
• Nevada man sues the Mormon church over a back injury he suffered performing baptisms for the dead. The church was negligent in not warning Daniel Dastrup that "the repetitive motion required for performing baptisms for the dead could cause serious damage to a person's back." Dastrup v. LDS Church
• Attorney says he was harassed by his boss at a Newport Beach, Calif., law firm because refused to attend a seminar "where he would be stripped naked, not allowed to leave, be required to discuss details of his sex life, handle a wooden dildo, and potentially allow other men to touch his genitals." Eggleston v. Bisnar/Chase
• Parents of a 10-year-old boy who witnessed a killer whale's fatal attack on a trainer sue Sea World Orlando for infliction of emotional distress. "Without question, it was reasonably foreseeable and in fact predictable that an attack such as this one by a killer whale with the tendencies of Tilikum was inevitable." Connell v. Sea World
• Denver judge dismisses Oklahoma City bomber Terry Nichols's civil rights claims against prison officials for denying him a high-fiber diet. Nichols v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
• Illinois teenager with cerebral palsy sues the Special Olympics for refusing to let her play basketball with the help of a service dog. Youngwith v. Special Olympics
• Montana judge sets aside a government decision removing protections for the northern Rocky Mountain gray wolf. The Endangered Species Act "was not intended to sow the dragon's teeth of strife or to plant the seeds of future conflicts that have given rise to this case." Defenders of Wildlife v. Salazar
• San Francisco judge dismisses a cereal consumer's false advertising suit. "[T]here is nothing in the packaging or marketing of Cap’n Crunch that would in any way deceive a reasonable consumer into believing that the cereal contains or derives nutritional value from real fruit." Werbel v. PepsiCo
• Iowa judge says a sheriff denied the applications of a father and son for concealed weapons permits in retaliation for their political activism. "This is a great reminder that the First Amendment protects the sole individual who may be a gadfly, kook, weirdo, nut job, whacko, and spook, with the same force of protection as folks with more majoritarian and popular views." Dorr v. Weber
• 5th Circuit rules that a school district violated the religious freedom of a Native American boy by requiring him to wear his long hair in a bun on top of his head or in a braid tucked into his shirt. The boy "has a sincere religious belief in wearing his hair uncut and in plain view." A.A. v. Needville Ind. Sch. Dist.

|
|
Court Tosses Suit Over Student's Attack on Jogger |
|
|
A jogger who was intentionally run over by a high-school student cannot sue school officials for turning a blind eye after the student expressed a desire to do “horrible things” with a vehicle, the Montana Supreme Court has ruled.
 |
Daniel Robbins
Daniel Robbins, then 16, nearly killed Patty Emanuel in May 2003 when he slammed his SUV into her as she was jogging near C.M. Russell High School in Great Falls, Mont. He had told his passenger that he wanted to run her over and then have sex with her corpse.
In suing the Great Falls School District for negligence, Emanuel said school officials failed to take appropriate action after Robbins expressed gruesome thoughts in a January 2002 typing assignment –- including a New Year's resoluton to “Get a drivers license, so I can do those horrible things people like to read about in the paper.”
“Daniel foretold, in writing, that he was resolved to commit a horrible act with a motor vehicle,” Emanuel, who suffered six fractured vertebrae, four fractures in her pelvis, a collapsed lung, three broken ribs and other injuries, said in an appellate brief.
But the Supreme Court found the district could not have foreseen he “would deliberately run over a pedestrian, after school hours, off school grounds, nearly seventeen months after the disturbing New Year’s Resolution list was brought to its attention.”
The list “did not contain any specific threats,” the court said in affirming a trial judge who summarily dismissed the case, and “several of the resolutions (e.g.: 'Kill the tooth fairy.') were sufficiently ridiculous or random so as to support Robbins’s explanation that the list was created as a misguided attempt at black humor.”
The decision did not discuss the public policy implications of the case. Emanuel argued that a school district should not “enjoy[ ] complete exemption from tort liability regardless of how negligently and dangerously it acts in counseling, evaluating and monitoring students and in designing and implementing a threat assessment and violence prevention plan.”
