
• Parents of a 10-year-old boy who witnessed a killer whale's fatal attack on a trainer sue Sea World Orlando for infliction of emotional distress. "Without question, it was reasonably foreseeable and in fact predictable that an attack such as this one by a killer whale with the tendencies of Tilikum was inevitable." Connell v. Sea World
• Denver judge dismisses Oklahoma City bomber Terry Nichols's civil rights claims against prison officials for denying him a high-fiber diet. Nichols v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
• Illinois teenager with cerebral palsy sues the Special Olympics for refusing to let her play basketball with the help of a service dog. Youngwith v. Special Olympics
• Montana judge sets aside a government decision removing protections for the northern Rocky Mountain gray wolf. The Endangered Species Act "was not intended to sow the dragon's teeth of strife or to plant the seeds of future conflicts that have given rise to this case." Defenders of Wildlife v. Salazar
• San Francisco judge dismisses a cereal consumer's false advertising suit. "[T]here is nothing in the packaging or marketing of Cap’n Crunch that would in any way deceive a reasonable consumer into believing that the cereal contains or derives nutritional value from real fruit." Werbel v. PepsiCo
• Iowa judge says a sheriff denied the applications of a father and son for concealed weapons permits in retaliation for their political activism. "This is a great reminder that the First Amendment protects the sole individual who may be a gadfly, kook, weirdo, nut job, whacko, and spook, with the same force of protection as folks with more majoritarian and popular views." Dorr v. Weber
• 5th Circuit rules that a school district violated the religious freedom of a Native American boy by requiring him to wear his long hair in a bun on top of his head or in a braid tucked into his shirt. The boy "has a sincere religious belief in wearing his hair uncut and in plain view." A.A. v. Needville Ind. Sch. Dist.
• 11th Circuit denies a challenge to an ordinance restricting handouts of food to the homeless in Orlando parks. "[W]e are unpersuaded that the conduct of simply feeding people ... is expressive for First Amendment purposes." First Vagabonds Church v. City of Orlando

|
|
"No Sex Involved" in Orgy Viewing Case, Hotel Insists |
|
A former manager at the Hilton Minneapolis who claimed she walked in on an orgy at a company sales conference has “sensationalized” what was only “some questionable behavior,” the hotel's owner says in arguing that her sexual harassment case should not go to trial.
Deborah Smith used the word “orgy” repeatedly in a complaint she filed in November 2008, alleging she was subjected to “unwelcome sexual conduct” in a banquet room at the Hilton and that she was fired from her position as manager of the hotel's upscale restaurant after complaining to human resources about it.
The lawsuit does not allege Smith was invited or forced to participate in any sexual activity. And in a motion for summary judgment, Hilton Hotels Corp. says the case should be dismissed in part because she didn't really see an orgy.
In a deposition, Smith testified, among other things, that she saw a sales manager standing between the legs of a woman who was lying on a table and making a “sexual movement where you would take your hips and grind upon another person.”
“It look[ed] like sex to me,” she said. But when asked, “But you didn't actually see them have sex?” she replied, “No.” She also agreed that she couldn't see if the manager's pants were undone.
“Smith's testimony ... debunks her Complaint's sensationalized account of events because she admits the only evidence supporting her harassment claim was what she witnessed for eight seconds and there was no sex involved,” Hilton argues.
“She merely walked into a room, and in less than eight seconds, saw some questionable behavior,” the company says.
In a brief opposing summary judgment, Smith backtracks from her hardcore allegations, saying that she observed managers “engaging in ... acts she believed constituted an orgy.” They were, nevertheless, “sexual acts that an employee should never be forced to witness in that context” and she was “horrified” by them.
“A single incident of sexual harassment can suffice to create liability when it is severe, as it was in this case,” she argues. “A single incident can be sufficient to find a hostile work environment.”
The alleged incident at the Hilton Minneapolis in August 2007 occurred during a national conference attended by sales managers from Hilton hotels around the country. Employers have been found liable for failing to protect employees from seeing pornography in the workplace but there is no precedent for finding harassment based on inadvertent viewing of an orgy.
