Iseman v. New York Times
Washington, D.C., lobbyist sues the New York Times for falsely reporting that she had an illicit "romantic" and unethical relationship with Sen. John McCain.
Newdow v. Roberts
Atheists sue for a court order enjoining U.S. Supreme Court chief justice from including "so help me God" in the presidential oath he administers to Barack Obama.
Tyler v. California
California Atty. Gen. Jerry Brown says the Prop 8 ban on gay marriage is unconstitutional because it abrogates fundamental rights without a compelling interest.
Courthouse News On Trial

On Point Search

On Point Day by Day

On Point News by Subject

On the Map

Extra Points

• 8th Circuit finds that Arkansas counties cannot sue cold medicine manufacturers over the misuse of pseudoephedrine in their products by methamphetamine cooks. "[W]e are very reluctant to open Pandora's box to the avalanche of actions that would follow if we found this case to state a cause of action under Arkansas law."
Ashley County v. Pfizer

• Alabama appeals court declines to "recogniz[e] as a rule of law that alimony is terminated once a recipient former spouse enters into a homosexual relationship."
J.L.M. v. S.A.K.

• New York judge finds no copyright infringement in a scene from the movie "What Women Want" which used a "Silver Slugger" pinball machine as a background prop. The machine "appears so fleetingly that I conclude there is no plausible claim for copyright infringement here."
Gottlieb Development v. Paramount Pictures

• D.C. Circuit says a prison inmate cannot stop having his DNA extracted from tissue and fluid samples for a national database because of his religious beliefs. Russell Kaemmerling "alleges no religious observance that the DNA Act impedes, or acts in violation of his religious beliefs that it pressures him to perform."
Kaemmerling v. Lappin

• Former Delaware jail detainee blames the death of his "irreplaceable" pet parrot on jail staff who refused to provide him with a telephone so he could arrange for its safekeeping. With Thomas Goodrich unable to make bail for 11 days, the "wonderful and intelligent Blue & Gold macaw" died of starvation. Goodrich v. Danberg

• South Carolina judge strikes down a law authorizing the state to issue a special “Christian” license plate featuring a cross, a stained-glass window and the words “I Believe.” "Plaintiffs have made a strong showing that the legislation at issue is 'entirely motivated by a purpose to advance religion,' specifically Christianity." Summers v. Adams

• Florida Supreme Court publicly reprimands 1st District Court of Appeal Judge Michael Allen for questioning the ethics of a colleague in an opinion. "An appellate judge cannot use his opinion-writing power to inappropriately personally attack another appellate judge by accusing him of a crime."
Inquiry Concerning Judge Allen

• D.C. Court of Appeals affirms the defense judgment in Roy Pearson's $54 million lost pants case against a dry cleaner. "[W]e agree with the trial court that Pearson’s expansive interpretation of 'Satisfaction Guaranteed' is not supported by law or reason." Pearson v. Chung

• Former U.S. Marine sues the Treasury Department to block the bailout of AIG, alleging the insurance giant "engages in Shariah-based Islamic religious activities that are anti-Christian, anti-Jewish, and anti-American." Murray v. Paulson

Subscribe via
Featured in Alltop

 
Ex-Manager Sues Hilton over Inadvertent Orgy Viewing

A former manager of the upscale restaurant at the Hilton Minneapolis who allegedly walked in on upper management having an orgy has filed a lawsuit that probably stretches liability for “undirected” sexual harassment beyond its limits.

Deborah Smith's case may be the first to allege harassment-by-orgy, testing to what extent a plaintiff may be injured by “undirected” sexual conduct and whether a single incident of group sex amounts to “sufficiently severe or pervasive” sexual harassment.

According to the complaint, Smith, who was the night manager at the SkyWater Restaurant and Lounge, opened a door to a banquet room at the Hilton where “she discovered an orgy” with “various Hilton executives inebriated and engaging in sexual acts.”

“In fact, she observed Hilton executives on top of a table engaging in sexual activity,” the suit says.

After Smith “walked away from the orgy,” SkyWater beverage manager James Vennewitz allegedly told her “she would be fired, and he would make sure of it.” She complained about the orgy to human resources but “a campaign of harassment and retaliation ensued,” culminating in her termination on Dec. 19, 2007.

Smith, 43, of Coon Rapids, Minn., is seeking at least $50,000 in damages under the Minnesota Human Rights Act (MHRA), which defines sexual harassment as “unwelcome sexual advances, requests for sexual favors, sexually motivated physical contact or other verbal or physical conduct or communication of a sexual nature.”

“Plaintiff was subjected to unwelcome sexual conduct directed at her on the basis of her sex,” Smith says.

In a related case, another former Hilton employee -- cocktail server April Bezdichek, 25 -- alleges direct harassment. She says Vennewitz told her to come to the banquet room "in which (unknown to her) an orgy was occurring."

"After she came into the room, Defendant Manager Vennewitz pulled her onto his lap and pumped her up and down on his erect penis," the complaint alleges. "He told her how good it felt and tried to physically force her up to a hotel room."

How the orgy was “directed” at Smith is unclear -– there is no allegation in the complaint that she was invited or forced to participate. But the alleged activity was certainly of a “sexual nature” and the MHRA, like Title VII of the federal Civil Rights Act, does not preclude liability for harassment based on “undirected” conduct.

