Peterson v. Grisham
10th Circuit finds John Grisham did not defame three Oklahoma law enforcement officials in a book about the wrongful convictions of two men for a rape-murder.
Lopez v. O'Neal
Florida model sues Shaquille O'Neal for cyber-stalking, saying the NBA star hacked into her text messages and voice mails after she
broke off their affair.
Sapir v. Cruise
Tabloid magazine publisher alleges a private investigator working for Tom Cruise secretly recorded conversations between the actor and Nicole Kidman before their divorce.
Baxter v. Montana
Montana Supreme Court finds "no indication in Montana law that [physician-assisted suicide for] terminally ill, mentally competent adult patients is against public policy."
lc_search
LC_DayByDay

 Jan   February 10   Mar

SMTWTFS
   1  2  3  4  5  6
  7  8  910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28 
Julianna Willis Technology
LC_BySubject
OnTheMap

rss

LC_ExtraPoints

• Illinois appeals court says the contact sports exception to negligence liability does not apply to the case of an athletic trainer who was struck in the eye by a hockey puck while refilling water bottles. Michael Weisberg "suffered injuries as a result of alleged conduct that was not inherent to the sport of hockey."
Weisberg v. Chicago Steel

• 3rd Circuit rules that a couple can sue Google for trespassing on their property while photographing it for the Street View feature. "[T]he Borings have alleged that Google entered upon their property without permission. If proven, that is a trespass, pure and simple."
Boring v. Google

• Minnesota judge reduces a jury award of copyright infringement damages against an illegal music file sharer from $2 million to $54,000. "The need for deterrence cannot justify a $2 million verdict for stealing and illegally distributing 24 songs for the sole purpose of obtaining free music."
Capitol Records v. Thomas-Rasset

• Special master says Texas Court of Criminal Appeals Judge Sharon Keller's conduct on the day of an execution was "not exemplary," but "she did not engage in conduct so egregious that she should be removed from office."
In re Honorable Sharon Keller

• New Jersey appeals court says a female business owner can sue a male customer for refusing to do business with her unless she gave him sexual favors. "The quid pro quo sexual harassment alleged in the complaint, if legally permitted, would stand as a barrier to women's ability to do business on an equal footing with men."
J.T.'s Tire Services v. United Rentals

• New Mexico judge says a photographer may be compelled to photograph a same-sex commitment ceremony despite her religious convictions because she "is not being forced to participate in any ceremony or ritual; the only requirement is that she photograph the event."
Elane Photography v. Willock

• Tennessee judge rules that the PGA Tour does not have to accommodate a golfer by allowing him to take testosterone shots. Doug Barron "has not shown that the 'reasonable accommodation' he has requested ... is necessary in order for him to continue playing golf in PGA Tour events."
Barron v. PGA Tour

• 6th Circuit says two high school basketball coaches did not use excessive corporal punishment in paddling a player. One of the coaches "testified that he only paddled Martin [Nolan] a total of ten times during Martin’s tenure at Hamilton [High School]."
Nolan v. Memphis City Schools

• Wrongful-death lawsuit alleges a cell phone company is liable for a fatal auto accident allegedly caused by a customer who was driving while "engrossed" in a cell phone conversation. Sprint/Nextel "failed to warn of the hazard of cell phone use while driving."
Estate of Doyle v. Sprint/Nextel


The 2009 Weblog Awards





Alltop_125x125.jpg

 

Radio Stunt Contestant Had "Role" in Own Death? Print

A lawsuit alleging the owner of a Sacramento radio station is liable for a woman's death after a water-drinking contest goes to trial this week with the defense planning to argue that Jennifer Strange was aware of the contest's dangers, even conducting a “practice run” to see how much water she could drink.

Jennifer Strange

“The facts show that Ms. Strange knew at least as much as the Defendants, if not more, about the dangers of drinking water,” Entercom Sacramento says in its trial brief. “As such, should the jury find Defendants liable, a key issue in this case will be the role that Ms. Strange voluntarily played in her own tragic death.”

If the jury finds Strange was comparatively negligent, that would reduce the amount of any damages award to her husband and three minor children. They are seeking at least $1.1 million in economic damages and unspecified emotional distress damages in a much-anticipated trial scheduled to start with jury selection Sept. 8.

Strange, 28, died Jan. 12, 2007 of water intoxication, or hyponatremia, after drinking more than 1.5 gallons of water while taking part in a "Hold Your Wee for a Wii" contest. The "Morning Rave" show on Sacramento's KDND station, which is owned by Entercom, offered a new Nintendo Wii video game system to the contestant who drank the most water without going to the bathroom.

The show's hosts “were given free rein to do as they pleased, so long as ratings stayed high,” the plaintiffs' trial brief says. “That is why Jennifer Strange died; not because of an oversight, but because Entercom cared about ratings, not risk.”

A court document shows Strange's heirs previously settled their claims against the hosts and other KDND employees for $100,000. The remaining defendants are Entercom and its vice-president and market manager, John Geary.

As evidence of contributory negligence, Entercom says a KDND receptionist will testify that she received a phone call in which a co-worker of Strange's, Kerry Carnes, said she “had warned [Strange] repeatedly” about the dangers of drinking too much water.

