John Doe A v. Penn State
First Penn State scandal lawsuit says Coach Jerry Sandusky sexually abused a boy more than 100 times and the abuse was enabled by the school's "negligent oversight."
Bradley v. Lohan
Former Betty Ford Center employee sues Lindsay Lohan for assault, alleging the actress threw a phone at her and yanked her wrist while refusing to be breathalzyed.
N.D. v. New York Post
Hotel maid allegedly raped by French politician sues the New York Post for falsely reporting that she is a prostitute who "routinely traded sex for money" with male guests.
Reinhart v. Mortenson
Two Montana residents allege the author of "Three Cups of Tea" "fabricated material about his activities and work in Pakistan and Afghanistan" to sell the book.
lc_search
LC_DayByDay

 Jan   February 12   Mar

SMTWTFS
   1  2  3  4
  5  6  7  8  91011
12131415161718
19202122232425
26272829 
Julianna Walker Willis Technology
LC_BySubject
OnTheMap

rss

LC_ExtraPoints

• Student alleges a prank involving a bottle rocket and another student's anus backfired, causing him to fall off the deck of a frat house.
Helmburg v. Alpha Tau Omega

• 5th Circuit reinstates a jury verdict finding a man employed by an engineering firm was sexually harassed by a male supervisor. "The text message 'I want cock' could be taken as an explicit sexual proposition." 
Cherry v. Shaw Coastal

• Massachusetts appeals court says the ex-wife of a man who fatally shot himself with a gun he had stolen cannot sue the gun's owner for wrongful death. "We conclude that public policy dictates that [Charles] Milot's criminal conduct acts as a bar to recovery."
Ryan v. Hughes-Ortiz

• Pennsylvania woman alleges her former employer discriminated against her because she wore a fake penis to assist her in her female-to-male transition. "Plaintiff's use of the prosthetic device was concealed and in no way interfered with the ability of Plaintiff to do her job." Davis v. J&J Snack Foods

• Son of a woman charged with murdering her husband cannot use the proceeds from the victim's life insurance policy to fund his mother's criminal defense. "[A]llowing the distribution of these proceeds to a third party who has clear intentions to transfer part of these proceeds to her, undermines the principles underlying the Slayer’s Act and federal common law."
In Re: Estate of Michael Burkland

• Oregon judge rules that a self-proclaimed "investigative blogger" is not "considered 'media' for the purposes of applying a negligence standard in a defamation claim." Obsidian Finance v. Cox

• Seattle judge says an actress cannot proceed anonymously in her suit against the IMDb.com website for publishing her age. "[W]hile Plaintiff may face public ridicule and embarrassment if she elects to go forward under her real name, the injury she fears is not severe enough to justify permitting her to proceed anonymously."
Doe v. Amazon.com

• Family of an 11-year-old girl who was crushed by a boulder of ice says forest ranger negligence caused her death. Rangers "did not warn users of the risk of harm associated with the dangerous, unstable snow and ice" at the Big Four Ice Caves in Snohomish County, Wash. Tam v. U.S.

• 3rd Circuit dismisses a breach of data security case against a payroll-processing company. "Appellants' allegations of an increased risk of identity theft as a result of the security breach are hypothetical, future injuries."
Reilly v. Ceridian Corp.

• Oregon judge denies First Amendment protections to a blogger. "Defendant cites no cases indicating that a self-proclaimed 'investigative blogger' is considered 'media' for the purposes of applying a negligence standard in a defamation claim."
Obsidian Finance v. Cox

• A transsexual who was fired from her government job while she was in the process of becoming a woman wins her sex discrimination suit. "[A] government agent violates the Equal Protection Clause’s prohibition of sex-based discrimination when he or she fires a transgender or transsexual employee because of his or her gender non-conformity."
Glenn v. Brumby

• New York man sues a Texas fertility clinic for wrongful insemination, alleging it failed to obtain his consent before using a sample of his sperm to impregnate his ex-girlfriend.
Pressil v. Advanced Fertility

• Nebraska judge rules that school officials may have illegally disciplined students for wearing t-shirts in honor of a slain friend suspected of gang membership. "[Q]uestions of fact remain whether Plaintiffs’ speech occurred in a context likely to provoke gang violence or other disruptions of school activities."
Kuhr v. Millard Public Sch. Dist.




