
• Roommate referral website does not discriminate by allowing users to list their preferences for roommate characteristics. "Holding that the [Fair Housing Act] applies inside a home or apartment ... would be a serious invasion of privacy, autonomy and security." Fair Housing Council v. Roommate.com
• Student alleges a prank involving a bottle rocket and another student's anus backfired, causing him to fall off the deck of a frat house. Helmburg v. Alpha Tau Omega
• 5th Circuit reinstates a jury verdict finding a man employed by an engineering firm was sexually harassed by a male supervisor. "The text message 'I want cock' could be taken as an explicit sexual proposition." Cherry v. Shaw Coastal
• The ex-wife of a man who fatally shot himself with a gun he had stolen cannot sue the gun's owner for wrongful death. "We conclude that public policy dictates that [Charles] Milot's criminal conduct acts as a bar to recovery." Ryan v. Hughes-Ortiz
• Pennsylvania woman alleges her former employer discriminated against her because she wore a fake penis to assist her in her female-to-male transition. "Plaintiff's use of the prosthetic device was concealed and in no way interfered with the ability of Plaintiff to do her job." Davis v. J&J Snack Foods
• Son of a woman charged with murdering her husband cannot use the proceeds from the victim's life insurance policy to fund his mother's criminal defense. "[A]llowing the distribution of these proceeds to a third party who has clear intentions to transfer part of these proceeds to her, undermines the principles underlying the Slayer’s Act and federal common law." In Re: Estate of Michael Burkland
• Seattle judge says an actress cannot proceed anonymously in her suit against the IMDb.com website for publishing her age. "[W]hile Plaintiff may face public ridicule and embarrassment if she elects to go forward under her real name, the injury she fears is not severe enough to justify permitting her to proceed anonymously." Doe v. Amazon.com
• Family of an 11-year-old girl who was crushed by a boulder of ice says forest ranger negligence caused her death. Rangers "did not warn users of the risk of harm associated with the dangerous, unstable snow and ice" at the Big Four Ice Caves in Snohomish County, Wash. Tam v. U.S.
• 3rd Circuit dismisses a breach of data security case against a payroll-processing company. "Appellants' allegations of an increased risk of identity theft as a result of the security breach are hypothetical, future injuries." Reilly v. Ceridian Corp.
• Oregon judge denies First Amendment protections to a blogger. "Defendant cites no cases indicating that a self-proclaimed 'investigative blogger' is considered 'media' for the purposes of applying a negligence standard in a defamation claim." Obsidian Finance v. Cox
• A transsexual who was fired from her government job while she was in the process of becoming a woman wins her sex discrimination suit. "[A] government agent violates the Equal Protection Clause’s prohibition of sex-based discrimination when he or she fires a transgender or transsexual employee because of his or her gender non-conformity." Glenn v. Brumby
• New York man sues a Texas fertility clinic for wrongful insemination, alleging it failed to obtain his consent before using a sample of his sperm to impregnate his ex-girlfriend. Pressil v. Advanced Fertility
• Nebraska judge rules that school officials may have illegally disciplined students for wearing t-shirts in honor of a slain friend suspected of gang membership. "[Q]uestions of fact remain whether Plaintiffs’ speech occurred in a context likely to provoke gang violence or other disruptions of school activities." Kuhr v. Millard Public Sch. Dist.

|
|
Softball League Makes Pitch for Excluding Non-Gays |
|

A national gay athletic league is taking a leaf out of the anti-gay legal playbook of the Boy Scouts of America to defend itself from allegations that it engaged in a witch hunt to “out” non-gay members of a softball team.
A trio of ace softball players made the startling allegations against the North American Gay Amateur Athletic Alliance (NAGAAA) in a lawsuit filed last month which says league officials deemed them insufficiently “gay” to play for San Francisco's D2 team in the 2008 Gay Softball World Series.
The league has a rule limiting teams to two heterosexual players but Steven Apilado, LaRon Charles and Jon Russ, who say they are bisexual, have sued for violations of a Washington law which makes it illegal for a “public accommodation” to discriminate on the basis of sexual orientation.
They are seeking at least $75,000 apiece in damages for, among other things, the emotional distress they suffered while being “interrogated” about their “sexual interests or attractions.” “NAGAAA's agents asked each Plaintiff a series of highly personal and intrusive questions,” the complaint says.
NAGAAA, which has 10,000 members nationwide, has yet to file an answer to the suit. But it has already indicated it will argue it is exempt as a “private organization” from discrimination law — a defense that the notoriously anti-gay Boy Scouts of America has used to justify excluding homosexuals from its membership.
The league “agrees that if they were a public accommodation, they could not limit players on the basis of sexual orientation,” NAGAAA attorney Beth Allen told Advocate.com. “But they’re a private organization, seeking to provide a forum for gay and lesbian athletes, or those who would like to become athletes, to play ball together in an environment where they don’t face any type of discrimination.”