Robbins also resolved in his list to “Taste human flesh” and “Shoot some one on a caping [sic] trip.” According to Emanuel, the Russell High principal told his parents that the ninth-grader was a normal, typical student and no one from the district referred him to a “school counselor, school psychologist, or any outside mental health professionals.”
The district said in a brief that Robbins only wrote “some weird things” in his list and that it was under no duty “to implement a plan that would protect a jogger from a student’s conduct off school grounds at night.”
In post-Columbine America, school officials have also been sued when they do take action against students who express violent thoughts. But Emanuel seemed to have a reasonable argument that Russell High should at least have provided Robbins with “responsive services” and kept him under some kind of increased supervision.
“If the District had been monitoring Daniel,” she said,
they would have discovered: Daniel was involved in a violent video gaming gang called the Apocalypse Knights; Daniel drew depictions of the gang's symbol, and satanic images on his arms, along with drawings of pentagrams, guns, knives and people dying, and had written the phrases "death rocks" and "the end of the world is near" on his arms; Daniel had drawn a depiction of his friend Pablo Jara's head being blown off while the two were in a dispute; Daniel had been "really different this year" and had been more "goth"; Daniel had been wearing realistic looking vampire teeth to school; Daniel had discussed getting a gun and did in fact have one in his possession prior to the attack on Patty; Daniel was committing crimes and stealing; Daniel had been discussing robbing a bank and how to get away with the robbery and murder.
Robbins is serving 50 years in prison after pleading guilty to attempted deliberate homicide. Referring to the resolutions list, the judge who sentenced him said, "The defendant made up his mind to run [Emanuel] down well in advance.”
By Matthew Heller 6/1/09
|
|
-
Court Raps Judge Over 'Moral' Views in Adoption Case
The Georgia Court of Appeals has rejected the reactionary views of a family court judge who ruled that a foster parent could not adopt a child because her out-of-wedlock relationship with a man was “immoral.”
Read more...
-
Off With His Head! Woman Sues 'Mad Hatter' Actor
Experimental theater clashes with premises liability law in the case of a Kentucky woman who claims she was injured while watching a performance of a circus-inspired play when one of the actors balanced his knee on her head.
Read more...
-
Charity Worker Accuses CEO of Hypnotic Seduction
A former charity worker may be pushing the limits of sexual harassment law by alleging that her boss required her to participate in “relaxation sessions” on his “magic couch” during which he hypnotized and molested her.
Read more...
-
Appeal is Expert's Latest Challenge to Judges
Expert witness Dr. David Egilman was previously successful in showing he had standing to appeal a judicial order in a case in which he was not a party — but that case may not help him in his latest challenge to a trial judge.
Read more...
-
Plaintiff's Expert Files Appeal in 'Popcorn Lung' Lawsuit
A controversial expert witness for plaintiffs has filed an unusual non-party appeal of a Washington state judge's decision finding his theory that snackers can contract lung disease from exposure to microwave popcorn is not scientifically sound.
Read more...
-
Philly School Sued Over Race Attack on Student's Mom
Taking civil rights law to what may be an extreme, an Asian-American woman is alleging a Philadelphia high school's tolerance of racism rendered her “helpless prey” to African-American students who attacked her when she picked her child up from the school.
Read more...
-
'McSteamy' Sex Tape Suit Cools off With Settlement
Acting couple Eric Dane and Rebecca Gayheart have dropped a $1 million lawsuit against Gawker.com for publishing a videotape featuring them in a nude threesome with a friend after the gossip website agreed to take down the much-viewed posting.
Read more...
|
McCourt v. McCourt Court: L.A. Superior Subject: Dodgers divorce
Pom Wonderful v. Welch Foods Court: USDC, C. Calif. Subject: False advertising
more
|
|
McCourt v. McCourt Date: 8/30/10 Court: L.A. Superior Hearing: Dodgers divorce trial
more
|
|
|