Irvin v. Mustafa
NFL Hall of Famer Michael Irvin files a countersuit against a woman who accused him of rape, alleging she is a "morally-bankrupt individual" who is trying to ruin his career.
Robbins v. Lower Merion SD
High-school student accuses a school
district of spying on him and other students
by remotely activating webcams contained in school-supplied laptops.
Peterson v. Grisham
10th Circuit finds John Grisham did not defame three Oklahoma law enforcement officials in a book about the wrongful convictions of two men for a rape-murder.
Lopez v. O'Neal
Florida model sues Shaquille O'Neal for cyber-stalking, saying the NBA star hacked into her text messages and voice mails after she
broke off their affair.
lc_search
LC_DayByDay

 Feb   March 10   Apr

SMTWTFS
   1  2  3  4  5  6
  7  8  910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031 
Julianna Willis Technology
LC_BySubject
OnTheMap

rss

LC_ExtraPoints

• Army bomb disposal expert sues the makers of "The Hurt Locker" for plagiarizing his life story. The film is "nothing more than the exploitation of a real life honorable, courageous, and long serving member of our country’s armed forces, by greedy multi-billion dollar 'entertainment' corporations."
Sarver v. The Hurt Locker

• Former patient sues the Cincinnati hospital where he was sexually assaulted by a transgender nurse. The nurse's "employment while masquerading as a member of the female gender in a hospital environment involved an unreasonable risk of harm to others."
Evans v. University of Cincinnati

• Federal judge enjoins the City of Phoenix from enforcing a noise ordinance against "sound generated in the course of religious expression," finding the right of churches to ring bells outweighs "the City's interest in preserving the peace and tranquility of its neighborhoods."
St. Mark Roman Catholic Parish v. City of Phoenix

• 5th Circuit says a Texas city's junked vehicle ordinance applies to a cactus planter made out of wrecked Oldsmobile 88. "Irrespective of the intentions of its creators ... the car-planter is a utilitarian device, an advertisement, and ultimately a 'junked vehicle.'"
Kleinman v. City of San Marcos

• Oklahoma City bomber Terry Nichols notifies a federal judge that he has gone on hunger strike, saying he is "prepared to die if necessary because he is done allowing his body to be defiled by [ ] refined and dead foods."
Nichols v. Federal Bureau of Prisons

• Texas judge finds the makers of a film about Rin Tin Tin did not infringe on the trademarks of a breeder of German Shepherds. "Defendants['] title 'Finding Rin Tin Tin: The Adventure Continues" is a fair use of the term 'Rin Tin Tin.'"
Rin Tin Tin, Inc. v. First Look Studios

• Illinois appeals court says the contact sports exception to negligence liability does not apply to the case of an athletic trainer who was struck in the eye by a hockey puck while refilling water bottles. Michael Weisberg "suffered injuries as a result of alleged conduct that was not inherent to the sport of hockey."
Weisberg v. Chicago Steel

• 3rd Circuit rules that a couple can sue Google for trespassing on their property while photographing it for the Street View feature. "[T]he Borings have alleged that Google entered upon their property without permission. If proven, that is a trespass, pure and simple."
Boring v. Google




Alltop_125x125.jpg

ADVERT

Free no win no fee claims advice for personal injury.


Judge OKs Claim in "Terrible" Clinic Sperm Mixup Print

A New York couple have moved a key step closer to recovering emotional distress damages for an “almost unimaginable” fertility clinic mixup which resulted in their daughter being conceived with the wrong man's sperm.

Thomas and Nancy Andrews received in-vitro fertilitization treatments at New York Medical Services for Reproductive Medicine. After their daughter Jessica was born in October 2004, they discovered to their horror that Thomas was not the biological father.

According to the couple's negligence suit, embryologist Carlos Acosta used an unknown donor's sperm to fertilize Nancy Andrews's eggs. “[W]hile we love Baby Jessica as our own, we are reminded of this terrible mistake every time we look at her,” the parents said.

Thomas Andrews is white and his wife is Dominican; Jessica has darker skin with “characteristics more typical of African, or African-American descent.”

Ruling last month on motions to dismiss, Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Sheila Abdus-Salaam said the Andrewses “cannot recover [damages] for mental distress arising from having a child who is not Mr. Andrews' biological offspring.”

New York does not recognize a claim for “wrongful life” or “wrongful conception,” she noted in her order, and "The birth of an unwanted but otherwise healthy and normal child does not constitute an injury to the child's parents.”

