
• Parents of a 10-year-old boy who witnessed a killer whale's fatal attack on a trainer sue Sea World Orlando for infliction of emotional distress. "Without question, it was reasonably foreseeable and in fact predictable that an attack such as this one by a killer whale with the tendencies of Tilikum was inevitable." Connell v. Sea World
• Denver judge dismisses Oklahoma City bomber Terry Nichols's civil rights claims against prison officials for denying him a high-fiber diet. Nichols v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
• Illinois teenager with cerebral palsy sues the Special Olympics for refusing to let her play basketball with the help of a service dog. Youngwith v. Special Olympics
• Montana judge sets aside a government decision removing protections for the northern Rocky Mountain gray wolf. The Endangered Species Act "was not intended to sow the dragon's teeth of strife or to plant the seeds of future conflicts that have given rise to this case." Defenders of Wildlife v. Salazar
• San Francisco judge dismisses a cereal consumer's false advertising suit. "[T]here is nothing in the packaging or marketing of Cap’n Crunch that would in any way deceive a reasonable consumer into believing that the cereal contains or derives nutritional value from real fruit." Werbel v. PepsiCo
• Iowa judge says a sheriff denied the applications of a father and son for concealed weapons permits in retaliation for their political activism. "This is a great reminder that the First Amendment protects the sole individual who may be a gadfly, kook, weirdo, nut job, whacko, and spook, with the same force of protection as folks with more majoritarian and popular views." Dorr v. Weber
• 5th Circuit rules that a school district violated the religious freedom of a Native American boy by requiring him to wear his long hair in a bun on top of his head or in a braid tucked into his shirt. The boy "has a sincere religious belief in wearing his hair uncut and in plain view." A.A. v. Needville Ind. Sch. Dist.
• 11th Circuit denies a challenge to an ordinance restricting handouts of food to the homeless in Orlando parks. "[W]e are unpersuaded that the conduct of simply feeding people ... is expressive for First Amendment purposes." First Vagabonds Church v. City of Orlando

|
|
Dirty Dancer Settles with Town -- to Tune of $275K |
|
A former Wyeth Pharmaceuticals (NYSE: WYE) manager says she wasn't expressing racial bias when she described herself as the “head nigger in charge” in front of an African-American employee -– she just had the phrase “fresh in my mind” after seeing the movie “Lean on Me.”
In the film, a school principal played by Morgan Freeman uses the phrase to convey his authority. “When I made the statement, I was referring to myself, and I did not intend to direct my comment at anyone but myself, and further never intended to hurt anyone who may have over heard the comment,” Patricia Stalter says in a court declaration.
Wyeth attached the declaration to a motion for summary dismissal of a discrimination suit filed by the African-American employee who overheard Stalter's comment. Joseph Gibson alleges he was subjected to a hostile work environment based on his race.
“A single offensive racial remark generally is insufficient to create a hostile work environment,” Wyeth argues in the motion.
According to Stalter, who worked at a Wyeth plant in Pearl River, N.Y., she saw “Lean on Me” in early October 2004. After she spoke about it with Francine Townsend, an African-American colleague, she says, “[S]ome of my African-American colleagues, including Townsend, used the 'HNIC' phrase to refer to me in jest on numerous occasions due to my position as a manager.”
On Oct. 26, 2004, Stalter had some trouble exerting her authority over two outside contractors who were visiting the plant. “Out of frustration,” she “blurted out to the contractors that I was the 'head nigger in charge ...”
“The phrase was fresh in my mind,” Stalter declares, “after having recently seen the movie 'Lean on Me' and having heard it from my colleagues recently ... I understand that it was inappropriate, and I deeply regret it.”
Gibson, who was at his desk about 20 feet away, has said that Stalter looked at him and said “Excuse me, Joe” before she made the “HNIC” comment -- which, if true, would suggest she wasn't being entirely spontaneous. She denies saying that in her declaration.
Courts have found the “routine” use of the word “nigger” in the workplace is evidence of discrimination, but Wyeth argues that Stalter uttered the type of “stray remark” which is not considered to be “severe or pervasive” enough to support a hostile work environment claim.
