
• Iowa judge says a sheriff denied the applications of a father and son for concealed weapons permits in retaliation for their political activism. "This is a great reminder that the First Amendment protects the sole individual who may be a gadfly, kook, weirdo, nut job, whacko, and spook, with the same force of protection as folks with more majoritarian and popular views." Dorr v. Weber
• 5th Circuit rules that a school district violated the religious freedom of a Native American boy by requiring him to wear his long hair in a bun on top of his head or in a braid tucked into his shirt. The boy "has a sincere religious belief in wearing his hair uncut and in plain view." A.A. v. Needville Ind. Sch. Dist.
• 11th Circuit denies a challenge to an ordinance restricting handouts of food to the homeless in Orlando parks. "[W]e are unpersuaded that the conduct of simply feeding people ... is expressive for First Amendment purposes." First Vagabonds Church v. City of Orlando
• Boston judge slashes a jury award in an illegal music downloading case from $675,000 to $67,500. "The award in this case ... lacks any rational foundation and smacks of arbitrariness." Sony v. Tenenbaum
• Iowa Supreme Court suspends a voyeuristic attorney indefinitely for peeping on women through windows. "[W]e cannot overlook the serious, egregious, and persistent nature of [Mark] Templeton’s misconduct and the effect it had on his victims." Disciplinary Board v. Templeton
• Pennsylvania judge strikes down the state's blasphemy law in a case brought by a film producer who wanted to name his company "I Choose Hell Productions." "'Choosing hell' may be an irreverent choice for a corporate name, but under the Constitution, this fact alone cannot be the basis for its suppression from the public debate." Kalman v. Cortes
• Cancer patient sues Wal-Mart for firing him after discovering that he uses medical marijuana for pain relief. "[N]o corporation doing business in Michigan should be permitted to flout state laws protecting patients who use medical marihuana in accordance with state law." Casias v. Wal-Mart Stores
• 11th Circuit rules that the operator of an Internet porn dorm was engaged in illegally operating a business in a residential zone. "Business objectives are the sole reason individuals are paid to live and engage in sexual activities at the 27th Street residence." Flava Works v. City of Miami

|
|
Sweat Lodge Suit Says Guru Barred Escape From Heat |
|
|
The first two of what could be many such lawsuits have been filed against “self-help by sweating” guru James Arthur Ray, with a survivor of his sweat lodge ceremony in the Arizona desert alleging he prevented her from leaving before she passed out.
Of the roughly 60 people who took part in the Oct. 8 ceremony offered by Ray as part of a five-day Spiritual Warrior program at a retreat center near Sedona, three died and more than 20 suffered breathing difficulties, vomiting and other symptoms. The ceremony took place in a 415-square-foot enclosure covered with blankets and tarps.
News reports have said Ray stood by the door of the enclosure. But in one of the two premises liability lawsuits filed Oct. 30 in Coconino County (Ariz.) Superior Court, survivor Sidney Spencer goes further, alleging Ray and unnamed employees were
negligent in denying participants, like the Plaintiff, from exiting the lodge when they became uncomfortable and instead intimidating them and cajoling them to not leave the sweat lodge despite the excessive heat and fumes.
Spencer, 59, was treated in a Flagstaff hospital for kidney failure. Her complaint also says the defendants deprived her of food, water and hydration during the three days before the sweat lodge ceremony.
The family of Lizbeth Neuman, a Minnesota woman who died Oct. 17 of multiple organ failure after participating in the ceremony, filed the other suit.
The Spiritual Warrior event (which costs $9,695 a person) is one of six expensive programs in Ray's Journey of Power Experience. All program participants are required to sign a waiver of liability which says, “I am fully aware that I may suffer physical, emotional, financial and other injury during any of the activities.”
But under Arizona law, a waiver does not protect against gross negligence. And Spencer could certainly argue Ray was grossly negligent in not allowing her to leave the ceremony.
She makes numerous other allegations of negligence, among them that the defendants:
-
“ignored her even after she lost consciousness in the sweat lodge” and failed to provide her with timely medical care.