“To determine whether actionable sex discrimination exists in a given case, all the circumstances surrounding the conduct alleged to constitute sexual harassment, such as the nature of the incidents and the context in which they occurred, should be examined,” the Minnesota Supreme Court said in Continental Can Co. v. State of Minnesota, 297 N.W.2d 241 (1980).

In a case quite similar to Smith's, a sheriff's department employee alleged among other things that a supervisor showed off a copy of "Penthouse" magazine and deputies displayed pin-ups of nude women in their lockers. But the Minnesota Court of Appeals ruled in Klink v. Ramsey County, 397 N.W.2d 894 (1986), that the plaintiff did not have an MHRA claim for "inadvertently view[ing] objectionable materials on a sporadic basis."

The co-workers' "carelessness and insensitivity is not tantamount to purposeful sexual harassment," the court said.

At most, the Hilton executives acted carelessly and finding the hotel liable for Smith's inadvertent viewing of their alleged orgy would impose a duty on an employer to “maintain a pristine working environment” -- a duty that the Supreme Court rejected in Continental Can.

The suit also alleges retaliation, which requires Smith to show she had "a reasonable and good faith belief" that she had suffered sexual harassment.

Smith originally filed her case in state court along with Bezdichek and another plaintiff, bartender Harley Gayle, 41. The cases, which have been severed, were removed to federal court last week.

By Matthew Heller
11/30/08



 
Woman, 88, Arrested over Football Sues Neighbors

A Cincinnati neighborhood that got stirred up when an 88-year-old woman was arrested after refusing to give the boy next door his ball back may not be returning to normal anytime soon. She is now suing the boy's parents for disturbing her peaceful enjoyment of her home.
more


Is $230K Deal to Cover
up Sex Assault Legal?

The enforceability of a “hush money” contract is at issue in the case of a casino host who alleges a Virginia businessman has reneged on an agreement to pay her $230,000 for not telling police that he sexually assaulted her.
more


Dissenter Has Beef with Cattle Burial Decision

A divided Arkansas Court of Appeals has ruled that a truck driver involved in an accident which killed 38 cattle he was transporting cannot be held liable for the improper burial of the animals by a third party.
more


Adult Site Not Liable for User's Tryst with Minor

Ruling in the case of an adult dating website which was sued for failing to prevent a minor from misrepresenting her age, the 6th Circuit has dodged the issue of whether SexSearch.com is immune from liability under federal law.
more


On Point's Ten Worst Decisions of 2008

Two of the country's more reactionary federal appellate judges have made it into On Point's third annual Judicial Hall of Shame.
more


On Point's Ten Best Decisions of 2008

Gray wolves, transgender job applicants, the terminally ill and members of a polygamous sect are among those who benefited from the decisions included in On Point's third annual Judicial Hall of Fame.
more


Judge OKs Claim That Brando Will a Forgery

The ex-wife of Marlon Brando's son Christian appears to have made some headway in her attempt to prove that the executors of Brando's $22 million estate illegally obtained their power through a forged codicil to his will.
more


Jury Backs Arrest of 73-Year-Old Porn Viewer

In a case of porn interrupted, a jury has ruled that two San Francisco police officers did not use excessive force in arresting a 73-year-old man after he allegedly got angry at his estranged wife for refusing to watch an X-rated movie with him.
more


Having Cellmate Means Woman Loses Alimony

In a very literal reading of a divorce agreement, a Florida appeals court has ruled that a woman can no longer receive alimony from her ex-husband because of her “cohabitation” with another person in a prison cell.
more


Cable Company Sued for Exposing Family to Porn

For five months, the Bourne family of Warwick, R.I., allegedly had an unwelcome intruder in their home –- the hardcore porn programming of the Playboy Channel. Now they are suing their cable provider for trespassing on their property.
more


P&G Satan Rumors Case Settles After Epic Battle

Four Amway distributors who spread a rumor linking Procter & Gamble to Satanism have dropped their appeal of a $19.25 million jury award and reached a settlement with the consumer products giant.
more


Jeweler Awarded $3.8M for Pink Diamond Theft

Julius Klein Diamonds insists the pink diamond it allegedly stole from an Ohio jeweler never existed. But the mysterious gem was real enough to a federal jury, which awarded John Stafford $6.9 million for his loss.
more



Sherman v. McDonald's
Subject: Nude Photos
Document: Complaint

Baxter v. Montana
Subject: Death with Dignity
Document: Opinion

Philippe v. Wal-Mart Stores
Subject: "Black Friday" Stampede
Document: Complaint

Smith v. Hilton Hotels
Subject: Orgy Viewing
Document: Complaint

Mattel v. MGA Entertainment
Subject: Bratz Dolls
Document: Order Granting Injunction

more

On Trial
Metzler v. Kurtz
Court: Sussex County (N.J.) Superior
Subject: Groping dentist

Donna West v. Tyler Perry
Court: USDC, E. Texas
Subject: Copyright infringement
Verdict: Defense

more

A.B. v. St. Louis Cardinals
Date: 1/5/09
Court: St. Louis Circuit
Hearing: Jury trial in electronic message board defamation case.

Estate of Butler v. Maharishi University
Date: 1/12/09
Court: USDC, S. Iowa
Hearing: Jury trial in wrongful-death case.

more