
• Owners of Who Dat?, Inc. sue the NFL and the New Orleans Saints for trademark infringement, seeking to protect the mark that "has become one of the most recognizable in all of America and quickly became well-known around the world." Who Dat?, Inc. v. NFL Properties
• Army bomb disposal expert sues the makers of "The Hurt Locker" for plagiarizing his life story. The film is "nothing more than the exploitation of a real life honorable, courageous, and long serving member of our country’s armed forces, by greedy multi-billion dollar 'entertainment' corporations." Sarver v. The Hurt Locker
• Former patient sues the Cincinnati hospital where he was sexually assaulted by a transgender nurse. The nurse's "employment while masquerading as a member of the female gender in a hospital environment involved an unreasonable risk of harm to others." Evans v. University of Cincinnati
• Federal judge enjoins the City of Phoenix from enforcing a noise ordinance against "sound generated in the course of religious expression," finding the right of churches to ring bells outweighs "the City's interest in preserving the peace and tranquility of its neighborhoods." St. Mark Roman Catholic Parish v. City of Phoenix
• 5th Circuit says a Texas city's junked vehicle ordinance applies to a cactus planter made out of wrecked Oldsmobile 88. "Irrespective of the intentions of its creators ... the car-planter is a utilitarian device, an advertisement, and ultimately a 'junked vehicle.'" Kleinman v. City of San Marcos
• Oklahoma City bomber Terry Nichols notifies a federal judge that he has gone on hunger strike, saying he is "prepared to die if necessary because he is done allowing his body to be defiled by [ ] refined and dead foods." Nichols v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
• Texas judge finds the makers of a film about Rin Tin Tin did not infringe on the trademarks of a breeder of German Shepherds. "Defendants['] title 'Finding Rin Tin Tin: The Adventure Continues" is a fair use of the term 'Rin Tin Tin.'" Rin Tin Tin, Inc. v. First Look Studios
• Illinois appeals court says the contact sports exception to negligence liability does not apply to the case of an athletic trainer who was struck in the eye by a hockey puck while refilling water bottles. Michael Weisberg "suffered injuries as a result of alleged conduct that was not inherent to the sport of hockey." Weisberg v. Chicago Steel

|
|
Chinese Medicine Doctor Sued over 'Dangerous' Herbs |
|
|
A Missouri woman has filed an unusual case of malpractice against a doctor of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM), alleging Zhengang Guo fell below the standard of care by prescribing Chinese herbs that caused her to suffer kidney failure.
Delores Drury's case challenges the notion that Chinese herbs are free of the harmful side effects often associated with prescription drugs. After being treated for a variety of ailments by Patrick Kennedy, a St. Louis-area chiropractor who ordered herbs from Guo, she allegedly developed a kidney condition known as “Chinese herb nephropathy” (CHN).
“Defendants knew, or by using ordinary care, should have known that said Chinese herbs caused unreasonably dangerous risks and serious side effects of which the general public would not be aware,” Drury alleges in a complaint filed Dec. 31 in Cook County (Ill.) Circuit Court.
Guo is a seventh-generation Chinese medicine doctor and the founder of Life Rising, which operates clinics in Chicago. According to Drury, the herbs he prescribed for her contained aristolochic acid, a naturally occuring toxin which some researchers have linked to CHN.
“Plaintiff's Chinese herb nephropathy, kidney disease, and renal failure occurred as a result of her ingestion of the Chinese herbs” prescribed by Guo, the suit says.
Alternative medicine practitioners have generally been insulated from malpractice suits, in part because there is no established standard of care in the field. In Charell v. Gonzales, 660 N.Y.S.2d 665 (1997), a New York judge upheld a malpractice verdict against a licensed physician who used hair analysis and nutritional care to treat a cancer patient.
“Since using a complementary and alternative therapy invariably deviates from the standard of care, physicians cannot undertake a responsible, measured integration of such therapies in clinical practice without risking malpractice exposure,” Michael H. Cohen, a Newport Beach, Calif., attorney who specializes in alternative medicine law, says on his blog.
