Iseman v. New York Times
Washington, D.C., lobbyist sues the New York Times for falsely reporting that she had an illicit "romantic" and unethical relationship with Sen. John McCain.
Newdow v. Roberts
Atheists sue for a court order enjoining U.S. Supreme Court chief justice from including "so help me God" in the presidential oath he administers to Barack Obama.
Tyler v. California
California Atty. Gen. Jerry Brown says the Prop 8 ban on gay marriage is unconstitutional because it abrogates fundamental rights without a compelling interest.
• 8th Circuit finds that Arkansas counties cannot sue cold medicine manufacturers over the misuse of pseudoephedrine in their products by methamphetamine cooks. "[W]e are very reluctant to open Pandora's box to the avalanche of actions that would follow if we found this case to state a cause of action under Arkansas law." Ashley County v. Pfizer
• Alabama appeals court declines to "recogniz[e] as a rule of law that
alimony is terminated once a recipient former spouse enters
into a homosexual relationship." J.L.M. v. S.A.K.
• New York judge finds no copyright infringement in a scene from the movie "What Women Want" which used a "Silver Slugger" pinball machine as a background prop. The machine "appears so fleetingly that I conclude there is no plausible claim for copyright infringement here." Gottlieb Development v. Paramount Pictures
• D.C. Circuit says a prison inmate cannot stop having his DNA extracted from tissue and fluid samples for a national database because of his religious beliefs. Russell Kaemmerling "alleges no religious observance that the DNA Act impedes, or acts in violation of his religious beliefs that it pressures him to perform." Kaemmerling v. Lappin
• Former Delaware jail detainee blames the death of his "irreplaceable" pet parrot on jail staff who refused to provide him with a telephone so he could arrange for its safekeeping. With Thomas Goodrich unable to make bail for 11 days, the "wonderful and intelligent Blue & Gold macaw" died of starvation. Goodrich v. Danberg
• South Carolina judge strikes down a law authorizing the state to issue a special “Christian” license plate featuring a cross, a stained-glass window and the words “I Believe.” "Plaintiffs have made a strong showing that the legislation at issue is 'entirely motivated by a purpose to advance religion,' specifically Christianity." Summers v. Adams
• Florida Supreme Court publicly reprimands 1st District Court of Appeal Judge Michael Allen for questioning the ethics of a colleague in an opinion. "An appellate judge cannot use his opinion-writing power to inappropriately personally attack another appellate judge by accusing him of a crime." Inquiry Concerning Judge Allen
• D.C. Court of Appeals affirms the defense judgment in Roy Pearson's $54 million lost pants case against a dry cleaner. "[W]e agree with the trial court that Pearson’s expansive interpretation of 'Satisfaction Guaranteed' is not supported by law or reason." Pearson v. Chung
• Former U.S. Marine sues the Treasury Department to block the bailout of AIG, alleging the insurance giant "engages in Shariah-based Islamic
religious activities that are anti-Christian, anti-Jewish, and anti-American." Murray v. Paulson
Courts Not Coddling Colleges That Coddle Athletes?
Dirk Koetter
Civil rights plaintiffs have won another victory in a case involving the coddling of college athletes as a judge ruled that a rape victim can sue former Arizona State University football coach Dirk Koetter for putting her in danger she would otherwise not have faced.
Koetter was the Sun Devils coach when a female student identified only as J.K. was raped by one of his players, Darnel Henderson, in March 2004. She sued both ASU and Koetter, alleging he “used his authority as a state official to create an opportunity for Henderson to assault Plaintiff that would not have otherwise existed.”
Henderson had been expelled in July 2003 from the school's Summer Bridge program for sexually harassing and intimidating women in his dormitory. He was allowed to return to campus the following month to begin his freshman year and join the football team.
Koetter moved for summary judgment on the basis of qualified immunity, but U.S. District Judge Mary H. Murguia decided recently that the case should go to trial.
“The evidence in the record indicates that J.K. may be able to establish that in light of Henderson’s egregious misconduct, Coach Koetter nonetheless facilitated Henderson’s return to ASU and ensured his ability to join the ASU football team,” she said in her decision.
Among other things, she noted, Koetter initially told Henderson he would be subject to a “three strikes” or “zero tolerance” plan, but “never put such a plan into effect.”
“Instead, he merely spoke to Henderson and told him that he needed to learn from his mistakes, and thought that Henderson had already 'paid a price' for his misconduct by being kicked out of the Summer Bridge program three weeks before it concluded,” Murguia said.
In another case of big-time athlete-coddling, the 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled last year that the University of Colorado could be held liable for the behavior of football players and recruits who allegedly raped two women at an off-campus party. Simpson v. University of Colorado, 500 F.3d 1170. The school subsequently settled the women's Title IX civil rights claims for $2.85 million.
