John Doe A v. Penn State
First Penn State scandal lawsuit says Coach Jerry Sandusky sexually abused a boy more than 100 times and the abuse was enabled by the school's "negligent oversight."
Bradley v. Lohan
Former Betty Ford Center employee sues Lindsay Lohan for assault, alleging the actress threw a phone at her and yanked her wrist while refusing to be breathalzyed.
N.D. v. New York Post
Hotel maid allegedly raped by French politician sues the New York Post for falsely reporting that she is a prostitute who "routinely traded sex for money" with male guests.
Reinhart v. Mortenson
Two Montana residents allege the author of "Three Cups of Tea" "fabricated material about his activities and work in Pakistan and Afghanistan" to sell the book.
lc_search
LC_DayByDay

 Apr   May 13   Jun

SMTWTFS
   1  2  3  4
  5  6  7  8  91011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 
Julianna Walker Willis Technology
LC_BySubject
OnTheMap

rss

LC_ExtraPoints

• Maryland appeals court says dog owners can be held strictly liable for pit bull attacks. "Because of its aggressive and vicious nature and its capability to inflict serious and sometimes fatal injuries, pit bulls and cross-bred pit bulls are inherently dangerous." Tracey v. Solesky

• Woman who has been diagnosed as a sex addict sues a school district for failing to prevent her from having sex with male students on the school bus when she was in 11th grade.
Barksdale v. Egg Harbor Township Bd. of Ed.

• Civil rights activist challenges Georgia's "stand your ground law." "By not defining what actions create a reasonable perception justifying the use of deadly force, the Act[] potentially deprives all Georgia[n]s of the right to life without due process of law." Hutchins v. Deal

• Former patient of a Rhode Island doctor sues him for featuring her in a book about drug addiction. "Plaintiff had expected, as any reasonable patient would, that her private conversations during her treatment sessions with the Defendant would remain private and confidential."
Lisnoff v. Stein

• Class action alleges the YMCA deceives consumers by representing that it practices "Christian" values while allowing its gyms to be used for gay sex trysts. "YMCAs around the country ... are currently being used as brothels for cruising, with the YMCA's knowledge and implicit consent."
Keister v. YMCA

• Social workers are not liable for a sexual assault on a 5-year-old boy by a 16-year-old male placed in an adoptive home. "To rule against the individual defendants in this case would definitely break new ground."
Doe v. Braddy

• Student sues college for refusing to grant her the "reasonable accommodation" of a single room after she complained about her roommate's exhibitionist behavior.
Blankmeyer v. Stonehill College

• School district can be sued over a guidance counselor's sexual relationship with a student who was over the age of consent. "The inherent imbalance of power between a guidance counselor in a public school and a student may render opportunistic sexual predation sufficiently shocking, even with a 'consenting' student over sixteen, to form the basis of a substantive due process claim."
Doe v. Fournier

• Utah judge finds a "credible threat" that Utah County officials will prosecute a polygamist and his wives for bigamy. The officials' acts "suggest that an actual prosecution of Plaintiffs is forthcoming."
Brown v. Herbert

• Louisville, Ky., strip club sues a competitor for displaying an electronic sign outside a convention center that said "Don't go to Godfathers, their girls are ugly and have crabs."
The Godfather v. Trixie's Lounge

• A lawyer cannot sue two women he dated for posting derogatory comments about him on liarscheatersrus.com. "[W]hen viewed within the larger context of the website on which they were posted, there can be no doubt that a reasonable reader would understand the comments to be opinion." Coulotte v. Ryncarz

• Oglala Sioux tribe sues beer makers and Whiteclay, Neb., bars for enabling alcohol abuse on the Pine Ridge Indian Reservation. The illegal trade in alcohol has "caused devastating injuries to the Lakota people and massive financial damages to the [tribe]."
Oglala Sioux Tribe v. Schwarting




Alltop_125x125.jpg







Record $95M Award Punishes Sex Harassment Coverup Print

A $95 million award to an Illinois woman — believed to be the largest ever in a single-plaintiff sexual harassment case — was not the product of a “runaway jury” but a runaway corporation that covered up the predatory behavior of a manager.

Ashley Alford

Ashley Alford won the award, which includes $15 million in compensatory damages and $80 million in punitive damages, from a federal court jury that found Aaron's Inc. (NYSE: AAN), a rent-to-own company, liable for the abuse she suffered while working at its Fairview Heights, Ill., furniture store.

The harassment allegedly culminated in October 2006 with the store manager, Richard Moore, flinging Alford to the floor of the store, lifting her sweatshirt and masturbating over her while he pinned her down. He is now awaiting trial on a charge of criminal sexual abuse.

Aaron's, which is based in Atlanta, conceded nothing after the verdict. “We feel strongly that this verdict is the result of a decision made by a classic runaway jury,” Chad Strickland, vice president of associate resources, said.

But the company only has itself to blame. Alford called Aaron's “Non-Discrimination and Harassment Hotline” six months before Moore allegedly assaulted her. And a district manager only told Moore to “watch [his] back” after, in a violation of company policy, questioning Alford in his presence.

“The record suggests that Aarons failed to react to Alford's complaints and did not seriously investigate them until after Aarons received word that Alford had been assaulted and that Moore had been arrested,” U.S. District Judge Michael J. Reagan said in an order allowing the case to go to trial.

