Lohan v. E-Trade
Actress Lindsay Lohan alleges a TV ad featuring a "milkaholic" baby named Lindsay used her name and personality for advertising purposes without her consent.
Irvin v. Mustafa
NFL Hall of Famer Michael Irvin files a countersuit against a woman who accused him of rape, alleging she is a "morally-bankrupt individual" who is trying to ruin his career.
Robbins v. Lower Merion SD
High-school student accuses a school
district of spying on him and other students
by remotely activating webcams contained in school-supplied laptops.
Peterson v. Grisham
10th Circuit finds John Grisham did not defame three Oklahoma law enforcement officials in a book about the wrongful convictions of two men for a rape-murder.
lc_search
LC_DayByDay

 Feb   March 10   Apr

SMTWTFS
   1  2  3  4  5  6
  7  8  910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031 
Julianna Willis Technology
LC_BySubject
OnTheMap

rss

LC_ExtraPoints

• Owners of Who Dat?, Inc. sue the NFL and the New Orleans Saints for trademark infringement, seeking to protect the mark that "has become one of the most recognizable in all of America and quickly became well-known around the world."
Who Dat?, Inc. v. NFL Properties

• Army bomb disposal expert sues the makers of "The Hurt Locker" for plagiarizing his life story. The film is "nothing more than the exploitation of a real life honorable, courageous, and long serving member of our country’s armed forces, by greedy multi-billion dollar 'entertainment' corporations."
Sarver v. The Hurt Locker

• Former patient sues the Cincinnati hospital where he was sexually assaulted by a transgender nurse. The nurse's "employment while masquerading as a member of the female gender in a hospital environment involved an unreasonable risk of harm to others."
Evans v. University of Cincinnati

• Federal judge enjoins the City of Phoenix from enforcing a noise ordinance against "sound generated in the course of religious expression," finding the right of churches to ring bells outweighs "the City's interest in preserving the peace and tranquility of its neighborhoods."
St. Mark Roman Catholic Parish v. City of Phoenix

• 5th Circuit says a Texas city's junked vehicle ordinance applies to a cactus planter made out of wrecked Oldsmobile 88. "Irrespective of the intentions of its creators ... the car-planter is a utilitarian device, an advertisement, and ultimately a 'junked vehicle.'"
Kleinman v. City of San Marcos

• Oklahoma City bomber Terry Nichols notifies a federal judge that he has gone on hunger strike, saying he is "prepared to die if necessary because he is done allowing his body to be defiled by [ ] refined and dead foods."
Nichols v. Federal Bureau of Prisons

• Texas judge finds the makers of a film about Rin Tin Tin did not infringe on the trademarks of a breeder of German Shepherds. "Defendants['] title 'Finding Rin Tin Tin: The Adventure Continues" is a fair use of the term 'Rin Tin Tin.'"
Rin Tin Tin, Inc. v. First Look Studios

• Illinois appeals court says the contact sports exception to negligence liability does not apply to the case of an athletic trainer who was struck in the eye by a hockey puck while refilling water bottles. Michael Weisberg "suffered injuries as a result of alleged conduct that was not inherent to the sport of hockey."
Weisberg v. Chicago Steel




Alltop_125x125.jpg

ADVERT

Free no win no fee claims advice for personal injury.


Judge Backs "Ambush" Interview Case vs. CNN Print

Melinda Duckett

A Florida judge's ruling in a wrongful-death suit against CNN and talk-show host Nancy Grace is the second defeat for a TV network this year in a case involving a suicide that allegedly resulted from “ambush” journalism.

The grandparents of Melinda Duckett sued CNN in November 2006 for intentional infliction of emotional distress (IIED), alleging Grace turned an interview into an ambush by aggressively questioning her about the disappearance of her two-year-old son. Duckett killed herself a day after taping the interview.

IIED claims are only actionable in the rare circumstance of conduct that was “so outrageous in character, and so extreme in degree, as to go beyond all possible bounds of decency.” And CNN argued in a motion to dismiss that Grace was only practicing “aggressive newsgathering.”

But Senior U.S. District Judge W. Terrell Hodges denied the motion last week, finding that the plaintiffs have “sufficiently alleged all of the elements of an intentional infliction of emotional distress claim.”

CNN allegedly knew, he explained in his order, that Duckett was “already suffering emotional and psychological stress from the disappearance of her son,” and

where the alleged conduct on the part of the Defendants may not be considered outrageous when the victim is of ordinary emotional and mental status, such conduct may become actionable (and liability may exist) when the alleged victim suffers from known emotional and/or psychological trauma.