But Abdus-Salaam did allow the plaintiffs to seek compensation for their “continuing uncertainty and distrust as to whether the genetic material of either or both of them has been inappropriately used for others.”

“[W]here the Andrews ... have been provided with absolutely no explanation as to ... what was done with the sperm that [Thomas] provided to the clinic for the sole purpose of conceiving a child with his wife,” the judge explained, they are entitled to “recover for emotional injuries absent the presence of physical injury.”

A trial on the issue of damages against Acosta, the clinic and the clinic's owner has been set for June 7. “Defendant Acosta has remained mute as to what, if any, steps he took to ensure that he was fertilizing Mrs. Andrews' eggs with Mr. Andrews' sperm,” Abdus-Salaam said in granting summary judgment on liability against the embryologist.

UPDATE

  • Court records show the case settled June 21 before trial.

  • In another case of fertility clinic clumsiness, an Oregon man alleged last year that the sperm he intended for his fiancée was used to get another woman pregnant. Clinics in Arizona and Illinois have been sued for losing or destroying pre-embryos.

    By Matthew Heller
    4/15/07



    An Ohio jury has awarded $786,760 to a man who suffered a severe injury to his left testicle while he was exercising at a YWCA gym in Akron. A cable on a leg-extension machine broke, causing a steel bar to swing into his groin.

    "It's a horrendous injury. Everyone who hears his story just kind of winces," the plaintiff's attorney said. Houston v. YWCA of Summit County.

    4/15/07


     
    rc_insidestories
    • Teen's Suit Puts Mug-Shot Publisher Against the Wall

      A new publication in Lincoln, Neb., milks mug shots for humor. But a teenager whose arrest photo appeared in Cuffed doesn't see the funny side of it and has sued the publisher for misappropriating his image.
      Read more...
    • BA Settles 'Reckless' Baggage Handling Suit

      Limiting its liability to a group of only 13 airline passengers, British Airways (NYSE: BAY) has settled a first-of-its kind lawsuit that accused the airline of being “inexcusably reckless” in its handling of passengers' baggage.
      Read more...
    • Judge Says "Gay" Still Defamatory in Texas

      What one court has called “a veritable sea change in social attitudes about homosexuality” has evidently not reached Texas where a judge ruled that an airport security guard can sue a radio show host for calling him “gay” on the air.
      Read more...
    • Mom Says Hospital Gave Her Wrong
      Baby to Nurse


      Because of a hospital's error, Jennifer Spiegel became an involuntary wet nurse to another woman's newborn son. Now she is suing the hospital for its malpractice in providing her with the wrong baby to breastfeed.
      Read more...
    • Case Over MySpace Page Chills Student Speech

      Several recent court rulings have been protective of off-campus student speech -– with the exception of a very shaky decision that a dissenting judge said “vests school officials with dangerously overbroad censorship discretion.”
      Read more...
    • Motorist Who Flipped off Cop Gets $50K From City

      The citation of a motorist for displaying his middle finger to a police officer -– what a judge described as a “somewhat innocuous” gesture -- turned out to be quite expensive for the City of Pittsburgh as it agreed to pay $50,000 to the bird-flipper.
      Read more...
    • Gamer's ADA Suit Doesn't Play in Court

      A Los Angeles judge has refused to apply disability law to the virtual gaming world, dismissing the case of a vision-impaired gamer who claimed Sony Corp. illegally denied him full access to its products.
      Read more...
    RC_OnFile

    Vance v. Rumsfeld
    Subject: Detainee abuse
    Document: Opinion

    Churchill v. Univ. of Colorado
    Subject: Academic freedom
    Document: ACLU amicus brief

    KBR/Halliburton v. Jones
    Subject: Sexual assault
    Document: Petition for review

    Olson v. Baron Cohen
    Subject: Verbal assault
    Document: Statement of decision

    North Face Apparel v. The South Butt
    Subject: Trademark infringement
    Document: Answer to complaint

    more

    RC_OnTrial

    Spears v. Allergan, Inc.
    Court: Orange County (Calif.) Superior
    Subject: Botox death
    Verdict: Defense

    Patterson v. Hudson Area Schools
    Court: USDC, E. Mich.
    Subject: Student harassment

    more


    RC_OnTheDocket

    McClain v. Pfizer, Inc.
    Date: 3/2/10
    Court: USDC, Conn.
    Hearing: Jury trial in case over unsafe lab conditions.

    Sherman v. McDonald's Corp.
    Date: 3/23/10
    Court: Washington County (Ark.) Circuit
    Hearing: Jury trial in case over nude photos.

    more