Perry v. Schwarzenegger
Judge strikes down California's same-sex marriage ban, finding that "Moral disapproval alone is an improper basis on which to deny rights to gay men and lesbians."
U.S. v. Arizona
Arizona judge enjoins enforcement of a new immigration law's requirement that police determine the immigration status of
every person who is arrested.
McGuire v. United Airlines
Michigan woman says a United Express flight crew locked her in a plane for nearly four hours after it landed because they failed to ensure that all passengers had disembarked.
R.H. v. Schenectady Sch. Dist.
Middle school student says he was suspended for wearing rosary beads because the rosary "is considered a gang-related symbol" and cannot be worn in school.
lc_search
LC_DayByDay

 Aug   September 10   Oct

SMTWTFS
   1  2  3  4
  5  6  7  8  91011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930 
Julianna Walker Willis Technology
LC_BySubject
OnTheMap

rss

LC_ExtraPoints

• Parents of a 10-year-old boy who witnessed a killer whale's fatal attack on a trainer sue Sea World Orlando for infliction of emotional distress. "Without question, it was reasonably foreseeable and in fact predictable that an attack such as this one by a killer whale with the tendencies of Tilikum was inevitable." Connell v. Sea World

• Denver judge dismisses Oklahoma City bomber Terry Nichols's civil rights claims against prison officials for denying him a high-fiber diet.
Nichols v. Federal Bureau of Prisons

• Illinois teenager with cerebral palsy sues the Special Olympics for refusing to let her play basketball with the help of a service dog.
Youngwith v. Special Olympics

• Montana judge sets aside a government decision removing protections for the northern Rocky Mountain gray wolf. The Endangered Species Act "was not intended to sow the dragon's teeth of strife or to plant the seeds of future conflicts that have given rise to this case."
Defenders of Wildlife v. Salazar

• San Francisco judge dismisses a cereal consumer's false advertising suit. "[T]here is nothing in the packaging or marketing of Cap’n Crunch that would in any way deceive a reasonable consumer into believing that the cereal contains or derives nutritional value from real fruit." Werbel v. PepsiCo

• Iowa judge says a sheriff denied the applications of a father and son for concealed weapons permits in retaliation for their political activism. "This is a great reminder that the First Amendment protects the sole individual who may be a gadfly, kook, weirdo, nut job, whacko, and spook, with the same force of protection as folks with more majoritarian and popular views." Dorr v. Weber

• 5th Circuit rules that a school district violated the religious freedom of a Native American boy by requiring him to wear his long hair in a bun on top of his head or in a braid tucked into his shirt. The boy "has a sincere religious belief in wearing his hair uncut and in plain view."
A.A. v. Needville Ind. Sch. Dist.

• 11th Circuit denies a challenge to an ordinance restricting handouts of food to the homeless in Orlando parks. "[W]e are unpersuaded that the conduct of simply feeding people ... is expressive for First Amendment purposes."
First Vagabonds Church v. City of Orlando




Alltop_125x125.jpg

ADVERT

Free no win no fee claims advice for personal injury.


ADVERT

For accident claims advice, visit a personal injury lawyer.


ADVERT

Injury Claims

Ex-Manager Sues Hilton over Orgy Viewing Print

hiltonA former manager of the upscale restaurant at the Hilton Minneapolis who allegedly walked in on upper management having an orgy has filed a lawsuit that probably stretches liability for “undirected” sexual harassment beyond its limits.

Deborah Smith's case may be the first to allege harassment-by-orgy, testing to what extent a plaintiff may be injured by “undirected” sexual conduct and whether a single incident of group sex amounts to “sufficiently severe or pervasive” sexual harassment.

According to the complaint, Smith, who was the night manager at the SkyWater Restaurant and Lounge, opened a door to a banquet room at the Hilton where “she discovered an orgy” with “various Hilton executives inebriated and engaging in sexual acts.”

“In fact, she observed Hilton executives on top of a table engaging in sexual activity,” the suit says.

After Smith “walked away from the orgy,” SkyWater beverage manager James Vennewitz allegedly told her “she would be fired, and he would make sure of it.” She complained about the orgy to human resources but “a campaign of harassment and retaliation ensued,” culminating in her termination on Dec. 19, 2007.

Smith, 43, of Coon Rapids, Minn., is seeking at least $50,000 in damages under the Minnesota Human Rights Act (MHRA), which defines sexual harassment as “unwelcome sexual advances, requests for sexual favors, sexually motivated physical contact or other verbal or physical conduct or communication of a sexual nature.”

“Plaintiff was subjected to unwelcome sexual conduct directed at her on the basis of her sex,” Smith says.

In a related case, another former Hilton employee -- cocktail server April Bezdichek, 25 -- alleges direct harassment. She says Vennewitz told her to come to the banquet room "in which (unknown to her) an orgy was occurring."

