
• Parents of a 10-year-old boy who witnessed a killer whale's fatal attack on a trainer sue Sea World Orlando for infliction of emotional distress. "Without question, it was reasonably foreseeable and in fact predictable that an attack such as this one by a killer whale with the tendencies of Tilikum was inevitable." Connell v. Sea World
• Denver judge dismisses Oklahoma City bomber Terry Nichols's civil rights claims against prison officials for denying him a high-fiber diet. Nichols v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
• Illinois teenager with cerebral palsy sues the Special Olympics for refusing to let her play basketball with the help of a service dog. Youngwith v. Special Olympics
• Montana judge sets aside a government decision removing protections for the northern Rocky Mountain gray wolf. The Endangered Species Act "was not intended to sow the dragon's teeth of strife or to plant the seeds of future conflicts that have given rise to this case." Defenders of Wildlife v. Salazar
• San Francisco judge dismisses a cereal consumer's false advertising suit. "[T]here is nothing in the packaging or marketing of Cap’n Crunch that would in any way deceive a reasonable consumer into believing that the cereal contains or derives nutritional value from real fruit." Werbel v. PepsiCo
• Iowa judge says a sheriff denied the applications of a father and son for concealed weapons permits in retaliation for their political activism. "This is a great reminder that the First Amendment protects the sole individual who may be a gadfly, kook, weirdo, nut job, whacko, and spook, with the same force of protection as folks with more majoritarian and popular views." Dorr v. Weber
• 5th Circuit rules that a school district violated the religious freedom of a Native American boy by requiring him to wear his long hair in a bun on top of his head or in a braid tucked into his shirt. The boy "has a sincere religious belief in wearing his hair uncut and in plain view." A.A. v. Needville Ind. Sch. Dist.
• 11th Circuit denies a challenge to an ordinance restricting handouts of food to the homeless in Orlando parks. "[W]e are unpersuaded that the conduct of simply feeding people ... is expressive for First Amendment purposes." First Vagabonds Church v. City of Orlando

|
|
Court Finds Church Liable in "Swoon-and-Fall" Case |
|
|
Churches might want to be more careful about protecting swooning parishioners after the Michigan Court of Appeals said a church was liable for the fall of a woman who was “slain in the spirit” during an altar call.
A jury had awarded Judith Dadd $40,000 in damages for the head injury she suffered in the fall at Mount Hope Church in Lansing and the appeals court affirmed the award in a first-of-its-kind decision last week, stressing the uniqueness of her negligence case.
“[W]e generally agree with defendants that they had no legal duty to insure that they would protect from injury all congregants who participated in the church service,” the per curiam opinion said, but
we conclude the very narrow and unique circumstances that exist in the present case support the imposition of a legal duty imposed on defendants to assist plaintiff while she participated in this altar call.
The court noted that the church's pastor “made it clear to the congregants that ushers were trained to catch persons who fall during an altar call” and that, according to Dadd's testimony, an usher “specifically solicited her participation in the altar call” and “directed her to a specific place before the altar where a specific minister would pray over her.”
“A person in plaintiff’s position could reasonably conclude that the usher who positioned her for this altar call would also guard her through the process,” the court said.
The opinion was not published, but it certainly puts churches on notice that if they regularly provide ushers at altar calls, they have a duty to protect congregants who are being prayed over from injury.
In a similar case, a parishioner sued a Knoxville, Tenn., church last year for allowing him to fall to the ground during an altar call even though the minister had “asked the catchers to be ready and stated that he didn't want anyone to fall and get hurt and sue him.” Another suit in Oakland, Calif., alleges a woman fell and injured her head after her pastor “laid hands” on her by striking her forehead with the palm of his hand.
Dadd was injured during a leadership rally at Mount Hope, a "megachurch" with more than 4,000 members, in July 2002. While an assistant minister prayed over her, she was “slain in the spirit,” fell backward and –- with no usher there to catch her –- struck her head on the floor.
As part of her case, she introduced a recording of one of Pastor Dave Williams’ sermons in which, while discussing whether congregants should respond to an altar call, he said that “others are against it because they’re afraid of getting hurt. That’s why we train our ushers to catch people if this happens.”
The church argued that “requiring the presence of an usher for every person who attends a church service places a huge burden on churches and removes all responsibility from a person attending a church service to be careful.” But the appeals court did not consider that argument because the church did not present it at trial.
Asked whether she checked to see if an usher was behind her before she fell, Dadd testified:
As I go before whoever is praying for me, they’re facing the congregation in the sanctuary. I’m facing the altar, the front. They are the ones that determine when to start praying for you. It’s up to them.
The jury awarded another $273,750 on claims alleging Williams damaged Dadd's reputation by suggesting in statements to parishioners that she faked her injury. The appeals court reversed that portion of the judgment because the trial judge failed to instruct the jury that the statements were entitled to a qualified privilege.
By Matthew Heller 4/12/09
|
|
-
Off With His Head! Woman Sues 'Mad Hatter' Actor
Experimental theater clashes with premises liability law in the case of a Kentucky woman who claims she was injured while watching a performance of a circus-inspired play when one of the actors balanced his knee on her head.
Read more...
-
Charity Worker Accuses CEO of Hypnotic Seduction
A former charity worker may be pushing the limits of sexual harassment law by alleging that her boss required her to participate in “relaxation sessions” on his “magic couch” during which he hypnotized and molested her.
Read more...
-
Appeal is Expert's Latest Challenge to Judges
Expert witness Dr. David Egilman was previously successful in showing he had standing to appeal a judicial order in a case in which he was not a party — but that case may not help him in his latest challenge to a trial judge.
Read more...
-
Plaintiff's Expert Files Appeal in 'Popcorn Lung' Lawsuit
A controversial expert witness for plaintiffs has filed an unusual non-party appeal of a Washington state judge's decision finding his theory that snackers can contract lung disease from exposure to microwave popcorn is not scientifically sound.
Read more...
-
Philly School Sued Over Race Attack on Student's Mom
Taking civil rights law to what may be an extreme, an Asian-American woman is alleging a Philadelphia high school's tolerance of racism rendered her “helpless prey” to African-American students who attacked her when she picked her child up from the school.
Read more...
-
'McSteamy' Sex Tape Suit Cools off With Settlement
Acting couple Eric Dane and Rebecca Gayheart have dropped a $1 million lawsuit against Gawker.com for publishing a videotape featuring them in a nude threesome with a friend after the gossip website agreed to take down the much-viewed posting.
Read more...
-
Sex Harassment Claims Hit Actor Affleck, 'Bones' Star
A producer of a film about actor Joaquin Phoenix, an extra on the set of the TV show “Bones,” an assistant property master, and a makeup artist are among the plaintiffs in a recent epidemic of lurid Hollywood lawsuits.
Read more...
|
Arnaout v. Warden Subject: Muslim inmate prayer Document: John Walker Lindh declaration
Marriage of J.B. and H.B. Subject: Same-sex divorce Document: Opinion
Stovell v. James Subject: LeBron's paternity Document: Complaint
U.S. v. Arizona Subject: Illegal immigration Document: Complaint
Rosenberg v. Google Subject: Negligent navigation Document: Complaint
more
|
|
McCourt v. McCourt Court: L.A. Superior Subject: Dodgers divorce
Pom Wonderful v. Welch Foods Court: USDC, C. Calif. Subject: False advertising
more
|
|
McCourt v. McCourt Date: 8/30/10 Court: L.A. Superior Hearing: Dodgers divorce trial
more
|
|
|