Lohan v. E-Trade
Actress Lindsay Lohan alleges a TV ad featuring a "milkaholic" baby named Lindsay used her name and personality for advertising purposes without her consent.
Irvin v. Mustafa
NFL Hall of Famer Michael Irvin files a countersuit against a woman who accused him of rape, alleging she is a "morally-bankrupt individual" who is trying to ruin his career.
Robbins v. Lower Merion SD
High-school student accuses a school
district of spying on him and other students
by remotely activating webcams contained in school-supplied laptops.
Peterson v. Grisham
10th Circuit finds John Grisham did not defame three Oklahoma law enforcement officials in a book about the wrongful convictions of two men for a rape-murder.
lc_search
LC_DayByDay

 Feb   March 10   Apr

SMTWTFS
   1  2  3  4  5  6
  7  8  910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031 
Julianna Walker Willis Technology
LC_BySubject
OnTheMap

rss

LC_ExtraPoints

• Owners of Who Dat?, Inc. sue the NFL and the New Orleans Saints for trademark infringement, seeking to protect the mark that "has become one of the most recognizable in all of America and quickly became well-known around the world."
Who Dat?, Inc. v. NFL Properties

• Army bomb disposal expert sues the makers of "The Hurt Locker" for plagiarizing his life story. The film is "nothing more than the exploitation of a real life honorable, courageous, and long serving member of our country’s armed forces, by greedy multi-billion dollar 'entertainment' corporations."
Sarver v. The Hurt Locker

• Former patient sues the Cincinnati hospital where he was sexually assaulted by a transgender nurse. The nurse's "employment while masquerading as a member of the female gender in a hospital environment involved an unreasonable risk of harm to others."
Evans v. University of Cincinnati

• Federal judge enjoins the City of Phoenix from enforcing a noise ordinance against "sound generated in the course of religious expression," finding the right of churches to ring bells outweighs "the City's interest in preserving the peace and tranquility of its neighborhoods."
St. Mark Roman Catholic Parish v. City of Phoenix

• 5th Circuit says a Texas city's junked vehicle ordinance applies to a cactus planter made out of wrecked Oldsmobile 88. "Irrespective of the intentions of its creators ... the car-planter is a utilitarian device, an advertisement, and ultimately a 'junked vehicle.'"
Kleinman v. City of San Marcos

• Oklahoma City bomber Terry Nichols notifies a federal judge that he has gone on hunger strike, saying he is "prepared to die if necessary because he is done allowing his body to be defiled by [ ] refined and dead foods."
Nichols v. Federal Bureau of Prisons

• Texas judge finds the makers of a film about Rin Tin Tin did not infringe on the trademarks of a breeder of German Shepherds. "Defendants['] title 'Finding Rin Tin Tin: The Adventure Continues" is a fair use of the term 'Rin Tin Tin.'"
Rin Tin Tin, Inc. v. First Look Studios

• Illinois appeals court says the contact sports exception to negligence liability does not apply to the case of an athletic trainer who was struck in the eye by a hockey puck while refilling water bottles. Michael Weisberg "suffered injuries as a result of alleged conduct that was not inherent to the sport of hockey."
Weisberg v. Chicago Steel




Alltop_125x125.jpg

ADVERT

Free no win no fee claims advice for personal injury.


Mosquito Bite Case Becomes Legal Pest for Railroads Print

The Nebraska Court of Appeals has stung the railroad industry by reinstating the case of a train conductor who claims she got West Nile disease because her employer did not take reasonable steps to protect her from mosquitoes.

Vivika Deviney alleged that a mosquito infected with West Nile virus (WNV) bit her while she was working in Wyoming more than six years ago. She sued Union Pacific Railroad Co. for negligence under the Federal Employers' Liability Act (FELA), which requires railroads to provide their employees with “a reasonably safe place to work.”

Evidence that, among other things, a UP manager only sprayed an evaporation pond in the Bill, Wyo., trainyard with insecticide when mosquitoes were a “noticeable problem” convinced a 2-1 majority of the appeals court to reverse a trial judge who had summarily dismissed the case.

“[T]here is certainly some evidence that Union Pacific breached its duty to provide Deviney with a reasonably safe place to work,” Judge Richard D. Sievers wrote in a recent opinion. The insecticide, he said, should have been used on mosquito larvae before the mosquitoes hatched and became noticeable.

In a dissent, Judge William B. Cassel said the risk of being bitten by a mosquito is so random that the majority had

effectively impose[d] strict liability upon FELA employers for a mosquito bite resulting in WNV. While the majority opinion correctly notes that a FELA employer has a duty to furnish its employees a “reasonably safe place to work,” the majority’s decision effectively makes the employer an insurer for a random risk beyond human control.

Deviney developed symptoms of West Nile virus shortly after she worked a late shift in August 2003 taking a coal train from Bill to mines near Gillette, Wyo. As she got off the train to perform a roll-by inspection of a passing train near East Cadaro Junction, she was bitten on her hands and neck by mosquitoes.

