Perry v. Schwarzenegger
Judge strikes down California's same-sex marriage ban, finding that "Moral disapproval alone is an improper basis on which to deny rights to gay men and lesbians."
U.S. v. Arizona
Arizona judge enjoins enforcement of a new immigration law's requirement that police determine the immigration status of
every person who is arrested.
McGuire v. United Airlines
Michigan woman says a United Express flight crew locked her in a plane for nearly four hours after it landed because they failed to ensure that all passengers had disembarked.
R.H. v. Schenectady Sch. Dist.
Middle school student says he was suspended for wearing rosary beads because the rosary "is considered a gang-related symbol" and cannot be worn in school.
lc_search
LC_DayByDay

 Aug   September 10   Oct

SMTWTFS
   1  2  3  4
  5  6  7  8  91011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930 
Julianna Walker Willis Technology
LC_BySubject
OnTheMap

rss

LC_ExtraPoints

• Parents of a 10-year-old boy who witnessed a killer whale's fatal attack on a trainer sue Sea World Orlando for infliction of emotional distress. "Without question, it was reasonably foreseeable and in fact predictable that an attack such as this one by a killer whale with the tendencies of Tilikum was inevitable." Connell v. Sea World

• Denver judge dismisses Oklahoma City bomber Terry Nichols's civil rights claims against prison officials for denying him a high-fiber diet.
Nichols v. Federal Bureau of Prisons

• Illinois teenager with cerebral palsy sues the Special Olympics for refusing to let her play basketball with the help of a service dog.
Youngwith v. Special Olympics

• Montana judge sets aside a government decision removing protections for the northern Rocky Mountain gray wolf. The Endangered Species Act "was not intended to sow the dragon's teeth of strife or to plant the seeds of future conflicts that have given rise to this case."
Defenders of Wildlife v. Salazar

• San Francisco judge dismisses a cereal consumer's false advertising suit. "[T]here is nothing in the packaging or marketing of Cap’n Crunch that would in any way deceive a reasonable consumer into believing that the cereal contains or derives nutritional value from real fruit." Werbel v. PepsiCo

• Iowa judge says a sheriff denied the applications of a father and son for concealed weapons permits in retaliation for their political activism. "This is a great reminder that the First Amendment protects the sole individual who may be a gadfly, kook, weirdo, nut job, whacko, and spook, with the same force of protection as folks with more majoritarian and popular views." Dorr v. Weber

• 5th Circuit rules that a school district violated the religious freedom of a Native American boy by requiring him to wear his long hair in a bun on top of his head or in a braid tucked into his shirt. The boy "has a sincere religious belief in wearing his hair uncut and in plain view."
A.A. v. Needville Ind. Sch. Dist.

• 11th Circuit denies a challenge to an ordinance restricting handouts of food to the homeless in Orlando parks. "[W]e are unpersuaded that the conduct of simply feeding people ... is expressive for First Amendment purposes."
First Vagabonds Church v. City of Orlando




Alltop_125x125.jpg

ADVERT

Free no win no fee claims advice for personal injury.


ADVERT

For accident claims advice, visit a personal injury lawyer.


ADVERT

Injury Claims

Porn Mogul Joe Francis Goes Wild Again in Deposition Print

Soft porn mogul Joe Francis' disruptive antics in a deposition described by a judge as a “waste of time and money” almost resulted in plaintiffs winning a default judgment against him in a lawsuit that alleges he sexually exploited minors.

Joe Francis

After Francis was sentenced in 2007 to 35 days in jail for yelling obscenities during a mediation in an earlier case, his attorney at the time said he had “changed from someone who was disdainful of the system to someone who recognizes that he has to play by the same rules as the rest of us. He has put a lot of this foolish behavior behind him.”

Evidently not -– judging by his behavior when questioned April 22 by counsel for four plaintiffs who, in a proposed class action filed in March 2008, allege he sexually exploited them “by filming them exposing their breasts and and/or engaging in sexually explicit conduct” for videos in his popular “Girls Gone Wild” series.

According to a magistrate judge's report, Francis arrived an hour late for the deposition and, over the next four hours, repeatedly asserted his Fifth Amendment rights even though a judge had previously found he had waived them.

Another Francis tactic, U.S. Magistrate Judge Allan Kornblum noted, was “pretend[ing] not to know the meaning of common words to avoid a straight answer.” A typical exchange with plaintiffs' counsel went as follows:

Q. Have you ever been convicted of a felony?
A. I don’t understand what that means.
...
Q. You don’t understand what being a convicted felon is?
A. No. Can you explain it to me?
Q. Did you serve any time in jail?
A. What do you mean “serve”?
...
Q. Do you know what a prisoner is?
A. No.
Q. Do you know what a cellmate is in jail?
A. No.
Q. Do you know what a jail is?
A. Sort of.

