Lohan v. E-Trade
Actress Lindsay Lohan alleges a TV ad featuring a "milkaholic" baby named Lindsay used her name and personality for advertising purposes without her consent.
Irvin v. Mustafa
NFL Hall of Famer Michael Irvin files a countersuit against a woman who accused him of rape, alleging she is a "morally-bankrupt individual" who is trying to ruin his career.
Robbins v. Lower Merion SD
High-school student accuses a school
district of spying on him and other students
by remotely activating webcams contained in school-supplied laptops.
Peterson v. Grisham
10th Circuit finds John Grisham did not defame three Oklahoma law enforcement officials in a book about the wrongful convictions of two men for a rape-murder.
lc_search
LC_DayByDay

 Feb   March 10   Apr

SMTWTFS
   1  2  3  4  5  6
  7  8  910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031 
Julianna Walker Willis Technology
LC_BySubject
OnTheMap

rss

LC_ExtraPoints

• Owners of Who Dat?, Inc. sue the NFL and the New Orleans Saints for trademark infringement, seeking to protect the mark that "has become one of the most recognizable in all of America and quickly became well-known around the world."
Who Dat?, Inc. v. NFL Properties

• Army bomb disposal expert sues the makers of "The Hurt Locker" for plagiarizing his life story. The film is "nothing more than the exploitation of a real life honorable, courageous, and long serving member of our country’s armed forces, by greedy multi-billion dollar 'entertainment' corporations."
Sarver v. The Hurt Locker

• Former patient sues the Cincinnati hospital where he was sexually assaulted by a transgender nurse. The nurse's "employment while masquerading as a member of the female gender in a hospital environment involved an unreasonable risk of harm to others."
Evans v. University of Cincinnati

• Federal judge enjoins the City of Phoenix from enforcing a noise ordinance against "sound generated in the course of religious expression," finding the right of churches to ring bells outweighs "the City's interest in preserving the peace and tranquility of its neighborhoods."
St. Mark Roman Catholic Parish v. City of Phoenix

• 5th Circuit says a Texas city's junked vehicle ordinance applies to a cactus planter made out of wrecked Oldsmobile 88. "Irrespective of the intentions of its creators ... the car-planter is a utilitarian device, an advertisement, and ultimately a 'junked vehicle.'"
Kleinman v. City of San Marcos

• Oklahoma City bomber Terry Nichols notifies a federal judge that he has gone on hunger strike, saying he is "prepared to die if necessary because he is done allowing his body to be defiled by [ ] refined and dead foods."
Nichols v. Federal Bureau of Prisons

• Texas judge finds the makers of a film about Rin Tin Tin did not infringe on the trademarks of a breeder of German Shepherds. "Defendants['] title 'Finding Rin Tin Tin: The Adventure Continues" is a fair use of the term 'Rin Tin Tin.'"
Rin Tin Tin, Inc. v. First Look Studios

• Illinois appeals court says the contact sports exception to negligence liability does not apply to the case of an athletic trainer who was struck in the eye by a hockey puck while refilling water bottles. Michael Weisberg "suffered injuries as a result of alleged conduct that was not inherent to the sport of hockey."
Weisberg v. Chicago Steel




Alltop_125x125.jpg

ADVERT

Free no win no fee claims advice for personal injury.


Liability Release At Issue in "Hardbody" Death Print

Richard Vega

A Texas man who killed himself after participating in an endurance contest extinguished any wrongful-death claim by signing a liability release, the sponsor of the contest argues in a motion for summary judgment.

Patterson Nissan of Longview, Texas, asserted the waiver defense to avoid getting to the merits of whether it caused Richard Vega's suicide by failing to protect him from the “bizarre and dangerous consequences” of its “Hands on a Hardbody” contest. Vega's family sued the auto dealership for wrongful death in January.

“[T]he contract signed by Vega prior to competing in the contest ... acts as an absolute bar to any right of action that plaintiffs may bring against Patterson,” the motion says.

By signing the release, contestants assumed “full and complete responsibility and liability for his or health and safety” and agreed to indemnify Patterson “against any demands, claims or liability.”

But the plaintiffs' attorney contends the release is unenforceable boilerplate.

“The contract ... was not a negotiated contract with parties of equal competence,” Blake Bailey of Tyler, Texas, says in a brief. “In fact the contestants were overwhelmed by advertisement and the chance to win a truck most could never hope to own.”