The damages on Alford's federal claim are capped at $300,000, leaving her with a net recovery of $41.3 million (see table). But that would still be one of the largest sexual harassment verdicts ever.

“This company has always denied responsibility and continues to deny its responsibility to its workers,” said lawyer Judy L. Cates, who originally filed Alford’s suit.

Alford alleged that Moore began pinching her and making uninvited advances soon after she was hired in October 2005. She called the hotline in April 2006 but had to leave a voicemail message. The call went directly to the phone of Vanessa Adams, an employee relations specialist in Atlanta, who testified she did not always answer when the phone rang.

Aaron's admitted that only about 11 percent of sexual harassment calls to the hotline per month were answered.

At some point after Alford's hotline call, District Manager Brad Martin questioned her in Moore's office. Because Moore was present, she said in her lawsuit, she declined to respond and Martin then dismissed her from the meeting, telling Moore “to 'watch his back' because Plaintiff had made several complaints.”

But during the fall of 2006, Moore allegedly approached Alford from behind as she was sitting on the floor of a stock room, “removed his penis from his pants and proceeded to hit Plaintiff on the top of her head with his penis.”

Aaron's finally sprang into action on Oct. 12, 2006 when Moore was arrested for masturbating over Alford. “Within hours ... Vanessa Adams traveled from Atlanta to investigate Alford's allegations,” Judge Reagan noted.

The jury indicated its outrage by awarding the $80 million in punitive damages — $30 million on Alford's state law claims for negligent supervision and intentional infliction of emotional distress and $50 million on her federal sexual harassment claim.

“[A] reasonable trier of fact could conclude that ... Aaron’s, through its agents, deliberately covered up or was willfully blind to intentional discrimination in violation of [her] federally protected rights,” Reagan said in an order finding the company could be liable for punitive damages.

In deciding the damages, jurors were told that Aaron's was worth $980 million and made $118 million last year in profit. The verdict also includes $1.5 million in compensatory damages on Alford's assault claim against Moore.

UPDATE

  • Judge Reagan applied the federal damages cap in a July 7, 2011 order, reducing the award against Aaron's to $39.8 million and the total award to $41.3 million.

  • Aaron's announced March 26, 2012 that it had settled the case for $6 million. The settlement followed a hearing at which Judge Reagan said the verdict was "monstrously excessive."


  • This story linked by:


    By Matthew Heller
    6/17/11

     

    Editor's note: On Point's RSS feed has moved to this link.

    rc_insidestories
    • Hotel Sued Over Slaying of Escort by 'Craigslist Killer'

      The mother of a prostitute slain by the “Craigslist killer” at a Marriott hotel in Boston has alleged in a first-of-its-kind lawsuit that the hotel's operator is liable for her daughter's death because it failed to prevent prostitution from occurring on its premises.
      Read more...
    • Court Extends Doctors' Liability for Prescription Gaffes

      The Utah Supreme Court has given a boost to the battle against prescription drug abuse by ruling that medical professionals can be sued over injuries to a nonpatient that were allegedly caused by  drugs they carelessly prescribed to patients.
      Read more...
    • Girl's Slaying Tests Cruise Line Liability

      The family of a 15-year-old girl who was killed in the crossfire of a gang shootout on a Caribbean island has asked an appeals court to reinstate a lawsuit that tests the liability of cruise ship operators for onshore injuries to passengers.
      Read more...
    • Bystander Claims "Swoon and Fall" Injuries at Church

      In yet another “swoon and fall” case against a church, an Illinois woman claims she was injured during a church service when a parishioner who was receiving the “spirit” fell backward, knocking several other worshippers into her.
      Read more...
    • Jurors' Comments Fuel New Trial Bid in Bullying Case

      Jurors may have opened the door to a new trial in a Maryland school bullying case by saying they returned a verdict for the defense because they were afraid of setting a bad precedent for school systems throughout the country.
      Read more...
    • Abuse Victim Can Sue Ex-DA Over 'Sexting' Messages

      A Wisconsin judge has protected a domestic violence victim from a rogue prosecutor, finding that she can sue him for sending her text messages in which he pressured her to have sex with him.
      Read more...
    • Four Loko Maker Says Users Knew of Health Dangers

      The maker of Four Loko has previewed its defense of a slew of product liability lawsuits, arguing that the physical effects of the energy drink's mixture of alcohol and caffeine — far from being an undisclosed risk to consumers — are precisely what made it so popular.
      Read more...
    RC_OnFile

    U.S. v. Arpaio
    Subject: Civil rights
    Document: Complaint

    Schultz v. Medina Valley
    Subject: School prayer
    Document: Non-Kumbaya order

    Chopourian v. Catholic Healthcare
    Subject: Sexual harassment
    Document: Verdict

    Jackson v. Paula Deen
    Subject: Sexual harassment
    Document: Complaint

    Marsh v. Air Tran Airways
    Subject: Roaches on a plane
    Document: Complaint

    more

    RC_OnTrial

    Peterson/Pryde v. Thyden
    Court: Montgomery (Va.) Circuit
    Subject: Virginia Tech shootings
    Verdict: $8 million

    Sheridan v. Cherry
    Court: L.A. Superior
    Subject: Wrongful termination

    more


    RC_OnTheDocket

    Brown v. Herbert
    Date: 12/16/11
    Court: USDC, Utah
    Hearing: Motion to dismiss polygamy case

    more