John Doe A v. Penn State
First Penn State scandal lawsuit says Coach Jerry Sandusky sexually abused a boy more than 100 times and the abuse was enabled by the school's "negligent oversight."
Bradley v. Lohan
Former Betty Ford Center employee sues Lindsay Lohan for assault, alleging the actress threw a phone at her and yanked her wrist while refusing to be breathalzyed.
N.D. v. New York Post
Hotel maid allegedly raped by French politician sues the New York Post for falsely reporting that she is a prostitute who "routinely traded sex for money" with male guests.
Reinhart v. Mortenson
Two Montana residents allege the author of "Three Cups of Tea" "fabricated material about his activities and work in Pakistan and Afghanistan" to sell the book.
lc_search
LC_DayByDay

 Jan   February 12   Mar

SMTWTFS
   1  2  3  4
  5  6  7  8  91011
12131415161718
19202122232425
26272829 
Julianna Willis Technology
LC_BySubject
OnTheMap

rss

LC_ExtraPoints

• Student alleges a prank involving a bottle rocket and another student's anus backfired, causing him to fall off the deck of a frat house.
Helmburg v. Alpha Tau Omega

• 5th Circuit reinstates a jury verdict finding a man employed by an engineering firm was sexually harassed by a male supervisor. "The text message 'I want cock' could be taken as an explicit sexual proposition." 
Cherry v. Shaw Coastal

• Massachusetts appeals court says the ex-wife of a man who fatally shot himself with a gun he had stolen cannot sue the gun's owner for wrongful death. "We conclude that public policy dictates that [Charles] Milot's criminal conduct acts as a bar to recovery."
Ryan v. Hughes-Ortiz

• Pennsylvania woman alleges her former employer discriminated against her because she wore a fake penis to assist her in her female-to-male transition. "Plaintiff's use of the prosthetic device was concealed and in no way interfered with the ability of Plaintiff to do her job." Davis v. J&J Snack Foods

• Son of a woman charged with murdering her husband cannot use the proceeds from the victim's life insurance policy to fund his mother's criminal defense. "[A]llowing the distribution of these proceeds to a third party who has clear intentions to transfer part of these proceeds to her, undermines the principles underlying the Slayer’s Act and federal common law."
In Re: Estate of Michael Burkland

• Oregon judge rules that a self-proclaimed "investigative blogger" is not "considered 'media' for the purposes of applying a negligence standard in a defamation claim." Obsidian Finance v. Cox

• Seattle judge says an actress cannot proceed anonymously in her suit against the IMDb.com website for publishing her age. "[W]hile Plaintiff may face public ridicule and embarrassment if she elects to go forward under her real name, the injury she fears is not severe enough to justify permitting her to proceed anonymously."
Doe v. Amazon.com

• Family of an 11-year-old girl who was crushed by a boulder of ice says forest ranger negligence caused her death. Rangers "did not warn users of the risk of harm associated with the dangerous, unstable snow and ice" at the Big Four Ice Caves in Snohomish County, Wash. Tam v. U.S.

• 3rd Circuit dismisses a breach of data security case against a payroll-processing company. "Appellants' allegations of an increased risk of identity theft as a result of the security breach are hypothetical, future injuries."
Reilly v. Ceridian Corp.

• Oregon judge denies First Amendment protections to a blogger. "Defendant cites no cases indicating that a self-proclaimed 'investigative blogger' is considered 'media' for the purposes of applying a negligence standard in a defamation claim."
Obsidian Finance v. Cox

• A transsexual who was fired from her government job while she was in the process of becoming a woman wins her sex discrimination suit. "[A] government agent violates the Equal Protection Clause’s prohibition of sex-based discrimination when he or she fires a transgender or transsexual employee because of his or her gender non-conformity."
Glenn v. Brumby

• New York man sues a Texas fertility clinic for wrongful insemination, alleging it failed to obtain his consent before using a sample of his sperm to impregnate his ex-girlfriend.
Pressil v. Advanced Fertility

• Nebraska judge rules that school officials may have illegally disciplined students for wearing t-shirts in honor of a slain friend suspected of gang membership. "[Q]uestions of fact remain whether Plaintiffs’ speech occurred in a context likely to provoke gang violence or other disruptions of school activities."
Kuhr v. Millard Public Sch. Dist.




Alltop_125x125.jpg







Mosquito Bite Case Becomes Legal Pest for Railroads Print

The Nebraska Court of Appeals has stung the railroad industry by reinstating the case of a train conductor who claims she got West Nile disease because her employer did not take reasonable steps to protect her from mosquitoes.

Vivika Deviney alleged that a mosquito infected with West Nile virus (WNV) bit her while she was working in Wyoming more than six years ago. She sued Union Pacific Railroad Co. for negligence under the Federal Employers' Liability Act (FELA), which requires railroads to provide their employees with “a reasonably safe place to work.”

Evidence that, among other things, a UP manager only sprayed an evaporation pond in the Bill, Wyo., trainyard with insecticide when mosquitoes were a “noticeable problem” convinced a 2-1 majority of the appeals court to reverse a trial judge who had summarily dismissed the case.

“[T]here is certainly some evidence that Union Pacific breached its duty to provide Deviney with a reasonably safe place to work,” Judge Richard D. Sievers wrote in a recent opinion. The insecticide, he said, should have been used on mosquito larvae before the mosquitoes hatched and became noticeable.

