
• Boston judge refuses to require Massachusetts to include materials that deny the Armenian genocide in the public school curriculum. "[T]he decision as to what to teach about ... the Armenian genocide must be made by elected officials, educators, and teachers rather than by federal judges." Griswold v. Driscoll
• Kentucky Court of Appeals upholds a $3.7 million jury award against a school board for ignoring a student's complaints that several teachers had molested her. Plaintiff Lynne Maner "presented sufficient evidence that the Board was deliberately indifferen[t] in its failure to act." Maner v. Fayette County Board of Education
• 6th Circuit revives the racial bias case of an African-American couple who sued a hotel for refusing to host their wedding reception. "There is a genuine issue of material fact in this case as to whether ... the Hotel denied them the right to enter into a contract because of their race." Keck v. Graham Hotel Systems
• San Francisco judge rules that a city did not violate a hiker's rights by failing to protect her from an attack on public land by a rancher's cattle. "[P]laintiffs have not alleged facts supporting a claim that the City was deliberately indifferent to a known or obvious danger" to Jo Dee Schmidt. Schmidt v. Hoover
• Divided New York appellate court says a golfer is not liable for striking another golfer in the eye with an errant drive. The defendant's failure to yell "Fore" before hitting the ball "does not rise to the level of creating a dangerous condition over and above the usual dangers inherent in participating in the sport of golf." Anand v. Kapoor
• Sioux tribal members file a class action seeking their share of as much as $900 million held in trust by the federal government as compensation for the "taking" of the Black Hills of South Dakota. The plaintiffs have split from other Sioux who refuse to take the money, insisting on the return of the land. Different Horse v. Salazar
• Texas Court of Appeals says a gas station owner is not liable for the negligence of an attendant who accidentally shot a customer while showing him a gun. The attendant's "actions were not merely a misuse of his authority; they were utterly unrelated to his duties." Glass v. Williams
• San Francisco judge denies Chevron Corp.'s request for $485,159 in court costs from impoverished Nigerian villagers who sued the company for human rights violations. "The economic disparity between plaintiffs, who are Nigerian villagers, and defendants, international oil companies, cannot be more stark." Bowoto v. Chevron

|
|
Endurance Stunt Backer Settles Case over Suicide |
|
 |
Richard Vega
A Texas auto dealership has settled a wrongful-death lawsuit involving its “Hands on a Hardbody” fatigue endurance contest after a judge ruled that it owed a duty to prevent sleep-deprived contestants from harming themselves.
Patterson Nissan of Longview agreed to the settlement days before trial was due to start Aug. 18 in the case filed by the widow of a contestant in the 2005 “Hands on a Hardbody” competition. Richard Vega, 24, killed himself after standing with his hand on a pickup truck for two days in the hope of winning the vehicle.
The amount of the settlement was not disclosed, but plaintiff's attorney Blake Bailey of Tyler, Texas, said things “worked out well” for Vega's widow, Chalala Gutierrez. “There's enough money for [her] to take care of her family,” he said.
The defense had argued in a summary judgment motion that “placing a duty on an entity like Patterson to be the guarantors of the well-being of voluntary contestants is absurd, and will have far-reaching effects on other businesses and enterprises.”
But after a hearing in May, District Court Judge Nathan E. White said the case should go to trial, finding it would not have been unreasonable for Patterson to ensure the safety of contestants who, like Vega, drop out after going without sleep for an extended period of time.
“The defense was saying you have no duty toward a contestant ... no matter what you do, no matter what experience you've had in the past,” Bailey said. “That's kind of a rough thing to say. It always gets back to reasonableness. The question is whether or not there was reasonableness in the way the contest was conducted.”
The prize in “Hands on a Hardbody” went to the contestant who endured standing beside the truck with a hand on it longer than any other. After 48 hours, Vega walked away from the contest, broke into a Kmart across the street and, with a shotgun taken from the store, shot himself in the head.
The contest manager testified in a deposition that one previous contestant became so disoriented he thought he was in Oklahoma, another thought he saw plants on the hood of the truck, and another thought she saw her husband “smooching” another woman.
Gutierrez contended that the contest was “effectively 'an experiment on sleep deprivation'” and required “obvious and common-sense safety measures, such as an escort, debriefing by a trained expert, and/or a mandatory, supervised sleep period.” Contestants got one five-minute break an hour and were given high-energy drinks to keep them going.
According to Bailey, the possibility of harm to a contestant should be weighed against what it would have cost the organizers to mitigate the risk. Judge White, he said, found that “the cost of having a medical professional check people before they leave [the contest] is relatively small.”
In a similar case, a Sacramento man sued a radio station last year, alleging it was liable for the death of his wife after she participated in an on-air water-drinking contest. “It was a stupid contest, period,” Bailey said. “The harm [to a contestant] could be irreversible.”
A “Hands on a Hardbody” contestant, he continued, could avoid the harm of sleep deprivation simply by going home and getting some sleep. Vega, however, never made it home.
By Matthew Heller 8/25/08 
|
|
-
No Prayer Now for Preacher's Suit Over "Religulous"
Less than three weeks after being sued for defrauding two former parishioners of $600,000, a Florida preacher dropped his $50 million lawsuit alleging the Bill Maher documentary “Religulous” falsely portrayed him as a charlatan, On Point has learned.
Read more...
-
Man Burned at Burning Man Assumed Risk
Get too close to the Burning Man fire and you assume the “obvious and inherent” risk of being burned, a California appeals court has ruled in dismissing a personal injury lawsuit against the operators of the iconic countercultural arts festival.
Read more...
-
Lawyer's 'Prove Me Wrong' Offer No Joke to Student
A Texas law student may have taken a $1 million “prove me wrong” challenge seriously, but the criminal defense lawyer who made the challenge on a TV news show appears to have done so with enough tongue in cheek to avoid liability for not paying up.
Read more...
-
Jury Chills Rights in Strip Search Case
A jury has reached a chilling decision in the civil rights case of a Southampton, N.Y., woman, clearing four police officers in the exclusive resort community of liability for performing a strip search on her after a minor marijuana bust.
Read more...
-
Toxic Bra Suits Won't be Combined in Ohio
A rash of lawsuits against Victoria's Secret alleging defectively manufactured underwear is continuing with eight new cases filed in the past two months. But in a setback for plaintiffs, a judicial panel has refused to consolidate all the litigation in Ohio.
Read more...
-
Wedding Fiasco Suit Really Takes Cake
Sandra Newsom's wedding disaster lawsuit may -– literally –- take the cake. The New York woman has sued a cruise ship operator for ruining her wedding reception by serving a coconut-containing cake to which she had an allergic reaction.
Read more...
-
Woody Allen Got $5M After Judge Shredded Defense
A week before American Apparel agreed to pay Woody Allen $5 million for misappropriating his image, a judge had shredded the clothing company's First Amendment defense based on its CEO's “mental processes,” On Point has learned.
Read more...
|
Capitol Records v. Thomas Court: USDC, Minn. Subject: Digital music downloading Verdict: $1.92 million
ASPCA v. Ringling Bros. Court: USDC, D. Col. Subject: Illegal "taking" of elephants by circus
more
|
|
Howard K. Stern v. Rita Cosby Date: 7/7/09 Court: USDC, S. N.Y. Hearing: Motions for summary judgment in defamation case.
Goldberg v. Paris Hilton Entertainment Date: 7/9/09 Court: USDC, S. Fla. Hearing: Jury trial in breach-of-contract case.
more
|
|