U.S. v. Arizona
Arizona judge enjoins enforcement of a new immigration law's requirement that police determine the immigration status of
every person who is arrested.
McGuire v. United Airlines
Michigan woman says a United Express flight crew locked her in a plane for nearly four hours after it landed because they failed to ensure that all passengers had disembarked.
R.H. v. Schenectady Sch. Dist.
Middle school student says he was suspended for wearing rosary beads because the rosary "is considered a gang-related symbol" and cannot be worn in school.
Fields v. Smith
Judge strikes down a law that bars transgender prison inmates from receiving hormone therapy at taxpayers' expense, finding it amounts to cruel and unusual punishment.
lc_search
LC_DayByDay

 Jun   July 10   Aug

SMTWTFS
   1  2  3
  4  5  6  7  8  910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031
Julianna Walker Willis Technology
LC_BySubject
OnTheMap

rss

LC_ExtraPoints

• Iowa judge says a sheriff denied the applications of a father and son for concealed weapons permits in retaliation for their political activism. "This is a great reminder that the First Amendment protects the sole individual who may be a gadfly, kook, weirdo, nut job, whacko, and spook, with the same force of protection as folks with more majoritarian and popular views." Dorr v. Weber

• 5th Circuit rules that a school district violated the religious freedom of a Native American boy by requiring him to wear his long hair in a bun on top of his head or in a braid tucked into his shirt. The boy "has a sincere religious belief in wearing his hair uncut and in plain view."
A.A. v. Needville Ind. Sch. Dist.

• 11th Circuit denies a challenge to an ordinance restricting handouts of food to the homeless in Orlando parks. "[W]e are unpersuaded that the conduct of simply feeding people ... is expressive for First Amendment purposes."
First Vagabonds Church v. City of Orlando

• Boston judge slashes a jury award in an illegal music downloading case from $675,000 to $67,500. "The award in this case ... lacks any rational foundation and smacks of arbitrariness." Sony v. Tenenbaum

• Iowa Supreme Court suspends a voyeuristic attorney indefinitely for peeping on women through windows. "[W]e cannot overlook the serious, egregious, and persistent nature of [Mark] Templeton’s misconduct and the effect it had on his victims."
Disciplinary Board v. Templeton

• Pennsylvania judge strikes down the state's blasphemy law in a case brought by a film producer who wanted to name his company "I Choose Hell Productions." "'Choosing hell' may be an irreverent choice for a corporate name, but under the Constitution, this fact alone cannot be the basis for its suppression from the public debate." Kalman v. Cortes

• Cancer patient sues Wal-Mart for firing him after discovering that he uses medical marijuana for pain relief. "[N]o corporation doing business in Michigan should be permitted to flout state laws protecting patients who use medical marihuana in accordance with state law." Casias v. Wal-Mart Stores

• 11th Circuit rules that the operator of an Internet porn dorm was engaged in illegally operating a business in a residential zone. "Business objectives are the sole reason individuals are paid to live and engage in sexual activities at the 27th Street residence."
Flava Works v. City of Miami




Alltop_125x125.jpg

ADVERT

Free no win no fee claims advice for personal injury.


ADVERT

For accident claims advice, visit a personal injury lawyer.

Case Over Fake MySpace Page Chills Student Speech Print

Several recent court rulings have been protective of off-campus student speech -– with the exception of a very shaky decision that a dissenting judge said “vests school officials with dangerously overbroad censorship discretion.”

All the cases address a First Amendment issue that has yet to come before the U.S. Supreme Court –- whether, as one judge put it,

a school can regulate student speech or expression that occurs outside the school gates, and is not connected to a school-sponsored event, but that subsequently makes its way onto campus, either by the speaker or by other means.

Under Tinker v. Des Moines Independent Community School Dist., 393 U.S. 503 (1969), a “showing that the students’ activities would materially and substantially disrupt the work and discipline of the school” is necessary to justify suppression of student expression.

Applying that test, a Florida judge ruled Feb. 12 that a high-school senior could sue her principal for suspending her after she used her home computer to create a Facebook group entitled, “Ms. Sarah Phelps is the worst teacher I’ve ever met.”

The student expressed an opinion about a teacher that “was published off-campus, did not  cause any disruption on-campus, and was not lewd, vulgar, threatening, or advocating illegal or dangerous behavior,” U.S. Magistrate Judge Barry L. Garber said in denying the principal's motion to dismiss in Evans v. Bayer.

In California, U.S. District Judge Stephen V. Wilson reached a similar conclusion in the case of a high-school student who was suspending for posting a video on YouTube in which she recorded a friend calling a classmate a “slut” and “the ugliest piece of shit I’ve ever seen in my whole life.”

The school's administrative principal testified that she believed classes would be disrupted by the video as a result of students “gossip[ing]” and “passing notes” in class, but Wilson said that did not amount to “a reasonable belief that the YouTube video was likely to cause a substantial disruption in the future.”

“The Court cannot uphold school discipline of student speech simply because young persons are unpredictable or immature, or because, in general, teenagers are emotionally fragile and may often fight over hurtful comments,” he concluded in J.C. v. Beverly Hills Unified Sch. Dist. The plaintiff in the case was awarded $8 in nominal damages and $103,335 in attorney fees.

