
• Parents of a 10-year-old boy who witnessed a killer whale's fatal attack on a trainer sue Sea World Orlando for infliction of emotional distress. "Without question, it was reasonably foreseeable and in fact predictable that an attack such as this one by a killer whale with the tendencies of Tilikum was inevitable." Connell v. Sea World
• Denver judge dismisses Oklahoma City bomber Terry Nichols's civil rights claims against prison officials for denying him a high-fiber diet. Nichols v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
• Illinois teenager with cerebral palsy sues the Special Olympics for refusing to let her play basketball with the help of a service dog. Youngwith v. Special Olympics
• Montana judge sets aside a government decision removing protections for the northern Rocky Mountain gray wolf. The Endangered Species Act "was not intended to sow the dragon's teeth of strife or to plant the seeds of future conflicts that have given rise to this case." Defenders of Wildlife v. Salazar
• San Francisco judge dismisses a cereal consumer's false advertising suit. "[T]here is nothing in the packaging or marketing of Cap’n Crunch that would in any way deceive a reasonable consumer into believing that the cereal contains or derives nutritional value from real fruit." Werbel v. PepsiCo
• Iowa judge says a sheriff denied the applications of a father and son for concealed weapons permits in retaliation for their political activism. "This is a great reminder that the First Amendment protects the sole individual who may be a gadfly, kook, weirdo, nut job, whacko, and spook, with the same force of protection as folks with more majoritarian and popular views." Dorr v. Weber
• 5th Circuit rules that a school district violated the religious freedom of a Native American boy by requiring him to wear his long hair in a bun on top of his head or in a braid tucked into his shirt. The boy "has a sincere religious belief in wearing his hair uncut and in plain view." A.A. v. Needville Ind. Sch. Dist.
• 11th Circuit denies a challenge to an ordinance restricting handouts of food to the homeless in Orlando parks. "[W]e are unpersuaded that the conduct of simply feeding people ... is expressive for First Amendment purposes." First Vagabonds Church v. City of Orlando

|
|
Paramedic Sued for MySpace Posting about Rape |
|
In what may be the first case of a health provider breaching confidentiality on MySpace, a Portland, Ore., rape victim has sued an ambulance paramedic who published details of the crime after transporting her to the hospital.
Simon Green was a member of an American Medical Response paramedic team that attended to the victim on Feb. 15. She had been raped and beaten by a stranger at her Southeast Portland apartment.
Oregon law protects “information of a personal nature such as ... that kept in a personal, medical or similar file” from public disclosure. But in a March 4 posting on his MySpace page, Green recalled how he had taken “a lady our age to the hospital after being raped at knife point, by a caucasian [sic] male of average build.”
While the paramedic did not disclose the victim's name or exact address, he provided the approximate location of the rape and detailed her description of the assailant. “All told he was in her apartment about an hour, and this very pretty, otherwise normal woman's life is irrepprably [sic] changed,” he said.
As a result of the posting, the woman alleges, “the media contacted [her] to question her about the assault” and she has suffered emotional distress and other damages of at least $1 million.
Green breached his duty to “protect the plaintiff from the unauthorized disclosure of her protected health information,” the complaint says, while his employer is liable for negligent hiring, training and supervision.
The fact that the media found the victim suggests Green disclosed enough in his posting to make her identifiable. And Oregon lists “emergency medical technician” among the health care providers covered by its “protected health information” law.
But some courts have declined to extend the physician-patient privilege to communications between a paramedic and a patient. Since ambulance technicians are not “physicians,” the Louisiana Supreme Court said in Med-Express v. Tarpley, 629 So.2d 331 (1993),
there is no privilege as to any type of communication made to them by the injured party nor as to any observations they may have made about the injured party's condition.
In Shulman v. Group W Productions, 51 Cal.App.4th 850 (1986), the California Court of Appeals found that a nurse on an airborne rescue team did not violate the physician-patient privilege because there was no evidence she “was working as the agent for or under the supervision of any physician while the rescue was in progress.”
Green could also raise the defense that his disclosures served the public's interest in crime prevention. “My advice: fight,” he recommended in his posting. “It's only a knife, and any rapist is a coward who will probably turn tail at any resistance.”
The case may turn out to be one of the more significant of at least 17 MySpace-related suits (see ) that have been filed in the past year or so.
By Matthew Heller 4/30/07
|
|
-
Off With His Head! Woman Sues 'Mad Hatter' Actor
Experimental theater clashes with premises liability law in the case of a Kentucky woman who claims she was injured while watching a performance of a circus-inspired play when one of the actors balanced his knee on her head.
Read more...
-
Charity Worker Accuses CEO of Hypnotic Seduction
A former charity worker may be pushing the limits of sexual harassment law by alleging that her boss required her to participate in “relaxation sessions” on his “magic couch” during which he hypnotized and molested her.
Read more...
-
Appeal is Expert's Latest Challenge to Judges
Expert witness Dr. David Egilman was previously successful in showing he had standing to appeal a judicial order in a case in which he was not a party — but that case may not help him in his latest challenge to a trial judge.
Read more...
-
Plaintiff's Expert Files Appeal in 'Popcorn Lung' Lawsuit
A controversial expert witness for plaintiffs has filed an unusual non-party appeal of a Washington state judge's decision finding his theory that snackers can contract lung disease from exposure to microwave popcorn is not scientifically sound.
Read more...
-
Philly School Sued Over Race Attack on Student's Mom
Taking civil rights law to what may be an extreme, an Asian-American woman is alleging a Philadelphia high school's tolerance of racism rendered her “helpless prey” to African-American students who attacked her when she picked her child up from the school.
Read more...
-
'McSteamy' Sex Tape Suit Cools off With Settlement
Acting couple Eric Dane and Rebecca Gayheart have dropped a $1 million lawsuit against Gawker.com for publishing a videotape featuring them in a nude threesome with a friend after the gossip website agreed to take down the much-viewed posting.
Read more...
-
Sex Harassment Claims Hit Actor Affleck, 'Bones' Star
A producer of a film about actor Joaquin Phoenix, an extra on the set of the TV show “Bones,” an assistant property master, and a makeup artist are among the plaintiffs in a recent epidemic of lurid Hollywood lawsuits.
Read more...
|
Arnaout v. Warden Subject: Muslim inmate prayer Document: John Walker Lindh declaration
Marriage of J.B. and H.B. Subject: Same-sex divorce Document: Opinion
Stovell v. James Subject: LeBron's paternity Document: Complaint
U.S. v. Arizona Subject: Illegal immigration Document: Complaint
Rosenberg v. Google Subject: Negligent navigation Document: Complaint
more
|
|
McCourt v. McCourt Court: L.A. Superior Subject: Dodgers divorce
Pom Wonderful v. Welch Foods Court: USDC, C. Calif. Subject: False advertising
more
|
|
McCourt v. McCourt Date: 8/30/10 Court: L.A. Superior Hearing: Dodgers divorce trial
more
|
|
|