
• Parents of a 10-year-old boy who witnessed a killer whale's fatal attack on a trainer sue Sea World Orlando for infliction of emotional distress. "Without question, it was reasonably foreseeable and in fact predictable that an attack such as this one by a killer whale with the tendencies of Tilikum was inevitable." Connell v. Sea World
• Denver judge dismisses Oklahoma City bomber Terry Nichols's civil rights claims against prison officials for denying him a high-fiber diet. Nichols v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
• Illinois teenager with cerebral palsy sues the Special Olympics for refusing to let her play basketball with the help of a service dog. Youngwith v. Special Olympics
• Montana judge sets aside a government decision removing protections for the northern Rocky Mountain gray wolf. The Endangered Species Act "was not intended to sow the dragon's teeth of strife or to plant the seeds of future conflicts that have given rise to this case." Defenders of Wildlife v. Salazar
• San Francisco judge dismisses a cereal consumer's false advertising suit. "[T]here is nothing in the packaging or marketing of Cap’n Crunch that would in any way deceive a reasonable consumer into believing that the cereal contains or derives nutritional value from real fruit." Werbel v. PepsiCo
• Iowa judge says a sheriff denied the applications of a father and son for concealed weapons permits in retaliation for their political activism. "This is a great reminder that the First Amendment protects the sole individual who may be a gadfly, kook, weirdo, nut job, whacko, and spook, with the same force of protection as folks with more majoritarian and popular views." Dorr v. Weber
• 5th Circuit rules that a school district violated the religious freedom of a Native American boy by requiring him to wear his long hair in a bun on top of his head or in a braid tucked into his shirt. The boy "has a sincere religious belief in wearing his hair uncut and in plain view." A.A. v. Needville Ind. Sch. Dist.
• 11th Circuit denies a challenge to an ordinance restricting handouts of food to the homeless in Orlando parks. "[W]e are unpersuaded that the conduct of simply feeding people ... is expressive for First Amendment purposes." First Vagabonds Church v. City of Orlando

|
|
Endurance Stunt Backer Settles Case over Suicide |
|
 |
Richard Vega
A Texas auto dealership has settled a wrongful-death lawsuit involving its “Hands on a Hardbody” fatigue endurance contest after a judge ruled that it owed a duty to prevent sleep-deprived contestants from harming themselves.
Patterson Nissan of Longview agreed to the settlement days before trial was due to start Aug. 18 in the case filed by the widow of a contestant in the 2005 “Hands on a Hardbody” competition. Richard Vega, 24, killed himself after standing with his hand on a pickup truck for two days in the hope of winning the vehicle.
The amount of the settlement was not disclosed, but plaintiff's attorney Blake Bailey of Tyler, Texas, said things “worked out well” for Vega's widow, Chalala Gutierrez. “There's enough money for [her] to take care of her family,” he said.
The defense had argued in a summary judgment motion that “placing a duty on an entity like Patterson to be the guarantors of the well-being of voluntary contestants is absurd, and will have far-reaching effects on other businesses and enterprises.”
But after a hearing in May, District Court Judge Nathan E. White said the case should go to trial, finding it would not have been unreasonable for Patterson to ensure the safety of contestants who, like Vega, drop out after going without sleep for an extended period of time.
“The defense was saying you have no duty toward a contestant ... no matter what you do, no matter what experience you've had in the past,” Bailey said. “That's kind of a rough thing to say. It always gets back to reasonableness. The question is whether or not there was reasonableness in the way the contest was conducted.”
The prize in “Hands on a Hardbody” went to the contestant who endured standing beside the truck with a hand on it longer than any other. After 48 hours, Vega walked away from the contest, broke into a Kmart across the street and, with a shotgun taken from the store, shot himself in the head.
The contest manager testified in a deposition that one previous contestant became so disoriented he thought he was in Oklahoma, another thought he saw plants on the hood of the truck, and another thought she saw her husband “smooching” another woman.
Gutierrez contended that the contest was “effectively 'an experiment on sleep deprivation'” and required “obvious and common-sense safety measures, such as an escort, debriefing by a trained expert, and/or a mandatory, supervised sleep period.” Contestants got one five-minute break an hour and were given high-energy drinks to keep them going.
According to Bailey, the possibility of harm to a contestant should be weighed against what it would have cost the organizers to mitigate the risk. Judge White, he said, found that “the cost of having a medical professional check people before they leave [the contest] is relatively small.”
In a similar case, a Sacramento man sued a radio station last year, alleging it was liable for the death of his wife after she participated in an on-air water-drinking contest. “It was a stupid contest, period,” Bailey said. “The harm [to a contestant] could be irreversible.”
A “Hands on a Hardbody” contestant, he continued, could avoid the harm of sleep deprivation simply by going home and getting some sleep. Vega, however, never made it home.
By Matthew Heller 8/25/08 
|
|
-
Off With His Head! Woman Sues 'Mad Hatter' Actor
Experimental theater clashes with premises liability law in the case of a Kentucky woman who claims she was injured while watching a performance of a circus-inspired play when one of the actors balanced his knee on her head.
Read more...
-
Charity Worker Accuses CEO of Hypnotic Seduction
A former charity worker may be pushing the limits of sexual harassment law by alleging that her boss required her to participate in “relaxation sessions” on his “magic couch” during which he hypnotized and molested her.
Read more...
-
Appeal is Expert's Latest Challenge to Judges
Expert witness Dr. David Egilman was previously successful in showing he had standing to appeal a judicial order in a case in which he was not a party — but that case may not help him in his latest challenge to a trial judge.
Read more...
-
Plaintiff's Expert Files Appeal in 'Popcorn Lung' Lawsuit
A controversial expert witness for plaintiffs has filed an unusual non-party appeal of a Washington state judge's decision finding his theory that snackers can contract lung disease from exposure to microwave popcorn is not scientifically sound.
Read more...
-
Philly School Sued Over Race Attack on Student's Mom
Taking civil rights law to what may be an extreme, an Asian-American woman is alleging a Philadelphia high school's tolerance of racism rendered her “helpless prey” to African-American students who attacked her when she picked her child up from the school.
Read more...
-
'McSteamy' Sex Tape Suit Cools off With Settlement
Acting couple Eric Dane and Rebecca Gayheart have dropped a $1 million lawsuit against Gawker.com for publishing a videotape featuring them in a nude threesome with a friend after the gossip website agreed to take down the much-viewed posting.
Read more...
-
Sex Harassment Claims Hit Actor Affleck, 'Bones' Star
A producer of a film about actor Joaquin Phoenix, an extra on the set of the TV show “Bones,” an assistant property master, and a makeup artist are among the plaintiffs in a recent epidemic of lurid Hollywood lawsuits.
Read more...
|
Arnaout v. Warden Subject: Muslim inmate prayer Document: John Walker Lindh declaration
Marriage of J.B. and H.B. Subject: Same-sex divorce Document: Opinion
Stovell v. James Subject: LeBron's paternity Document: Complaint
U.S. v. Arizona Subject: Illegal immigration Document: Complaint
Rosenberg v. Google Subject: Negligent navigation Document: Complaint
more
|
|
McCourt v. McCourt Court: L.A. Superior Subject: Dodgers divorce
Pom Wonderful v. Welch Foods Court: USDC, C. Calif. Subject: False advertising
more
|
|
McCourt v. McCourt Date: 8/30/10 Court: L.A. Superior Hearing: Dodgers divorce trial
more
|
|
|