
• Owners of Who Dat?, Inc. sue the NFL and the New Orleans Saints for trademark infringement, seeking to protect the mark that "has become one of the most recognizable in all of America and quickly became well-known around the world." Who Dat?, Inc. v. NFL Properties
• Army bomb disposal expert sues the makers of "The Hurt Locker" for plagiarizing his life story. The film is "nothing more than the exploitation of a real life honorable, courageous, and long serving member of our country’s armed forces, by greedy multi-billion dollar 'entertainment' corporations." Sarver v. The Hurt Locker
• Former patient sues the Cincinnati hospital where he was sexually assaulted by a transgender nurse. The nurse's "employment while masquerading as a member of the female gender in a hospital environment involved an unreasonable risk of harm to others." Evans v. University of Cincinnati
• Federal judge enjoins the City of Phoenix from enforcing a noise ordinance against "sound generated in the course of religious expression," finding the right of churches to ring bells outweighs "the City's interest in preserving the peace and tranquility of its neighborhoods." St. Mark Roman Catholic Parish v. City of Phoenix
• 5th Circuit says a Texas city's junked vehicle ordinance applies to a cactus planter made out of wrecked Oldsmobile 88. "Irrespective of the intentions of its creators ... the car-planter is a utilitarian device, an advertisement, and ultimately a 'junked vehicle.'" Kleinman v. City of San Marcos
• Oklahoma City bomber Terry Nichols notifies a federal judge that he has gone on hunger strike, saying he is "prepared to die if necessary because he is done allowing his body to be defiled by [ ] refined and dead foods." Nichols v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
• Texas judge finds the makers of a film about Rin Tin Tin did not infringe on the trademarks of a breeder of German Shepherds. "Defendants['] title 'Finding Rin Tin Tin: The Adventure Continues" is a fair use of the term 'Rin Tin Tin.'" Rin Tin Tin, Inc. v. First Look Studios
• Illinois appeals court says the contact sports exception to negligence liability does not apply to the case of an athletic trainer who was struck in the eye by a hockey puck while refilling water bottles. Michael Weisberg "suffered injuries as a result of alleged conduct that was not inherent to the sport of hockey." Weisberg v. Chicago Steel

|
|
Carol Burnett Parody "Offensive" But Suit Tossed |
|
A Los Angeles judge waxed nostalgic about the “self-imposed restraint” of “old media,” but still found that a “new media” parody of Carol Burnett's “Charwoman” character was protected from the star's copyright suit.
Burnett objected to an 18-second segment on Fox's animated show “The Family Guy” which portrayed her Charwoman mopping the floor of a porn shop accompanied by a version of the theme music from “The Carol Burnett Show.” She sued Fox in March for copyright infringement and violation of publicity rights.
Ruling on Fox's motion to dismiss, U.S. District Judge Dean D. Pregerson described Burnett as “an icon in American culture” and recognized “how distasteful and offensive the segment is to Ms. Burnett.”
“To some extent this dispute is indicative of how far the 'new media' has come from the 'old media,'” he said, recalling wistfully that “crude jokes and insensitive, often mean-spirited, programming” used to be confined to live nightclub performances. “In the new media, any self-imposed restraint essentially has been eliminated.”
Nevertheless, the judge dismissed the case, concluding in his order that “the law, as it must in an open society, provides broad protection for the defendant's segment.”
The First Amendment protects a parody as long as it takes “no more from the original than necessary to accomplish reasonably.” A FindLaw columnist thought Fox might have gone too far by using Burnett's name in dialogue, depicting “Charwoman” in her “trademark blue bonnet,” and using the theme music.
“Burnett may be able to persuade a judge that 'The Family Guy' borrowed more than it had to,” Julie Hilden speculated.
But Pregerson found that argument “unpersuasive ... Here, Family Guy takes just enough of the imagery and accompanying theme music to make this crude depiction of the Charwoman character 'recognizable' to viewers.”
In her complaint, Burnett alleged that Fox had the “Peterotica” episode of “The Family Guy” rewritten to disparage her after she refused permission for the show to use her theme music. Pregerson's ruling does not address that allegation.
“As Ms. Burnett well knows, it takes far more creative talent to create a character such as 'Charwoman' than to use such characters in a crude parody,” Pregerson sympathized. “Perhaps Ms. Burnett can take solace in that fact.”
The owners of the rights to “Barney” recently dropped a suit over an online parody of the children's TV character. A case involving a Kanye West music video parody of an Evel Knievel stunt is pending in Florida.
By Matthew Heller 6/7/07
|
|
-
"Upskirting" Victim Loses Privacy Suit Against Store
A customer at a T.J. Maxx store in upstate New York has lost her lawsuit against the retailer for allowing a man to take photos up her skirt by using her as “human bait” in a sting operation.
Read more...
-
Perfume Allergy Case Settles for $100,000
A Detroit city planner with an allergy to perfume is savoring the sweet smell of legal success after the city agreed to pay her $100,000 and be more sensitive to the chemically sensitive.
Read more...
-
Teen's Suit Puts Mug-Shot Publisher Against the Wall
A new publication in Lincoln, Neb., milks mug shots for humor. But a teenager whose arrest photo appeared in Cuffed doesn't see the funny side of it and has sued the publisher for misappropriating his image.
Read more...
-
BA Settles 'Reckless' Baggage Handling Suit
Limiting its liability to a group of only 13 airline passengers, British Airways (NYSE: BAY) has settled a first-of-its kind lawsuit that accused the airline of being “inexcusably reckless” in its handling of passengers' baggage.
Read more...
-
Judge Says "Gay" Still Defamatory in Texas
What one court has called “a veritable sea change in social attitudes about homosexuality” has evidently not reached Texas where a judge ruled that an airport security guard can sue a radio show host for calling him “gay” on the air.
Read more...
-
Mom Says Hospital Gave Her Wrong Baby to Nurse
Because of a hospital's error, Jennifer Spiegel became an involuntary wet nurse to another woman's newborn son. Now she is suing the hospital for its malpractice in providing her with the wrong baby to breastfeed.
Read more...
-
Case Over MySpace Page Chills Student Speech
Several recent court rulings have been protective of off-campus student speech -– with the exception of a very shaky decision that a dissenting judge said “vests school officials with dangerously overbroad censorship discretion.”
Read more...
|
Newdow v. Rio Lindo Union Sch. Dist. Subject: Pledge of allegiance Document: Opinion
Vance v. Rumsfeld Subject: Detainee abuse Document: Opinion
Stern v. Sony Corp. Subject: Disabled gamers Document: Opinion
Churchill v. Univ. of Colorado Subject: Academic freedom Document: ACLU amicus brief
KBR/Halliburton v. Jones Subject: Sexual assault Document: Petition for review
more
|
|
Spears v. Allergan, Inc. Court: Orange County (Calif.) Superior Subject: Botox death Verdict: Defense
Patterson v. Hudson Area Schools Court: USDC, E. Mich. Subject: Student harassment
more
|
|
McClain v. Pfizer, Inc. Date: 3/2/10 Court: USDC, Conn. Hearing: Jury trial in case over unsafe lab conditions.
Sherman v. McDonald's Corp. Date: 3/23/10 Court: Washington County (Ark.) Circuit Hearing: Jury trial in case over nude photos.
more
|
|
|