
• Boston judge refuses to require Massachusetts to include materials that deny the Armenian genocide in the public school curriculum. "[T]he decision as to what to teach about ... the Armenian genocide must be made by elected officials, educators, and teachers rather than by federal judges." Griswold v. Driscoll
• Kentucky Court of Appeals upholds a $3.7 million jury award against a school board for ignoring a student's complaints that several teachers had molested her. Plaintiff Lynne Maner "presented sufficient evidence that the Board was deliberately indifferen[t] in its failure to act." Maner v. Fayette County Board of Education
• 6th Circuit revives the racial bias case of an African-American couple who sued a hotel for refusing to host their wedding reception. "There is a genuine issue of material fact in this case as to whether ... the Hotel denied them the right to enter into a contract because of their race." Keck v. Graham Hotel Systems
• San Francisco judge rules that a city did not violate a hiker's rights by failing to protect her from an attack on public land by a rancher's cattle. "[P]laintiffs have not alleged facts supporting a claim that the City was deliberately indifferent to a known or obvious danger" to Jo Dee Schmidt. Schmidt v. Hoover
• Divided New York appellate court says a golfer is not liable for striking another golfer in the eye with an errant drive. The defendant's failure to yell "Fore" before hitting the ball "does not rise to the level of creating a dangerous condition over and above the usual dangers inherent in participating in the sport of golf." Anand v. Kapoor
• Sioux tribal members file a class action seeking their share of as much as $900 million held in trust by the federal government as compensation for the "taking" of the Black Hills of South Dakota. The plaintiffs have split from other Sioux who refuse to take the money, insisting on the return of the land. Different Horse v. Salazar
• Texas Court of Appeals says a gas station owner is not liable for the negligence of an attendant who accidentally shot a customer while showing him a gun. The attendant's "actions were not merely a misuse of his authority; they were utterly unrelated to his duties." Glass v. Williams
• San Francisco judge denies Chevron Corp.'s request for $485,159 in court costs from impoverished Nigerian villagers who sued the company for human rights violations. "The economic disparity between plaintiffs, who are Nigerian villagers, and defendants, international oil companies, cannot be more stark." Bowoto v. Chevron

|
|
Jeweler Awarded $3.8M for Pink Diamond Theft |
|
 |
John Stafford
Julius Klein Diamonds insists the pink diamond it allegedly stole from an Ohio jeweler never existed. But the mysterious gem was real enough to a federal jury, which awarded John Stafford $3.8 million for his loss.
The case opened a window into the secretive world of diamond trading, pitting Stafford, who operates a retail jewelry store in Miami Township, Ohio, against JKD, an industry giant which is one of only nine Diamond Trading Company “sightholders” in the U.S.
JKD argued that Stafford failed to prove the 5.56 carat pink diamond existed or, if it did, that he ever shipped it to JKD's New York office in February 2006 with the Brink's security company. When the package allegedly containing the diamond arrived in New York, JKD said, there was nothing in it.
But an investigation by Brink's showed the package had not been opened or tampered with before it was delivered. And a jury in Dayton last month rejected JKD's theory that Stafford lied about the shipment of the diamond as part of an insurance scam.
“The jury sent a strong, strong message that this kind of conduct absolutely will not be tolerated in our society,” Stafford attorney Dianne F. Marx said.
The verdict totaled $3.8 million in compensatory damages -- $8,400 for unjust enrichment, $1.7 million for conversion, and $2.3 million on a claim of civil liability for the criminal act of theft.
In a proposed judgment, Marx contends that Stafford is entitled to treble damages on the civil liability claim, which would bring the total award up to $8.6 million. However, defense counsel Stephen E. Chappelear says he can recover no more than $2.3 million since all three claims were based on a single event.
[Editor's note: Based upon information released by Marx, On Point initially reported that the jury awarded Stafford $6.9 million -- reflecting treble damages for civil liability.]
JKD, which was founded in 1948 and has offices in five countries, intends to appeal. “Prior to this case, in its entire 60 year history, Julius Klein Diamonds LLC has never been accused of taking any diamond,” the company said in a court document.