While Hodges stressed he was applying the “lenient notice pleading standard,” his expansive view of IIED liability duplicates that of a New York judge who ruled in February that NBC Universal could be sued for causing the suicide of a Texas prosecutor. Conradt v. NBC Universal, 536 F.Supp.2d 380.

Louis Conradt shot himself as an NBC camera crew waited outside his home to film his arrest for a segment of the “To Catch a Predator” show. In denying NBC's motion to dismiss, U.S. District Judge Denny Chin said the network “knew or should have known that Conradt was peculiarly susceptible to emotional distress and suicide.”

Hodges relied in part on Williams v. City of Minneola, 575 So. 2d 683 (1991), in which a Florida appeals court upheld IIED claims against police officers accused of improperly viewing a videotape of an autopsy. “[O]ur society ... shows a particular solicitude for the emotional vulnerability of survivors regarding improper behavior toward the dead body of a loved one,” the court noted.

Whether CNN should have showed a “particular solicitude” toward the emotionally vulnerable mother of a missing toddler –- who was part of a national news story -- appears to be a quite different question from that addressed in Williams.

After Judge Chin's decision, NBC settled the Conradt case. Unless CNN reaches a similar settlement, Duckett's grandparents will now have an opportunity to question Grace and her producers about their pre-interview discussions with Duckett.

In their complaint, the plaintiffs alleged Duckett was misled into believing the interview would help in the search for her missing child when, in fact, “the real purpose of the show ... was to try to obtain a confession as to 'where she was' on the night that [the child] disappeared.”

Other Calvert v. CNN Sources

By Matthew Heller
8/5/08


 
rc_insidestories
  • Perfume Allergy Case Settles for $100,000

    A Detroit city planner with an allergy to perfume is savoring the sweet smell of legal success after the city agreed to pay her $100,000 and be more sensitive to the chemically sensitive.
    Read more...
  • Teen's Suit Puts Mug-Shot Publisher Against the Wall

    A new publication in Lincoln, Neb., milks mug shots for humor. But a teenager whose arrest photo appeared in Cuffed doesn't see the funny side of it and has sued the publisher for misappropriating his image.
    Read more...
  • BA Settles 'Reckless' Baggage Handling Suit

    Limiting its liability to a group of only 13 airline passengers, British Airways (NYSE: BAY) has settled a first-of-its kind lawsuit that accused the airline of being “inexcusably reckless” in its handling of passengers' baggage.
    Read more...
  • Judge Says "Gay" Still Defamatory in Texas

    What one court has called “a veritable sea change in social attitudes about homosexuality” has evidently not reached Texas where a judge ruled that an airport security guard can sue a radio show host for calling him “gay” on the air.
    Read more...
  • Mom Says Hospital Gave Her Wrong
    Baby to Nurse


    Because of a hospital's error, Jennifer Spiegel became an involuntary wet nurse to another woman's newborn son. Now she is suing the hospital for its malpractice in providing her with the wrong baby to breastfeed.
    Read more...
  • Case Over MySpace Page Chills Student Speech

    Several recent court rulings have been protective of off-campus student speech -– with the exception of a very shaky decision that a dissenting judge said “vests school officials with dangerously overbroad censorship discretion.”
    Read more...
  • Motorist Who Flipped off Cop Gets $50K From City

    The citation of a motorist for displaying his middle finger to a police officer -– what a judge described as a “somewhat innocuous” gesture -- turned out to be quite expensive for the City of Pittsburgh as it agreed to pay $50,000 to the bird-flipper.
    Read more...
RC_OnFile

Newdow v. Rio Lindo Union Sch. Dist.
Subject: Pledge of allegiance
Document: Opinion

Vance v. Rumsfeld
Subject: Detainee abuse
Document: Opinion

Stern v. Sony Corp.
Subject: Disabled gamers
Document: Opinion

Churchill v. Univ. of Colorado
Subject: Academic freedom
Document: ACLU amicus brief

KBR/Halliburton v. Jones
Subject: Sexual assault
Document: Petition for review

more

RC_OnTrial

Spears v. Allergan, Inc.
Court: Orange County (Calif.) Superior
Subject: Botox death
Verdict: Defense

Patterson v. Hudson Area Schools
Court: USDC, E. Mich.
Subject: Student harassment

more


RC_OnTheDocket

McClain v. Pfizer, Inc.
Date: 3/2/10
Court: USDC, Conn.
Hearing: Jury trial in case over unsafe lab conditions.

Sherman v. McDonald's Corp.
Date: 3/23/10
Court: Washington County (Ark.) Circuit
Hearing: Jury trial in case over nude photos.

more