U.S. v. Arizona
Arizona judge enjoins enforcement of a new immigration law's requirement that police determine the immigration status of
every person who is arrested.
McGuire v. United Airlines
Michigan woman says a United Express flight crew locked her in a plane for nearly four hours after it landed because they failed to ensure that all passengers had disembarked.
R.H. v. Schenectady Sch. Dist.
Middle school student says he was suspended for wearing rosary beads because the rosary "is considered a gang-related symbol" and cannot be worn in school.
Fields v. Smith
Judge strikes down a law that bars transgender prison inmates from receiving hormone therapy at taxpayers' expense, finding it amounts to cruel and unusual punishment.
lc_search
LC_DayByDay

 Jun   July 10   Aug

SMTWTFS
   1  2  3
  4  5  6  7  8  910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
Julianna Walker Willis Technology
LC_BySubject
OnTheMap

rss

LC_ExtraPoints

• Iowa judge says a sheriff denied the applications of a father and son for concealed weapons permits in retaliation for their political activism. "This is a great reminder that the First Amendment protects the sole individual who may be a gadfly, kook, weirdo, nut job, whacko, and spook, with the same force of protection as folks with more majoritarian and popular views." Dorr v. Weber

• 5th Circuit rules that a school district violated the religious freedom of a Native American boy by requiring him to wear his long hair in a bun on top of his head or in a braid tucked into his shirt. The boy "has a sincere religious belief in wearing his hair uncut and in plain view."
A.A. v. Needville Ind. Sch. Dist.

• 11th Circuit denies a challenge to an ordinance restricting handouts of food to the homeless in Orlando parks. "[W]e are unpersuaded that the conduct of simply feeding people ... is expressive for First Amendment purposes."
First Vagabonds Church v. City of Orlando

• Boston judge slashes a jury award in an illegal music downloading case from $675,000 to $67,500. "The award in this case ... lacks any rational foundation and smacks of arbitrariness." Sony v. Tenenbaum

• Iowa Supreme Court suspends a voyeuristic attorney indefinitely for peeping on women through windows. "[W]e cannot overlook the serious, egregious, and persistent nature of [Mark] Templeton’s misconduct and the effect it had on his victims."
Disciplinary Board v. Templeton

• Pennsylvania judge strikes down the state's blasphemy law in a case brought by a film producer who wanted to name his company "I Choose Hell Productions." "'Choosing hell' may be an irreverent choice for a corporate name, but under the Constitution, this fact alone cannot be the basis for its suppression from the public debate." Kalman v. Cortes

• Cancer patient sues Wal-Mart for firing him after discovering that he uses medical marijuana for pain relief. "[N]o corporation doing business in Michigan should be permitted to flout state laws protecting patients who use medical marihuana in accordance with state law." Casias v. Wal-Mart Stores

• 11th Circuit rules that the operator of an Internet porn dorm was engaged in illegally operating a business in a residential zone. "Business objectives are the sole reason individuals are paid to live and engage in sexual activities at the 27th Street residence."
Flava Works v. City of Miami




Alltop_125x125.jpg

ADVERT

Free no win no fee claims advice for personal injury.


ADVERT

For accident claims advice, visit a personal injury lawyer.

Radio Stunt Contestant Had "Role" in Own Death? Print

A lawsuit alleging the owner of a Sacramento radio station is liable for a woman's death after a water-drinking contest goes to trial this week with the defense planning to argue that Jennifer Strange was aware of the contest's dangers, even conducting a “practice run” to see how much water she could drink.

Jennifer Strange

“The facts show that Ms. Strange knew at least as much as the Defendants, if not more, about the dangers of drinking water,” Entercom Sacramento says in its trial brief. “As such, should the jury find Defendants liable, a key issue in this case will be the role that Ms. Strange voluntarily played in her own tragic death.”

If the jury finds Strange was comparatively negligent, that would reduce the amount of any damages award to her husband and three minor children. They are seeking at least $1.1 million in economic damages and unspecified emotional distress damages in a much-anticipated trial scheduled to start with jury selection Sept. 8.

Strange, 28, died Jan. 12, 2007 of water intoxication, or hyponatremia, after drinking more than 1.5 gallons of water while taking part in a "Hold Your Wee for a Wii" contest. The "Morning Rave" show on Sacramento's KDND station, which is owned by Entercom, offered a new Nintendo Wii video game system to the contestant who drank the most water without going to the bathroom.

The show's hosts “were given free rein to do as they pleased, so long as ratings stayed high,” the plaintiffs' trial brief says. “That is why Jennifer Strange died; not because of an oversight, but because Entercom cared about ratings, not risk.”

A court document shows Strange's heirs previously settled their claims against the hosts and other KDND employees for $100,000. The remaining defendants are Entercom and its vice-president and market manager, John Geary.

As evidence of contributory negligence, Entercom says a KDND receptionist will testify that she received a phone call in which a co-worker of Strange's, Kerry Carnes, said she “had warned [Strange] repeatedly” about the dangers of drinking too much water.