Alltop_125x125.jpg







Woman Blames Study Abroad Program for Rape in Mali Print

An unusual negligence case arising from the rape of an American woman in the African nation of Mali could set a precedent that makes study abroad programs liable for failing to warn students of cultural differences with their host countries.

Dance class with AEA students in Mali

Stephanie Slattery lived in Mali as part of a program organized by Antioch University of Yellow Springs, Ohio. She alleges a bus driver working for Antioch Education Abroad (AEA) raped her after inviting her to have a cup of tea in the room he shared with his assistant.

Slattery flew to Paris for medical treatment. After she returned to Mali, she says in a complaint filed earlier this month in Ohio, AEA belatedly warned students “to never be alone with a male in his room because in Malian culture it is considered to be implied consent to have sexual intercourse.”

AEA's “negligent failure to warn of this cultural difference directly and proximately caused physical harm ... and severe, permanent emotional damage, pain and suffering to Plaintiff,” the suit says.

Nearly a quarter of a million Americans now travel abroad each year to study but the legal liability of study abroad programs for injuries to students is murky, with only a few cases having reached appeals courts. There appears to be no precedent for holding a program liable for failing to warn about cultural conditions in a host country.

A Michigan judge ruled in 2002 that Title IX protections against sexual harassment applied to women studying in South Africa but the harassers in that case were other students. King v. Board of Control of E. Michigan Univ., 221 F. Supp. 2d 783.

According to AEA's website, its "Arts and Culture in Mali" program “allows students to expand their creative faculties in the visual and performing arts in a cross-cultural learning environment ... Artistic apprenticeships, rigorous study, extended homestays, an independent project, and focused field trips are combined to create a safe and challenging environment for personal and intellectual growth.”

Slattery enrolled in the program while attending Eastern Michigan University. AEA, she says in her complaint, contracted with a Mali resident to “house, feed and hire a bus driver for the students, among other functions.”

On Sept. 29, 2007, the driver, Dramane Coulibaly, and his assistant allegedly invited Slattery “to have a cup of tea in their room, during which time Dramane Coulibaly spoke to his assistant in a foreign tongue, after which the assistant left the room. Dramane Coulibaly then forcefully assaulted and raped Plaintiff.”

AEA encouraged students “to interact with the local population, to learn the language and cultural differences,” Slattery says, but “negligently failed to advise [her] of the cultural belief in Mali that having tea alone in a man's apartment [is] considered implied consent to engage in sexual intercourse.”

The Florida Supreme Court has held that a student injured during an off-campus internship program could sue her college because it had sufficient control over her actions. Among other things, the school had the “final say" over where students did their internships, the court said in Nova Southeastern University v. Gross, 758 So. 2d 86 (2000).

That precedent may help Slattery establish that AEA had a duty to protect her from “foreseeable, reasonable dangers.” The tougher issue could be showing it breached that duty by failing to educate her about Malian sexual mores.

AEA says students in all its programs “receive thorough orientation to all program sites” and “field courses are periodically assessed to determine safety.” It could argue that sexual harassment or assault in countries like Mali is a known danger and Slattery did not act as a reasonably prudent person in going to Coulibaly's room.

One travel guide to Mauritania – like Mali, an Islamic country in western Africa –- warns: “If you are a female, there is no non-sexual reason, EVER, to go off in private with a man. If they ask you to step into an office, or back of the store, or whatever, don't. The men are aware that that is an unreasonable request, and no one would ask you for a private chat if they meant well.”

Slattery is also suing AEA for negligent hiring and supervision, alleging it knew or should have known of Coulibaly's "history of fathering multiple, illegitimate children with multiple women, and other disqualifying aspects."