The issue of the D2 trio's eligibility to play surfaced during the 2008 championship game in Seattle. Play was stopped “on multiple occasions,” the suit says, as a team D2 had beaten earlier in the tournament protested it was in violation of the two-hetero rule.
After the game, which D2 lost, Apilado, Charles and Russ were summoned to a “protest committee” hearing before more than 25 league officials “to determine whether each Plaintiff was 'heterosexual' or 'gay.'” As punishment for breaking the rule, D2 was stripped of its second-place trophy.
In addition to damages, the suit requests reinstatement of the trophy and suspension of the cap on heterosexual players. The plaintiffs are being represented by the National Center for Lesbian Rights.
The distinction between a public accommodation and private organization is one that has bedeviled many courts. In a landmark case, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that requiring the Boy Scouts to admit a homosexual as a member would violate its First Amendment right to “expressive association.” Dale v. Boy Scouts of America, 530 U.S. 640 (2000).
But in addressing a similar conundrum, the same court said the Jaycees illegally discriminated against women by denying them full voting membership.
“We are persuaded that Minnesota's compelling interest in eradicating discrimination against its female citizens justifies the impact that application of the statute to the Jaycees may have on the male members' associational freedoms," Justice William Brennan wrote in Roberts v. U.S. Jaycees, 468 U.S. 609 (1984).
The difference between the Boy Scouts and Jaycees, said Brennan, is that the Scouts' right to express the view that homosexuality is inconsistent with its values would be violated by forcing it to admit homosexuals, whereas the Jaycees' right to expressive association wasn't substantially burdened by allowing women full voting membership. He noted that despite their inability to vote, women regularly participated in Jaycees programs.
NAGAAA doesn't limit membership strictly to homosexuals so it can hardly argue that heterosexuality is inconsistent with its values. The league's mission statement, in fact, says it welcomes “all persons regardless of age, sexual orientation or preference, with special emphasis on the participation of members of the gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender (GLBT) community ...”
Apilado, Charles and Russ apparently identified with NAGAAA's values by playing on a gay softball team. Shouldn't that be enough?
By Julie Edgar 5/21/10
|
|
-
Jurors' Comments Fuel New Trial Bid in Bullying Case
Jurors may have opened the door to a new trial in a Maryland school bullying case by saying they returned a verdict for the defense because they were afraid of setting a bad precedent for school systems throughout the country.
Read more...
-
Abuse Victim Can Sue Ex-DA Over 'Sexting' Messages
A Wisconsin judge has protected a domestic violence victim from a rogue prosecutor, finding that she can sue him for sending her text messages in which he pressured her to have sex with him.
Read more...
-
Four Loko Maker Says Users Knew of Health Dangers
The maker of Four Loko has previewed its defense of a slew of product liability lawsuits, arguing that the physical effects of the energy drink's mixture of alcohol and caffeine — far from being an undisclosed risk to consumers — are precisely what made it so popular.
Read more...
-
Mortician Sued for Speaking Ill of the Dead
In a first-of-its-kind unprofessional conduct lawsuit, a woman has sued her former boss at a Michigan funeral home for making an indecent comment about the body of a dead man in front of her.
Read more...
-
'Next Friends' of Orcas Bid to Stop SeaWorld Slavery
An animal rights lawsuit against SeaWorld for enslaving five killer whales at its aquatic theme parks in San Diego and Orlando may sink even though humans are representing the orcas as their “next friends.”
Read more...
-
Jury Finds No Harm to Boy From Wrongful Circumcision
In a blow to supporters of male “genital integrity,” an Indiana jury has ruled that a doctor did not injure a boy by circumcising him when he was an infant even though his mother wanted him to be left intact.
Read more...
-
Guest Can Sue Motel 6 Over Attack by Woman's Pimp
A guest who paid for sex with a prostitute at a Motel 6 did not assume the risk of being attacked several hours later by the prostitute's pimp, a Pennsylvania judge has ruled in an unusual premises liability lawsuit against the motel operator.
Read more...
|
Marsh v. Air Tran Airways Subject: Roaches on a plane Document: Complaint
Classic Media v. J.G. Wentworth Subject: "Lassie" copyright Document: Complaint
Kardashian v. Old Navy Subject: Publicity rights Document: Complaint
McKee v. Laurion Subject: Doctor defamation Document: Opinion
Francis v. U.S. Subject: Bear attack Document: Decision
more
|
|
Doe v. Discovery Day Care Court: Miami-Dade Circuit Subject: Child molestation Verdict: $3,000,000
Hoback v. City of Chattanooga Court: USDC, E. Tenn. Subject: PTSD discrimination Verdict: $680,000
more
|
|
Brown v. Herbert Date: 12/16/11 Court: USDC, Utah Hearing: Motion to dismiss polygamy case
more
|
|
|