Despite those warnings, the defense says, “Ms. Strange conducted a 'practice run' the day before the Contest to see how much water she could drink and hold.”

Strange also signed a liability waiver, which, according to the trial brief, “echoed the warnings that she had already received about the Contest,” and “openly discussed” the dangers of water drinking with other contestants. She chose to remain in the contest “even after she, like other contestants present, saw several other contestants get sick and drop out.”

Any attempt to shift the blame to such a sympathetic victim could backfire on the defense. And the plaintiffs appear to have a strong case that, as their trial brief puts it, “this is a case of aggravated, 100% liability as to Defendants.”

In devising the contest, the KDND promotions director said contestants would be given one 8-ounce bottle of water to drink every 15 minutes. But the plaintiffs say the show hosts ignored that “most critical" rule, increasing the contestants' intake to 8 ounces every 10 minutes and, after the contest began, doubling the size of the bottles to 16 ounces.

“These off-the-cuff, ill-considered changes,” the plaintiffs argue,

served only one purpose: sheer entertainment value. These actors wanted to create "good radio." To the Morning Rave, "good radio" meant edgy, risky, exciting, even dangerous radio. A contest where adults might soil themselves just to win a video game? Might vomit publicly? Might be embarrassed and humiliated in the most personal and unhygienic of ways? How marvelous! How cutting edge! How captivating!

According to the plaintiffs, the DJs also knew that a college student in nearby Chico, Calif., had died of water intoxication in 2005 and, during the broadcast itself, a listener called in to warn them of the dangers of the contest.

Three contestants also sued Entercom, alleging they have developed health problems -– including an irrational fear of water -– as a result of taking part in the contest. Their cases have been consolidated with the Strange family's for trial.

UPDATE

  • A jury on Oct. 29, 2009 awarded $16.57 million to the Strange family, finding no contributory negligence against Strange. Click here for On Point story on verdict.


  • Other Jennifer Strange Case Sources


    This story linked by:


    By Matthew Heller
    9/7/09


     
    rc_insidestories
    • Sex Harassment Claims Hit Actor Affleck, 'Bones' Star

      A producer of a film about actor Joaquin Phoenix, an extra on the set of the TV show “Bones,” an assistant property master, and a makeup artist are among the plaintiffs in a recent epidemic of lurid Hollywood lawsuits.
      Read more...
    • Jury Goes 'Wild' in Woman's Privacy Case Over Video

      A Missouri jury has gone wild in a case of involuntary nudity, finding that a woman consented to appearing topless in a “Girls Gone Wild” video by playing to the camera before another person pulled her top down.
      Read more...
    • Actress Facing $750K Award to Therapist

      Soap opera star Hunter Tylo may have to pay more than $750,000 in damages and attorney fees to a psychotherapist whom she sued more than four years ago for negligent treatment of her children, On Point has learned.
      Read more...
    • Reporter Sues Hotels Over Peephole Videos

      In an unusual premises liability case, ESPN reporter Erin Andrews has sued the operators of three hotels for allowing a stalker to surreptitiously videotape her naked through peepholes in the doors to her rooms.
      Read more...
    • Students Challenge Rubber Fetus Ban

      The suspensions of seven pro-life students at two Roswell, N.M., high schools for distributing rubber fetuses have given birth to a lawsuit that takes the First Amendment protections for student speech into uncharted territory.
      Read more...
    • Distress Claim Barred in Hotel 'Ménâge à Trois' Case

      A former employee of a luxury Miami Beach hotel who says her billionaire boss invited her to join him in a “ménâge à trois” cannot sue him for infliction of emotional distress, a judge has ruled, finding his alleged behavior, while “obnoxious,” was not “objectively outrageous.”
      Read more...
    • Chuck E. Cheese Settles Molesting Mascot Suit

      A Missouri woman who claimed a Chuck E. Cheese mascot groped her breast has settled her lawsuit against the operator of the restaurant chain, On Point has learned.
      Read more...
    RC_OnFile

    Stovell v. James
    Subject: LeBron's paternity
    Document: Complaint

    U.S. v. Arizona
    Subject: Illegal immigration
    Document: Complaint

    Rosenberg v. Google
    Subject: Negligent navigation
    Document: Complaint

    Smith v. Hooters
    Subject: Weight discrimination
    Document: Complaint

    City of Ontario v. Quon
    Subject: Text-message privacy
    Document: Opinion

    more

    RC_OnTrial

    Rosenberg v. Musical Arts Assn.
    Court: Cuyahoga County (Ohio) Common Pleas
    Subject: Defamation, age bias

    Mecozzi v. City of Los Angeles
    Court: L.A. Superior
    Subject: Police brutality
    Verdict: $1.7 million

    more


    RC_OnTheDocket

    Jose Padilla v. John Yoo
    Date: 6/14/10
    Court: 9th Circuit
    Hearing: Oral arguments in human rights case.

    Perry v. Schwarzenegger
    Date: 6/16/10
    Court: USDC, N. Calif.
    Hearing: Closing arguments in trial of challenge to gay marriage ban.

    more