Philippe v. Wal-Mart Stores
Family of a Wal-Mart worker trampled to death in a "Black Friday" stampede sues the company for "creat[ing] an atmosphere of competition and anxiety amongst the crowd."
Mattel v. MGA Entertainment
Los Angeles judge permanently enjoins a toy company from making or selling Bratz dolls as a result of its infringement of the intellectual property of Barbie maker Mattel.
Wone v. Price
Widow of murdered attorney Robert Wone sues three men for wrongful death, alleging the knife used to stab him was "in [their] custody and control ... at all relevant times."
• New Jersey appeals court orders the unsealing of a settlement paid by a Giants Stadium vendor to a girl injured in a crash with a drunken fan. "We fail to discern the compelling interest that allows plaintiffs to shroud the amount and terms of the settlement in secrecy by settling the case prior to trial." Verni v. Lanzaro
• Michigan judge says a city of Detroit employee can sue for failure to accommodate her sensitivity to perfume. "Plaintiff may proceed [to trial] with her claim of disability based on the major life activity of breathing."
McBride v. City of Detroit
• Ex-wife of Henry Nicholas petitions to remove the co-founder of Broadcom Corp. as co-trustee of the family trust, alleging he whispered in her ear that "he was going to have [her] 'whacked.'" In the Matter of the Nicholas Family Trust
• Two National Guardsmen allege Wisconsin Dells police forced them to consume urine-soaked dirt and a plant after accusing them of public urination. Anderson v. City of Wisconsin Dells
• Los Angeles judge orders a man to pay his ex-wife $12.5 million in damages for infecting her with the HIV virus during their marriage when he knew or should have known he was HIV-positive. Bridget B v. John B
• Victoria's Secret users file another class action alleging the company's undergarments are defective, causing "allergic reactions, contact dermatitis, blistering, itching, hives, rashes, scarring, systemic reactions and other health concerns." Amaya v. Victoria's Secret Stores
• ABC asks the 2nd Circuit to overturn a $1.4 million fine for airing a woman's nude buttocks on an episode of "NYPD Blue." The FCC's "conclusion that the threshold indecency requirement was met here rested entirely on the notion that buttocks are a sexual or excretory organ. But buttocks are not a sexual or excretory organ." ABC v. FCC
• Cookbook author Missy Chase Lapine, allegedly slandered by Jerry Seinfeld, says she has "never felt so frightened and vulnerable as the day my daughter, 7 years old, came home from school and asked, "Mom, what is an assassin?" Seinfeld had joked on the "David Letterman Show" that "if you read history, many of the three-name people do become assassins.” Lapine v. Seinfeld
• North Carolina Court of Appeals refuses to issue an injunction requiring pop singer Clay Aiken to endorse a book about him. "Our courts cannot be used to force celebrities or their family or friends into making endorsements for another person's profit." Holleman v. Aiken
Stickup Victims Sue Employer Over "Callous" Firings
Four employees of a check-cashing company suffered one trauma when they were robbed at gunpoint. Now they're suing ACE Cash Express over another trauma –- being fired for not sounding an alarm during the robberies.
ACE lost $60,000 in robberies at three of its Denver stores between November 2007 and January 2008. In each case, a robber with a gun confronted employees and told them they would be killed if they hit a panic button or punched in an alarm code.
The employees -- Monica Perea, Felicia Dia, Desiree Lopez and Andre Robledo -– were expecting ACE to provide free counseling to help them recover from their ordeal. Instead, they each got a pink slip three days later.
“ACE terminated Plaintiffs in complete and intentional disregard of the further traumatic impact this termination from employment would have on Plaintiffs after such recent and severe trauma from the robberies,” they say in a complaint filed last month in Denver District Court.
The suit alleges ACE violated its own security policies telling workers to cooperate with robbers and Colorado laws which protect crime victims from retaliation. With punitive damages for “outrageous conduct,” the potential recovery is a lot more than $60,000.
“This is just one of the most callous, outrageous ways of treating an employee that I've ever heard of,” plaintiffs' attorney Gregg McReynolds told KCNC-TV in Denver.
ACE Cash Express, which is based in Irving, Texas, is the largest owner, operator and franchisor of check-cashing stores in the U.S. The company went private in a 2006 management-led buyout valued at about $420 million.
