Lohan v. E-Trade
Actress Lindsay Lohan alleges a TV ad featuring a "milkaholic" baby named Lindsay used her name and personality for advertising purposes without her consent.
Irvin v. Mustafa
NFL Hall of Famer Michael Irvin files a countersuit against a woman who accused him of rape, alleging she is a "morally-bankrupt individual" who is trying to ruin his career.
Robbins v. Lower Merion SD
High-school student accuses a school
district of spying on him and other students
by remotely activating webcams contained in school-supplied laptops.
Peterson v. Grisham
10th Circuit finds John Grisham did not defame three Oklahoma law enforcement officials in a book about the wrongful convictions of two men for a rape-murder.
lc_search
LC_DayByDay

 Feb   March 10   Apr

SMTWTFS
   1  2  3  4  5  6
  7  8  910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031 
Julianna Walker Willis Technology
LC_BySubject
OnTheMap

rss

LC_ExtraPoints

• Owners of Who Dat?, Inc. sue the NFL and the New Orleans Saints for trademark infringement, seeking to protect the mark that "has become one of the most recognizable in all of America and quickly became well-known around the world."
Who Dat?, Inc. v. NFL Properties

• Army bomb disposal expert sues the makers of "The Hurt Locker" for plagiarizing his life story. The film is "nothing more than the exploitation of a real life honorable, courageous, and long serving member of our country’s armed forces, by greedy multi-billion dollar 'entertainment' corporations."
Sarver v. The Hurt Locker

• Former patient sues the Cincinnati hospital where he was sexually assaulted by a transgender nurse. The nurse's "employment while masquerading as a member of the female gender in a hospital environment involved an unreasonable risk of harm to others."
Evans v. University of Cincinnati

• Federal judge enjoins the City of Phoenix from enforcing a noise ordinance against "sound generated in the course of religious expression," finding the right of churches to ring bells outweighs "the City's interest in preserving the peace and tranquility of its neighborhoods."
St. Mark Roman Catholic Parish v. City of Phoenix

• 5th Circuit says a Texas city's junked vehicle ordinance applies to a cactus planter made out of wrecked Oldsmobile 88. "Irrespective of the intentions of its creators ... the car-planter is a utilitarian device, an advertisement, and ultimately a 'junked vehicle.'"
Kleinman v. City of San Marcos

• Oklahoma City bomber Terry Nichols notifies a federal judge that he has gone on hunger strike, saying he is "prepared to die if necessary because he is done allowing his body to be defiled by [ ] refined and dead foods."
Nichols v. Federal Bureau of Prisons

• Texas judge finds the makers of a film about Rin Tin Tin did not infringe on the trademarks of a breeder of German Shepherds. "Defendants['] title 'Finding Rin Tin Tin: The Adventure Continues" is a fair use of the term 'Rin Tin Tin.'"
Rin Tin Tin, Inc. v. First Look Studios

• Illinois appeals court says the contact sports exception to negligence liability does not apply to the case of an athletic trainer who was struck in the eye by a hockey puck while refilling water bottles. Michael Weisberg "suffered injuries as a result of alleged conduct that was not inherent to the sport of hockey."
Weisberg v. Chicago Steel




Alltop_125x125.jpg

ADVERT

Free no win no fee claims advice for personal injury.


Radio Stunt Contestant Had "Role" in Own Death? Print

A lawsuit alleging the owner of a Sacramento radio station is liable for a woman's death after a water-drinking contest goes to trial this week with the defense planning to argue that Jennifer Strange was aware of the contest's dangers, even conducting a “practice run” to see how much water she could drink.

Jennifer Strange

“The facts show that Ms. Strange knew at least as much as the Defendants, if not more, about the dangers of drinking water,” Entercom Sacramento says in its trial brief. “As such, should the jury find Defendants liable, a key issue in this case will be the role that Ms. Strange voluntarily played in her own tragic death.”

If the jury finds Strange was comparatively negligent, that would reduce the amount of any damages award to her husband and three minor children. They are seeking at least $1.1 million in economic damages and unspecified emotional distress damages in a much-anticipated trial scheduled to start with jury selection Sept. 8.

Strange, 28, died Jan. 12, 2007 of water intoxication, or hyponatremia, after drinking more than 1.5 gallons of water while taking part in a "Hold Your Wee for a Wii" contest. The "Morning Rave" show on Sacramento's KDND station, which is owned by Entercom, offered a new Nintendo Wii video game system to the contestant who drank the most water without going to the bathroom.

The show's hosts “were given free rein to do as they pleased, so long as ratings stayed high,” the plaintiffs' trial brief says. “That is why Jennifer Strange died; not because of an oversight, but because Entercom cared about ratings, not risk.”

A court document shows Strange's heirs previously settled their claims against the hosts and other KDND employees for $100,000. The remaining defendants are Entercom and its vice-president and market manager, John Geary.

As evidence of contributory negligence, Entercom says a KDND receptionist will testify that she received a phone call in which a co-worker of Strange's, Kerry Carnes, said she “had warned [Strange] repeatedly” about the dangers of drinking too much water.

