
• Boston judge refuses to require Massachusetts to include materials that deny the Armenian genocide in the public school curriculum. "[T]he decision as to what to teach about ... the Armenian genocide must be made by elected officials, educators, and teachers rather than by federal judges." Griswold v. Driscoll
• Kentucky Court of Appeals upholds a $3.7 million jury award against a school board for ignoring a student's complaints that several teachers had molested her. Plaintiff Lynne Maner "presented sufficient evidence that the Board was deliberately indifferen[t] in its failure to act." Maner v. Fayette County Board of Education
• 6th Circuit revives the racial bias case of an African-American couple who sued a hotel for refusing to host their wedding reception. "There is a genuine issue of material fact in this case as to whether ... the Hotel denied them the right to enter into a contract because of their race." Keck v. Graham Hotel Systems
• San Francisco judge rules that a city did not violate a hiker's rights by failing to protect her from an attack on public land by a rancher's cattle. "[P]laintiffs have not alleged facts supporting a claim that the City was deliberately indifferent to a known or obvious danger" to Jo Dee Schmidt. Schmidt v. Hoover
• Divided New York appellate court says a golfer is not liable for striking another golfer in the eye with an errant drive. The defendant's failure to yell "Fore" before hitting the ball "does not rise to the level of creating a dangerous condition over and above the usual dangers inherent in participating in the sport of golf." Anand v. Kapoor
• Sioux tribal members file a class action seeking their share of as much as $900 million held in trust by the federal government as compensation for the "taking" of the Black Hills of South Dakota. The plaintiffs have split from other Sioux who refuse to take the money, insisting on the return of the land. Different Horse v. Salazar
• Texas Court of Appeals says a gas station owner is not liable for the negligence of an attendant who accidentally shot a customer while showing him a gun. The attendant's "actions were not merely a misuse of his authority; they were utterly unrelated to his duties." Glass v. Williams
• San Francisco judge denies Chevron Corp.'s request for $485,159 in court costs from impoverished Nigerian villagers who sued the company for human rights violations. "The economic disparity between plaintiffs, who are Nigerian villagers, and defendants, international oil companies, cannot be more stark." Bowoto v. Chevron

|
|
Hand Scanners Spark Religion Bias Suits |
|
Biometric technology clashes with religious belief in two cases from the Bible Belt that allege businesses wrongfully fired employees who refused to put their hands on a scanner for timekeeping purposes.
A former van driver for Hertz Corp. and two former nursing home employees filed the suits under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act, which requires employers to make reasonable accommodations for an employee’s religion unless doing so would create an “undue hardship.”
But no published opinion has addressed whether an employer should accommodate those who believe a biometric “hand geometry” scanner will stamp them with the “Mark of the Beast.” The Book of Revelation warns believers not to take the “Mark of the Beast” on their foreheads or on their right hands.
In the complaint filed Feb. 27 in Atlanta, former Hertz employee Anthony Amos says he refused to participate in a timekeeping system which “involved the placement of a right hand on a digital scanner machine.” He advised his boss of his “religious issues” but was fired a week later.
The two former employees of Arbor Place, a Puryear, Tenn., nursing home, filed their suit last week, alleging their “sincerely held religious beliefs” prohibited them from using a similar biometric system.
“Plaintiffs requested a reasonable accomodation which would allow them to record their time by an alternative method,” the complaint says. “Instead of providing a reasonable accommodation ... Defendant terminated Plaintiffs' employment.”
Some employers in the U.S. have allowed believers to put the left hand, rather than the right, on the scanner. But the plaintiffs in the two cases do not indicate whether that accommodation was offered to them.
In a Canadian labor grievance case, an arbitrator ruled in January that an Ontario company “never seriously addressed the question of what it could do to accommodate” three employees apart from allowing the use of the left hand. The employees declined that option.
“[T]he accommodation sought by the Union and the Grievors –- that the Grievors use the biometric scanner with a swipe card and password, without its biometric features –- does not impose an undue hardship on the Employer,” the arbitrator concluded.
The Employment Relations Authority of New Zealand came to a different conclusion in 2004, finding no basis for a discrimination claim because the biometric technology does not actually stamp a mark on a person, or even store the image of a fingerprint.
The scanner measures the dimensions of a hand, which it converts to an algorithm of a nine-digit number. Each successive time the hand is placed on the scanner, it is measured and compared to the algorithm stored in the system.
But U.S. law does not require employees to justify their beliefs no matter how extreme they may appear, the only test being whether they are “sincerely held.” And no less an authority than Pat Robertson has denounced biometrics.
“The Bible says the time is going to come that you cannot buy or sell except with a mark placed on your hand or on your forehead,” he told viewers of his TV show “The 700 Club” in 1995. “It is happening, ladies and gentlemen, exactly according to the Book of Revelation.”
By Matthew Heller 3/28/07
|
|
-
No Prayer Now for Preacher's Suit Over "Religulous"
Less than three weeks after being sued for defrauding two former parishioners of $600,000, a Florida preacher dropped his $50 million lawsuit alleging the Bill Maher documentary “Religulous” falsely portrayed him as a charlatan, On Point has learned.
Read more...
-
Man Burned at Burning Man Assumed Risk
Get too close to the Burning Man fire and you assume the “obvious and inherent” risk of being burned, a California appeals court has ruled in dismissing a personal injury lawsuit against the operators of the iconic countercultural arts festival.
Read more...
-
Lawyer's 'Prove Me Wrong' Offer No Joke to Student
A Texas law student may have taken a $1 million “prove me wrong” challenge seriously, but the criminal defense lawyer who made the challenge on a TV news show appears to have done so with enough tongue in cheek to avoid liability for not paying up.
Read more...
-
Jury Chills Rights in Strip Search Case
A jury has reached a chilling decision in the civil rights case of a Southampton, N.Y., woman, clearing four police officers in the exclusive resort community of liability for performing a strip search on her after a minor marijuana bust.
Read more...
-
Toxic Bra Suits Won't be Combined in Ohio
A rash of lawsuits against Victoria's Secret alleging defectively manufactured underwear is continuing with eight new cases filed in the past two months. But in a setback for plaintiffs, a judicial panel has refused to consolidate all the litigation in Ohio.
Read more...
-
Wedding Fiasco Suit Really Takes Cake
Sandra Newsom's wedding disaster lawsuit may -– literally –- take the cake. The New York woman has sued a cruise ship operator for ruining her wedding reception by serving a coconut-containing cake to which she had an allergic reaction.
Read more...
-
Woody Allen Got $5M After Judge Shredded Defense
A week before American Apparel agreed to pay Woody Allen $5 million for misappropriating his image, a judge had shredded the clothing company's First Amendment defense based on its CEO's “mental processes,” On Point has learned.
Read more...
|
Capitol Records v. Thomas Court: USDC, Minn. Subject: Digital music downloading Verdict: $1.92 million
ASPCA v. Ringling Bros. Court: USDC, D. Col. Subject: Illegal "taking" of elephants by circus
more
|
|
Howard K. Stern v. Rita Cosby Date: 7/7/09 Court: USDC, S. N.Y. Hearing: Motions for summary judgment in defamation case.
Goldberg v. Paris Hilton Entertainment Date: 7/9/09 Court: USDC, S. Fla. Hearing: Jury trial in breach-of-contract case.
more
|
|