According to Stafford, he bought the “fancy,” “intense” pink diamond from a German man during a trip to Las Vegas in 2005, paying only $8,000 in cash. The man, who said his mother considered the stone to be bad luck, disappeared before Stafford could give him a receipt.
Before deciding whether to buy the diamond, JKD needed to see it first. So, as alleged in his complaint, Stafford took it from his safe, packaged it in a UPS box placed inside a Brink's shipping bag and handed it over to Brink's on Feb. 13, 2006 after insuring it for $1.5 million.
The package arrived in New York the following day, but JKD called Stafford to say “there was no Pink Diamond.” Stafford was “shocked” and, after Brink's completed its investigation, “was left with the disconcerting conclusion that his trust in JKD was woefully misplaced.”
JKD came to its own conclusion about Stafford, accusing him in a counterclaim for fraud of “a pattern of conduct which involves scamming shipping carriers and insurance companies by alleging lost shipments pursuant to an insurance fraud scheme.”
“Stafford's testimony only establishes that he allegedly purchased the Pink Diamond from a ghost,” the company argued in a court brief, referring to the enigmatic German, and “plaintiffs have not introduced any substantial evidence that the Pink Diamond exists.”
But Stafford emphasized the testimony of Brink's that "JKD received and accepted the Brink's package containing the Pink Diamond 'in good order.'” He has also questioned whether JKD could have “accidentally or inadvertently deleted” the original surveillance video showing the opening of his package at its premises in New York.
"Mr. Stafford unequivocally testified that he placed a $1.7 million Pink Diamond in [a] box and that neither the Pink Diamond box nor the Brink’s bag containing the Pink Diamond box contained any hole," Marx said.
|
Stafford's Jewelers v. JKD Documents
|
By Matthew Heller 12/14/08
|
|
-
No Prayer Now for Preacher's Suit Over "Religulous"
Less than three weeks after being sued for defrauding two former parishioners of $600,000, a Florida preacher dropped his $50 million lawsuit alleging the Bill Maher documentary “Religulous” falsely portrayed him as a charlatan, On Point has learned.
Read more...
-
Man Burned at Burning Man Assumed Risk
Get too close to the Burning Man fire and you assume the “obvious and inherent” risk of being burned, a California appeals court has ruled in dismissing a personal injury lawsuit against the operators of the iconic countercultural arts festival.
Read more...
-
Lawyer's 'Prove Me Wrong' Offer No Joke to Student
A Texas law student may have taken a $1 million “prove me wrong” challenge seriously, but the criminal defense lawyer who made the challenge on a TV news show appears to have done so with enough tongue in cheek to avoid liability for not paying up.
Read more...
-
Jury Chills Rights in Strip Search Case
A jury has reached a chilling decision in the civil rights case of a Southampton, N.Y., woman, clearing four police officers in the exclusive resort community of liability for performing a strip search on her after a minor marijuana bust.
Read more...
-
Toxic Bra Suits Won't be Combined in Ohio
A rash of lawsuits against Victoria's Secret alleging defectively manufactured underwear is continuing with eight new cases filed in the past two months. But in a setback for plaintiffs, a judicial panel has refused to consolidate all the litigation in Ohio.
Read more...
-
Wedding Fiasco Suit Really Takes Cake
Sandra Newsom's wedding disaster lawsuit may -– literally –- take the cake. The New York woman has sued a cruise ship operator for ruining her wedding reception by serving a coconut-containing cake to which she had an allergic reaction.
Read more...
-
Woody Allen Got $5M After Judge Shredded Defense
A week before American Apparel agreed to pay Woody Allen $5 million for misappropriating his image, a judge had shredded the clothing company's First Amendment defense based on its CEO's “mental processes,” On Point has learned.
Read more...
|
Capitol Records v. Thomas Court: USDC, Minn. Subject: Digital music downloading Verdict: $1.92 million
ASPCA v. Ringling Bros. Court: USDC, D. Col. Subject: Illegal "taking" of elephants by circus
more
|
|
Howard K. Stern v. Rita Cosby Date: 7/7/09 Court: USDC, S. N.Y. Hearing: Motions for summary judgment in defamation case.
Goldberg v. Paris Hilton Entertainment Date: 7/9/09 Court: USDC, S. Fla. Hearing: Jury trial in breach-of-contract case.
more
|
|