Perry v. Schwarzenegger
Judge strikes down California's same-sex marriage ban, finding that "Moral disapproval alone is an improper basis on which to deny rights to gay men and lesbians."
U.S. v. Arizona
Arizona judge enjoins enforcement of a new immigration law's requirement that police determine the immigration status of
every person who is arrested.
McGuire v. United Airlines
Michigan woman says a United Express flight crew locked her in a plane for nearly four hours after it landed because they failed to ensure that all passengers had disembarked.
R.H. v. Schenectady Sch. Dist.
Middle school student says he was suspended for wearing rosary beads because the rosary "is considered a gang-related symbol" and cannot be worn in school.
lc_search
LC_DayByDay

 Aug   September 10   Oct

SMTWTFS
   1  2  3  4
  5  6  7  8  91011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930 
Julianna Willis Technology
LC_BySubject
OnTheMap

rss

LC_ExtraPoints

• Parents of a 10-year-old boy who witnessed a killer whale's fatal attack on a trainer sue Sea World Orlando for infliction of emotional distress. "Without question, it was reasonably foreseeable and in fact predictable that an attack such as this one by a killer whale with the tendencies of Tilikum was inevitable." Connell v. Sea World

• Denver judge dismisses Oklahoma City bomber Terry Nichols's civil rights claims against prison officials for denying him a high-fiber diet.
Nichols v. Federal Bureau of Prisons

• Illinois teenager with cerebral palsy sues the Special Olympics for refusing to let her play basketball with the help of a service dog.
Youngwith v. Special Olympics

• Montana judge sets aside a government decision removing protections for the northern Rocky Mountain gray wolf. The Endangered Species Act "was not intended to sow the dragon's teeth of strife or to plant the seeds of future conflicts that have given rise to this case."
Defenders of Wildlife v. Salazar

• San Francisco judge dismisses a cereal consumer's false advertising suit. "[T]here is nothing in the packaging or marketing of Cap’n Crunch that would in any way deceive a reasonable consumer into believing that the cereal contains or derives nutritional value from real fruit." Werbel v. PepsiCo

• Iowa judge says a sheriff denied the applications of a father and son for concealed weapons permits in retaliation for their political activism. "This is a great reminder that the First Amendment protects the sole individual who may be a gadfly, kook, weirdo, nut job, whacko, and spook, with the same force of protection as folks with more majoritarian and popular views." Dorr v. Weber

• 5th Circuit rules that a school district violated the religious freedom of a Native American boy by requiring him to wear his long hair in a bun on top of his head or in a braid tucked into his shirt. The boy "has a sincere religious belief in wearing his hair uncut and in plain view."
A.A. v. Needville Ind. Sch. Dist.

• 11th Circuit denies a challenge to an ordinance restricting handouts of food to the homeless in Orlando parks. "[W]e are unpersuaded that the conduct of simply feeding people ... is expressive for First Amendment purposes."
First Vagabonds Church v. City of Orlando




Alltop_125x125.jpg

ADVERT

Free no win no fee claims advice for personal injury.


ADVERT

For accident claims advice, visit a personal injury lawyer.


ADVERT

Injury Claims

Carol Burnett Parody "Offensive" But Suit Tossed Print

A Los Angeles judge waxed nostalgic about the “self-imposed restraint” of “old media,” but still found that a “new media” parody of Carol Burnett's “Charwoman” character was protected from the star's copyright suit.

Burnett objected to an 18-second segment on Fox's animated show “The Family Guy” which portrayed her Charwoman mopping the floor of a porn shop accompanied by a version of the theme music from “The Carol Burnett Show.” She sued Fox in March for copyright infringement and violation of publicity rights.

Ruling on Fox's motion to dismiss, U.S. District Judge Dean D. Pregerson described Burnett as “an icon in American culture” and recognized “how distasteful and offensive the segment is to Ms. Burnett.”

“To some extent this dispute is indicative of how far the 'new media' has come from the 'old media,'” he said, recalling wistfully that “crude jokes and insensitive, often mean-spirited, programming” used to be confined to live nightclub performances. “In the new media, any self-imposed restraint essentially has been eliminated.”