“You couldn’t stand still because the mosquito[e]s were so bad,” she has testified. “I had to ... walk and watch the train as it went by and wave my arms.” She also said there were mosquitoes in the Bill trainyard.

In dismissing the case, a Douglas County District Court judge found “the risk of harm to ... Deviney was not reasonably foreseeable to, or preventable by, [Union Pacific],” pointing to the railroad's lack of specific knowledge about large concentrations of mosquitoes at either East Cadaro Junction or the Bill yard.

But in Gallick v. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad Co., 372 U.S. 108 (1963), the U.S. Supreme Court said a railroad could be held liable for an employee's insect bite if there was evidence that it knew the accumulation of water in a stagnant pool would attract bugs.

Gallick looks specifically at whether an employer has to take reasonable steps to protect its employees from bug bites,” Deviney attorney Richard L. Carlson said in oral arguments.

Judge Sievers ruled that a jury should decide whether it was reasonable for UP operations manager Bernie Boersma to treat the evaporation pond only when he noticed mosquitoes. “The information in evidence about the larvicide states that it 'kills mosquitoes before they are old enough to bite,'” he noted, concluding that

it could be inferred that [Boersma] was not properly using the larvicide to treat the property for mosquitoes, because proper treatment with the larvicide would have occurred before the mosquitoes hatched.

Union Pacific attorney William M. Lamson argued to the court that Gallick “did not address the issue that's addressed here -– which is, when you have mosquitoes that are ubiquitous, what is the duty of the employer or the landlord in that situation?”

“If it's not to eradicate all the mosquitoes, what is the duty?” he asked. “... The plaintiff is really proposing that the court adopt strict liability ... What they're really saying is if you have a bug bite and if you get sick and the bug bite might have taken place in the course of your employment, then there's strict liability.”

That argument, however, convinced only Judge Cassel. “It is not reasonable to impose upon Union Pacific a duty to eradicate mosquitoes that may fly into the area in which an employee happens to be working,” he said.

This story linked by:



By Matthew Heller
11/30/09


 
rc_insidestories
  • "Upskirting" Victim Loses Privacy Suit Against Store

    A customer at a T.J. Maxx store in upstate New York has lost her lawsuit against the retailer for allowing a man to take photos up her skirt by using her as “human bait” in a sting operation.
    Read more...
  • Perfume Allergy Case Settles for $100,000

    A Detroit city planner with an allergy to perfume is savoring the sweet smell of legal success after the city agreed to pay her $100,000 and be more sensitive to the chemically sensitive.
    Read more...
  • Teen's Suit Puts Mug-Shot Publisher Against the Wall

    A new publication in Lincoln, Neb., milks mug shots for humor. But a teenager whose arrest photo appeared in Cuffed doesn't see the funny side of it and has sued the publisher for misappropriating his image.
    Read more...
  • BA Settles 'Reckless' Baggage Handling Suit

    Limiting its liability to a group of only 13 airline passengers, British Airways (NYSE: BAY) has settled a first-of-its kind lawsuit that accused the airline of being “inexcusably reckless” in its handling of passengers' baggage.
    Read more...
  • Judge Says "Gay" Still Defamatory in Texas

    What one court has called “a veritable sea change in social attitudes about homosexuality” has evidently not reached Texas where a judge ruled that an airport security guard can sue a radio show host for calling him “gay” on the air.
    Read more...
  • Mom Says Hospital Gave Her Wrong
    Baby to Nurse


    Because of a hospital's error, Jennifer Spiegel became an involuntary wet nurse to another woman's newborn son. Now she is suing the hospital for its malpractice in providing her with the wrong baby to breastfeed.
    Read more...
  • Case Over MySpace Page Chills Student Speech

    Several recent court rulings have been protective of off-campus student speech -– with the exception of a very shaky decision that a dissenting judge said “vests school officials with dangerously overbroad censorship discretion.”
    Read more...
RC_OnFile

Newdow v. Rio Lindo Union Sch. Dist.
Subject: Pledge of allegiance
Document: Opinion

Vance v. Rumsfeld
Subject: Detainee abuse
Document: Opinion

Stern v. Sony Corp.
Subject: Disabled gamers
Document: Opinion

Churchill v. Univ. of Colorado
Subject: Academic freedom
Document: ACLU amicus brief

KBR/Halliburton v. Jones
Subject: Sexual assault
Document: Petition for review

more

RC_OnTrial

Spears v. Allergan, Inc.
Court: Orange County (Calif.) Superior
Subject: Botox death
Verdict: Defense

Patterson v. Hudson Area Schools
Court: USDC, E. Mich.
Subject: Student harassment

more


RC_OnTheDocket

McClain v. Pfizer, Inc.
Date: 3/2/10
Court: USDC, Conn.
Hearing: Jury trial in case over unsafe lab conditions.

Sherman v. McDonald's Corp.
Date: 3/23/10
Court: Washington County (Ark.) Circuit
Hearing: Jury trial in case over nude photos.

more