John Doe A v. Penn State
First Penn State scandal lawsuit says Coach Jerry Sandusky sexually abused a boy more than 100 times and the abuse was enabled by the school's "negligent oversight."
Bradley v. Lohan
Former Betty Ford Center employee sues Lindsay Lohan for assault, alleging the actress threw a phone at her and yanked her wrist while refusing to be breathalzyed.
N.D. v. New York Post
Hotel maid allegedly raped by French politician sues the New York Post for falsely reporting that she is a prostitute who "routinely traded sex for money" with male guests.
Reinhart v. Mortenson
Two Montana residents allege the author of "Three Cups of Tea" "fabricated material about his activities and work in Pakistan and Afghanistan" to sell the book.
lc_search
LC_DayByDay

 Apr   May 12   Jun

SMTWTFS
   1  2  3  4  5
  6  7  8  9101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031 
Julianna Willis Technology
LC_BySubject
OnTheMap

rss

LC_ExtraPoints

• Maryland appeals court says dog owners can be held strictly liable for pit bull attacks. "Because of its aggressive and vicious nature and its capability to inflict serious and sometimes fatal injuries, pit bulls and cross-bred pit bulls are inherently dangerous." Tracey v. Solesky

• Woman who has been diagnosed as a sex addict sues a school district for failing to prevent her from having sex with male students on the school bus when she was in 11th grade.
Barksdale v. Egg Harbor Township Bd. of Ed.

• Civil rights activist challenges Georgia's "stand your ground law." "By not defining what actions create a reasonable perception justifying the use of deadly force, the Act[] potentially deprives all Georgia[n]s of the right to life without due process of law." Hutchins v. Deal

• Former patient of a Rhode Island doctor sues him for featuring her in a book about drug addiction. "Plaintiff had expected, as any reasonable patient would, that her private conversations during her treatment sessions with the Defendant would remain private and confidential."
Lisnoff v. Stein

• Class action alleges the YMCA deceives consumers by representing that it practices "Christian" values while allowing its gyms to be used for gay sex trysts. "YMCAs around the country ... are currently being used as brothels for cruising, with the YMCA's knowledge and implicit consent."
Keister v. YMCA

• Social workers are not liable for a sexual assault on a 5-year-old boy by a 16-year-old male placed in an adoptive home. "To rule against the individual defendants in this case would definitely break new ground."
Doe v. Braddy

• Student sues college for refusing to grant her the "reasonable accommodation" of a single room after she complained about her roommate's exhibitionist behavior.
Blankmeyer v. Stonehill College

• School district can be sued over a guidance counselor's sexual relationship with a student who was over the age of consent. "The inherent imbalance of power between a guidance counselor in a public school and a student may render opportunistic sexual predation sufficiently shocking, even with a 'consenting' student over sixteen, to form the basis of a substantive due process claim."
Doe v. Fournier

• Utah judge finds a "credible threat" that Utah County officials will prosecute a polygamist and his wives for bigamy. The officials' acts "suggest that an actual prosecution of Plaintiffs is forthcoming."
Brown v. Herbert

• Louisville, Ky., strip club sues a competitor for displaying an electronic sign outside a convention center that said "Don't go to Godfathers, their girls are ugly and have crabs."
The Godfather v. Trixie's Lounge

• A lawyer cannot sue two women he dated for posting derogatory comments about him on liarscheatersrus.com. "[W]hen viewed within the larger context of the website on which they were posted, there can be no doubt that a reasonable reader would understand the comments to be opinion." Coulotte v. Ryncarz

• Oglala Sioux tribe sues beer makers and Whiteclay, Neb., bars for enabling alcohol abuse on the Pine Ridge Indian Reservation. The illegal trade in alcohol has "caused devastating injuries to the Lakota people and massive financial damages to the [tribe]."
Oglala Sioux Tribe v. Schwarting




Alltop_125x125.jpg








Health Store Feels Heat in Suit Over Ear Candle Injury Print

A Chicago ear, nose and throat doctor has become the focal point of the unusual product liability lawsuit of a Kansas woman who claims she was injured by an ear-cleaning procedure using a special candle.

“Ear-candling,” which has become a trendy alternative to Q-tips, involves inserting the narrow tip of a hollow conical candle into the ear. Advocates say the warmth and suction from the heat generated by the flame draws wax out of the ear canal.

The safety of the procedure is at issue in the suit filed by Anne Danaher, who alleges the ear candle she bought from a Wild Oats Markets health store in Kansas City is an unreasonably dangerous product that left her with a burned ear drum. She sued the store and Karen Kenney, the “ear-candler” who performed the procedure on her in 2006.

Danaher's expert witness is Dr. Richard J. Wiet, an otolaryngologist with a practice in Chicago who has been a vocal critic of ear-candling. “Ear candles are unreasonably dangerous products because of the potential for damage to the structure of the middle ear associated with their use,” he wrote in a report for Danaher.

Dr. Richard Wiet

But Wild Oats says Wiet's testimony should be excluded from the case because he has a “glaring lack of knowledge, training and education in the field of ear candles.” In a deposition, he acknowledged that Q-tips cause more injuries than ear candles on an annual basis.

