
• Boston judge refuses to require Massachusetts to include materials that deny the Armenian genocide in the public school curriculum. "[T]he decision as to what to teach about ... the Armenian genocide must be made by elected officials, educators, and teachers rather than by federal judges." Griswold v. Driscoll
• Kentucky Court of Appeals upholds a $3.7 million jury award against a school board for ignoring a student's complaints that several teachers had molested her. Plaintiff Lynne Maner "presented sufficient evidence that the Board was deliberately indifferen[t] in its failure to act." Maner v. Fayette County Board of Education
• 6th Circuit revives the racial bias case of an African-American couple who sued a hotel for refusing to host their wedding reception. "There is a genuine issue of material fact in this case as to whether ... the Hotel denied them the right to enter into a contract because of their race." Keck v. Graham Hotel Systems
• San Francisco judge rules that a city did not violate a hiker's rights by failing to protect her from an attack on public land by a rancher's cattle. "[P]laintiffs have not alleged facts supporting a claim that the City was deliberately indifferent to a known or obvious danger" to Jo Dee Schmidt. Schmidt v. Hoover
• Divided New York appellate court says a golfer is not liable for striking another golfer in the eye with an errant drive. The defendant's failure to yell "Fore" before hitting the ball "does not rise to the level of creating a dangerous condition over and above the usual dangers inherent in participating in the sport of golf." Anand v. Kapoor
• Sioux tribal members file a class action seeking their share of as much as $900 million held in trust by the federal government as compensation for the "taking" of the Black Hills of South Dakota. The plaintiffs have split from other Sioux who refuse to take the money, insisting on the return of the land. Different Horse v. Salazar
• Texas Court of Appeals says a gas station owner is not liable for the negligence of an attendant who accidentally shot a customer while showing him a gun. The attendant's "actions were not merely a misuse of his authority; they were utterly unrelated to his duties." Glass v. Williams
• San Francisco judge denies Chevron Corp.'s request for $485,159 in court costs from impoverished Nigerian villagers who sued the company for human rights violations. "The economic disparity between plaintiffs, who are Nigerian villagers, and defendants, international oil companies, cannot be more stark." Bowoto v. Chevron

|
|
Ex-Manager Sues Hilton over Orgy Viewing |
|
A former manager of the upscale restaurant at the Hilton Minneapolis who allegedly walked in on upper management having an orgy has filed a lawsuit that probably stretches liability for “undirected” sexual harassment beyond its limits.
Deborah Smith's case may be the first to allege harassment-by-orgy, testing to what extent a plaintiff may be injured by “undirected” sexual conduct and whether a single incident of group sex amounts to “sufficiently severe or pervasive” sexual harassment.
According to the complaint, Smith, who was the night manager at the SkyWater Restaurant and Lounge, opened a door to a banquet room at the Hilton where “she discovered an orgy” with “various Hilton executives inebriated and engaging in sexual acts.”
“In fact, she observed Hilton executives on top of a table engaging in sexual activity,” the suit says.
After Smith “walked away from the orgy,” SkyWater beverage manager James Vennewitz allegedly told her “she would be fired, and he would make sure of it.” She complained about the orgy to human resources but “a campaign of harassment and retaliation ensued,” culminating in her termination on Dec. 19, 2007.
Smith, 43, of Coon Rapids, Minn., is seeking at least $50,000 in damages under the Minnesota Human Rights Act (MHRA), which defines sexual harassment as “unwelcome sexual advances, requests for sexual favors, sexually motivated physical contact or other verbal or physical conduct or communication of a sexual nature.”
“Plaintiff was subjected to unwelcome sexual conduct directed at her on the basis of her sex,” Smith says.
In a related case, another former Hilton employee -- cocktail server April Bezdichek, 25 -- alleges direct harassment. She says Vennewitz told her to come to the banquet room "in which (unknown to her) an orgy was occurring."
"After she came into the room, Defendant Manager Vennewitz pulled her onto his lap and pumped her up and down on his erect penis," the complaint alleges. "He told her how good it felt and tried to physically force her up to a hotel room."
