
• Iowa judge says a sheriff denied the applications of a father and son for concealed weapons permits in retaliation for their political activism. "This is a great reminder that the First Amendment protects the sole individual who may be a gadfly, kook, weirdo, nut job, whacko, and spook, with the same force of protection as folks with more majoritarian and popular views." Dorr v. Weber
• 5th Circuit rules that a school district violated the religious freedom of a Native American boy by requiring him to wear his long hair in a bun on top of his head or in a braid tucked into his shirt. The boy "has a sincere religious belief in wearing his hair uncut and in plain view." A.A. v. Needville Ind. Sch. Dist.
• 11th Circuit denies a challenge to an ordinance restricting handouts of food to the homeless in Orlando parks. "[W]e are unpersuaded that the conduct of simply feeding people ... is expressive for First Amendment purposes." First Vagabonds Church v. City of Orlando
• Boston judge slashes a jury award in an illegal music downloading case from $675,000 to $67,500. "The award in this case ... lacks any rational foundation and smacks of arbitrariness." Sony v. Tenenbaum
• Iowa Supreme Court suspends a voyeuristic attorney indefinitely for peeping on women through windows. "[W]e cannot overlook the serious, egregious, and persistent nature of [Mark] Templeton’s misconduct and the effect it had on his victims." Disciplinary Board v. Templeton
• Pennsylvania judge strikes down the state's blasphemy law in a case brought by a film producer who wanted to name his company "I Choose Hell Productions." "'Choosing hell' may be an irreverent choice for a corporate name, but under the Constitution, this fact alone cannot be the basis for its suppression from the public debate." Kalman v. Cortes
• Cancer patient sues Wal-Mart for firing him after discovering that he uses medical marijuana for pain relief. "[N]o corporation doing business in Michigan should be permitted to flout state laws protecting patients who use medical marihuana in accordance with state law." Casias v. Wal-Mart Stores
• 11th Circuit rules that the operator of an Internet porn dorm was engaged in illegally operating a business in a residential zone. "Business objectives are the sole reason individuals are paid to live and engage in sexual activities at the 27th Street residence." Flava Works v. City of Miami

|
|
Three Suits Allege Debt Collectors Are Cyber-Bullies |
|

Plaintiffs in three states have recently filed privacy lawsuits over what may be a new form of cyber-bullying -– using the Internet to harass debtors, in one case even creating a website in the debtor's name.
The defendants include a Phoenix car loan company, Auto Financing Network (AFN), and two collection agencies working for other auto lenders, Assets Recovered and Universal Tracing Services. All of the alleged Internet harassment has occurred since January, suggesting an unnerving new trend in the noble profession of debt collection.
In two of the cases, the creativity of collection agencies allegedly extended to intruding on the MySpace page of one debtor and the MySpace page of another debtor's daughter.
Jennifer Dicks's troubles began when she missed payments on a Chevrolet Cavalier she had bought from AFN. According to a complaint filed April 24, the lender used a hidden GPS device to locate the car and repossess it in January.
Dicks then made a payment to regain possession but after she again missed a payment, AFN allegedly created a website with the domain name "jenniferdicks.com.” The site's content is identical to that of AFN's website (goafn.com) except for the heading, which states, “Jennifer Dicks isn't paying for her Cavalier!”
“Because Defendant uses Plaintiff's full name, and references her private financial situation, as well as her automobile, this action amounts to an invasion of privacy, an intrusion into private affairs, and public disclosure of private facts,” the suit says.
The "jenniferdicks.com" domain name is registered to AFN President Michael Fischer, a co-defendant in the case who allegedly harassed Dicks with text messages.
In one of the MySpace cases, a Michigan auto lender hired Assets Recovered to collect overdue payments on a 2005 Chevrolet Impala from Paula Newland of Edwardsburg, Mich. The collection agency's methods allegedly included “Posting information regarding Plaintiff's indebtedness on Plaintiff's 'MySpace' page” and “Using or threatening to use a 'shame automobile' and 'camp out all weekend' in front of Plaintiff's house.”
Newland says in her complaint that both those methods violated her privacy and the Michigan Collection Practices Act, which prohibits “Using a shame card, shame automobile, or otherwise bring[ing] to public notice that the consumer is a debtor.”
