
• Owners of Who Dat?, Inc. sue the NFL and the New Orleans Saints for trademark infringement, seeking to protect the mark that "has become one of the most recognizable in all of America and quickly became well-known around the world." Who Dat?, Inc. v. NFL Properties
• Army bomb disposal expert sues the makers of "The Hurt Locker" for plagiarizing his life story. The film is "nothing more than the exploitation of a real life honorable, courageous, and long serving member of our country’s armed forces, by greedy multi-billion dollar 'entertainment' corporations." Sarver v. The Hurt Locker
• Former patient sues the Cincinnati hospital where he was sexually assaulted by a transgender nurse. The nurse's "employment while masquerading as a member of the female gender in a hospital environment involved an unreasonable risk of harm to others." Evans v. University of Cincinnati
• Federal judge enjoins the City of Phoenix from enforcing a noise ordinance against "sound generated in the course of religious expression," finding the right of churches to ring bells outweighs "the City's interest in preserving the peace and tranquility of its neighborhoods." St. Mark Roman Catholic Parish v. City of Phoenix
• 5th Circuit says a Texas city's junked vehicle ordinance applies to a cactus planter made out of wrecked Oldsmobile 88. "Irrespective of the intentions of its creators ... the car-planter is a utilitarian device, an advertisement, and ultimately a 'junked vehicle.'" Kleinman v. City of San Marcos
• Oklahoma City bomber Terry Nichols notifies a federal judge that he has gone on hunger strike, saying he is "prepared to die if necessary because he is done allowing his body to be defiled by [ ] refined and dead foods." Nichols v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
• Texas judge finds the makers of a film about Rin Tin Tin did not infringe on the trademarks of a breeder of German Shepherds. "Defendants['] title 'Finding Rin Tin Tin: The Adventure Continues" is a fair use of the term 'Rin Tin Tin.'" Rin Tin Tin, Inc. v. First Look Studios
• Illinois appeals court says the contact sports exception to negligence liability does not apply to the case of an athletic trainer who was struck in the eye by a hockey puck while refilling water bottles. Michael Weisberg "suffered injuries as a result of alleged conduct that was not inherent to the sport of hockey." Weisberg v. Chicago Steel

|
|
Hotel Alleges “Graphic” Graffiti a Construction Defect |
|

In what may be the first case of a sexually explicit construction defect, the owner of a historic Kansas City, Mo., hotel is alleging that “graphic markings” left by a contractor on unfinished sheetrock walls have “bled through” vinyl wall covering, causing “significant damage” to the hotel's reputation.
A lawsuit filed earlier this week by Marcus Hotels says the contractor, Walton Construction Co. of Kansas City, is liable for the graffiti at the Hotel Phillips, which allegedly includes “caricatures of male genitalia” and a drawing of a nude female and has “resulted in a number of customer complaints.”
According to the complaint, Walton also breached its promise to “deliver a defect-free project” by failing to remove or pre-treat its employees' artwork before the vinyl wall covering was applied to the sheetrock. The hotel –- an Art Deco landmark which boasts a “tradition of class and distinction” -- reopened in 2001 after a $28 million renovation.
“Over a period of years following completion of the project, the markings ... have bled through the VWC in various locations and rooms throughout the Hotel,” the suit says. Repair costs have been estimated at “well in excess of $200,000” and
The defective construction work, due to the sexually explicit nature of the defect, has also caused significant damage to the Hotel's reputation and status in the community and industry.
The Hotel Phillips, which opened in 1931, had fallen on hard times when the renovation project began in September 2000. Walton was the “at risk” construction manager on the project, responsible not only for its own employees but also for those of its subcontractors.
During the construction, the suit says, workers marked up the unfinished sheetrock with “measurements, room numbers, and locations for plumbing tie-ins, sprinklers, smoke detectors and other fixtures.” Some also allegedly used their “'Sharpie' or 'magic' type markers” for “personal comments,” “football plays” and the more graphic hieroglyphics.
Rolls of VWC carry instructions for preparing surfaces so ink markings or any other “foreign matter” do not bleed through the vinyl. But according to Marcus, “Walton's subcontractor, Rogers Painting Co., applied the VWC to the walls without any attempt to remove or pre-treat the permanent marker stains.”
Milwaukee-based Marcus specializes in “restoring once elegant hotels to their original splendor.” Rooms at the Hotel Phillips, winner of a AAA four-diamond award, start at about $189 -– with, apparently, no discount for those where the graffiti has surfaced.
By Matthew Heller 1/20/09
|
|
-
Perfume Allergy Case Settles for $100,000
A Detroit city planner with an allergy to perfume is savoring the sweet smell of legal success after the city agreed to pay her $100,000 and be more sensitive to the chemically sensitive.
Read more...
-
Teen's Suit Puts Mug-Shot Publisher Against the Wall
A new publication in Lincoln, Neb., milks mug shots for humor. But a teenager whose arrest photo appeared in Cuffed doesn't see the funny side of it and has sued the publisher for misappropriating his image.
Read more...
-
BA Settles 'Reckless' Baggage Handling Suit
Limiting its liability to a group of only 13 airline passengers, British Airways (NYSE: BAY) has settled a first-of-its kind lawsuit that accused the airline of being “inexcusably reckless” in its handling of passengers' baggage.
Read more...
-
Judge Says "Gay" Still Defamatory in Texas
What one court has called “a veritable sea change in social attitudes about homosexuality” has evidently not reached Texas where a judge ruled that an airport security guard can sue a radio show host for calling him “gay” on the air.
Read more...
-
Mom Says Hospital Gave Her Wrong Baby to Nurse
Because of a hospital's error, Jennifer Spiegel became an involuntary wet nurse to another woman's newborn son. Now she is suing the hospital for its malpractice in providing her with the wrong baby to breastfeed.
Read more...
-
Case Over MySpace Page Chills Student Speech
Several recent court rulings have been protective of off-campus student speech -– with the exception of a very shaky decision that a dissenting judge said “vests school officials with dangerously overbroad censorship discretion.”
Read more...
-
Motorist Who Flipped off Cop Gets $50K From City
The citation of a motorist for displaying his middle finger to a police officer -– what a judge described as a “somewhat innocuous” gesture -- turned out to be quite expensive for the City of Pittsburgh as it agreed to pay $50,000 to the bird-flipper.
Read more...
|
Spears v. Allergan, Inc. Court: Orange County (Calif.) Superior Subject: Botox death Verdict: Defense
Patterson v. Hudson Area Schools Court: USDC, E. Mich. Subject: Student harassment
more
|
|
McClain v. Pfizer, Inc. Date: 3/2/10 Court: USDC, Conn. Hearing: Jury trial in case over unsafe lab conditions.
Sherman v. McDonald's Corp. Date: 3/23/10 Court: Washington County (Ark.) Circuit Hearing: Jury trial in case over nude photos.
more
|
|
|