
• Boston judge refuses to require Massachusetts to include materials that deny the Armenian genocide in the public school curriculum. "[T]he decision as to what to teach about ... the Armenian genocide must be made by elected officials, educators, and teachers rather than by federal judges." Griswold v. Driscoll
• Kentucky Court of Appeals upholds a $3.7 million jury award against a school board for ignoring a student's complaints that several teachers had molested her. Plaintiff Lynne Maner "presented sufficient evidence that the Board was deliberately indifferen[t] in its failure to act." Maner v. Fayette County Board of Education
• 6th Circuit revives the racial bias case of an African-American couple who sued a hotel for refusing to host their wedding reception. "There is a genuine issue of material fact in this case as to whether ... the Hotel denied them the right to enter into a contract because of their race." Keck v. Graham Hotel Systems
• San Francisco judge rules that a city did not violate a hiker's rights by failing to protect her from an attack on public land by a rancher's cattle. "[P]laintiffs have not alleged facts supporting a claim that the City was deliberately indifferent to a known or obvious danger" to Jo Dee Schmidt. Schmidt v. Hoover
• Divided New York appellate court says a golfer is not liable for striking another golfer in the eye with an errant drive. The defendant's failure to yell "Fore" before hitting the ball "does not rise to the level of creating a dangerous condition over and above the usual dangers inherent in participating in the sport of golf." Anand v. Kapoor
• Sioux tribal members file a class action seeking their share of as much as $900 million held in trust by the federal government as compensation for the "taking" of the Black Hills of South Dakota. The plaintiffs have split from other Sioux who refuse to take the money, insisting on the return of the land. Different Horse v. Salazar
• Texas Court of Appeals says a gas station owner is not liable for the negligence of an attendant who accidentally shot a customer while showing him a gun. The attendant's "actions were not merely a misuse of his authority; they were utterly unrelated to his duties." Glass v. Williams
• San Francisco judge denies Chevron Corp.'s request for $485,159 in court costs from impoverished Nigerian villagers who sued the company for human rights violations. "The economic disparity between plaintiffs, who are Nigerian villagers, and defendants, international oil companies, cannot be more stark." Bowoto v. Chevron

|
|
Judge OKs Claim in "Terrible" Clinic Sperm Mixup |
|
A New York couple have moved a key step closer to recovering emotional distress damages for an “almost unimaginable” fertility clinic mixup which resulted in their daughter being conceived with the wrong man's sperm.
Thomas and Nancy Andrews received in-vitro fertilitization treatments at New York Medical Services for Reproductive Medicine. After their daughter Jessica was born in October 2004, they discovered to their horror that Thomas was not the biological father.
According to the couple's negligence suit, embryologist Carlos Acosta used an unknown donor's sperm to fertilize Nancy Andrews's eggs. “[W]hile we love Baby Jessica as our own, we are reminded of this terrible mistake every time we look at her,” the parents said.
Thomas Andrews is white and his wife is Dominican; Jessica has darker skin with “characteristics more typical of African, or African-American descent.”
Ruling last month on motions to dismiss, Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Sheila Abdus-Salaam said the Andrewses “cannot recover [damages] for mental distress arising from having a child who is not Mr. Andrews' biological offspring.”
New York does not recognize a claim for “wrongful life” or “wrongful conception,” she noted in her order, and "The birth of an unwanted but otherwise healthy and normal child does not constitute an injury to the child's parents.”
But Abdus-Salaam did allow the plaintiffs to seek compensation for their “continuing uncertainty and distrust as to whether the genetic material of either or both of them has been inappropriately used for others.”
“[W]here the Andrews ... have been provided with absolutely no explanation as to ... what was done with the sperm that [Thomas] provided to the clinic for the sole purpose of conceiving a child with his wife,” the judge explained, they are entitled to “recover for emotional injuries absent the presence of physical injury.”
A trial on the issue of damages against Acosta, the clinic and the clinic's owner has been set for June 7. “Defendant Acosta has remained mute as to what, if any, steps he took to ensure that he was fertilizing Mrs. Andrews' eggs with Mr. Andrews' sperm,” Abdus-Salaam said in granting summary judgment on liability against the embryologist.
|
UPDATE
Court records show the case settled June 21 before trial.
|
In another case of fertility clinic clumsiness, an Oregon man alleged last year that the sperm he intended for his fiancée was used to get another woman pregnant. Clinics in Arizona and Illinois have been sued for losing or destroying pre-embryos.
By Matthew Heller 4/15/07
An Ohio jury has awarded $786,760 to a man who suffered a severe injury to his left testicle while he was exercising at a YWCA gym in Akron. A cable on a leg-extension machine broke, causing a steel bar to swing into his groin.
"It's a horrendous injury. Everyone who hears his story just kind of winces," the plaintiff's attorney said. Houston v. YWCA of Summit County.
4/15/07
|
|
-
No Prayer Now for Preacher's Suit Over "Religulous"
Less than three weeks after being sued for defrauding two former parishioners of $600,000, a Florida preacher dropped his $50 million lawsuit alleging the Bill Maher documentary “Religulous” falsely portrayed him as a charlatan, On Point has learned.
Read more...
-
Man Burned at Burning Man Assumed Risk
Get too close to the Burning Man fire and you assume the “obvious and inherent” risk of being burned, a California appeals court has ruled in dismissing a personal injury lawsuit against the operators of the iconic countercultural arts festival.
Read more...
-
Lawyer's 'Prove Me Wrong' Offer No Joke to Student
A Texas law student may have taken a $1 million “prove me wrong” challenge seriously, but the criminal defense lawyer who made the challenge on a TV news show appears to have done so with enough tongue in cheek to avoid liability for not paying up.
Read more...
-
Jury Chills Rights in Strip Search Case
A jury has reached a chilling decision in the civil rights case of a Southampton, N.Y., woman, clearing four police officers in the exclusive resort community of liability for performing a strip search on her after a minor marijuana bust.
Read more...
-
Toxic Bra Suits Won't be Combined in Ohio
A rash of lawsuits against Victoria's Secret alleging defectively manufactured underwear is continuing with eight new cases filed in the past two months. But in a setback for plaintiffs, a judicial panel has refused to consolidate all the litigation in Ohio.
Read more...
-
Wedding Fiasco Suit Really Takes Cake
Sandra Newsom's wedding disaster lawsuit may -– literally –- take the cake. The New York woman has sued a cruise ship operator for ruining her wedding reception by serving a coconut-containing cake to which she had an allergic reaction.
Read more...
-
Woody Allen Got $5M After Judge Shredded Defense
A week before American Apparel agreed to pay Woody Allen $5 million for misappropriating his image, a judge had shredded the clothing company's First Amendment defense based on its CEO's “mental processes,” On Point has learned.
Read more...
|
Capitol Records v. Thomas Court: USDC, Minn. Subject: Digital music downloading Verdict: $1.92 million
ASPCA v. Ringling Bros. Court: USDC, D. Col. Subject: Illegal "taking" of elephants by circus
more
|
|
Howard K. Stern v. Rita Cosby Date: 7/7/09 Court: USDC, S. N.Y. Hearing: Motions for summary judgment in defamation case.
Goldberg v. Paris Hilton Entertainment Date: 7/9/09 Court: USDC, S. Fla. Hearing: Jury trial in breach-of-contract case.
more
|
|