The company cited three cases (see ) in which courts found that “the use of the HNIC phrase is insufficient to demonstrate that a work environment is objectively hostile.”
Stalter got a written warning from Wyeth because of the “HNIC” incident and retired last April after nearly 36 years with the company. A Wyeth spokesman told the Journal News of White Plains, N.Y., that her retirement was not related to the lawsuit.
By Matthew Heller 11/13/08 
After a six-year legal battle over dirty dancing, a North Carolina town has agreed to pay $275,000 to a woman whom it had banned from its community center because of her “sexual gyrations.”
The settlement will come from the Town of Marshall's insurance fund in return for Rebecca Willis dropping her civil-rights suit, which had twice been reinstated by the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.
“I am very happy with this settlement and relieved that the lawsuit is finally over,” Willis said in a statement released by the ACLU. “Although I personally no longer desire to attend dances at the Town Depot, today’s $275,000 settlement should send a message to the Town that in the future, any government-sponsored events should allow for diversity and free expression by members of the community.”
The town could ill afford to risk a trial after the recent pasting it got from the 4th Circuit, which ruled in April that Willis had a triable equal protection claim against the town for treating her differently than other patrons of Friday night concerts at its community center who danced and dressed similarly.
“[A] reasonable jury could conclude that the Town’s actions, rather than being guided by concern for the public welfare, were actually motivated by a conscious desire to single her out for undeserved punishment,” the opinion said.
By Matthew Heller 11/13/08 
|
|
-
Off With His Head! Woman Sues 'Mad Hatter' Actor
Experimental theater clashes with premises liability law in the case of a Kentucky woman who claims she was injured while watching a performance of a circus-inspired play when one of the actors balanced his knee on her head.
Read more...
-
Charity Worker Accuses CEO of Hypnotic Seduction
A former charity worker may be pushing the limits of sexual harassment law by alleging that her boss required her to participate in “relaxation sessions” on his “magic couch” during which he hypnotized and molested her.
Read more...
-
Appeal is Expert's Latest Challenge to Judges
Expert witness Dr. David Egilman was previously successful in showing he had standing to appeal a judicial order in a case in which he was not a party — but that case may not help him in his latest challenge to a trial judge.
Read more...
-
Plaintiff's Expert Files Appeal in 'Popcorn Lung' Lawsuit
A controversial expert witness for plaintiffs has filed an unusual non-party appeal of a Washington state judge's decision finding his theory that snackers can contract lung disease from exposure to microwave popcorn is not scientifically sound.
Read more...
-
Philly School Sued Over Race Attack on Student's Mom
Taking civil rights law to what may be an extreme, an Asian-American woman is alleging a Philadelphia high school's tolerance of racism rendered her “helpless prey” to African-American students who attacked her when she picked her child up from the school.
Read more...
-
'McSteamy' Sex Tape Suit Cools off With Settlement
Acting couple Eric Dane and Rebecca Gayheart have dropped a $1 million lawsuit against Gawker.com for publishing a videotape featuring them in a nude threesome with a friend after the gossip website agreed to take down the much-viewed posting.
Read more...
-
Sex Harassment Claims Hit Actor Affleck, 'Bones' Star
A producer of a film about actor Joaquin Phoenix, an extra on the set of the TV show “Bones,” an assistant property master, and a makeup artist are among the plaintiffs in a recent epidemic of lurid Hollywood lawsuits.
Read more...
|
Arnaout v. Warden Subject: Muslim inmate prayer Document: John Walker Lindh declaration
Marriage of J.B. and H.B. Subject: Same-sex divorce Document: Opinion
Stovell v. James Subject: LeBron's paternity Document: Complaint
U.S. v. Arizona Subject: Illegal immigration Document: Complaint
Rosenberg v. Google Subject: Negligent navigation Document: Complaint
more
|
|
McCourt v. McCourt Court: L.A. Superior Subject: Dodgers divorce
Pom Wonderful v. Welch Foods Court: USDC, C. Calif. Subject: False advertising
more
|
|
McCourt v. McCourt Date: 8/30/10 Court: L.A. Superior Hearing: Dodgers divorce trial
more
|
|
|