nurse to another woman's newborn son. Now she is suing the hospital for its malpractice in providing her with the wrong baby to breastfeed.
Read more...
-
Case Over MySpace Page Chills Student Speech
Several recent court rulings have been protective of off-campus student speech -– with the exception of a very shaky decision that a dissenting judge said “vests school officials with dangerously overbroad censorship discretion.”
Read more...
-
Motorist Who Flipped off Cop Gets $50K From City
The citation of a motorist for displaying his middle finger to a police officer -– what a judge described as a “somewhat innocuous” gesture -- turned out to be quite expensive for the City of Pittsburgh as it agreed to pay $50,000 to the bird-flipper.
Read more...
|
Newdow v. Rio Lindo Union Sch. Dist. Subject: Pledge of allegiance Document: Opinion
Vance v. Rumsfeld Subject: Detainee abuse Document: Opinion
Stern v. Sony Corp. Subject: Disabled gamers Document: Opinion
Churchill v. Univ. of Colorado Subject: Academic freedom Document: ACLU amicus brief
KBR/Halliburton v. Jones Subject: Sexual assault Document: Petition for review
more
|
|
Spears v. Allergan, Inc. Court: Orange County (Calif.) Superior Subject: Botox death Verdict: Defense
Patterson v. Hudson Area Schools Court: USDC, E. Mich. Subject: Student harassment
more
|
|
McClain v. Pfizer, Inc. Date: 3/2/10 Court: USDC, Conn. Hearing: Jury trial in case over unsafe lab conditions.
Sherman v. McDonald's Corp. Date: 3/23/10 Court: Washington County (Ark.) Circuit Hearing: Jury trial in case over nude photos.
more
|
|
|