Lohan v. E-Trade
Actress Lindsay Lohan alleges a TV ad featuring a "milkaholic" baby named Lindsay used her name and personality for advertising purposes without her consent.
Irvin v. Mustafa
NFL Hall of Famer Michael Irvin files a countersuit against a woman who accused him of rape, alleging she is a "morally-bankrupt individual" who is trying to ruin his career.
Robbins v. Lower Merion SD
High-school student accuses a school
district of spying on him and other students
by remotely activating webcams contained in school-supplied laptops.
Peterson v. Grisham
10th Circuit finds John Grisham did not defame three Oklahoma law enforcement officials in a book about the wrongful convictions of two men for a rape-murder.
lc_search
LC_DayByDay

 Feb   March 10   Apr

SMTWTFS
   1  2  3  4  5  6
  7  8  910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031 
Julianna Walker Willis Technology
LC_BySubject
OnTheMap

rss

LC_ExtraPoints

• Owners of Who Dat?, Inc. sue the NFL and the New Orleans Saints for trademark infringement, seeking to protect the mark that "has become one of the most recognizable in all of America and quickly became well-known around the world."
Who Dat?, Inc. v. NFL Properties

• Army bomb disposal expert sues the makers of "The Hurt Locker" for plagiarizing his life story. The film is "nothing more than the exploitation of a real life honorable, courageous, and long serving member of our country’s armed forces, by greedy multi-billion dollar 'entertainment' corporations."
Sarver v. The Hurt Locker

• Former patient sues the Cincinnati hospital where he was sexually assaulted by a transgender nurse. The nurse's "employment while masquerading as a member of the female gender in a hospital environment involved an unreasonable risk of harm to others."
Evans v. University of Cincinnati

• Federal judge enjoins the City of Phoenix from enforcing a noise ordinance against "sound generated in the course of religious expression," finding the right of churches to ring bells outweighs "the City's interest in preserving the peace and tranquility of its neighborhoods."
St. Mark Roman Catholic Parish v. City of Phoenix

• 5th Circuit says a Texas city's junked vehicle ordinance applies to a cactus planter made out of wrecked Oldsmobile 88. "Irrespective of the intentions of its creators ... the car-planter is a utilitarian device, an advertisement, and ultimately a 'junked vehicle.'"
Kleinman v. City of San Marcos

• Oklahoma City bomber Terry Nichols notifies a federal judge that he has gone on hunger strike, saying he is "prepared to die if necessary because he is done allowing his body to be defiled by [ ] refined and dead foods."
Nichols v. Federal Bureau of Prisons

• Texas judge finds the makers of a film about Rin Tin Tin did not infringe on the trademarks of a breeder of German Shepherds. "Defendants['] title 'Finding Rin Tin Tin: The Adventure Continues" is a fair use of the term 'Rin Tin Tin.'"
Rin Tin Tin, Inc. v. First Look Studios

• Illinois appeals court says the contact sports exception to negligence liability does not apply to the case of an athletic trainer who was struck in the eye by a hockey puck while refilling water bottles. Michael Weisberg "suffered injuries as a result of alleged conduct that was not inherent to the sport of hockey."
Weisberg v. Chicago Steel




Alltop_125x125.jpg

ADVERT

Free no win no fee claims advice for personal injury.


$6M Reverse Religious Bias Award Cut to $1M Print

A California judge has reduced a $6.5 million jury verdict to $1.3 million in the “reverse” religious discrimination case of a former employee of a temporary agency who claimed she was denied a promotion because of favoritism toward members of an obscure religious group.

U.S. District Judge Garland E. Burrell affirmed the $647,174 in compensatory damages awarded to Lynn Noyes in April. But he agreed with her former employer, Kelly Services, that the award of $5.9 million in punitive damages was unconstitutionally excessive.

A 1:1 ratio of punitive to compensatory damages “is the constitutional limit in this case,” Burrell said in a July 25 decision, finding that “while Kelly’s behavior was sufficiently reprehensible to warrant punitive damages, it was not highly egregious.”

The U.S. Supreme Court has of late disapproved of high punitive-to-compensatory ratios, ruling in State Farm v. Campbell, 538 U.S. 408 (2003), that “few awards exceeding a single-digit ratio between punitive and compensatory damages, to a significant degree, will satisfy due process.”

The jury's award of punitive damages to Noyes was more than nine times the compensatory award.