Vega, 24, competed in September 2005 to win a Nissan pickup, the prize going to the contestant who endured standing beside the truck with a hand on it longer than any other. After standing for 48 hours, he walked away, broke into a Kmart across the street and, with a shotgun taken from the store, shot himself in the head.

In their petition, his family alleged that the stress of the contest caused Vega “to become “temporarily insane and to take his own life” and Patterson was negligent in not providing psychiatric or medical monitoring to contestants.

The case is more of a stretch than that of a California woman who died in January after taking part in a radio show's water-drinking competition. But the plaintiffs should be able to defeat the waiver defense.

Under Texas law, a release from liability for negligence must be freely negotiated and “unambiguously and expressly” state that it applies to negligence claims. Patterson Nissan's waiver appears to fail the express-negligence test by referring generically to “demands, claims or liability.”

As for free negotiation, the plaintiffs dispute that the terms of the contract were explained to Vega. And the Texas Supreme Court found a similar boilerplate contract unenforceable in Exxon Corp. v Brecheen, 526 S.W.2d 519 (1975), saying that “the showing of disparity of bargaining power was such that it would be contrary to public policy to enforce the document.”

A hearing on the summary judgment motion has been set for May 17 in Gregg County District Court.

Other Richard Vega Case Sources

By Matthew Heller
4/22/07

 
rc_insidestories
  • Perfume Allergy Case Settles for $100,000

    A Detroit city planner with an allergy to perfume is savoring the sweet smell of legal success after the city agreed to pay her $100,000 and be more sensitive to the chemically sensitive.
    Read more...
  • Teen's Suit Puts Mug-Shot Publisher Against the Wall

    A new publication in Lincoln, Neb., milks mug shots for humor. But a teenager whose arrest photo appeared in Cuffed doesn't see the funny side of it and has sued the publisher for misappropriating his image.
    Read more...
  • BA Settles 'Reckless' Baggage Handling Suit

    Limiting its liability to a group of only 13 airline passengers, British Airways (NYSE: BAY) has settled a first-of-its kind lawsuit that accused the airline of being “inexcusably reckless” in its handling of passengers' baggage.
    Read more...
  • Judge Says "Gay" Still Defamatory in Texas

    What one court has called “a veritable sea change in social attitudes about homosexuality” has evidently not reached Texas where a judge ruled that an airport security guard can sue a radio show host for calling him “gay” on the air.
    Read more...
  • Mom Says Hospital Gave Her Wrong
    Baby to Nurse


    Because of a hospital's error, Jennifer Spiegel became an involuntary wet nurse to another woman's newborn son. Now she is suing the hospital for its malpractice in providing her with the wrong baby to breastfeed.
    Read more...
  • Case Over MySpace Page Chills Student Speech

    Several recent court rulings have been protective of off-campus student speech -– with the exception of a very shaky decision that a dissenting judge said “vests school officials with dangerously overbroad censorship discretion.”
    Read more...
  • Motorist Who Flipped off Cop Gets $50K From City

    The citation of a motorist for displaying his middle finger to a police officer -– what a judge described as a “somewhat innocuous” gesture -- turned out to be quite expensive for the City of Pittsburgh as it agreed to pay $50,000 to the bird-flipper.
    Read more...
RC_OnFile

Newdow v. Rio Lindo Union Sch. Dist.
Subject: Pledge of allegiance
Document: Opinion

Vance v. Rumsfeld
Subject: Detainee abuse
Document: Opinion

Stern v. Sony Corp.
Subject: Disabled gamers
Document: Opinion

Churchill v. Univ. of Colorado
Subject: Academic freedom
Document: ACLU amicus brief

KBR/Halliburton v. Jones
Subject: Sexual assault
Document: Petition for review

more

RC_OnTrial

Spears v. Allergan, Inc.
Court: Orange County (Calif.) Superior
Subject: Botox death
Verdict: Defense

Patterson v. Hudson Area Schools
Court: USDC, E. Mich.
Subject: Student harassment

more


RC_OnTheDocket

McClain v. Pfizer, Inc.
Date: 3/2/10
Court: USDC, Conn.
Hearing: Jury trial in case over unsafe lab conditions.

Sherman v. McDonald's Corp.
Date: 3/23/10
Court: Washington County (Ark.) Circuit
Hearing: Jury trial in case over nude photos.

more