Philippe v. Wal-Mart Stores
Family of a Wal-Mart worker trampled to death in a "Black Friday" stampede sues the company for "creat[ing] an atmosphere of competition and anxiety amongst the crowd."
Mattel v. MGA Entertainment
Los Angeles judge permanently enjoins a toy company from making or selling Bratz dolls as a result of its infringement of the intellectual property of Barbie maker Mattel.
Wone v. Price
Widow of murdered attorney Robert Wone sues three men for wrongful death, alleging the knife used to stab him was "in [their] custody and control ... at all relevant times."
Courthouse News On Trial

On Point Search

On Point Day by Day

On Point News by Subject

On the Map

Extra Points

• New Jersey appeals court orders the unsealing of a settlement paid by a Giants Stadium vendor to a girl injured in a crash with a drunken fan. "We fail to discern the compelling interest that allows plaintiffs to shroud the amount and terms of the settlement in secrecy by settling the case prior to trial."
Verni v. Lanzaro

• Michigan judge says a city of Detroit employee can sue for failure to accommodate her sensitivity to perfume. "Plaintiff may proceed [to trial] with her claim of disability based on the major life activity of breathing."
McBride v. City of Detroit

• Ex-wife of Henry Nicholas petitions to remove the co-founder of Broadcom Corp. as co-trustee of the family trust, alleging he whispered in her ear that "he was going to have [her] 'whacked.'"
In the Matter of the Nicholas Family Trust

• Two National Guardsmen allege Wisconsin Dells police forced them to consume urine-soaked dirt and a plant after accusing them of public urination.
Anderson v. City of Wisconsin Dells

• Los Angeles judge orders a man to pay his ex-wife $12.5 million in damages for infecting her with the HIV virus during their marriage when he knew or should have known he was HIV-positive.
Bridget B v. John B

• Victoria's Secret users file another class action alleging the company's undergarments are defective, causing "allergic reactions, contact dermatitis, blistering, itching, hives, rashes, scarring, systemic reactions and other health concerns."
Amaya v. Victoria's Secret Stores

• ABC asks the 2nd Circuit to overturn a $1.4 million fine for airing a woman's nude buttocks on an episode of "NYPD Blue." The FCC's "conclusion that the threshold indecency requirement was met here rested entirely on the notion that buttocks are a sexual or excretory organ. But buttocks are not a sexual or excretory organ." ABC v. FCC

• Cookbook author Missy Chase Lapine, allegedly slandered by Jerry Seinfeld, says she has "never felt so frightened and vulnerable as the day my daughter, 7 years old, came home from school and asked, "Mom, what is an assassin?" Seinfeld had joked on the "David Letterman Show" that "if you read history, many of the three-name people do become assassins.” Lapine v. Seinfeld

• North Carolina Court of Appeals refuses to issue an injunction requiring pop singer Clay Aiken to endorse a book about him. "Our courts cannot be used to force celebrities or their family or friends into making endorsements for another person's profit."
Holleman v. Aiken

Subscribe via
Featured in Alltop

 
Judge Cuts $6M Reverse Religious Bias Award to $1M

A California judge has reduced a $6.5 million jury verdict to $1.3 million in the “reverse” religious discrimination case of a former employee of a temporary agency who claimed she was denied a promotion because of favoritism toward members of an obscure religious group.

U.S. District Judge Garland E. Burrell affirmed the $647,174 in compensatory damages awarded to Lynn Noyes in April. But he agreed with her former employer, Kelly Services, that the award of $5.9 million in punitive damages was unconstitutionally excessive.

A 1:1 ratio of punitive to compensatory damages “is the constitutional limit in this case,” Burrell said in a July 25 decision, finding that “while Kelly’s behavior was sufficiently reprehensible to warrant punitive damages, it was not highly egregious.”

The U.S. Supreme Court has of late disapproved of high punitive-to-compensatory ratios, ruling in State Farm v. Campbell, 538 U.S. 408 (2003), that “few awards exceeding a single-digit ratio between punitive and compensatory damages, to a significant degree, will satisfy due process.”

The jury's award of punitive damages to Noyes was more than nine times the compensatory award.

Noyes sued Kelly for giving the job of software development manager to a co-worker, Joep Jilesen, who belonged to the Fellowship of Friends, a “Fourth Way” -- or “esoteric Christianity” -- group influenced by the mystic Georgi Gurdjieff. Several other employees and the supervisor responsible for filling the position, William Heinz, were also members.

In his ruling, Burrell denied Kelly's motion for a new trial. "There was sufficient evidence to support [the jury's] finding that Heinz did not select Noyes for the position because she was not a member of the Fellowship,” he said.

On the issue of punitive damages, the judge found “substantial evidence ... that Heinz acted with oppression, malice or fraud.” He also said Kelly's argument that Jilesen wasn't really promoted to a management job “indicates Kelly was being deceitful by trying to hide the promotion.”

