
• Parents of a 10-year-old boy who witnessed a killer whale's fatal attack on a trainer sue Sea World Orlando for infliction of emotional distress. "Without question, it was reasonably foreseeable and in fact predictable that an attack such as this one by a killer whale with the tendencies of Tilikum was inevitable." Connell v. Sea World
• Denver judge dismisses Oklahoma City bomber Terry Nichols's civil rights claims against prison officials for denying him a high-fiber diet. Nichols v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
• Illinois teenager with cerebral palsy sues the Special Olympics for refusing to let her play basketball with the help of a service dog. Youngwith v. Special Olympics
• Montana judge sets aside a government decision removing protections for the northern Rocky Mountain gray wolf. The Endangered Species Act "was not intended to sow the dragon's teeth of strife or to plant the seeds of future conflicts that have given rise to this case." Defenders of Wildlife v. Salazar
• San Francisco judge dismisses a cereal consumer's false advertising suit. "[T]here is nothing in the packaging or marketing of Cap’n Crunch that would in any way deceive a reasonable consumer into believing that the cereal contains or derives nutritional value from real fruit." Werbel v. PepsiCo
• Iowa judge says a sheriff denied the applications of a father and son for concealed weapons permits in retaliation for their political activism. "This is a great reminder that the First Amendment protects the sole individual who may be a gadfly, kook, weirdo, nut job, whacko, and spook, with the same force of protection as folks with more majoritarian and popular views." Dorr v. Weber
• 5th Circuit rules that a school district violated the religious freedom of a Native American boy by requiring him to wear his long hair in a bun on top of his head or in a braid tucked into his shirt. The boy "has a sincere religious belief in wearing his hair uncut and in plain view." A.A. v. Needville Ind. Sch. Dist.
• 11th Circuit denies a challenge to an ordinance restricting handouts of food to the homeless in Orlando parks. "[W]e are unpersuaded that the conduct of simply feeding people ... is expressive for First Amendment purposes." First Vagabonds Church v. City of Orlando

|
|
Hypnosis Show Volunteer Alleges Mental Injuries |
|
 |
Chris Cady
Stage hypnotist Chris Cady promotes his show as "controlled, positive, safe" entertainment. But in what could be a mesmerizing case, a volunteer at one of Cady's performances is claiming his experience of being hypnotized caused him severe psychological injury.
Louis Johnson had to be subdued by police and hospitalized after Cady allegedly failed to bring him out of the hypnotic state during a performance for seniors at a northern California high school in May 2006.
There is no precedent in the U.S. for a successful claim of psychological injury against a stage hypnotist. According to Cady's Web site, “It is impossible for anyone to get stuck in hypnosis, lose control or be made to do something against their morals ... No one has ever been injured physically or mentally in one of my shows.”
Johnson, then a senior at Hercules High School, volunteered with several other students to be hypnotized by Cady. But he and his mother allege in a negligence suit filed earlier this month that toward the end of the performance,
while still in a hypnotic trance, [he] proceeded to run out of the building, jump two flights of stairs and continued running through the campus in an incoherent state.
Six police officers were required to handcuff him and strap him onto a gurney for the ride to the hospital, where a psychiatrist “'reversed' the effects of the hypnosis and brought Louis Johnson out of the hypnotic state.”
The complaint names Cady, Clowns of the U.S. -- which referred him to the school –- and the West Contra Costa Unified School District as defendants. “As a result of each of the defendants' actions, [Johnson] suffered extreme physical and emotional injury,” it says.
In Britain, activists campaigned to ban stage hypnosis, arguing it is too powerful a tool to be used for entertainment purposes. William Kroger, a renowned hypnotherapist, has warned that stage hypnosis can cause adverse psychological reactions in some subjects.
But Johnson will have to show that a stage hypnotist owes a duty of care to protect a volunteer who offers to undergo hypnotism from psychological injury.