But Guo is not a licensed physician so Drury alleges a duty “to exercise that degree of care and caution commonly exercised by other [Chinese medicine] practitioners in the community.” Prescribing herbs that contained aristolochic acid and failing to warn her of their alleged side effects, she argues, falls below that standard of care.
Drury's ailments included headaches, joint aches and bowel irritation. Kennedy -– who is not named as a defendant -– treated her between 2003 and 2007 and she also visited Guo at his office in May and August of 2005.
At the very least, the case faces a causation problem since there appears to be no definitive evidence that the amount of aristolochic acid present in a herbal formula is unsafe.
In the 1990s, researchers investigated cases of nephropathy at a Belgian weight loss clinic where dieters were given a mixture of drugs, including serotonin, and herbs. Samples of the mixture showed aristolochic acid but, according to one review of the scientific literature, the dosage was “much lower than would be expected to exert nephrotoxic effects.”
Several incidents of aristolochic acid-related nephropathy have been reported elsewhere in recent years, the review says, but “[i]n none of these cases were the herbs prescribed by a fully trained and licensed practitioner of traditional Chinese medicine.”
According to the Life Rising website, Guo trained as both a TCM practitioner and conventional physician and has taught herbal medicine at the University of Illinois.
|
UPDATE
Drury has sued Dr. Kennedy separately in St. Louis County (Mo.) Circuit Court.
|
By Matthew Heller 1/9/09
|
|
-
"Upskirting" Victim Loses Privacy Suit Against Store
A customer at a T.J. Maxx store in upstate New York has lost her lawsuit against the retailer for allowing a man to take photos up her skirt by using her as “human bait” in a sting operation.
Read more...
-
Perfume Allergy Case Settles for $100,000
A Detroit city planner with an allergy to perfume is savoring the sweet smell of legal success after the city agreed to pay her $100,000 and be more sensitive to the chemically sensitive.
Read more...
-
Teen's Suit Puts Mug-Shot Publisher Against the Wall
A new publication in Lincoln, Neb., milks mug shots for humor. But a teenager whose arrest photo appeared in Cuffed doesn't see the funny side of it and has sued the publisher for misappropriating his image.
Read more...
-
BA Settles 'Reckless' Baggage Handling Suit
Limiting its liability to a group of only 13 airline passengers, British Airways (NYSE: BAY) has settled a first-of-its kind lawsuit that accused the airline of being “inexcusably reckless” in its handling of passengers' baggage.
Read more...
-
Judge Says "Gay" Still Defamatory in Texas
What one court has called “a veritable sea change in social attitudes about homosexuality” has evidently not reached Texas where a judge ruled that an airport security guard can sue a radio show host for calling him “gay” on the air.
Read more...
-
Mom Says Hospital Gave Her Wrong Baby to Nurse
Because of a hospital's error, Jennifer Spiegel became an involuntary wet nurse to another woman's newborn son. Now she is suing the hospital for its malpractice in providing her with the wrong baby to breastfeed.
Read more...
-
Case Over MySpace Page Chills Student Speech
Several recent court rulings have been protective of off-campus student speech -– with the exception of a very shaky decision that a dissenting judge said “vests school officials with dangerously overbroad censorship discretion.”
Read more...
|
Newdow v. Rio Lindo Union Sch. Dist. Subject: Pledge of allegiance Document: Opinion
Vance v. Rumsfeld Subject: Detainee abuse Document: Opinion
Stern v. Sony Corp. Subject: Disabled gamers Document: Opinion
Churchill v. Univ. of Colorado Subject: Academic freedom Document: ACLU amicus brief
KBR/Halliburton v. Jones Subject: Sexual assault Document: Petition for review
more
|
|
Spears v. Allergan, Inc. Court: Orange County (Calif.) Superior Subject: Botox death Verdict: Defense
Patterson v. Hudson Area Schools Court: USDC, E. Mich. Subject: Student harassment
more
|
|
McClain v. Pfizer, Inc. Date: 3/2/10 Court: USDC, Conn. Hearing: Jury trial in case over unsafe lab conditions.
Sherman v. McDonald's Corp. Date: 3/23/10 Court: Washington County (Ark.) Circuit Hearing: Jury trial in case over nude photos.
more
|
|
|