-
constructed the sweat lodge without adequate ventilation, light, or a temperature monitoring device.
-
conducted the ceremony without a licensed health provider in the sweat lodge.
-
had too many people in the sweat lodge at the same time, “making it impossible to properly monitor their health.”
A case for gross negligence may also be supported by Spencer's allegation that Ray knew of the risk because “Defendants had similar experience in running a sweat lodge in the past where participants had passed out and otherwise suffered physical injury.”
She appears to be referring to an incident at the same Angel Valley Spiritual Retreat Center in October 2005 when paramedics treated a 42-year-old man who had lost consciousness after spending time in a sweat lodge.
“Defendants were aware of and consciously disregarded a substantial and unjustifiable risk that Sidney Spencer's injuries would result from her participation in the 'sweat lodge' ceremony,” she alleges.
Neuman's family do not claim anyone stopped her from leaving the sweat lodge.
|
UPDATE
Dennis Mehravar, a Canadian man who passed out in the sweat lodge, has joined Spencer in her suit.
|
By Matthew Heller 11/1/09
|
|
-
Sex Harassment Claims Hit Actor Affleck, 'Bones' Star
A producer of a film about actor Joaquin Phoenix, an extra on the set of the TV show “Bones,” an assistant property master, and a makeup artist are among the plaintiffs in a recent epidemic of lurid Hollywood lawsuits.
Read more...
-
Jury Goes 'Wild' in Woman's Privacy Case Over Video
A Missouri jury has gone wild in a case of involuntary nudity, finding that a woman consented to appearing topless in a “Girls Gone Wild” video by playing to the camera before another person pulled her top down.
Read more...
-
Actress Facing $750K Award to Therapist
Soap opera star Hunter Tylo may have to pay more than $750,000 in damages and attorney fees to a psychotherapist whom she sued more than four years ago for negligent treatment of her children, On Point has learned.
Read more...
-
Reporter Sues Hotels Over Peephole Videos
In an unusual premises liability case, ESPN reporter Erin Andrews has sued the operators of three hotels for allowing a stalker to surreptitiously videotape her naked through peepholes in the doors to her rooms.
Read more...
-
Students Challenge Rubber Fetus Ban
The suspensions of seven pro-life students at two Roswell, N.M., high schools for distributing rubber fetuses have given birth to a lawsuit that takes the First Amendment protections for student speech into uncharted territory.
Read more...
-
Distress Claim Barred in Hotel 'Ménâge à Trois' Case
A former employee of a luxury Miami Beach hotel who says her billionaire boss invited her to join him in a “ménâge à trois” cannot sue him for infliction of emotional distress, a judge has ruled, finding his alleged behavior, while “obnoxious,” was not “objectively outrageous.”
Read more...
-
Chuck E. Cheese Settles Molesting Mascot Suit
A Missouri woman who claimed a Chuck E. Cheese mascot groped her breast has settled her lawsuit against the operator of the restaurant chain, On Point has learned.
Read more...
|
Stovell v. James Subject: LeBron's paternity Document: Complaint
U.S. v. Arizona Subject: Illegal immigration Document: Complaint
Rosenberg v. Google Subject: Negligent navigation Document: Complaint
Smith v. Hooters Subject: Weight discrimination Document: Complaint
City of Ontario v. Quon Subject: Text-message privacy Document: Opinion
more
|
|
Rosenberg v. Musical Arts Assn. Court: Cuyahoga County (Ohio) Common Pleas Subject: Defamation, age bias
Mecozzi v. City of Los Angeles Court: L.A. Superior Subject: Police brutality Verdict: $1.7 million
more
|
|
Jose Padilla v. John Yoo Date: 6/14/10 Court: 9th Circuit Hearing: Oral arguments in human rights case.
Perry v. Schwarzenegger Date: 6/16/10 Court: USDC, N. Calif. Hearing: Closing arguments in trial of challenge to gay marriage ban.
more
|
|
|