U.S. v. Arizona
Arizona judge enjoins enforcement of a new immigration law's requirement that police determine the immigration status of
every person who is arrested.
McGuire v. United Airlines
Michigan woman says a United Express flight crew locked her in a plane for nearly four hours after it landed because they failed to ensure that all passengers had disembarked.
R.H. v. Schenectady Sch. Dist.
Middle school student says he was suspended for wearing rosary beads because the rosary "is considered a gang-related symbol" and cannot be worn in school.
Fields v. Smith
Judge strikes down a law that bars transgender prison inmates from receiving hormone therapy at taxpayers' expense, finding it amounts to cruel and unusual punishment.
lc_search
LC_DayByDay

 Jun   July 10   Aug

SMTWTFS
   1  2  3
  4  5  6  7  8  910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
Julianna Walker Willis Technology
LC_BySubject
OnTheMap

rss

LC_ExtraPoints

• Iowa judge says a sheriff denied the applications of a father and son for concealed weapons permits in retaliation for their political activism. "This is a great reminder that the First Amendment protects the sole individual who may be a gadfly, kook, weirdo, nut job, whacko, and spook, with the same force of protection as folks with more majoritarian and popular views." Dorr v. Weber

• 5th Circuit rules that a school district violated the religious freedom of a Native American boy by requiring him to wear his long hair in a bun on top of his head or in a braid tucked into his shirt. The boy "has a sincere religious belief in wearing his hair uncut and in plain view."
A.A. v. Needville Ind. Sch. Dist.

• 11th Circuit denies a challenge to an ordinance restricting handouts of food to the homeless in Orlando parks. "[W]e are unpersuaded that the conduct of simply feeding people ... is expressive for First Amendment purposes."
First Vagabonds Church v. City of Orlando

• Boston judge slashes a jury award in an illegal music downloading case from $675,000 to $67,500. "The award in this case ... lacks any rational foundation and smacks of arbitrariness." Sony v. Tenenbaum

• Iowa Supreme Court suspends a voyeuristic attorney indefinitely for peeping on women through windows. "[W]e cannot overlook the serious, egregious, and persistent nature of [Mark] Templeton’s misconduct and the effect it had on his victims."
Disciplinary Board v. Templeton

• Pennsylvania judge strikes down the state's blasphemy law in a case brought by a film producer who wanted to name his company "I Choose Hell Productions." "'Choosing hell' may be an irreverent choice for a corporate name, but under the Constitution, this fact alone cannot be the basis for its suppression from the public debate." Kalman v. Cortes

• Cancer patient sues Wal-Mart for firing him after discovering that he uses medical marijuana for pain relief. "[N]o corporation doing business in Michigan should be permitted to flout state laws protecting patients who use medical marihuana in accordance with state law." Casias v. Wal-Mart Stores

• 11th Circuit rules that the operator of an Internet porn dorm was engaged in illegally operating a business in a residential zone. "Business objectives are the sole reason individuals are paid to live and engage in sexual activities at the 27th Street residence."
Flava Works v. City of Miami




Alltop_125x125.jpg

ADVERT

Free no win no fee claims advice for personal injury.


ADVERT

For accident claims advice, visit a personal injury lawyer.

Crack-Dealing Suit Against Mistress Goes up in Smoke Print

The ex-lover of a Northern California man did not injure his wife by providing him with crack cocaine during their two-year affair, a jury has ruled in a case of sex, drugs and a law that makes drug dealers liable for the injuries they cause.

The defense verdict means the wife of Marc Siciliano, 53, of San Rafael will not recover any damages under California's Drug Dealer Liability Act (DDLA). Cynthia Siciliano, 46, alleged Jodie Graham-Potts, 49, of Petaluma was liable for the “willful, reckless, or negligent actions” of her husband related to his cocaine use.

Cynthia Siciliano's attorney asked the jury to award her at least $100,000 in economic and emotional distress damages. “What happened in this marriage is more than just an affair,” Robert Diskint of San Rafael argued. “It is a husband being destroyed by crack cocaine, provided to him by Ms. Graham-Potts.”

Marc Siciliano, a former minor league baseball catcher, has reunited with his wife and testified against Graham-Potts, saying she introduced him to crack and “cooked” it for him because he didn't know how. He described smoking crack as a “full-body orgasm” that caused him to mistreat his wife and nine-year-old daughter.

The plaintiffs' evidence included a homemade sex-and-drugs videotape in which Graham-Potts lights a drug pipe and offers it to Marc Siciliano. “Let's get this party started,” she says.

But during a 10-day trial in Sonoma County Superior Court, Graham-Potts said Marc Siciliano was already using drugs when she met him in 2003 and would show up for their trysts with a briefcase containing drugs. Her attorney argued she was not responsible for any suffering resulting from their shared drug use.

“The Drug Dealer Liability Act was never meant for this sort of action,” Lisa L. Gygax of Forestville tells On Point. “It was clearly a revenge situation wherein the wife and her lawyer father sought to punish her husband and the defendant, who was waiting for the husband to divorce his wife and marry her.”

Graham-Potts says the trial was a "humiliating experience" and she is hoping Cynthia Siciliano does not appeal. "Let the healing begin for all involved," she urged.