"After she came into the room, Defendant Manager Vennewitz pulled her onto his lap and pumped her up and down on his erect penis," the complaint alleges. "He told her how good it felt and tried to physically force her up to a hotel room."

How the orgy was “directed” at Smith is unclear -– there is no allegation in the complaint that she was invited or forced to participate. But the alleged activity was certainly of a “sexual nature” and the MHRA, like Title VII of the federal Civil Rights Act, does not preclude liability for harassment based on “undirected” conduct.

“To determine whether actionable sex discrimination exists in a given case, all the circumstances surrounding the conduct alleged to constitute sexual harassment, such as the nature of the incidents and the context in which they occurred, should be examined,” the Minnesota Supreme Court said in Continental Can Co. v. State of Minnesota, 297 N.W.2d 241 (1980).

In a case quite similar to Smith's, a sheriff's department employee alleged among other things that a supervisor showed off a copy of "Penthouse" magazine and deputies displayed pin-ups of nude women in their lockers. But the Minnesota Court of Appeals ruled in Klink v. Ramsey County, 397 N.W.2d 894 (1986), that the plaintiff did not have an MHRA claim for "inadvertently view[ing] objectionable materials on a sporadic basis."

The co-workers' "carelessness and insensitivity is not tantamount to purposeful sexual harassment," the court said.

At most, the Hilton executives acted carelessly and finding the hotel liable for Smith's inadvertent viewing of their alleged orgy would impose a duty on an employer to “maintain a pristine working environment” -- a duty that the Supreme Court rejected in Continental Can.

The suit also alleges retaliation, which requires Smith to show she had "a reasonable and good faith belief" that she had suffered sexual harassment.

Smith originally filed her case in state court along with Bezdichek and another plaintiff, bartender Harley Gayle, 41. The cases, which have been severed, were removed to federal court last week.

UPDATE

  • Hilton argues there was "no sex involved" in the banquet room activities, as On Point reports here.



  • By Matthew Heller
    11/30/08


     
    rc_insidestories
    • Off With His Head! Woman Sues 'Mad Hatter' Actor

      Experimental theater clashes with premises liability law in the case of a Kentucky woman who claims she was injured while watching a performance of a circus-inspired play when one of the actors balanced his knee on her head.
      Read more...
    • Charity Worker Accuses CEO of Hypnotic Seduction

      A former charity worker may be pushing the limits of sexual harassment law by alleging that her boss required her to participate in “relaxation sessions” on his “magic couch” during which he hypnotized and molested her.
      Read more...
    • Appeal is Expert's Latest Challenge to Judges

      Expert witness Dr. David Egilman was previously successful in showing he had standing to appeal a judicial order in a case in which he was not a party — but that case may not help him in his latest challenge to a trial judge.
      Read more...
    • Plaintiff's Expert Files Appeal in 'Popcorn Lung' Lawsuit

      A controversial expert witness for plaintiffs has filed an unusual non-party appeal of a Washington state judge's decision finding his theory that snackers can contract lung disease from exposure to microwave popcorn is not scientifically sound.
      Read more...
    • Philly School Sued Over Race Attack on Student's Mom

      Taking civil rights law to what may be an extreme, an Asian-American woman is alleging a Philadelphia high school's tolerance of racism rendered her “helpless prey” to African-American students who attacked her when she picked her child up from the school.
      Read more...
    • 'McSteamy' Sex Tape Suit Cools off With Settlement

      Acting couple Eric Dane and Rebecca Gayheart have dropped a $1 million lawsuit against Gawker.com for publishing a videotape featuring them in a nude threesome with a friend after the gossip website agreed to take down the much-viewed posting.
      Read more...
    • Sex Harassment Claims Hit Actor Affleck, 'Bones' Star

      A producer of a film about actor Joaquin Phoenix, an extra on the set of the TV show “Bones,” an assistant property master, and a makeup artist are among the plaintiffs in a recent epidemic of lurid Hollywood lawsuits.
      Read more...
    RC_OnFile

    Arnaout v. Warden
    Subject: Muslim inmate prayer
    Document: John Walker Lindh declaration

    Marriage of J.B. and H.B.
    Subject: Same-sex divorce
    Document: Opinion

    Stovell v. James
    Subject: LeBron's paternity
    Document: Complaint

    U.S. v. Arizona
    Subject: Illegal immigration
    Document: Complaint

    Rosenberg v. Google
    Subject: Negligent navigation
    Document: Complaint

    more

    RC_OnTrial

    McCourt v. McCourt
    Court: L.A. Superior
    Subject: Dodgers divorce

    Pom Wonderful v. Welch Foods
    Court: USDC, C. Calif.
    Subject: False advertising

    more


    RC_OnTheDocket

    McCourt v. McCourt
    Date: 8/30/10
    Court: L.A. Superior
    Hearing: Dodgers divorce trial

    more