Smith's deposition doesn't appear to help her case much. While she was in the banquet room, she testified, she also saw a banquet staff employee rubbing another manager's “thighs and genitals with her hands” while he was tilting his head back saying “ooh.”
But both those people were also fully clothed. According to Hilton, moreover, surveillance tapes show she was only in the room for eight seconds, contradicting her claim that she was there for a full minute.
“Smith testified she saw four of her co-workers engaged in 'sexual-type' simulated acts while fully clothed,” Hilton says. “As a matter of law, this eight second exposure is not sex harassment.”
The company has also moved for summary dismissal of a related complaint in which another former employee -- cocktail server April Bezdichek -– alleges she was harassed directly in the banquet room by a manager who made her sit on his lap and “moved her body up and down on his erect penis.” She has also corroborated Smith's description of simulated sex acts.
“Essentially, Bezdichek complains of a non-existent 'orgy', excessive alcohol consumption with her supervisor, and occasional innocuous remarks,” Hilton says.
A hearing on both summary judgment motions is scheduled for Feb. 26 before U.S. District Judge Michael J. Davis. Smith is seeking at least $50,000 in damages under the Minnesota Human Rights Act.
|
UPDATE
Both Smith and Bezdichek reached settlements with Hilton Hotels at a mediation on Feb. 18, 2010.
|
By Matthew Heller 1/18/10
|
|
-
Off With His Head! Woman Sues 'Mad Hatter' Actor
Experimental theater clashes with premises liability law in the case of a Kentucky woman who claims she was injured while watching a performance of a circus-inspired play when one of the actors balanced his knee on her head.
Read more...
-
Charity Worker Accuses CEO of Hypnotic Seduction
A former charity worker may be pushing the limits of sexual harassment law by alleging that her boss required her to participate in “relaxation sessions” on his “magic couch” during which he hypnotized and molested her.
Read more...
-
Appeal is Expert's Latest Challenge to Judges
Expert witness Dr. David Egilman was previously successful in showing he had standing to appeal a judicial order in a case in which he was not a party — but that case may not help him in his latest challenge to a trial judge.
Read more...
-
Plaintiff's Expert Files Appeal in 'Popcorn Lung' Lawsuit
A controversial expert witness for plaintiffs has filed an unusual non-party appeal of a Washington state judge's decision finding his theory that snackers can contract lung disease from exposure to microwave popcorn is not scientifically sound.
Read more...
-
Philly School Sued Over Race Attack on Student's Mom
Taking civil rights law to what may be an extreme, an Asian-American woman is alleging a Philadelphia high school's tolerance of racism rendered her “helpless prey” to African-American students who attacked her when she picked her child up from the school.
Read more...
-
'McSteamy' Sex Tape Suit Cools off With Settlement
Acting couple Eric Dane and Rebecca Gayheart have dropped a $1 million lawsuit against Gawker.com for publishing a videotape featuring them in a nude threesome with a friend after the gossip website agreed to take down the much-viewed posting.
Read more...
-
Sex Harassment Claims Hit Actor Affleck, 'Bones' Star
A producer of a film about actor Joaquin Phoenix, an extra on the set of the TV show “Bones,” an assistant property master, and a makeup artist are among the plaintiffs in a recent epidemic of lurid Hollywood lawsuits.
Read more...
|
Arnaout v. Warden Subject: Muslim inmate prayer Document: John Walker Lindh declaration
Marriage of J.B. and H.B. Subject: Same-sex divorce Document: Opinion
Stovell v. James Subject: LeBron's paternity Document: Complaint
U.S. v. Arizona Subject: Illegal immigration Document: Complaint
Rosenberg v. Google Subject: Negligent navigation Document: Complaint
more
|
|
McCourt v. McCourt Court: L.A. Superior Subject: Dodgers divorce
Pom Wonderful v. Welch Foods Court: USDC, C. Calif. Subject: False advertising
more
|
|
McCourt v. McCourt Date: 8/30/10 Court: L.A. Superior Hearing: Dodgers divorce trial
more
|
|
|