Nevertheless, the judge dismissed the case, concluding in his order that “the law, as it must in an open society, provides broad protection for the defendant's segment.”

The First Amendment protects a parody as long as it takes “no more from the original than necessary to accomplish reasonably.” A FindLaw columnist thought Fox might have gone too far by using Burnett's name in dialogue, depicting “Charwoman” in her “trademark blue bonnet,” and using the theme music.

“Burnett may be able to persuade a judge that 'The Family Guy' borrowed more than it had to,” Julie Hilden speculated.

But Pregerson found that argument “unpersuasive ... Here, Family Guy takes just enough of the imagery and accompanying theme music to make this crude depiction of the Charwoman character 'recognizable' to viewers.”

In her complaint, Burnett alleged that Fox had the “Peterotica” episode of “The Family Guy” rewritten to disparage her after she refused permission for the show to use her theme music. Pregerson's ruling does not address that allegation.

“As Ms. Burnett well knows, it takes far more creative talent to create a character such as 'Charwoman' than to use such characters in a crude parody,” Pregerson sympathized. “Perhaps Ms. Burnett can take solace in that fact.”

The owners of the rights to “Barney” recently dropped a suit over an online parody of the children's TV character. A case involving a Kanye West music video parody of an Evel Knievel stunt is pending in Florida.

By Matthew Heller
6/7/07

 
rc_insidestories
  • Off With His Head! Woman Sues 'Mad Hatter' Actor

    Experimental theater clashes with premises liability law in the case of a Kentucky woman who claims she was injured while watching a performance of a circus-inspired play when one of the actors balanced his knee on her head.
    Read more...
  • Charity Worker Accuses CEO of Hypnotic Seduction

    A former charity worker may be pushing the limits of sexual harassment law by alleging that her boss required her to participate in “relaxation sessions” on his “magic couch” during which he hypnotized and molested her.
    Read more...
  • Appeal is Expert's Latest Challenge to Judges

    Expert witness Dr. David Egilman was previously successful in showing he had standing to appeal a judicial order in a case in which he was not a party — but that case may not help him in his latest challenge to a trial judge.
    Read more...
  • Plaintiff's Expert Files Appeal in 'Popcorn Lung' Lawsuit

    A controversial expert witness for plaintiffs has filed an unusual non-party appeal of a Washington state judge's decision finding his theory that snackers can contract lung disease from exposure to microwave popcorn is not scientifically sound.
    Read more...
  • Philly School Sued Over Race Attack on Student's Mom

    Taking civil rights law to what may be an extreme, an Asian-American woman is alleging a Philadelphia high school's tolerance of racism rendered her “helpless prey” to African-American students who attacked her when she picked her child up from the school.
    Read more...
  • 'McSteamy' Sex Tape Suit Cools off With Settlement

    Acting couple Eric Dane and Rebecca Gayheart have dropped a $1 million lawsuit against Gawker.com for publishing a videotape featuring them in a nude threesome with a friend after the gossip website agreed to take down the much-viewed posting.
    Read more...
  • Sex Harassment Claims Hit Actor Affleck, 'Bones' Star

    A producer of a film about actor Joaquin Phoenix, an extra on the set of the TV show “Bones,” an assistant property master, and a makeup artist are among the plaintiffs in a recent epidemic of lurid Hollywood lawsuits.
    Read more...
RC_OnFile

Arnaout v. Warden
Subject: Muslim inmate prayer
Document: John Walker Lindh declaration

Marriage of J.B. and H.B.
Subject: Same-sex divorce
Document: Opinion

Stovell v. James
Subject: LeBron's paternity
Document: Complaint

U.S. v. Arizona
Subject: Illegal immigration
Document: Complaint

Rosenberg v. Google
Subject: Negligent navigation
Document: Complaint

more

RC_OnTrial

McCourt v. McCourt
Court: L.A. Superior
Subject: Dodgers divorce

Pom Wonderful v. Welch Foods
Court: USDC, C. Calif.
Subject: False advertising

more


RC_OnTheDocket

McCourt v. McCourt
Date: 8/30/10
Court: L.A. Superior
Hearing: Dodgers divorce trial

more