
• Illinois appeals court says the contact sports exception to negligence liability does not apply to the case of an athletic trainer who was struck in the eye by a hockey puck while refilling water bottles. Michael Weisberg "suffered injuries as a result of alleged conduct that was not inherent to the sport of hockey." Weisberg v. Chicago Steel
• 3rd Circuit rules that a couple can sue Google for trespassing on their property while photographing it for the Street View feature. "[T]he Borings have alleged that Google entered upon their property without permission. If proven, that is a trespass, pure and simple." Boring v. Google
• Minnesota judge reduces a jury award of copyright infringement damages against an illegal music file sharer from $2 million to $54,000. "The need for deterrence cannot justify a $2 million verdict for stealing and illegally distributing 24 songs for the sole purpose of obtaining free music." Capitol Records v. Thomas-Rasset
• Special master says Texas Court of Criminal Appeals Judge Sharon Keller's conduct on the day of an execution was "not exemplary," but "she did not engage in conduct so egregious that she should be removed from office." In re Honorable Sharon Keller
• New Jersey appeals court says a female business owner can sue a male customer for refusing to do business with her unless she gave him sexual favors. "The quid pro quo sexual harassment alleged in the complaint, if legally permitted, would stand as a barrier to women's ability to do business on an equal footing with men." J.T.'s Tire Services v. United Rentals
• New Mexico judge says a photographer may be compelled to photograph a same-sex commitment ceremony despite her religious convictions because she "is not being forced to participate in any ceremony or ritual; the only requirement is that she photograph the event." Elane Photography v. Willock
• Tennessee judge rules that the PGA Tour does not have to accommodate a golfer by allowing him to take testosterone shots. Doug Barron "has not shown that the 'reasonable accommodation' he has requested ... is necessary in order for him to continue playing golf in PGA Tour events." Barron v. PGA Tour
• 6th Circuit says two high school basketball coaches did not use excessive corporal punishment in paddling a player. One of the coaches "testified that he only paddled Martin [Nolan] a total of ten times during Martin’s tenure at Hamilton [High School]." Nolan v. Memphis City Schools
• Wrongful-death lawsuit alleges a cell phone company is liable for a fatal auto accident allegedly caused by a customer who was driving while "engrossed" in a cell phone conversation. Sprint/Nextel "failed to warn of the hazard of cell phone use while driving." Estate of Doyle v. Sprint/Nextel

|
|
Court Finds Church Liable in "Swoon-and-Fall" Case |
|
|
Churches might want to be more careful about protecting swooning parishioners after the Michigan Court of Appeals said a church was liable for the fall of a woman who was “slain in the spirit” during an altar call.
A jury had awarded Judith Dadd $40,000 in damages for the head injury she suffered in the fall at Mount Hope Church in Lansing and the appeals court affirmed the award in a first-of-its-kind decision last week, stressing the uniqueness of her negligence case.
“[W]e generally agree with defendants that they had no legal duty to insure that they would protect from injury all congregants who participated in the church service,” the per curiam opinion said, but
we conclude the very narrow and unique circumstances that exist in the present case support the imposition of a legal duty imposed on defendants to assist plaintiff while she participated in this altar call.
The court noted that the church's pastor “made it clear to the congregants that ushers were trained to catch persons who fall during an altar call” and that, according to Dadd's testimony, an usher “specifically solicited her participation in the altar call” and “directed her to a specific place before the altar where a specific minister would pray over her.”
“A person in plaintiff’s position could reasonably conclude that the usher who positioned her for this altar call would also guard her through the process,” the court said.
The opinion was not published, but it certainly puts churches on notice that if they regularly provide ushers at altar calls, they have a duty to protect congregants who are being prayed over from injury.
In a similar case, a parishioner sued a Knoxville, Tenn., church last year for allowing him to fall to the ground during an altar call even though the minister had “asked the catchers to be ready and stated that he didn't want anyone to fall and get hurt and sue him.” Another suit in Oakland, Calif., alleges a woman fell and injured her head after her pastor “laid hands” on her by striking her forehead with the palm of his hand.
