Irvin v. Mustafa
NFL Hall of Famer Michael Irvin files a countersuit against a woman who accused him of rape, alleging she is a "morally-bankrupt individual" who is trying to ruin his career.
Robbins v. Lower Merion SD
High-school student accuses a school
district of spying on him and other students
by remotely activating webcams contained in school-supplied laptops.
Peterson v. Grisham
10th Circuit finds John Grisham did not defame three Oklahoma law enforcement officials in a book about the wrongful convictions of two men for a rape-murder.
Lopez v. O'Neal
Florida model sues Shaquille O'Neal for cyber-stalking, saying the NBA star hacked into her text messages and voice mails after she
broke off their affair.
lc_search
LC_DayByDay

 Feb   March 10   Apr

SMTWTFS
   1  2  3  4  5  6
  7  8  910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031 
Julianna Willis Technology
LC_BySubject
OnTheMap

rss

LC_ExtraPoints

• Army bomb disposal expert sues the makers of "The Hurt Locker" for plagiarizing his life story. The film is "nothing more than the exploitation of a real life honorable, courageous, and long serving member of our country’s armed forces, by greedy multi-billion dollar 'entertainment' corporations."
Sarver v. The Hurt Locker

• Former patient sues the Cincinnati hospital where he was sexually assaulted by a transgender nurse. The nurse's "employment while masquerading as a member of the female gender in a hospital environment involved an unreasonable risk of harm to others."
Evans v. University of Cincinnati

• Federal judge enjoins the City of Phoenix from enforcing a noise ordinance against "sound generated in the course of religious expression," finding the right of churches to ring bells outweighs "the City's interest in preserving the peace and tranquility of its neighborhoods."
St. Mark Roman Catholic Parish v. City of Phoenix

• 5th Circuit says a Texas city's junked vehicle ordinance applies to a cactus planter made out of wrecked Oldsmobile 88. "Irrespective of the intentions of its creators ... the car-planter is a utilitarian device, an advertisement, and ultimately a 'junked vehicle.'"
Kleinman v. City of San Marcos

• Oklahoma City bomber Terry Nichols notifies a federal judge that he has gone on hunger strike, saying he is "prepared to die if necessary because he is done allowing his body to be defiled by [ ] refined and dead foods."
Nichols v. Federal Bureau of Prisons

• Texas judge finds the makers of a film about Rin Tin Tin did not infringe on the trademarks of a breeder of German Shepherds. "Defendants['] title 'Finding Rin Tin Tin: The Adventure Continues" is a fair use of the term 'Rin Tin Tin.'"
Rin Tin Tin, Inc. v. First Look Studios

• Illinois appeals court says the contact sports exception to negligence liability does not apply to the case of an athletic trainer who was struck in the eye by a hockey puck while refilling water bottles. Michael Weisberg "suffered injuries as a result of alleged conduct that was not inherent to the sport of hockey."
Weisberg v. Chicago Steel

• 3rd Circuit rules that a couple can sue Google for trespassing on their property while photographing it for the Street View feature. "[T]he Borings have alleged that Google entered upon their property without permission. If proven, that is a trespass, pure and simple."
Boring v. Google




Alltop_125x125.jpg

ADVERT

Free no win no fee claims advice for personal injury.


Porn Mogul Joe Francis Goes Wild Again in Deposition Print

Soft porn mogul Joe Francis' disruptive antics in a deposition described by a judge as a “waste of time and money” almost resulted in plaintiffs winning a default judgment against him in a lawsuit that alleges he sexually exploited minors.

Joe Francis

After Francis was sentenced in 2007 to 35 days in jail for yelling obscenities during a mediation in an earlier case, his attorney at the time said he had “changed from someone who was disdainful of the system to someone who recognizes that he has to play by the same rules as the rest of us. He has put a lot of this foolish behavior behind him.”

Evidently not -– judging by his behavior when questioned April 22 by counsel for four plaintiffs who, in a proposed class action filed in March 2008, allege he sexually exploited them “by filming them exposing their breasts and and/or engaging in sexually explicit conduct” for videos in his popular “Girls Gone Wild” series.

According to a magistrate judge's report, Francis arrived an hour late for the deposition and, over the next four hours, repeatedly asserted his Fifth Amendment rights even though a judge had previously found he had waived them.

Another Francis tactic, U.S. Magistrate Judge Allan Kornblum noted, was “pretend[ing] not to know the meaning of common words to avoid a straight answer.” A typical exchange with plaintiffs' counsel went as follows:

Q. Have you ever been convicted of a felony?
A. I don’t understand what that means.
...
Q. You don’t understand what being a convicted felon is?
A. No. Can you explain it to me?
Q. Did you serve any time in jail?
A. What do you mean “serve”?
...
Q. Do you know what a prisoner is?
A. No.
Q. Do you know what a cellmate is in jail?
A. No.
Q. Do you know what a jail is?
A. Sort of.

Excerpts from the deposition also show Francis insulted and taunted plaintiffs' counsel. Asked about paying two teenage girls to masturbate him, he said it was “disgusting and laughable that you would be accusing a man like me of such disgusting allegations ... a man of my integrity.”

