
• Parents of a 10-year-old boy who witnessed a killer whale's fatal attack on a trainer sue Sea World Orlando for infliction of emotional distress. "Without question, it was reasonably foreseeable and in fact predictable that an attack such as this one by a killer whale with the tendencies of Tilikum was inevitable." Connell v. Sea World
• Denver judge dismisses Oklahoma City bomber Terry Nichols's civil rights claims against prison officials for denying him a high-fiber diet. Nichols v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
• Illinois teenager with cerebral palsy sues the Special Olympics for refusing to let her play basketball with the help of a service dog. Youngwith v. Special Olympics
• Montana judge sets aside a government decision removing protections for the northern Rocky Mountain gray wolf. The Endangered Species Act "was not intended to sow the dragon's teeth of strife or to plant the seeds of future conflicts that have given rise to this case." Defenders of Wildlife v. Salazar
• San Francisco judge dismisses a cereal consumer's false advertising suit. "[T]here is nothing in the packaging or marketing of Cap’n Crunch that would in any way deceive a reasonable consumer into believing that the cereal contains or derives nutritional value from real fruit." Werbel v. PepsiCo
• Iowa judge says a sheriff denied the applications of a father and son for concealed weapons permits in retaliation for their political activism. "This is a great reminder that the First Amendment protects the sole individual who may be a gadfly, kook, weirdo, nut job, whacko, and spook, with the same force of protection as folks with more majoritarian and popular views." Dorr v. Weber
• 5th Circuit rules that a school district violated the religious freedom of a Native American boy by requiring him to wear his long hair in a bun on top of his head or in a braid tucked into his shirt. The boy "has a sincere religious belief in wearing his hair uncut and in plain view." A.A. v. Needville Ind. Sch. Dist.
• 11th Circuit denies a challenge to an ordinance restricting handouts of food to the homeless in Orlando parks. "[W]e are unpersuaded that the conduct of simply feeding people ... is expressive for First Amendment purposes." First Vagabonds Church v. City of Orlando

|
|
Judge OKs Claim in "Terrible" Clinic Sperm Mixup |
|
A New York couple have moved a key step closer to recovering emotional distress damages for an “almost unimaginable” fertility clinic mixup which resulted in their daughter being conceived with the wrong man's sperm.
Thomas and Nancy Andrews received in-vitro fertilitization treatments at New York Medical Services for Reproductive Medicine. After their daughter Jessica was born in October 2004, they discovered to their horror that Thomas was not the biological father.
According to the couple's negligence suit, embryologist Carlos Acosta used an unknown donor's sperm to fertilize Nancy Andrews's eggs. “[W]hile we love Baby Jessica as our own, we are reminded of this terrible mistake every time we look at her,” the parents said.
Thomas Andrews is white and his wife is Dominican; Jessica has darker skin with “characteristics more typical of African, or African-American descent.”
Ruling last month on motions to dismiss, Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Sheila Abdus-Salaam said the Andrewses “cannot recover [damages] for mental distress arising from having a child who is not Mr. Andrews' biological offspring.”
New York does not recognize a claim for “wrongful life” or “wrongful conception,” she noted in her order, and "The birth of an unwanted but otherwise healthy and normal child does not constitute an injury to the child's parents.”
But Abdus-Salaam did allow the plaintiffs to seek compensation for their “continuing uncertainty and distrust as to whether the genetic material of either or both of them has been inappropriately used for others.”
“[W]here the Andrews ... have been provided with absolutely no explanation as to ... what was done with the sperm that [Thomas] provided to the clinic for the sole purpose of conceiving a child with his wife,” the judge explained, they are entitled to “recover for emotional injuries absent the presence of physical injury.”
A trial on the issue of damages against Acosta, the clinic and the clinic's owner has been set for June 7. “Defendant Acosta has remained mute as to what, if any, steps he took to ensure that he was fertilizing Mrs. Andrews' eggs with Mr. Andrews' sperm,” Abdus-Salaam said in granting summary judgment on liability against the embryologist.
|
UPDATE
Court records show the case settled June 21 before trial.
|
In another case of fertility clinic clumsiness, an Oregon man alleged last year that the sperm he intended for his fiancée was used to get another woman pregnant. Clinics in Arizona and Illinois have been sued for losing or destroying pre-embryos.
By Matthew Heller 4/15/07
An Ohio jury has awarded $786,760 to a man who suffered a severe injury to his left testicle while he was exercising at a YWCA gym in Akron. A cable on a leg-extension machine broke, causing a steel bar to swing into his groin.
"It's a horrendous injury. Everyone who hears his story just kind of winces," the plaintiff's attorney said. Houston v. YWCA of Summit County.
4/15/07
|
|
-
Off With His Head! Woman Sues 'Mad Hatter' Actor
Experimental theater clashes with premises liability law in the case of a Kentucky woman who claims she was injured while watching a performance of a circus-inspired play when one of the actors balanced his knee on her head.
Read more...
-
Charity Worker Accuses CEO of Hypnotic Seduction
A former charity worker may be pushing the limits of sexual harassment law by alleging that her boss required her to participate in “relaxation sessions” on his “magic couch” during which he hypnotized and molested her.
Read more...
-
Appeal is Expert's Latest Challenge to Judges
Expert witness Dr. David Egilman was previously successful in showing he had standing to appeal a judicial order in a case in which he was not a party — but that case may not help him in his latest challenge to a trial judge.
Read more...
-
Plaintiff's Expert Files Appeal in 'Popcorn Lung' Lawsuit
A controversial expert witness for plaintiffs has filed an unusual non-party appeal of a Washington state judge's decision finding his theory that snackers can contract lung disease from exposure to microwave popcorn is not scientifically sound.
Read more...
-
Philly School Sued Over Race Attack on Student's Mom
Taking civil rights law to what may be an extreme, an Asian-American woman is alleging a Philadelphia high school's tolerance of racism rendered her “helpless prey” to African-American students who attacked her when she picked her child up from the school.
Read more...
-
'McSteamy' Sex Tape Suit Cools off With Settlement
Acting couple Eric Dane and Rebecca Gayheart have dropped a $1 million lawsuit against Gawker.com for publishing a videotape featuring them in a nude threesome with a friend after the gossip website agreed to take down the much-viewed posting.
Read more...
-
Sex Harassment Claims Hit Actor Affleck, 'Bones' Star
A producer of a film about actor Joaquin Phoenix, an extra on the set of the TV show “Bones,” an assistant property master, and a makeup artist are among the plaintiffs in a recent epidemic of lurid Hollywood lawsuits.
Read more...
|
Arnaout v. Warden Subject: Muslim inmate prayer Document: John Walker Lindh declaration
Marriage of J.B. and H.B. Subject: Same-sex divorce Document: Opinion
Stovell v. James Subject: LeBron's paternity Document: Complaint
U.S. v. Arizona Subject: Illegal immigration Document: Complaint
Rosenberg v. Google Subject: Negligent navigation Document: Complaint
more
|
|
McCourt v. McCourt Court: L.A. Superior Subject: Dodgers divorce
Pom Wonderful v. Welch Foods Court: USDC, C. Calif. Subject: False advertising
more
|
|
McCourt v. McCourt Date: 8/30/10 Court: L.A. Superior Hearing: Dodgers divorce trial
more
|
|
|