“Dr. Wiet does not identify a specific design or manufacturing defect in the particular ear candle involved in plaintiff’s accident, which is a pre-requisite to establishing liability under Kansas law,” Wild Oats argues in a motion for summary judgment.

Danaher says ear candles are presumptively defective under Kansas law because they have not been approved by the Food and Drug Administration. And even without the presumption and Wiet's testimony, a jury could hold Wild Oats liable for failing to warn her of the dangers of ear candles.

“Defendant chose to sell a product intended to be placed in the human ear and set afire,” she said in a brief.

Ear-candling apparently originated in India or ancient Egypt. But Canada has banned the treatment and the FDA warned last year that ear candles “can cause serious injuries, even when used in accordance [with] manufacturers' directions.”

According to a study published in the journal Laryngoscope, no ear wax was removed during candling of test subjects and candle wax was actually deposited in some of the subjects' ears.

Danaher bought an ear candle made by Wally's Natural Products of Auburn, Calif., in 2003. She did not use it until three years later when Kenney, while treating her for discomfort in her right ear, allegedly “allowed the ear candle to burn down to within 3 inches of the tip at which time the Plaintiff felt hot wax roll into her ear.”

The specific defect of ear candles, Danaher argues, “is that they are not effective in treating any illnesses or condition of the ear and they create a risk, not necessarily apparent to the user, of serious injury due to hot wax dripping in the ear. Dr. Wiet’s testimony and opinion in this regard are factually supported and admissible ...”

Wild Oats contends Danaher is arguing, in effect, for strict liability. “Without identifying a specific defect in the ear candle [she used], the plaintiff would be able to establish the liability of Wild Oats solely based upon the fact that she sustained an injury through use of a product,” the company says.

As far as showing a failure to warn, it says, Danaher still needs expert testimony and Wiet “does not have an opinion regarding any instructions or warnings, or whether any instructions or warnings were either adequate or defective.”

Danaher's case could well go up in flames and, even if it doesn't, Wild Oats may not have to pay a judgment. It has countersued Wally's Natural for indemnification because Wally's is insured up to $1 million and Danaher cannot win an award of more than $300,000.

Kenney, meanwhile, has retained an “an experienced and certified ear candler,” Teede Stipich, as her expert.

This story linked by:


By Matthew Heller
1/13/11


 

Editor's note: On Point's RSS feed has moved to this link.

rc_insidestories
  • Court Extends Doctors' Liability for Prescription Gaffes

    The Utah Supreme Court has given a boost to the battle against prescription drug abuse by ruling that medical professionals can be sued over injuries to a nonpatient that were allegedly caused by  drugs they carelessly prescribed to patients.
    Read more...
  • Girl's Slaying Tests Cruise Line Liability

    The family of a 15-year-old girl who was killed in the crossfire of a gang shootout on a Caribbean island has asked an appeals court to reinstate a lawsuit that tests the liability of cruise ship operators for onshore injuries to passengers.
    Read more...
  • Bystander Claims "Swoon and Fall" Injuries at Church

    In yet another “swoon and fall” case against a church, an Illinois woman claims she was injured during a church service when a parishioner who was receiving the “spirit” fell backward, knocking several other worshippers into her.
    Read more...
  • Jurors' Comments Fuel New Trial Bid in Bullying Case

    Jurors may have opened the door to a new trial in a Maryland school bullying case by saying they returned a verdict for the defense because they were afraid of setting a bad precedent for school systems throughout the country.
    Read more...
  • Abuse Victim Can Sue Ex-DA Over 'Sexting' Messages

    A Wisconsin judge has protected a domestic violence victim from a rogue prosecutor, finding that she can sue him for sending her text messages in which he pressured her to have sex with him.
    Read more...
  • Four Loko Maker Says Users Knew of Health Dangers

    The maker of Four Loko has previewed its defense of a slew of product liability lawsuits, arguing that the physical effects of the energy drink's mixture of alcohol and caffeine — far from being an undisclosed risk to consumers — are precisely what made it so popular.
    Read more...
  • Mortician Sued for Speaking Ill of the Dead

    In a first-of-its-kind unprofessional conduct lawsuit, a woman has sued her former boss at a Michigan funeral home for making an indecent comment about the body of a dead man in front of her.
    Read more...
RC_OnFile

U.S. v. Arpaio
Subject: Civil rights
Document: Complaint

Schultz v. Medina Valley
Subject: School prayer
Document: Non-Kumbaya order

Chopourian v. Catholic Healthcare
Subject: Sexual harassment
Document: Verdict

Jackson v. Paula Deen
Subject: Sexual harassment
Document: Complaint

Marsh v. Air Tran Airways
Subject: Roaches on a plane
Document: Complaint

more

RC_OnTrial

Peterson/Pryde v. Thyden
Court: Montgomery (Va.) Circuit
Subject: Virginia Tech shootings
Verdict: $8 million

Sheridan v. Cherry
Court: L.A. Superior
Subject: Wrongful termination

more


RC_OnTheDocket

Brown v. Herbert
Date: 12/16/11
Court: USDC, Utah
Hearing: Motion to dismiss polygamy case

more