The 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals also protected off-campus speech in ruling that a school district illegally disciplined a student for creating a fake MySpace profile of his high-school principal. “It would be an unseemly and dangerous precedent,” the court said,

to allow the state in the guise of school authorities to reach into a child’s home and control his/her actions there to the same extent that they can control that child when he/she participates in school sponsored activities. Layshock v. Hermitage Sch. Dist.

But a 2-1 majority of another 3rd Circuit panel applied Tinker too broadly in the similar case of a middle-school student -– identified only as “J.S.” -- who was disciplined for creating a fictitious MySpace profile that insinuated her principal was a sex addict and a pedophile.

Writing for the majority in J.S. v. Blue Mountain Sch. Dist., Judge D. Michael Fisher was “sufficiently persuaded that the profile presented a reasonable possibility of a future disruption,” in part because of “its blatant allusions to [the principal] engaging in sexual misconduct.”

“We simply cannot agree that a principal may not regulate student speech rising to this level of vulgarity and containing such reckless and damaging information so as to undermine the principal’s authority within the school, and potentially arouse suspicions among the school community about his character,” he said in affirming a trial judge who summarily dismissed the case.

In a strong dissent, Judge Michael A. Chagares said the majority opinion “significantly broadens school districts’ authority over student speech; I believe that this holding vests school officials with dangerously overbroad censorship discretion.”

“[D]espite the unfortunate humiliation it caused for [the principal],” he argued, the MySpace profile “was so outrageous that no one could have taken it seriously, and no one did. Thus, it was clearly not reasonably foreseeable that J.S.’s speech would create a substantial disruption or material interference in school.”

Courts have viewed the “foreseeability” standard as consistent with Tinker but the J.S. case suggests it should only be applied when school officials reasonably believe that a campus will be disrupted by violent behavior. J.S. is preparing to file a petition for a rehearing en banc.

Pending off-campus speech cases include Doninger v. Niehoff, in which a student was punished for making crude remarks about school officials on her blog, and T.V. v. Smith-Green Community School Corp., in which two girls were disciplined for posting raunchy photos of themselves on their MySpace pages.

UPDATES

  • The losing parties in the Layshock and J.S. cases have petitioned the 3rd Circuit for rehearing en banc.

  • The 3rd Circuit granted both petitions for rehearing en banc. Oral arguments are scheduled for June 3, 2010.


  • By Matthew Heller
    2/22/10


     
    rc_insidestories
    • Sex Harassment Claims Hit Actor Affleck, 'Bones' Star

      A producer of a film about actor Joaquin Phoenix, an extra on the set of the TV show “Bones,” an assistant property master, and a makeup artist are among the plaintiffs in a recent epidemic of lurid Hollywood lawsuits.
      Read more...
    • Jury Goes 'Wild' in Woman's Privacy Case Over Video

      A Missouri jury has gone wild in a case of involuntary nudity, finding that a woman consented to appearing topless in a “Girls Gone Wild” video by playing to the camera before another person pulled her top down.
      Read more...
    • Actress Facing $750K Award to Therapist

      Soap opera star Hunter Tylo may have to pay more than $750,000 in damages and attorney fees to a psychotherapist whom she sued more than four years ago for negligent treatment of her children, On Point has learned.
      Read more...
    • Reporter Sues Hotels Over Peephole Videos

      In an unusual premises liability case, ESPN reporter Erin Andrews has sued the operators of three hotels for allowing a stalker to surreptitiously videotape her naked through peepholes in the doors to her rooms.
      Read more...
    • Students Challenge Rubber Fetus Ban

      The suspensions of seven pro-life students at two Roswell, N.M., high schools for distributing rubber fetuses have given birth to a lawsuit that takes the First Amendment protections for student speech into uncharted territory.
      Read more...
    • Distress Claim Barred in Hotel 'Ménâge à Trois' Case

      A former employee of a luxury Miami Beach hotel who says her billionaire boss invited her to join him in a “ménâge à trois” cannot sue him for infliction of emotional distress, a judge has ruled, finding his alleged behavior, while “obnoxious,” was not “objectively outrageous.”
      Read more...
    • Chuck E. Cheese Settles Molesting Mascot Suit

      A Missouri woman who claimed a Chuck E. Cheese mascot groped her breast has settled her lawsuit against the operator of the restaurant chain, On Point has learned.
      Read more...
    RC_OnFile

    Stovell v. James
    Subject: LeBron's paternity
    Document: Complaint

    U.S. v. Arizona
    Subject: Illegal immigration
    Document: Complaint

    Rosenberg v. Google
    Subject: Negligent navigation
    Document: Complaint

    Smith v. Hooters
    Subject: Weight discrimination
    Document: Complaint

    City of Ontario v. Quon
    Subject: Text-message privacy
    Document: Opinion

    more

    RC_OnTrial

    Rosenberg v. Musical Arts Assn.
    Court: Cuyahoga County (Ohio) Common Pleas
    Subject: Defamation, age bias

    Mecozzi v. City of Los Angeles
    Court: L.A. Superior
    Subject: Police brutality
    Verdict: $1.7 million

    more


    RC_OnTheDocket

    Jose Padilla v. John Yoo
    Date: 6/14/10
    Court: 9th Circuit
    Hearing: Oral arguments in human rights case.

    Perry v. Schwarzenegger
    Date: 6/16/10
    Court: USDC, N. Calif.
    Hearing: Closing arguments in trial of challenge to gay marriage ban.

    more