Ironically, a page on the AEA website still offers a testimonial from Slattery about her studies in Mali. “I had the unique opportunity of spending my days with a group of photographers who were around my age," she says. "We awoke before the sun rose and worked until after it set. I learned an incredible work ethic.”

If nothing else, Slattery's case could revive support for increased oversight over study abroad programs and/or legislation that would clarify their liability. According to USA Today, 477 students from a California college who studied abroad from 1999 to 2005 reported 596 safety incidents, of which 229 involved harassment.

“What concerns me is that there may be a sizable gap between the best and the worst run study abroad programs,” a congressman said at a hearing in 2000. “That gap is likely to increase if there is a headlong rush to expand student abroad activities by institutions that are not prepared to do so. I fear that they may be tempted to cut corners or to send students to potentially dangerous areas without taking the necessary precautions.”

Rep. Pete Hoekstra's concerns may be even more pertinent today.

UPDATE

  • A court document filed Oct. 28, 2011 indicates that the case was settled.


  • This story linked by:


    By Matthew Heller
    9/30/09


     
    rc_insidestories
    • Jurors' Comments Fuel New Trial Bid in Bullying Case

      Jurors may have opened the door to a new trial in a Maryland school bullying case by saying they returned a verdict for the defense because they were afraid of setting a bad precedent for school systems throughout the country.
      Read more...
    • Abuse Victim Can Sue Ex-DA Over 'Sexting' Messages

      A Wisconsin judge has protected a domestic violence victim from a rogue prosecutor, finding that she can sue him for sending her text messages in which he pressured her to have sex with him.
      Read more...
    • Four Loko Maker Says Users Knew of Health Dangers

      The maker of Four Loko has previewed its defense of a slew of product liability lawsuits, arguing that the physical effects of the energy drink's mixture of alcohol and caffeine — far from being an undisclosed risk to consumers — are precisely what made it so popular.
      Read more...
    • Mortician Sued for Speaking Ill of the Dead

      In a first-of-its-kind unprofessional conduct lawsuit, a woman has sued her former boss at a Michigan funeral home for making an indecent comment about the body of a dead man in front of her.
      Read more...
    • 'Next Friends' of Orcas Bid to Stop SeaWorld Slavery

      An animal rights lawsuit against SeaWorld for enslaving five killer whales at its aquatic theme parks in San Diego and Orlando may sink even though humans are representing the orcas as their “next friends.”
      Read more...
    • Jury Finds No Harm to Boy From Wrongful Circumcision

      In a blow to supporters of male “genital integrity,” an Indiana jury has ruled that a doctor did not injure a boy by circumcising him when he was an infant even though his mother wanted him to be left intact.
      Read more...
    • Guest Can Sue Motel 6 Over Attack by Woman's Pimp

      A guest who paid for sex with a prostitute at a Motel 6 did not assume the risk of being attacked several hours later by the prostitute's pimp, a Pennsylvania judge has ruled in an unusual premises liability lawsuit against the motel operator.
      Read more...
    RC_OnFile

    Marsh v. Air Tran Airways
    Subject: Roaches on a plane
    Document: Complaint

    Classic Media v. J.G. Wentworth
    Subject: "Lassie" copyright
    Document: Complaint

    Kardashian v. Old Navy
    Subject: Publicity rights
    Document: Complaint

    McKee v. Laurion
    Subject: Doctor defamation
    Document: Opinion

    Francis v. U.S.
    Subject: Bear attack
    Document: Decision

    more

    RC_OnTrial

    Doe v. Discovery Day Care
    Court: Miami-Dade Circuit
    Subject: Child molestation
    Verdict: $3,000,000

    Hoback v. City of Chattanooga
    Court: USDC, E. Tenn.
    Subject: PTSD discrimination
    Verdict: $680,000

    more


    RC_OnTheDocket

    Brown v. Herbert
    Date: 12/16/11
    Court: USDC, Utah
    Hearing: Motion to dismiss polygamy case

    more