California passed the DDLA in 1997 after a lobbying campaign by the late actor Carroll O'Connor, who had blamed a drug dealer for his son's death. “A person who sold, administered, or furnished an illegal controlled substance” to a drug user, the law states, is liable for “injury resulting from” the use of the drug.

At least 13 states now have such laws but they have rarely been used, in part because plaintiffs or their relatives have to admit to using drugs. In 2007, the South Dakota Supreme Court found a pharmacy was not liable under that state's law for the death of a man who overdosed on prescription morphine he had picked up for a disabled friend. Schafer v. Shopko Stores, 741 N.W.2d 758.

A similar lawsuit against a pharmacy -- Whittemore v. Owens Healthcare-Retail Pharmacy –- is pending before a California appeals court.

Graham-Potts and Marc Siciliano began their affair after he hired her as a driver for his limousine service. They broke up after he was arrested for possession of drug paraphernalia and, during a fight, threw a water bottle at her, breaking her nose.

A few months later, Cynthia Siciliano's nephew discovered the videotape in the couple's pool house and she confronted her husband, who admitted the affair. She filed her lawsuit in 2008 after consulting with her father, attorney Lee E. Shroyer of Mill Valley, also naming her daughter as a plaintiff.

While her husband was using drugs supplied by Graham-Potts, she alleged in the complaint, he abandoned her “for days at a time,” had “violent fits of anger,” was unavailable for medical emergencies and caused her to develop stress-related shingles and insomnia. “He became a monster,” she testified.

But under cross-examination, Marc Siciliano described the hedonistic lifestyle he led before meeting Graham-Potts, including using drugs with others at his home while his wife was at work. When Cynthia found stray bags of methamphetamine in the house, he told her they belonged to a friend.

“My client is not proud of what happened,” Gygax said in her opening statement. “But this public flogging ... it's just revenge.” After the verdict was announced, a juror told The Press Democrat of Santa Rosa there wasn't clear evidence that Graham-Potts provided drugs to Marc Siciliano.

In passing the DDLA, California lawmakers cited the need to compensate “those who have suffered harm as a result of the marketing and distribution of illegal controlled substances.” But the Siciliano case shows the danger that the law will be misused as a “heart balm” by the scorned spouses of drug users.

Like most states, California does not allow “heart balm” or alienation of affections actions.

This story linked by:


By Matthew Heller
2/5/10


 
rc_insidestories
  • Sex Harassment Claims Hit Actor Affleck, 'Bones' Star

    A producer of a film about actor Joaquin Phoenix, an extra on the set of the TV show “Bones,” an assistant property master, and a makeup artist are among the plaintiffs in a recent epidemic of lurid Hollywood lawsuits.
    Read more...
  • Jury Goes 'Wild' in Woman's Privacy Case Over Video

    A Missouri jury has gone wild in a case of involuntary nudity, finding that a woman consented to appearing topless in a “Girls Gone Wild” video by playing to the camera before another person pulled her top down.
    Read more...
  • Actress Facing $750K Award to Therapist

    Soap opera star Hunter Tylo may have to pay more than $750,000 in damages and attorney fees to a psychotherapist whom she sued more than four years ago for negligent treatment of her children, On Point has learned.
    Read more...
  • Reporter Sues Hotels Over Peephole Videos

    In an unusual premises liability case, ESPN reporter Erin Andrews has sued the operators of three hotels for allowing a stalker to surreptitiously videotape her naked through peepholes in the doors to her rooms.
    Read more...
  • Students Challenge Rubber Fetus Ban

    The suspensions of seven pro-life students at two Roswell, N.M., high schools for distributing rubber fetuses have given birth to a lawsuit that takes the First Amendment protections for student speech into uncharted territory.
    Read more...
  • Distress Claim Barred in Hotel 'Ménâge à Trois' Case

    A former employee of a luxury Miami Beach hotel who says her billionaire boss invited her to join him in a “ménâge à trois” cannot sue him for infliction of emotional distress, a judge has ruled, finding his alleged behavior, while “obnoxious,” was not “objectively outrageous.”
    Read more...
  • Chuck E. Cheese Settles Molesting Mascot Suit

    A Missouri woman who claimed a Chuck E. Cheese mascot groped her breast has settled her lawsuit against the operator of the restaurant chain, On Point has learned.
    Read more...
RC_OnFile

Stovell v. James
Subject: LeBron's paternity
Document: Complaint

U.S. v. Arizona
Subject: Illegal immigration
Document: Complaint

Rosenberg v. Google
Subject: Negligent navigation
Document: Complaint

Smith v. Hooters
Subject: Weight discrimination
Document: Complaint

City of Ontario v. Quon
Subject: Text-message privacy
Document: Opinion

more

RC_OnTrial

Rosenberg v. Musical Arts Assn.
Court: Cuyahoga County (Ohio) Common Pleas
Subject: Defamation, age bias

Mecozzi v. City of Los Angeles
Court: L.A. Superior
Subject: Police brutality
Verdict: $1.7 million

more


RC_OnTheDocket

Jose Padilla v. John Yoo
Date: 6/14/10
Court: 9th Circuit
Hearing: Oral arguments in human rights case.

Perry v. Schwarzenegger
Date: 6/16/10
Court: USDC, N. Calif.
Hearing: Closing arguments in trial of challenge to gay marriage ban.

more