How the orgy was “directed” at Smith is unclear -– there is no allegation in the complaint that she was invited or forced to participate. But the alleged activity was certainly of a “sexual nature” and the MHRA, like Title VII of the federal Civil Rights Act, does not preclude liability for harassment based on “undirected” conduct.
“To determine whether actionable sex discrimination exists in a given case, all the circumstances surrounding the conduct alleged to constitute sexual harassment, such as the nature of the incidents and the context in which they occurred, should be examined,” the Minnesota Supreme Court said in Continental Can Co. v. State of Minnesota, 297 N.W.2d 241 (1980).
In a case quite similar to Smith's, a sheriff's department employee alleged among other things that a supervisor showed off a copy of "Penthouse" magazine and deputies displayed pin-ups of nude women in their lockers. But the Minnesota Court of Appeals ruled in Klink v. Ramsey County, 397 N.W.2d 894 (1986), that the plaintiff did not have an MHRA claim for "inadvertently view[ing] objectionable materials on a sporadic basis."
The co-workers' "carelessness and insensitivity is not tantamount to purposeful sexual harassment," the court said.
At most, the Hilton executives acted carelessly and finding the hotel liable for Smith's inadvertent viewing of their alleged orgy would impose a duty on an employer to “maintain a pristine working environment” -- a duty that the Supreme Court rejected in Continental Can.
The suit also alleges retaliation, which requires Smith to show she had "a reasonable and good faith belief" that she had suffered sexual harassment.
Smith originally filed her case in state court along with Bezdichek and another plaintiff, bartender Harley Gayle, 41. The cases, which have been severed, were removed to federal court last week.
By Matthew Heller 11/30/08
|
|
-
No Prayer Now for Preacher's Suit Over "Religulous"
Less than three weeks after being sued for defrauding two former parishioners of $600,000, a Florida preacher dropped his $50 million lawsuit alleging the Bill Maher documentary “Religulous” falsely portrayed him as a charlatan, On Point has learned.
Read more...
-
Man Burned at Burning Man Assumed Risk
Get too close to the Burning Man fire and you assume the “obvious and inherent” risk of being burned, a California appeals court has ruled in dismissing a personal injury lawsuit against the operators of the iconic countercultural arts festival.
Read more...
-
Lawyer's 'Prove Me Wrong' Offer No Joke to Student
A Texas law student may have taken a $1 million “prove me wrong” challenge seriously, but the criminal defense lawyer who made the challenge on a TV news show appears to have done so with enough tongue in cheek to avoid liability for not paying up.
Read more...
-
Jury Chills Rights in Strip Search Case
A jury has reached a chilling decision in the civil rights case of a Southampton, N.Y., woman, clearing four police officers in the exclusive resort community of liability for performing a strip search on her after a minor marijuana bust.
Read more...
-
Toxic Bra Suits Won't be Combined in Ohio
A rash of lawsuits against Victoria's Secret alleging defectively manufactured underwear is continuing with eight new cases filed in the past two months. But in a setback for plaintiffs, a judicial panel has refused to consolidate all the litigation in Ohio.
Read more...
-
Wedding Fiasco Suit Really Takes Cake
Sandra Newsom's wedding disaster lawsuit may -– literally –- take the cake. The New York woman has sued a cruise ship operator for ruining her wedding reception by serving a coconut-containing cake to which she had an allergic reaction.
Read more...
-
Woody Allen Got $5M After Judge Shredded Defense
A week before American Apparel agreed to pay Woody Allen $5 million for misappropriating his image, a judge had shredded the clothing company's First Amendment defense based on its CEO's “mental processes,” On Point has learned.
Read more...
|
Capitol Records v. Thomas Court: USDC, Minn. Subject: Digital music downloading Verdict: $1.92 million
ASPCA v. Ringling Bros. Court: USDC, D. Col. Subject: Illegal "taking" of elephants by circus
more
|
|
Howard K. Stern v. Rita Cosby Date: 7/7/09 Court: USDC, S. N.Y. Hearing: Motions for summary judgment in defamation case.
Goldberg v. Paris Hilton Entertainment Date: 7/9/09 Court: USDC, S. Fla. Hearing: Jury trial in breach-of-contract case.
more
|
|