In 2001, a British judge awarded £6,500 in damages to a woman who claimed a stage hypnotist reawakened memories of childhood sexual abuse by persuading her she was eight years old. “I went to that stage show as a normal, happy, healthy, energetic woman and came out a zombie,” she testified in the landmark case.
The hypnotist, the judge concluded in Howarth v. Green, “failed to ensure that his instructions were sufficiently clear for his volunteers not to indulge in [the] known danger of age regression.”
Johnson's attorney believes Cady should be liable for failing to disclose the risks of stage hypnosis. "You can't have an individual make an informed decision [about volunteering] if they don't know the risks," David Hermelin (Hermelin Law Firm, Martinez, Calif.) tells On Point.
Since Cady describes his show on his Website as "one of the safest types of programs you could ever have," it would not be surprising if he made no disclosure of risk.
Hermelin also argues that a higher degree of care is required at hypnosis shows involving underage volunteers. The complaint does not detail what instructions Cady gave Johnson, but Hermelin says the hypnotist may have videotaped his performance.
Johnson has graduated from Hercules High but, according to the suit, "still suffers the adverse effects from being hypnotized at the Senior Breakfast.”
By Matthew Heller 5/29/07
|
|
-
Off With His Head! Woman Sues 'Mad Hatter' Actor
Experimental theater clashes with premises liability law in the case of a Kentucky woman who claims she was injured while watching a performance of a circus-inspired play when one of the actors balanced his knee on her head.
Read more...
-
Charity Worker Accuses CEO of Hypnotic Seduction
A former charity worker may be pushing the limits of sexual harassment law by alleging that her boss required her to participate in “relaxation sessions” on his “magic couch” during which he hypnotized and molested her.
Read more...
-
Appeal is Expert's Latest Challenge to Judges
Expert witness Dr. David Egilman was previously successful in showing he had standing to appeal a judicial order in a case in which he was not a party — but that case may not help him in his latest challenge to a trial judge.
Read more...
-
Plaintiff's Expert Files Appeal in 'Popcorn Lung' Lawsuit
A controversial expert witness for plaintiffs has filed an unusual non-party appeal of a Washington state judge's decision finding his theory that snackers can contract lung disease from exposure to microwave popcorn is not scientifically sound.
Read more...
-
Philly School Sued Over Race Attack on Student's Mom
Taking civil rights law to what may be an extreme, an Asian-American woman is alleging a Philadelphia high school's tolerance of racism rendered her “helpless prey” to African-American students who attacked her when she picked her child up from the school.
Read more...
-
'McSteamy' Sex Tape Suit Cools off With Settlement
Acting couple Eric Dane and Rebecca Gayheart have dropped a $1 million lawsuit against Gawker.com for publishing a videotape featuring them in a nude threesome with a friend after the gossip website agreed to take down the much-viewed posting.
Read more...
-
Sex Harassment Claims Hit Actor Affleck, 'Bones' Star
A producer of a film about actor Joaquin Phoenix, an extra on the set of the TV show “Bones,” an assistant property master, and a makeup artist are among the plaintiffs in a recent epidemic of lurid Hollywood lawsuits.
Read more...
|
Arnaout v. Warden Subject: Muslim inmate prayer Document: John Walker Lindh declaration
Marriage of J.B. and H.B. Subject: Same-sex divorce Document: Opinion
Stovell v. James Subject: LeBron's paternity Document: Complaint
U.S. v. Arizona Subject: Illegal immigration Document: Complaint
Rosenberg v. Google Subject: Negligent navigation Document: Complaint
more
|
|
McCourt v. McCourt Court: L.A. Superior Subject: Dodgers divorce
Pom Wonderful v. Welch Foods Court: USDC, C. Calif. Subject: False advertising
more
|
|
McCourt v. McCourt Date: 8/30/10 Court: L.A. Superior Hearing: Dodgers divorce trial
more
|
|
|