Perry v. Schwarzenegger
Judge strikes down California's same-sex marriage ban, finding that "Moral disapproval alone is an improper basis on which to deny rights to gay men and lesbians."
U.S. v. Arizona
Arizona judge enjoins enforcement of a new immigration law's requirement that police determine the immigration status of
every person who is arrested.
McGuire v. United Airlines
Michigan woman says a United Express flight crew locked her in a plane for nearly four hours after it landed because they failed to ensure that all passengers had disembarked.
R.H. v. Schenectady Sch. Dist.
Middle school student says he was suspended for wearing rosary beads because the rosary "is considered a gang-related symbol" and cannot be worn in school.
lc_search
LC_DayByDay

 Aug   September 10   Oct

SMTWTFS
   1  2  3  4
  5  6  7  8  91011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930 
Julianna Walker Willis Technology
LC_BySubject
OnTheMap

rss

LC_ExtraPoints

• 9th Circuit says the U.S. may be held vicariously liable for the sexual harassment of asylum applicants by an INS officer. "California law makes the United States bear the cost of [Thomas] Powell’s conduct, unauthorized but incidental to the asylum system." Lu v. Powell

• Nevada man sues the Mormon church over a back injury he suffered performing baptisms for the dead. The church was negligent in not warning Daniel Dastrup that "the repetitive motion required for performing baptisms for the dead could cause serious damage to a person's back."
Dastrup v. LDS Church

• Attorney says he was harassed by his boss at a Newport Beach, Calif., law firm because refused to attend a seminar "where he would be stripped naked, not allowed to leave, be required to discuss details of his sex life, handle a wooden dildo, and potentially allow other men to touch his genitals."
Eggleston v. Bisnar/Chase

• Parents of a 10-year-old boy who witnessed a killer whale's fatal attack on a trainer sue Sea World Orlando for infliction of emotional distress. "Without question, it was reasonably foreseeable and in fact predictable that an attack such as this one by a killer whale with the tendencies of Tilikum was inevitable." Connell v. Sea World

• Denver judge dismisses Oklahoma City bomber Terry Nichols's civil rights claims against prison officials for denying him a high-fiber diet.
Nichols v. Federal Bureau of Prisons

• Illinois teenager with cerebral palsy sues the Special Olympics for refusing to let her play basketball with the help of a service dog.
Youngwith v. Special Olympics

• Montana judge sets aside a government decision removing protections for the northern Rocky Mountain gray wolf. The Endangered Species Act "was not intended to sow the dragon's teeth of strife or to plant the seeds of future conflicts that have given rise to this case."
Defenders of Wildlife v. Salazar

• San Francisco judge dismisses a cereal consumer's false advertising suit. "[T]here is nothing in the packaging or marketing of Cap’n Crunch that would in any way deceive a reasonable consumer into believing that the cereal contains or derives nutritional value from real fruit." Werbel v. PepsiCo

• Iowa judge says a sheriff denied the applications of a father and son for concealed weapons permits in retaliation for their political activism. "This is a great reminder that the First Amendment protects the sole individual who may be a gadfly, kook, weirdo, nut job, whacko, and spook, with the same force of protection as folks with more majoritarian and popular views." Dorr v. Weber

• 5th Circuit rules that a school district violated the religious freedom of a Native American boy by requiring him to wear his long hair in a bun on top of his head or in a braid tucked into his shirt. The boy "has a sincere religious belief in wearing his hair uncut and in plain view."
A.A. v. Needville Ind. Sch. Dist.




Alltop_125x125.jpg

ADVERT

Free no win no fee claims advice for personal injury.


ADVERT

For accident claims advice, visit a personal injury lawyer.


ADVERT

Injury Claims

Airline Claims Removal of "Flying Imams" Rational Print

A US Airways pilot removed six Muslim scholars from a flight for safety reasons alone after a passenger reported they had cursed American involvement in Iraq, the airline says in a court document.

Captain John Wood “rationally and reasonably evaluated the information provided to him, and determined that denial of transportation was necessary to ensure the safety of the flight,” a motion for summary dismissal of the “flying imams” religious bias case argues.

The scholars, one of whom is blind and walks with a cane, claim there was nothing rational about what happened to them as they were on a plane awaiting departure from the Minneapolis-St. Paul Airport. But their case hasn't attracted much sympathy, in part because they sued not only US Airways but also unidentified passengers who reported their “suspicious behavior.”