The alleged shaming of James Ricobene, who sued Universal Tracing in Chicago earlier this month, was less direct. According to his complaint, a senior investigator for the collection agency posted a message on his daughter's MySpace page asking her to “contact our office immediately so we can discuss the peaceful recovery” of his 2007 Mercedes GL450.
The suit identifies JP Morgan Chase Bank as the lender on the vehicle. “Failure to contact me will result in further action against your father,” the investigator, Chris Flanagan, warned Gina Ricobene.
Because friends and family members saw the MySpace message, James Ricobene says he was “humiliated, embarrassed and suffered substantial emotional distress.” He also alleges that “Chase was aware that Universal used this method of collecting debts and repossessing collateral because it was an effective collection practice.”
In an e-mail sent to the TechSpank website, Universal Tracing denied the allegations, saying it “never had an employee by the name of Chris Flanagan” and no employee “has ever posted anything on anyone's MySpace page ... We are also preparing a countersuit against both James Ricobene and Gina Ricobene.”
Gina Ricobene filed a separate suit against Universal and Chase. “She is not responsible for the debts or acts of her father,” it says.
|
UPDATE
Since this article was published, jenniferdicks.com has been taken down.
|
By Matthew Heller 4/30/09
|
|
-
Sex Harassment Claims Hit Actor Affleck, 'Bones' Star
A producer of a film about actor Joaquin Phoenix, an extra on the set of the TV show “Bones,” an assistant property master, and a makeup artist are among the plaintiffs in a recent epidemic of lurid Hollywood lawsuits.
Read more...
-
Jury Goes 'Wild' in Woman's Privacy Case Over Video
A Missouri jury has gone wild in a case of involuntary nudity, finding that a woman consented to appearing topless in a “Girls Gone Wild” video by playing to the camera before another person pulled her top down.
Read more...
-
Actress Facing $750K Award to Therapist
Soap opera star Hunter Tylo may have to pay more than $750,000 in damages and attorney fees to a psychotherapist whom she sued more than four years ago for negligent treatment of her children, On Point has learned.
Read more...
-
Reporter Sues Hotels Over Peephole Videos
In an unusual premises liability case, ESPN reporter Erin Andrews has sued the operators of three hotels for allowing a stalker to surreptitiously videotape her naked through peepholes in the doors to her rooms.
Read more...
-
Students Challenge Rubber Fetus Ban
The suspensions of seven pro-life students at two Roswell, N.M., high schools for distributing rubber fetuses have given birth to a lawsuit that takes the First Amendment protections for student speech into uncharted territory.
Read more...
-
Distress Claim Barred in Hotel 'Ménâge à Trois' Case
A former employee of a luxury Miami Beach hotel who says her billionaire boss invited her to join him in a “ménâge à trois” cannot sue him for infliction of emotional distress, a judge has ruled, finding his alleged behavior, while “obnoxious,” was not “objectively outrageous.”
Read more...
-
Chuck E. Cheese Settles Molesting Mascot Suit
A Missouri woman who claimed a Chuck E. Cheese mascot groped her breast has settled her lawsuit against the operator of the restaurant chain, On Point has learned.
Read more...
|
Stovell v. James Subject: LeBron's paternity Document: Complaint
U.S. v. Arizona Subject: Illegal immigration Document: Complaint
Rosenberg v. Google Subject: Negligent navigation Document: Complaint
Smith v. Hooters Subject: Weight discrimination Document: Complaint
City of Ontario v. Quon Subject: Text-message privacy Document: Opinion
more
|
|
Rosenberg v. Musical Arts Assn. Court: Cuyahoga County (Ohio) Common Pleas Subject: Defamation, age bias
Mecozzi v. City of Los Angeles Court: L.A. Superior Subject: Police brutality Verdict: $1.7 million
more
|
|
Jose Padilla v. John Yoo Date: 6/14/10 Court: 9th Circuit Hearing: Oral arguments in human rights case.
Perry v. Schwarzenegger Date: 6/16/10 Court: USDC, N. Calif. Hearing: Closing arguments in trial of challenge to gay marriage ban.
more
|
|
|