Despite those warnings, the defense says, “Ms. Strange conducted a 'practice run' the day before the Contest to see how much water she could drink and hold.”

Strange also signed a liability waiver, which, according to the trial brief, “echoed the warnings that she had already received about the Contest,” and “openly discussed” the dangers of water drinking with other contestants. She chose to remain in the contest “even after she, like other contestants present, saw several other contestants get sick and drop out.”

Any attempt to shift the blame to such a sympathetic victim could backfire on the defense. And the plaintiffs appear to have a strong case that, as their trial brief puts it, “this is a case of aggravated, 100% liability as to Defendants.”

In devising the contest, the KDND promotions director said contestants would be given one 8-ounce bottle of water to drink every 15 minutes. But the plaintiffs say the show hosts ignored that “most critical" rule, increasing the contestants' intake to 8 ounces every 10 minutes and, after the contest began, doubling the size of the bottles to 16 ounces.

“These off-the-cuff, ill-considered changes,” the plaintiffs argue,

served only one purpose: sheer entertainment value. These actors wanted to create "good radio." To the Morning Rave, "good radio" meant edgy, risky, exciting, even dangerous radio. A contest where adults might soil themselves just to win a video game? Might vomit publicly? Might be embarrassed and humiliated in the most personal and unhygienic of ways? How marvelous! How cutting edge! How captivating!

According to the plaintiffs, the DJs also knew that a college student in nearby Chico, Calif., had died of water intoxication in 2005 and, during the broadcast itself, a listener called in to warn them of the dangers of the contest.

Three contestants also sued Entercom, alleging they have developed health problems -– including an irrational fear of water -– as a result of taking part in the contest. Their cases have been consolidated with the Strange family's for trial.

UPDATE

  • A jury on Oct. 29, 2009 awarded $16.57 million to the Strange family, finding no contributory negligence against Strange. Click here for On Point story on verdict.


  • Other Jennifer Strange Case Sources


    This story linked by:


    By Matthew Heller
    9/7/09


     
    rc_insidestories
    • Dancer Strips Club of $100K in DUI Case

      A former stripper has won a $100,000 award in an unusual employment law case as a jury found a Birmingham, Ala., strip club liable for allowing her to drive home from work “in a highly intoxicated state.”
      Read more...
    • Halliburton Takes Swing at Alleged
      Rape Victim


      Perhaps befitting the former employer of Dick Cheney, KBR/Halliburton has taken the low road in asking the U.S. Supreme Court to bar a former employee from having a public trial of her claims that she was gang raped by co-workers in Iraq.
      Read more...
    • Tenant's Gripe Tweet Too Vague to be Libel

      A Chicago judge has dismissed the first libel case involving a single Twitter posting, finding that an apartment renter's gripe about her landlord was too vague and imprecise to be construed as defamatory.
      Read more...
    • Copperfield Wants U.S. to Keep Evidence From Accuser

      Magician David Copperfield has some sharp words for federal prosecutors who have refused to acknowledge that they dropped a sexual assault investigation against him because of the accuser's lack of credibility.
      Read more...
    • Hotel Exec Settles Drug Death Case

      The former CEO of a luxury hotel operator has quickly settled a lawsuit accusing him of causing the drug overdose death of his girlfriend, On Point has learned –- even though he describes the allegations as “slanderous and bogus.”
      Read more...
    • Bingo for "Bruno!" Baron Cohen KO's Verbal Spat Case

      A California judge has dismissed a verbal assault case against comedian Sacha Baron Cohen, finding that a woman initiated a confrontation with him during the filming of a scene for the movie “Brüno” and “not vice versa.”
      Read more...
    • "No Sex Involved" in Orgy Viewing Case, Hotel Insists

      A former manager at the Hilton Minneapolis who claimed she walked in on an orgy at a company sales conference has “sensationalized” what was only “some questionable behavior,” the hotel's owner says in arguing that her sexual harassment case should not go to trial.
      Read more...
    RC_OnFile

    North Face Apparel v. The South Butt
    Subject: Trademark infringement
    Document: Answer to complaint

    Stern v. Sony Corp.
    Subject: Gamer's rights
    Document: Motion to dismiss

    Rossiter v. Evans
    Subject: STD infection
    Document: Opinion

    Sanford Siegal v. Kim Kardashian
    Subject: Twitter libel
    Document: Complaint

    Bryan v. McPherson
    Subject: Excessive Taser force
    Document: Opinion

    more

    RC_OnTrial

    Spears v. Allergan, Inc.
    Court: Orange County (Calif.) Superior
    Subject: Botox death

    Putnam v. Morning Star Boys' Ranch
    Court: Spokane County (Wash.) Superior
    Subject: Sexual abuse

    more


    RC_OnTheDocket

    Plaintiff B v. Joe Francis
    Date: 2/22/10
    Court: USDC, N. Fla.
    Hearing: Jury trial in sexual abuse case.

    CBS v. FCC
    Date: 2/23/10
    Court: 3rd Circuit
    Hearing: Oral arguments in "Nipplegate" case.

    more