Despite those warnings, the defense says, “Ms. Strange conducted a 'practice run' the day before the Contest to see how much water she could drink and hold.”

Strange also signed a liability waiver, which, according to the trial brief, “echoed the warnings that she had already received about the Contest,” and “openly discussed” the dangers of water drinking with other contestants. She chose to remain in the contest “even after she, like other contestants present, saw several other contestants get sick and drop out.”

Any attempt to shift the blame to such a sympathetic victim could backfire on the defense. And the plaintiffs appear to have a strong case that, as their trial brief puts it, “this is a case of aggravated, 100% liability as to Defendants.”

In devising the contest, the KDND promotions director said contestants would be given one 8-ounce bottle of water to drink every 15 minutes. But the plaintiffs say the show hosts ignored that “most critical" rule, increasing the contestants' intake to 8 ounces every 10 minutes and, after the contest began, doubling the size of the bottles to 16 ounces.

“These off-the-cuff, ill-considered changes,” the plaintiffs argue,

served only one purpose: sheer entertainment value. These actors wanted to create "good radio." To the Morning Rave, "good radio" meant edgy, risky, exciting, even dangerous radio. A contest where adults might soil themselves just to win a video game? Might vomit publicly? Might be embarrassed and humiliated in the most personal and unhygienic of ways? How marvelous! How cutting edge! How captivating!

According to the plaintiffs, the DJs also knew that a college student in nearby Chico, Calif., had died of water intoxication in 2005 and, during the broadcast itself, a listener called in to warn them of the dangers of the contest.

Three contestants also sued Entercom, alleging they have developed health problems -– including an irrational fear of water -– as a result of taking part in the contest. Their cases have been consolidated with the Strange family's for trial.

UPDATE

  • A jury on Oct. 29, 2009 awarded $16.57 million to the Strange family, finding no contributory negligence against Strange. Click here for On Point story on verdict.


  • Other Jennifer Strange Case Sources


    This story linked by:


    By Matthew Heller
    9/7/09


     
    rc_insidestories
    • "Upskirting" Victim Loses Privacy Suit Against Store

      A customer at a T.J. Maxx store in upstate New York has lost her lawsuit against the retailer for allowing a man to take photos up her skirt by using her as “human bait” in a sting operation.
      Read more...
    • Perfume Allergy Case Settles for $100,000

      A Detroit city planner with an allergy to perfume is savoring the sweet smell of legal success after the city agreed to pay her $100,000 and be more sensitive to the chemically sensitive.
      Read more...
    • Teen's Suit Puts Mug-Shot Publisher Against the Wall

      A new publication in Lincoln, Neb., milks mug shots for humor. But a teenager whose arrest photo appeared in Cuffed doesn't see the funny side of it and has sued the publisher for misappropriating his image.
      Read more...
    • BA Settles 'Reckless' Baggage Handling Suit

      Limiting its liability to a group of only 13 airline passengers, British Airways (NYSE: BAY) has settled a first-of-its kind lawsuit that accused the airline of being “inexcusably reckless” in its handling of passengers' baggage.
      Read more...
    • Judge Says "Gay" Still Defamatory in Texas

      What one court has called “a veritable sea change in social attitudes about homosexuality” has evidently not reached Texas where a judge ruled that an airport security guard can sue a radio show host for calling him “gay” on the air.
      Read more...
    • Mom Says Hospital Gave Her Wrong
      Baby to Nurse


      Because of a hospital's error, Jennifer Spiegel became an involuntary wet nurse to another woman's newborn son. Now she is suing the hospital for its malpractice in providing her with the wrong baby to breastfeed.
      Read more...
    • Case Over MySpace Page Chills Student Speech

      Several recent court rulings have been protective of off-campus student speech -– with the exception of a very shaky decision that a dissenting judge said “vests school officials with dangerously overbroad censorship discretion.”
      Read more...
    RC_OnFile

    Newdow v. Rio Lindo Union Sch. Dist.
    Subject: Pledge of allegiance
    Document: Opinion

    Vance v. Rumsfeld
    Subject: Detainee abuse
    Document: Opinion

    Stern v. Sony Corp.
    Subject: Disabled gamers
    Document: Opinion

    Churchill v. Univ. of Colorado
    Subject: Academic freedom
    Document: ACLU amicus brief

    KBR/Halliburton v. Jones
    Subject: Sexual assault
    Document: Petition for review

    more

    RC_OnTrial

    Spears v. Allergan, Inc.
    Court: Orange County (Calif.) Superior
    Subject: Botox death
    Verdict: Defense

    Patterson v. Hudson Area Schools
    Court: USDC, E. Mich.
    Subject: Student harassment

    more


    RC_OnTheDocket

    McClain v. Pfizer, Inc.
    Date: 3/2/10
    Court: USDC, Conn.
    Hearing: Jury trial in case over unsafe lab conditions.

    Sherman v. McDonald's Corp.
    Date: 3/23/10
    Court: Washington County (Ark.) Circuit
    Hearing: Jury trial in case over nude photos.

    more