Had he ever paid girls to masturbate him, he was asked? “Do you?” he replied.

Even the efforts of his attorney, Frederick J. Bateman, to restrain him were unavailing. Bateman succeeded two previous defense lawyers, only agreeing to take the case after Francis agreed to honor “the conduct requirements, the ethics requirements and the procedural requirements for moving this matter to trial.”

After plaintiffs' counsel decided to terminate the deposition, Francis -– perhaps flashing back to his work on “Girls Gone Wild” videos -- took the camera from the court videographer and began filming one of the plaintiffs' attorneys, Rachael G. Pontikes.

Kornblum recommended June 11 that the plaintiffs' motion for a default judgment should be granted. “It is obvious from Mr. Francis’ obstructionist posture at his deposition that his third set of attorneys can not or will not get his cooperation in the prosecution of this lawsuit despite clear warning from this Court that continued past practices will result in entry of a default judgment,” he said.

Francis got a reprieve, though, as U.S. District Judge Richard Smoak deferred ruling on the magistrate's recommendation pending the taking of another deposition. "I find that the deposition taken of Defendant Francis, on April 22, 2009, was a waste of time and money and will be retaken” after the completion of his criminal trial on tax evasion charges in California, he said.

Smoak's restraint is surprising since he is the very same judge who jailed Francis for contempt and whom Francis once described as a “judge gone wild.”

A Las Vegas judge recently ordered Francis to pay a $2 million gambling debt to a casino resort, finding he improperly asserted his Fifth Amendment rights in a deposition. According to attorneys for Wynn Las Vegas, he also made "repeated attempts to disrupt the deposition with flatulence."

In the mediation that resulted in his jailing, Francis arrived four hours late, put his bare, dirty feet on the table and yelled repeatedly at plaintiffs' counsel, “Don't expect to get a fucking dime -– not one fucking dime!” The case eventually settled.

This story linked by:


By Matthew Heller
8/20/09


 
rc_insidestories
  • Teen's Suit Puts Mug-Shot Publisher Against the Wall

    A new publication in Lincoln, Neb., milks mug shots for humor. But a teenager whose arrest photo appeared in Cuffed doesn't see the funny side of it and has sued the publisher for misappropriating his image.
    Read more...
  • BA Settles 'Reckless' Baggage Handling Suit

    Limiting its liability to a group of only 13 airline passengers, British Airways (NYSE: BAY) has settled a first-of-its kind lawsuit that accused the airline of being “inexcusably reckless” in its handling of passengers' baggage.
    Read more...
  • Judge Says "Gay" Still Defamatory in Texas

    What one court has called “a veritable sea change in social attitudes about homosexuality” has evidently not reached Texas where a judge ruled that an airport security guard can sue a radio show host for calling him “gay” on the air.
    Read more...
  • Mom Says Hospital Gave Her Wrong
    Baby to Nurse


    Because of a hospital's error, Jennifer Spiegel became an involuntary wet nurse to another woman's newborn son. Now she is suing the hospital for its malpractice in providing her with the wrong baby to breastfeed.
    Read more...
  • Case Over MySpace Page Chills Student Speech

    Several recent court rulings have been protective of off-campus student speech -– with the exception of a very shaky decision that a dissenting judge said “vests school officials with dangerously overbroad censorship discretion.”
    Read more...
  • Motorist Who Flipped off Cop Gets $50K From City

    The citation of a motorist for displaying his middle finger to a police officer -– what a judge described as a “somewhat innocuous” gesture -- turned out to be quite expensive for the City of Pittsburgh as it agreed to pay $50,000 to the bird-flipper.
    Read more...
  • Gamer's ADA Suit Doesn't Play in Court

    A Los Angeles judge has refused to apply disability law to the virtual gaming world, dismissing the case of a vision-impaired gamer who claimed Sony Corp. illegally denied him full access to its products.
    Read more...
RC_OnFile

Vance v. Rumsfeld
Subject: Detainee abuse
Document: Opinion

Churchill v. Univ. of Colorado
Subject: Academic freedom
Document: ACLU amicus brief

KBR/Halliburton v. Jones
Subject: Sexual assault
Document: Petition for review

Olson v. Baron Cohen
Subject: Verbal assault
Document: Statement of decision

North Face Apparel v. The South Butt
Subject: Trademark infringement
Document: Answer to complaint

more

RC_OnTrial

Spears v. Allergan, Inc.
Court: Orange County (Calif.) Superior
Subject: Botox death
Verdict: Defense

Patterson v. Hudson Area Schools
Court: USDC, E. Mich.
Subject: Student harassment

more


RC_OnTheDocket

McClain v. Pfizer, Inc.
Date: 3/2/10
Court: USDC, Conn.
Hearing: Jury trial in case over unsafe lab conditions.

Sherman v. McDonald's Corp.
Date: 3/23/10
Court: Washington County (Ark.) Circuit
Hearing: Jury trial in case over nude photos.

more