The first in the series of robberies occurred Nov. 3, 2007 at the store where Perea, an assistant manager, worked. As she entered the store, the suit says, “an armed robber ... grabbed her arm and demanded that she open the store safe.”
The robber “apparently had knowledge concerning the company's security procedures” and “If Perea had followed ACE procedures and had hit an alarm or entered an alarm code into the security system, she most likely would have been killed.”
The other robberies followed a similar pattern, although a pair of robbers, one of them armed, confronted Dia and Lopez. “I kept thinking how it was going to end and I thought I was going to die,” Lopez recalled.
Colorado is an “at-will” employment state, but the plaintiffs say they were told during training that they could not be terminated “without a legitimate reason.” They were all fired for “failure to follow security procedures.”
“We believe when everybody follows the procedures it protects everyone,” an ACE spokesman said. “When you fail to do so, it puts everyone at risk.”
By requiring employees to activate an alarm, ACE can deter insiders from participating in robberies. But the plaintiffs are not suspects and, according to their complaint, they did follow company procedures.
“As part of the company training,” the suit says,
Plaintiffs were told that if a robbery occurred at the store, [ ] they should cooperate with the robber because their lives were more important than the money. They were told to try and trigger an alarm if possible.
How ACE can argue it was “possible” for the plaintiffs to activate an alarm while in fear for their lives is as yet unclear.
In a quirk of legal fate, Crystal Bear won a $6 million jury award against her sister in an SUV rollover case. Now she has accepted $200,000 from her sister's insurers as payment in full to heal their wounded relationship. more
Ex-Manager Sues Hilton Hotel over Orgy Viewing
A former manager of the upscale restaurant at the Hilton Minneapolis who allegedly walked in on upper management having an orgy has filed a lawsuit that probably stretches liability for “undirected” sexual harassment beyond its limits. more
Does Anti-Plagiarism Site Benefit the Public?
The 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals will hear a copyright infringement case next week that may turn on whether Turnitin, an Internet service designed to catch plagiarists, really provides a “substantial public benefit.” more
Soccer Mom Fires Gun Rights Suit at Sheriff
A pistol-packing soccer mom has sued a Pennsylvania sheriff for recklessly revoking her concealed-weapons permit after she openly wore a handgun at her 5-year-old daughter's soccer game. more
Dreadlocked Juror Case Ties S.C. Court in Knots
A divided South Carolina Supreme Court has ordered a new trial in an auto accident case because defense counsel did not offer a “race-neutral” reason for striking an African-American man with dreadlocks from the jury. more
'Douchebags' Suits Face Protection for Opinion
Two lawsuits involving the book “Hot Chicks with Douchebags” raise the novel question of whether calling someone a “douchebag” is a defamatory statement of fact or a mere vulgarity that cannot be proved true or false. more
'Known Risk' Makes U.S. Liable for Bear Attack?
The failure of wildlife officials in Utah to warn campers of the “known risk” of a specific bear makes them liable for the fatal mauling of an 11-year-old boy, the parents of Samuel Ives argue in court papers. more
Is There Room on Web for Two "Funky" Chicks?
In a colorful legal battle between “personal” bloggers, “Funky Brown Chick” will have to show more than surface similarities between her eponymous website and “funkyblackchick.com” to prevail on her trademark infringement claims. more
Manager Blames Movie for Use of Racial Slur
A former Wyeth Pharmaceuticals manager says she wasn't expressing racial bias when she described herself as the “head nigger in charge” in front of an African-American employee -– she just had the phrase “fresh in my mind” after seeing the movie “Lean on Me.”
more
Dirty Dancer Settles with Town -- to Tune of $275K
After a six-year legal battle over dirty dancing, a North Carolina town has agreed to pay $275,000 to a woman whom it had banned from its community center because of her “sexual gyrations.”
more
Careless Cart Loading Alleged in Death Case
Florida premises liability law appears to be generous enough toward plaintiffs that Home Depot could be held liable for the death of a customer who was allegedly struck by an overloaded shopping cart being pushed by another customer.
more
Chambers v. God Subject: Access to Courts Document: Notice of Appeal
Nelson v. American Apparel Subject: "Sham" Arbitration Document: Opinion