Noyes sued Kelly for giving the job of software development manager to a co-worker, Joep Jilesen, who belonged to the Fellowship of Friends, a “Fourth Way” -- or “esoteric Christianity” -- group influenced by the mystic Georgi Gurdjieff. Several other employees and the supervisor responsible for filling the position, William Heinz, were also members.

In his ruling, Burrell denied Kelly's motion for a new trial. "There was sufficient evidence to support [the jury's] finding that Heinz did not select Noyes for the position because she was not a member of the Fellowship,” he said.

On the issue of punitive damages, the judge found “substantial evidence ... that Heinz acted with oppression, malice or fraud.” He also said Kelly's argument that Jilesen wasn't really promoted to a management job “indicates Kelly was being deceitful by trying to hide the promotion.”

But Burrell cited State Farm in reducing the punitives to $647,174 –- the same amount as the compensatory damages, which included $500,000 for emotional distress and $147,174 for economic damages.

“Noyes was awarded significant compensatory damages,” he explained, and the portion for emotional distress “already contain[s] a punitive element.”

The Fellowship has about 2,000 members and says on its website that it practices “the art and science of awakening.” According to Noyes, 13 of the 35 full-time Kelly employees in Nevada City were members and, on the floor where she worked, nine of 13 employees belonged to the Fellowship.

UPDATE

  • Both Noyes and Kelly Services have appealed the final judgment. In addition, Judge Burrell awarded Noyes $765,972.70 in attorneys' fees and expenses.

  •  

    Other Noyes v. Kelly Services Sources

    By Matthew Heller
    7/31/08

     
    rc_insidestories
    • "Upskirting" Victim Loses Privacy Suit Against Store

      A customer at a T.J. Maxx store in upstate New York has lost her lawsuit against the retailer for allowing a man to take photos up her skirt by using her as “human bait” in a sting operation.
      Read more...
    • Perfume Allergy Case Settles for $100,000

      A Detroit city planner with an allergy to perfume is savoring the sweet smell of legal success after the city agreed to pay her $100,000 and be more sensitive to the chemically sensitive.
      Read more...
    • Teen's Suit Puts Mug-Shot Publisher Against the Wall

      A new publication in Lincoln, Neb., milks mug shots for humor. But a teenager whose arrest photo appeared in Cuffed doesn't see the funny side of it and has sued the publisher for misappropriating his image.
      Read more...
    • BA Settles 'Reckless' Baggage Handling Suit

      Limiting its liability to a group of only 13 airline passengers, British Airways (NYSE: BAY) has settled a first-of-its kind lawsuit that accused the airline of being “inexcusably reckless” in its handling of passengers' baggage.
      Read more...
    • Judge Says "Gay" Still Defamatory in Texas

      What one court has called “a veritable sea change in social attitudes about homosexuality” has evidently not reached Texas where a judge ruled that an airport security guard can sue a radio show host for calling him “gay” on the air.
      Read more...
    • Mom Says Hospital Gave Her Wrong
      Baby to Nurse


      Because of a hospital's error, Jennifer Spiegel became an involuntary wet nurse to another woman's newborn son. Now she is suing the hospital for its malpractice in providing her with the wrong baby to breastfeed.
      Read more...
    • Case Over MySpace Page Chills Student Speech

      Several recent court rulings have been protective of off-campus student speech -– with the exception of a very shaky decision that a dissenting judge said “vests school officials with dangerously overbroad censorship discretion.”
      Read more...
    RC_OnFile

    Newdow v. Rio Lindo Union Sch. Dist.
    Subject: Pledge of allegiance
    Document: Opinion

    Vance v. Rumsfeld
    Subject: Detainee abuse
    Document: Opinion

    Stern v. Sony Corp.
    Subject: Disabled gamers
    Document: Opinion

    Churchill v. Univ. of Colorado
    Subject: Academic freedom
    Document: ACLU amicus brief

    KBR/Halliburton v. Jones
    Subject: Sexual assault
    Document: Petition for review

    more

    RC_OnTrial

    Spears v. Allergan, Inc.
    Court: Orange County (Calif.) Superior
    Subject: Botox death
    Verdict: Defense

    Patterson v. Hudson Area Schools
    Court: USDC, E. Mich.
    Subject: Student harassment

    more


    RC_OnTheDocket

    McClain v. Pfizer, Inc.
    Date: 3/2/10
    Court: USDC, Conn.
    Hearing: Jury trial in case over unsafe lab conditions.

    Sherman v. McDonald's Corp.
    Date: 3/23/10
    Court: Washington County (Ark.) Circuit
    Hearing: Jury trial in case over nude photos.

    more