In a dissent, Judge William B. Cassel said the risk of being bitten by a mosquito is so random that the majority had

effectively impose[d] strict liability upon FELA employers for a mosquito bite resulting in WNV. While the majority opinion correctly notes that a FELA employer has a duty to furnish its employees a “reasonably safe place to work,” the majority’s decision effectively makes the employer an insurer for a random risk beyond human control.

Deviney developed symptoms of West Nile virus shortly after she worked a late shift in August 2003 taking a coal train from Bill to mines near Gillette, Wyo. As she got off the train to perform a roll-by inspection of a passing train near East Cadaro Junction, she was bitten on her hands and neck by mosquitoes.

“You couldn’t stand still because the mosquito[e]s were so bad,” she has testified. “I had to ... walk and watch the train as it went by and wave my arms.” She also said there were mosquitoes in the Bill trainyard.

In dismissing the case, a Douglas County District Court judge found “the risk of harm to ... Deviney was not reasonably foreseeable to, or preventable by, [Union Pacific],” pointing to the railroad's lack of specific knowledge about large concentrations of mosquitoes at either East Cadaro Junction or the Bill yard.

But in Gallick v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Co., 372 U.S. 108 (1963), the U.S. Supreme Court said a railroad could be held liable for an employee's insect bite if there was evidence that it knew the accumulation of water in a stagnant pool would attract bugs.

Gallick looks specifically at whether an employer has to take reasonable steps to protect its employees from bug bites,” Deviney attorney Richard L. Carlson said in oral arguments.

Judge Sievers ruled that a jury should decide whether it was reasonable for UP operations manager Bernie Boersma to treat the evaporation pond only when he noticed mosquitoes. “The information in evidence about the larvicide states that it 'kills mosquitoes before they are old enough to bite,'” he noted, concluding that

it could be inferred that [Boersma] was not properly using the larvicide to treat the property for mosquitoes, because proper treatment with the larvicide would have occurred before the mosquitoes hatched.

Union Pacific attorney William M. Lamson argued to the court that Gallick “did not address the issue that's addressed here -– which is, when you have mosquitoes that are ubiquitous, what is the duty of the employer or the landlord in that situation?”

“If it's not to eradicate all the mosquitoes, what is the duty?” he asked. “... The plaintiff is really proposing that the court adopt strict liability ... What they're really saying is if you have a bug bite and if you get sick and the bug bite might have taken place in the course of your employment, then there's strict liability.”

That argument, however, convinced only Judge Cassel. “It is not reasonable to impose upon Union Pacific a duty to eradicate mosquitoes that may fly into the area in which an employee happens to be working,” he said.

UPDATE

  • The Nebraska Supreme Court affirmed the appeals court in an Aug. 6, 2010 decision.


  • This story linked by:



    By Matthew Heller
    11/30/09


     
    rc_insidestories
    • Jurors' Comments Fuel New Trial Bid in Bullying Case

      Jurors may have opened the door to a new trial in a Maryland school bullying case by saying they returned a verdict for the defense because they were afraid of setting a bad precedent for school systems throughout the country.
      Read more...
    • Abuse Victim Can Sue Ex-DA Over 'Sexting' Messages

      A Wisconsin judge has protected a domestic violence victim from a rogue prosecutor, finding that she can sue him for sending her text messages in which he pressured her to have sex with him.
      Read more...
    • Four Loko Maker Says Users Knew of Health Dangers

      The maker of Four Loko has previewed its defense of a slew of product liability lawsuits, arguing that the physical effects of the energy drink's mixture of alcohol and caffeine — far from being an undisclosed risk to consumers — are precisely what made it so popular.
      Read more...
    • Mortician Sued for Speaking Ill of the Dead

      In a first-of-its-kind unprofessional conduct lawsuit, a woman has sued her former boss at a Michigan funeral home for making an indecent comment about the body of a dead man in front of her.
      Read more...
    • 'Next Friends' of Orcas Bid to Stop SeaWorld Slavery

      An animal rights lawsuit against SeaWorld for enslaving five killer whales at its aquatic theme parks in San Diego and Orlando may sink even though humans are representing the orcas as their “next friends.”
      Read more...
    • Jury Finds No Harm to Boy From Wrongful Circumcision

      In a blow to supporters of male “genital integrity,” an Indiana jury has ruled that a doctor did not injure a boy by circumcising him when he was an infant even though his mother wanted him to be left intact.
      Read more...
    • Guest Can Sue Motel 6 Over Attack by Woman's Pimp

      A guest who paid for sex with a prostitute at a Motel 6 did not assume the risk of being attacked several hours later by the prostitute's pimp, a Pennsylvania judge has ruled in an unusual premises liability lawsuit against the motel operator.
      Read more...
    RC_OnFile

    Marsh v. Air Tran Airways
    Subject: Roaches on a plane
    Document: Complaint

    Classic Media v. J.G. Wentworth
    Subject: "Lassie" copyright
    Document: Complaint

    Kardashian v. Old Navy
    Subject: Publicity rights
    Document: Complaint

    McKee v. Laurion
    Subject: Doctor defamation
    Document: Opinion

    Francis v. U.S.
    Subject: Bear attack
    Document: Decision

    more

    RC_OnTrial

    Doe v. Discovery Day Care
    Court: Miami-Dade Circuit
    Subject: Child molestation
    Verdict: $3,000,000

    Hoback v. City of Chattanooga
    Court: USDC, E. Tenn.
    Subject: PTSD discrimination
    Verdict: $680,000

    more


    RC_OnTheDocket

    Brown v. Herbert
    Date: 12/16/11
    Court: USDC, Utah
    Hearing: Motion to dismiss polygamy case

    more