Dadd was injured during a leadership rally at Mount Hope, a "megachurch" with more than 4,000 members, in July 2002. While an assistant minister prayed over her, she was “slain in the spirit,” fell backward and –- with no usher there to catch her –- struck her head on the floor.
As part of her case, she introduced a recording of one of Pastor Dave Williams’ sermons in which, while discussing whether congregants should respond to an altar call, he said that “others are against it because they’re afraid of getting hurt. That’s why we train our ushers to catch people if this happens.”
The church argued that “requiring the presence of an usher for every person who attends a church service places a huge burden on churches and removes all responsibility from a person attending a church service to be careful.” But the appeals court did not consider that argument because the church did not present it at trial.
Asked whether she checked to see if an usher was behind her before she fell, Dadd testified:
As I go before whoever is praying for me, they’re facing the congregation in the sanctuary. I’m facing the altar, the front. They are the ones that determine when to start praying for you. It’s up to them.
The jury awarded another $273,750 on claims alleging Williams damaged Dadd's reputation by suggesting in statements to parishioners that she faked her injury. The appeals court reversed that portion of the judgment because the trial judge failed to instruct the jury that the statements were entitled to a qualified privilege.
By Matthew Heller 4/12/09
|
|
-
Dancer Strips Club of $100K in DUI Case
A former stripper has won a $100,000 award in an unusual employment law case as a jury found a Birmingham, Ala., strip club liable for allowing her to drive home from work “in a highly intoxicated state.”
Read more...
-
Halliburton Takes Swing at Alleged Rape Victim
Perhaps befitting the former employer of Dick Cheney, KBR/Halliburton has taken the low road in asking the U.S. Supreme Court to bar a former employee from having a public trial of her claims that she was gang raped by co-workers in Iraq.
Read more...
-
Tenant's Gripe Tweet Too Vague to be Libel
A Chicago judge has dismissed the first libel case involving a single Twitter posting, finding that an apartment renter's gripe about her landlord was too vague and imprecise to be construed as defamatory.
Read more...
-
Copperfield Wants U.S. to Keep Evidence From Accuser
Magician David Copperfield has some sharp words for federal prosecutors who have refused to acknowledge that they dropped a sexual assault investigation against him because of the accuser's lack of credibility.
Read more...
-
Hotel Exec Settles Drug Death Case
The former CEO of a luxury hotel operator has quickly settled a lawsuit accusing him of causing the drug overdose death of his girlfriend, On Point has learned –- even though he describes the allegations as “slanderous and bogus.”
Read more...
-
Bingo for "Bruno!" Baron Cohen KO's Verbal Spat Case
A California judge has dismissed a verbal assault case against comedian Sacha Baron Cohen, finding that a woman initiated a confrontation with him during the filming of a scene for the movie “Brüno” and “not vice versa.”
Read more...
-
"No Sex Involved" in Orgy Viewing Case, Hotel Insists
A former manager at the Hilton Minneapolis who claimed she walked in on an orgy at a company sales conference has “sensationalized” what was only “some questionable behavior,” the hotel's owner says in arguing that her sexual harassment case should not go to trial.
Read more...
|
North Face Apparel v. The South Butt Subject: Trademark infringement Document: Answer to complaint
Stern v. Sony Corp. Subject: Gamer's rights Document: Motion to dismiss
Rossiter v. Evans Subject: STD infection Document: Opinion
Sanford Siegal v. Kim Kardashian Subject: Twitter libel Document: Complaint
Bryan v. McPherson Subject: Excessive Taser force Document: Opinion
more
|
|
Spears v. Allergan, Inc. Court: Orange County (Calif.) Superior Subject: Botox death
Putnam v. Morning Star Boys' Ranch Court: Spokane County (Wash.) Superior Subject: Sexual abuse
more
|
|
Plaintiff B v. Joe Francis Date: 2/22/10 Court: USDC, N. Fla. Hearing: Jury trial in sexual abuse case.
CBS v. FCC Date: 2/23/10 Court: 3rd Circuit Hearing: Oral arguments in "Nipplegate" case.
more
|
|
|