Excerpts from the deposition also show Francis insulted and taunted plaintiffs' counsel. Asked about paying two teenage girls to masturbate him, he said it was “disgusting and laughable that you would be accusing a man like me of such disgusting allegations ... a man of my integrity.”

Had he ever paid girls to masturbate him, he was asked? “Do you?” he replied.

Even the efforts of his attorney, Frederick J. Bateman, to restrain him were unavailing. Bateman succeeded two previous defense lawyers, only agreeing to take the case after Francis agreed to honor “the conduct requirements, the ethics requirements and the procedural requirements for moving this matter to trial.”

After plaintiffs' counsel decided to terminate the deposition, Francis -– perhaps flashing back to his work on “Girls Gone Wild” videos -- took the camera from the court videographer and began filming one of the plaintiffs' attorneys, Rachael G. Pontikes.

Kornblum recommended June 11 that the plaintiffs' motion for a default judgment should be granted. “It is obvious from Mr. Francis’ obstructionist posture at his deposition that his third set of attorneys can not or will not get his cooperation in the prosecution of this lawsuit despite clear warning from this Court that continued past practices will result in entry of a default judgment,” he said.

Francis got a reprieve, though, as U.S. District Judge Richard Smoak deferred ruling on the magistrate's recommendation pending the taking of another deposition. "I find that the deposition taken of Defendant Francis, on April 22, 2009, was a waste of time and money and will be retaken” after the completion of his criminal trial on tax evasion charges in California, he said.

Smoak's restraint is surprising since he is the very same judge who jailed Francis for contempt and whom Francis once described as a “judge gone wild.”

A Las Vegas judge recently ordered Francis to pay a $2 million gambling debt to a casino resort, finding he improperly asserted his Fifth Amendment rights in a deposition. According to attorneys for Wynn Las Vegas, he also made "repeated attempts to disrupt the deposition with flatulence."

In the mediation that resulted in his jailing, Francis arrived four hours late, put his bare, dirty feet on the table and yelled repeatedly at plaintiffs' counsel, “Don't expect to get a fucking dime -– not one fucking dime!” The case eventually settled.

This story linked by:


By Matthew Heller
8/20/09


 
rc_insidestories
  • Off With His Head! Woman Sues 'Mad Hatter' Actor

    Experimental theater clashes with premises liability law in the case of a Kentucky woman who claims she was injured while watching a performance of a circus-inspired play when one of the actors balanced his knee on her head.
    Read more...
  • Charity Worker Accuses CEO of Hypnotic Seduction

    A former charity worker may be pushing the limits of sexual harassment law by alleging that her boss required her to participate in “relaxation sessions” on his “magic couch” during which he hypnotized and molested her.
    Read more...
  • Appeal is Expert's Latest Challenge to Judges

    Expert witness Dr. David Egilman was previously successful in showing he had standing to appeal a judicial order in a case in which he was not a party — but that case may not help him in his latest challenge to a trial judge.
    Read more...
  • Plaintiff's Expert Files Appeal in 'Popcorn Lung' Lawsuit

    A controversial expert witness for plaintiffs has filed an unusual non-party appeal of a Washington state judge's decision finding his theory that snackers can contract lung disease from exposure to microwave popcorn is not scientifically sound.
    Read more...
  • Philly School Sued Over Race Attack on Student's Mom

    Taking civil rights law to what may be an extreme, an Asian-American woman is alleging a Philadelphia high school's tolerance of racism rendered her “helpless prey” to African-American students who attacked her when she picked her child up from the school.
    Read more...
  • 'McSteamy' Sex Tape Suit Cools off With Settlement

    Acting couple Eric Dane and Rebecca Gayheart have dropped a $1 million lawsuit against Gawker.com for publishing a videotape featuring them in a nude threesome with a friend after the gossip website agreed to take down the much-viewed posting.
    Read more...
  • Sex Harassment Claims Hit Actor Affleck, 'Bones' Star

    A producer of a film about actor Joaquin Phoenix, an extra on the set of the TV show “Bones,” an assistant property master, and a makeup artist are among the plaintiffs in a recent epidemic of lurid Hollywood lawsuits.
    Read more...
RC_OnFile

Arnaout v. Warden
Subject: Muslim inmate prayer
Document: John Walker Lindh declaration

Marriage of J.B. and H.B.
Subject: Same-sex divorce
Document: Opinion

Stovell v. James
Subject: LeBron's paternity
Document: Complaint

U.S. v. Arizona
Subject: Illegal immigration
Document: Complaint

Rosenberg v. Google
Subject: Negligent navigation
Document: Complaint

more

RC_OnTrial

McCourt v. McCourt
Court: L.A. Superior
Subject: Dodgers divorce

Pom Wonderful v. Welch Foods
Court: USDC, C. Calif.
Subject: False advertising

more


RC_OnTheDocket

McCourt v. McCourt
Date: 8/30/10
Court: L.A. Superior
Hearing: Dodgers divorce trial

more