A settlement may now be ASU's best hope of minimizing its liability –- particularly as Henderson had told the director of the Summer Bridge program that he wanted women to fear him and wanted to “show them their place.”
Koetter, now offensive coordinator for the NFL's Jacksonville Jaguars, had a policy of placing football players in on-campus dorms and Henderson was placed in the same dorm from which he had just been expelled. J.K. had not met Henderson before the night he raped her in the dorm, where she was also a resident.
In 2006, an Arizona state court judge dismissed a wrongful-death case against ASU and Koetter arising from an off-campus murder committed by former Sun Devils running back Loren Wade, finding the school did not have a duty to protect the public from Wade's “known violent tendencies.”
J.K.'s case is more specific since, as Murguia noted, “The female ASU students living in Henderson’s dormitory are not analogous to the public at large ... Clearly, women living in Henderson’s dormitory had been sexually harassed during the Summer Bridge program, and thus women in the dormitories that Henderson lived in once he returned to ASU also faced the possibility of being sexually harassed by Henderson.”
Koetter has filed an interlocutory appeal of Murguia's ruling, but federal trial court judges rarely certify such appeals. “Defendant Koetter’s interlocutory appeal is frivolous and a transparent attempt to delay the trial of this matter,” J.K. argues in a court brief.
Murguia also denied ASU's motion for summary judgment, finding J.K. may be able to prove that
the ASU Defendants “subjected” her to harassment when ASU not only allowed Henderson to return, but Coach Koetter affirmatively facilitated his return, and Henderson was placed back in the on-campus dormitories with no restrictions or specialized monitoring.
UPDATE
J.K. filed a notice of settlement of her claims against Koetter on Nov. 25, 2008.
A Cincinnati neighborhood that got stirred up when an 88-year-old woman was arrested after refusing to give the boy next door his ball back may not be returning to normal anytime soon. She is now suing the boy's parents for disturbing her peaceful enjoyment of her home. more
Is $230K Deal to Cover up Sex Assault Legal?
The enforceability of a “hush money” contract is at issue in the case of a casino host who alleges a Virginia businessman has reneged on an agreement to pay her $230,000 for not telling police that he sexually assaulted her. more
Dissenter Has Beef with Cattle Burial Decision
A divided Arkansas Court of Appeals has ruled that a truck driver involved in an accident which killed 38 cattle he was transporting cannot be held liable for the improper burial of the animals by a third party. more
Adult Site Not Liable for User's Tryst with Minor
Ruling in the case of an adult dating website which was sued for failing to prevent a minor from misrepresenting her age, the 6th Circuit has dodged the issue of whether SexSearch.com is immune from liability under federal law. more
On Point's Ten Worst Decisions of 2008
Two of the country's more reactionary federal appellate judges have made it into On Point's third annual Judicial Hall of Shame. more
On Point's Ten Best Decisions of 2008
Gray wolves, transgender job applicants, the terminally ill and members of a polygamous sect are among those who benefited from the decisions included in On Point's third annual Judicial Hall of Fame. more
Judge OKs Claim That Brando Will a Forgery
The ex-wife of Marlon Brando's son Christian appears to have made some headway in her attempt to prove that the executors of Brando's $22 million estate illegally obtained their power through a forged codicil to his will. more
Jury Backs Arrest of 73-Year-Old Porn Viewer
In a case of porn interrupted, a jury has ruled that two San Francisco police officers did not use excessive force in arresting a 73-year-old man after he allegedly got angry at his estranged wife for refusing to watch an X-rated movie with him. more
Having Cellmate Means Woman Loses Alimony
In a very literal reading of a divorce agreement, a Florida appeals court has ruled that a woman can no longer receive alimony from her ex-husband because of her “cohabitation” with another person in a prison cell. more
Cable Company Sued for Exposing Family to Porn
For five months, the Bourne family of Warwick, R.I., allegedly had an unwelcome intruder in their home –- the hardcore porn programming of the Playboy Channel. Now they are suing their cable provider for trespassing on their property. more
P&G Satan Rumors Case Settles After Epic Battle
Four Amway distributors who spread a rumor linking Procter & Gamble to Satanism have dropped their appeal of a $19.25 million jury award and reached a settlement with the consumer products giant. more
Jeweler Awarded $3.8M for Pink Diamond Theft
Julius Klein Diamonds insists the pink diamond it allegedly stole from an Ohio jeweler never existed. But the mysterious gem was real enough to a federal jury, which awarded John Stafford $6.9 million for his loss. more
Sherman v. McDonald's Subject: Nude Photos Document: Complaint
Baxter v. Montana Subject: Death with Dignity Document: Opinion
Philippe v. Wal-Mart Stores Subject: "Black Friday" Stampede Document: Complaint
Smith v. Hilton Hotels Subject: Orgy Viewing Document: Complaint