
• Boston judge refuses to require Massachusetts to include materials that deny the Armenian genocide in the public school curriculum. "[T]he decision as to what to teach about ... the Armenian genocide must be made by elected officials, educators, and teachers rather than by federal judges." Griswold v. Driscoll
• Kentucky Court of Appeals upholds a $3.7 million jury award against a school board for ignoring a student's complaints that several teachers had molested her. Plaintiff Lynne Maner "presented sufficient evidence that the Board was deliberately indifferen[t] in its failure to act." Maner v. Fayette County Board of Education
• 6th Circuit revives the racial bias case of an African-American couple who sued a hotel for refusing to host their wedding reception. "There is a genuine issue of material fact in this case as to whether ... the Hotel denied them the right to enter into a contract because of their race." Keck v. Graham Hotel Systems
• San Francisco judge rules that a city did not violate a hiker's rights by failing to protect her from an attack on public land by a rancher's cattle. "[P]laintiffs have not alleged facts supporting a claim that the City was deliberately indifferent to a known or obvious danger" to Jo Dee Schmidt. Schmidt v. Hoover
• Divided New York appellate court says a golfer is not liable for striking another golfer in the eye with an errant drive. The defendant's failure to yell "Fore" before hitting the ball "does not rise to the level of creating a dangerous condition over and above the usual dangers inherent in participating in the sport of golf." Anand v. Kapoor
• Sioux tribal members file a class action seeking their share of as much as $900 million held in trust by the federal government as compensation for the "taking" of the Black Hills of South Dakota. The plaintiffs have split from other Sioux who refuse to take the money, insisting on the return of the land. Different Horse v. Salazar
• Texas Court of Appeals says a gas station owner is not liable for the negligence of an attendant who accidentally shot a customer while showing him a gun. The attendant's "actions were not merely a misuse of his authority; they were utterly unrelated to his duties." Glass v. Williams
• San Francisco judge denies Chevron Corp.'s request for $485,159 in court costs from impoverished Nigerian villagers who sued the company for human rights violations. "The economic disparity between plaintiffs, who are Nigerian villagers, and defendants, international oil companies, cannot be more stark." Bowoto v. Chevron

|
|
Carol Burnett Parody "Offensive" But Suit Tossed |
|
A Los Angeles judge waxed nostalgic about the “self-imposed restraint” of “old media,” but still found that a “new media” parody of Carol Burnett's “Charwoman” character was protected from the star's copyright suit.
Burnett objected to an 18-second segment on Fox's animated show “The Family Guy” which portrayed her Charwoman mopping the floor of a porn shop accompanied by a version of the theme music from “The Carol Burnett Show.” She sued Fox in March for copyright infringement and violation of publicity rights.
Ruling on Fox's motion to dismiss, U.S. District Judge Dean D. Pregerson described Burnett as “an icon in American culture” and recognized “how distasteful and offensive the segment is to Ms. Burnett.”
“To some extent this dispute is indicative of how far the 'new media' has come from the 'old media,'” he said, recalling wistfully that “crude jokes and insensitive, often mean-spirited, programming” used to be confined to live nightclub performances. “In the new media, any self-imposed restraint essentially has been eliminated.”
Nevertheless, the judge dismissed the case, concluding in his order that “the law, as it must in an open society, provides broad protection for the defendant's segment.”
The First Amendment protects a parody as long as it takes “no more from the original than necessary to accomplish reasonably.” A FindLaw columnist thought Fox might have gone too far by using Burnett's name in dialogue, depicting “Charwoman” in her “trademark blue bonnet,” and using the theme music.
“Burnett may be able to persuade a judge that 'The Family Guy' borrowed more than it had to,” Julie Hilden speculated.
But Pregerson found that argument “unpersuasive ... Here, Family Guy takes just enough of the imagery and accompanying theme music to make this crude depiction of the Charwoman character 'recognizable' to viewers.”
In her complaint, Burnett alleged that Fox had the “Peterotica” episode of “The Family Guy” rewritten to disparage her after she refused permission for the show to use her theme music. Pregerson's ruling does not address that allegation.
“As Ms. Burnett well knows, it takes far more creative talent to create a character such as 'Charwoman' than to use such characters in a crude parody,” Pregerson sympathized. “Perhaps Ms. Burnett can take solace in that fact.”
The owners of the rights to “Barney” recently dropped a suit over an online parody of the children's TV character. A case involving a Kanye West music video parody of an Evel Knievel stunt is pending in Florida.
By Matthew Heller 6/7/07
|
|
-
No Prayer Now for Preacher's Suit Over "Religulous"
Less than three weeks after being sued for defrauding two former parishioners of $600,000, a Florida preacher dropped his $50 million lawsuit alleging the Bill Maher documentary “Religulous” falsely portrayed him as a charlatan, On Point has learned.
Read more...
-
Man Burned at Burning Man Assumed Risk
Get too close to the Burning Man fire and you assume the “obvious and inherent” risk of being burned, a California appeals court has ruled in dismissing a personal injury lawsuit against the operators of the iconic countercultural arts festival.
Read more...
-
Lawyer's 'Prove Me Wrong' Offer No Joke to Student
A Texas law student may have taken a $1 million “prove me wrong” challenge seriously, but the criminal defense lawyer who made the challenge on a TV news show appears to have done so with enough tongue in cheek to avoid liability for not paying up.
Read more...
-
Jury Chills Rights in Strip Search Case
A jury has reached a chilling decision in the civil rights case of a Southampton, N.Y., woman, clearing four police officers in the exclusive resort community of liability for performing a strip search on her after a minor marijuana bust.
Read more...
-
Toxic Bra Suits Won't be Combined in Ohio
A rash of lawsuits against Victoria's Secret alleging defectively manufactured underwear is continuing with eight new cases filed in the past two months. But in a setback for plaintiffs, a judicial panel has refused to consolidate all the litigation in Ohio.
Read more...
-
Wedding Fiasco Suit Really Takes Cake
Sandra Newsom's wedding disaster lawsuit may -– literally –- take the cake. The New York woman has sued a cruise ship operator for ruining her wedding reception by serving a coconut-containing cake to which she had an allergic reaction.
Read more...
-
Woody Allen Got $5M After Judge Shredded Defense
A week before American Apparel agreed to pay Woody Allen $5 million for misappropriating his image, a judge had shredded the clothing company's First Amendment defense based on its CEO's “mental processes,” On Point has learned.
Read more...
|
Capitol Records v. Thomas Court: USDC, Minn. Subject: Digital music downloading Verdict: $1.92 million
ASPCA v. Ringling Bros. Court: USDC, D. Col. Subject: Illegal "taking" of elephants by circus
more
|
|
Howard K. Stern v. Rita Cosby Date: 7/7/09 Court: USDC, S. N.Y. Hearing: Motions for summary judgment in defamation case.
Goldberg v. Paris Hilton Entertainment Date: 7/9/09 Court: USDC, S. Fla. Hearing: Jury trial in breach-of-contract case.
more
|
|