But Burrell cited State Farm in reducing the punitives to $647,174 –- the same amount as the compensatory damages, which included $500,000 for emotional distress and $147,174 for economic damages.

“Noyes was awarded significant compensatory damages,” he explained, and the portion for emotional distress “already contain[s] a punitive element.”

The Fellowship has about 2,000 members and says on its website that it practices “the art and science of awakening.” According to Noyes, 13 of the 35 full-time Kelly employees in Nevada City were members and, on the floor where she worked, nine of 13 employees belonged to the Fellowship.

UPDATE

  • Both Noyes and Kelly Services have appealed the final judgment. In addition, Judge Burrell awarded Noyes $765,972.70 in attorneys' fees and expenses.

  • Other Noyes v. Kelly Services Sources

    By Matthew Heller
    7/31/08



     
    Sisters' Bond Trumps $6M SUV Crash Award

    In a quirk of legal fate, Crystal Bear won a $6 million jury award against her sister in an SUV rollover case. Now she has accepted $200,000 from her sister's insurers as payment in full to heal their wounded relationship.
    more


    Ex-Manager Sues Hilton Hotel over Orgy Viewing

    A former manager of the upscale restaurant at the Hilton Minneapolis who allegedly walked in on upper management having an orgy has filed a lawsuit that probably stretches liability for “undirected” sexual harassment beyond its limits.
    more


    Does Anti-Plagiarism Site Benefit the Public?

    The 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals will hear a copyright infringement case next week that may turn on whether Turnitin, an Internet service designed to catch plagiarists, really provides a “substantial public benefit.”
    more


    Soccer Mom Fires Gun Rights Suit at Sheriff

    A pistol-packing soccer mom has sued a Pennsylvania sheriff for recklessly revoking her concealed-weapons permit after she openly wore a handgun at her 5-year-old daughter's soccer game.
    more


    Dreadlocked Juror Case Ties S.C. Court in Knots

    A divided South Carolina Supreme Court has ordered a new trial in an auto accident case because defense counsel did not offer a “race-neutral” reason for striking an African-American man with dreadlocks from the jury.
    more


    'Douchebags' Suits Face Protection for Opinion

    Two lawsuits involving the book “Hot Chicks with Douchebags” raise the novel question of whether calling someone a “douchebag” is a defamatory statement of fact or a mere vulgarity that cannot be proved true or false.
    more


    'Known Risk' Makes U.S. Liable for Bear Attack?

    The failure of wildlife officials in Utah to warn campers of the “known risk” of a specific bear makes them liable for the fatal mauling of an 11-year-old boy, the parents of Samuel Ives argue in court papers.
    more


    Is There Room on Web
    for Two "Funky" Chicks?

    In a colorful legal battle between “personal” bloggers, “Funky Brown Chick” will have to show more than surface similarities between her eponymous website and “funkyblackchick.com” to prevail on her trademark infringement claims.
    more


    Manager Blames Movie for Use of Racial Slur

    A former Wyeth Pharmaceuticals manager says she wasn't expressing racial bias when she described herself as the “head nigger in charge” in front of an African-American employee -– she just had the phrase “fresh in my mind” after seeing the movie “Lean on Me.”
    more


    Dirty Dancer Settles with Town -- to Tune of $275K

    After a six-year legal battle over dirty dancing, a North Carolina town has agreed to pay $275,000 to a woman whom it had banned from its community center because of her “sexual gyrations.”
    more


    Careless Cart Loading Alleged in Death Case

    Florida premises liability law appears to be generous enough toward plaintiffs that Home Depot could be held liable for the death of a customer who was allegedly struck by an overloaded shopping cart being pushed by another customer.
    more



    Chambers v. God
    Subject: Access to Courts
    Document: Notice of Appeal

    Nelson v. American Apparel
    Subject: "Sham" Arbitration
    Document: Opinion

    Ernie Chambers v. God
    Subject: Frivolous Lawsuits
    Document: Order to Formalize Dismissal

    Privette v. Booby Trap
    Subject: Stripclub Injury
    Document: Complaint

    Peacock v. City Press
    Subject: Stripper Defamation
    Document: Complaint

    more

    On Trial
    Bowoto v. Chevron
    Court: USDC, N. Calif.
    Subject: Human rights
    Verdict: Defense

    Donna West v. Tyler Perry
    Court: USDC, E. Texas
    Subject: Copyright infringement

    more

    Jose Padilla v. John Yoo
    Date: 12/5/08
    Court: USDC, N. Calif.
    Hearing: Motion to dismiss terror suspect torture case.

    Varnum v. O'Brien
    Date: 12/9/08
    Court: Iowa Supreme
    Hearing: Oral arguments in same-sex marriage case.

    more