According to the airline, a passenger seated behind two of the imams passed a handwritten note to a flight attendant which stated:

6 suspicious Arabic men on plane, spaced out in their seats. All were together, saying “.....Allah......Allah,” cursing US involvement w/ Saddam before flight - 1 in front exit row, another in first row 1st class, another in 8D, another in 22D, two in 25 E&F.

Another flight attendant also noticed that Omar Shahin and Marwan Sadeddin had requested seatbelt extenders when only one of them seemed to need one and that Shahin, who was seated in first class, had twice walked back to the coach section to speak with his companions.

More information came from a customer service manager in Phoenix, who mistakenly told Captain Wood that three of the scholars were traveling on one-way tickets.

“The Captain’s decision [to remove the imams from the plane] was reasonable in light of the time constraints under which he was operating, the various independent reports he received regarding Plaintiffs’ behavior and travel arrangements, and the heightened security climate within which all airlines operate since 9/11,” the summary judgment motion says.

The brief also tries to explain why, even after FBI agents and Secret Service agents found no reason to detain the scholars, US Airways refused to let them travel home to Phoenix on another of its flights.

“[A]lthough US Airways personnel provided law enforcement with their contact information, no law enforcement personnel contacted US Airways at [the airport] or US Airways corporate headquarters to inform them that Plaintiffs had been cleared to travel,” it says.

Captain Wood's reaction still seems excessive. What was so dangerous about chanting “Allah,” asking for seatbelt extenders or moving through the cabin?

US Airways cites Al-Qudhai’een v. America West Airlines, 267 F. Supp. 2d 841 (2003), in which an airline was found immune from liability for removing two Saudi Arabian passengers from a plane. But the behavior of those passengers –- they failed to follow crew instructions, changed seats without permission, and walked up to the cockpit and pulled the door handle –- was more provocative than what the imams allegedly did.

By Matthew Heller
6/24/07

 
rc_insidestories
  • Court Raps Judge Over 'Moral' Views in Adoption Case

    The Georgia Court of Appeals has rejected the reactionary views of a family court judge who ruled that a foster parent could not adopt a child because her out-of-wedlock relationship with a man was “immoral.”
    Read more...
  • Off With His Head! Woman Sues 'Mad Hatter' Actor

    Experimental theater clashes with premises liability law in the case of a Kentucky woman who claims she was injured while watching a performance of a circus-inspired play when one of the actors balanced his knee on her head.
    Read more...
  • Charity Worker Accuses CEO of Hypnotic Seduction

    A former charity worker may be pushing the limits of sexual harassment law by alleging that her boss required her to participate in “relaxation sessions” on his “magic couch” during which he hypnotized and molested her.
    Read more...
  • Appeal is Expert's Latest Challenge to Judges

    Expert witness Dr. David Egilman was previously successful in showing he had standing to appeal a judicial order in a case in which he was not a party — but that case may not help him in his latest challenge to a trial judge.
    Read more...
  • Plaintiff's Expert Files Appeal in 'Popcorn Lung' Lawsuit

    A controversial expert witness for plaintiffs has filed an unusual non-party appeal of a Washington state judge's decision finding his theory that snackers can contract lung disease from exposure to microwave popcorn is not scientifically sound.
    Read more...
  • Philly School Sued Over Race Attack on Student's Mom

    Taking civil rights law to what may be an extreme, an Asian-American woman is alleging a Philadelphia high school's tolerance of racism rendered her “helpless prey” to African-American students who attacked her when she picked her child up from the school.
    Read more...
  • 'McSteamy' Sex Tape Suit Cools off With Settlement

    Acting couple Eric Dane and Rebecca Gayheart have dropped a $1 million lawsuit against Gawker.com for publishing a videotape featuring them in a nude threesome with a friend after the gossip website agreed to take down the much-viewed posting.
    Read more...
RC_OnFile

Mohamed v. Jeppesen Dataplan
Subject: State secrets
Document: En banc opinion

Young v. Facebook
Subject: Discrimination
Document: Complaint

LaRocco v. McDonald's
Subject: Hot chocolate scalding
Document: Complaint

Stovell v. James
Subject: LeBron's paternity
Document: Motion to dismiss

Arnaout v. Warden
Subject: Muslim inmate prayer
Document: John Walker Lindh declaration

more

RC_OnTrial

McCourt v. McCourt
Court: L.A. Superior
Subject: Dodgers divorce

Pom Wonderful v. Welch Foods
Court: USDC, C. Calif.
Subject: False advertising

more


RC_OnTheDocket

McCourt v. McCourt
Date: 8/30/10
Court: L.A. Superior
Hearing: Dodgers divorce trial

more