Philippe v. Wal-Mart Stores
Family of a Wal-Mart worker trampled to death in a "Black Friday" stampede sues the company for "creat[ing] an atmosphere of competition and anxiety amongst the crowd."
Mattel v. MGA Entertainment
Los Angeles judge permanently enjoins a toy company from making or selling Bratz dolls as a result of its infringement of the intellectual property of Barbie maker Mattel.
Wone v. Price
Widow of murdered attorney Robert Wone sues three men for wrongful death, alleging the knife used to stab him was "in [their] custody and control ... at all relevant times."
• New Jersey appeals court orders the unsealing of a settlement paid by a Giants Stadium vendor to a girl injured in a crash with a drunken fan. "We fail to discern the compelling interest that allows plaintiffs to shroud the amount and terms of the settlement in secrecy by settling the case prior to trial." Verni v. Lanzaro
• Michigan judge says a city of Detroit employee can sue for failure to accommodate her sensitivity to perfume. "Plaintiff may proceed [to trial] with her claim of disability based on the major life activity of breathing."
McBride v. City of Detroit
• Ex-wife of Henry Nicholas petitions to remove the co-founder of Broadcom Corp. as co-trustee of the family trust, alleging he whispered in her ear that "he was going to have [her] 'whacked.'" In the Matter of the Nicholas Family Trust
• Two National Guardsmen allege Wisconsin Dells police forced them to consume urine-soaked dirt and a plant after accusing them of public urination. Anderson v. City of Wisconsin Dells
• Los Angeles judge orders a man to pay his ex-wife $12.5 million in damages for infecting her with the HIV virus during their marriage when he knew or should have known he was HIV-positive. Bridget B v. John B
• Victoria's Secret users file another class action alleging the company's undergarments are defective, causing "allergic reactions, contact dermatitis, blistering, itching, hives, rashes, scarring, systemic reactions and other health concerns." Amaya v. Victoria's Secret Stores
• ABC asks the 2nd Circuit to overturn a $1.4 million fine for airing a woman's nude buttocks on an episode of "NYPD Blue." The FCC's "conclusion that the threshold indecency requirement was met here rested entirely on the notion that buttocks are a sexual or excretory organ. But buttocks are not a sexual or excretory organ." ABC v. FCC
• Cookbook author Missy Chase Lapine, allegedly slandered by Jerry Seinfeld, says she has "never felt so frightened and vulnerable as the day my daughter, 7 years old, came home from school and asked, "Mom, what is an assassin?" Seinfeld had joked on the "David Letterman Show" that "if you read history, many of the three-name people do become assassins.” Lapine v. Seinfeld
• North Carolina Court of Appeals refuses to issue an injunction requiring pop singer Clay Aiken to endorse a book about him. "Our courts cannot be used to force celebrities or their family or friends into making endorsements for another person's profit." Holleman v. Aiken
Jury Awards $6 Million for Reverse Religious Bias
In a rare case of “reverse” religious discrimination, a California jury has awarded $6.5 million to a former employee of a temporary agency who claimed the company failed to promote her because she did not belong to the same religious group as many of her co-workers.
Lynn Noyes's “lack of certain religious beliefs was a motivating factor” for why she was not selected for the job of software development manager for Kelly Services, the jury's verdict form said. The award includes $5.9 million in punitive damages.
The job went to an employee who, like many others who worked at Kelly's Nevada City, Calif., branch, belonged to the Fellowship of Friends, a “Fourth Way” -- or “esoteric Christianity” -- sect influenced by the mystic Georgi Gurdjieff. The supervisor responsible for filling the position, William Heinz, was also a member.
“The Fellowship had essentially taken over the Nevada City office,” Noyes's attorney, M. Catherine Jones, said.
Kelly Services insisted there was no intentional discrimination, pointing out that Heinz originally offered the position to a non-Fellowship member, who declined. It also claimed the decision to give Fellowship member Joep Jilesen the job was made through a “consensus” of Heinz and three other managers.
But the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals noted in a May 2007 decision that two of those managers did not recall reaching a “consensus” and one of them testified that Heinz made the ultimate decision.
The evidence “supports a finding that Heinz had an unspoken motive for promoting Jilesen over Noyes -- favoritism toward members of the Fellowship,” the court said in reversing a trial judge who summarily dismissed the case.
Reverse religious discrimination has cropped up in employment law cases alleging a Mormon supervisor was biased against non-Mormons and a born-again Christian police chief created a hostile work environment with his “relentless proselytizing.” Shapolia v. Los Alamos National Laboratory, 992 F.2d 1033 (1993); Venters v. City of Delphi, 123 F.3d 956 (1997).
Noyes's case focused on the relatively obscure Fellowship, which has about 2,000 members and says on its website that it practices “the art and science of awakening.” According to Noyes, 13 of the 35 full-time Kelly employees in Nevada City were members and, on the floor where she worked, nine of 13 employees belonged to the Fellowship.
"No matter how good you were at your job, it didn't matter," she testified.
"The jobs were going to go to Fellowship members." Noyes sued Kelly in December 2002 and was laid off in May 2004.
In his closing argument, Kelly attorney E. Joseph Connaughton made a clumsy attempt to compare Noyes to some of the more notorious plaintiffs in personal injury and discrimination cases. “We live in a culture of blame, don't we?” he said. “The coffee's too hot, there's a lawsuit. Our kid doesn't make the sports team, there's a lawsuit.”
The jury awarded Noyes $147,174 for past and future economic damages and $500,000 for emotional distress. Kelly, which turned down Noyes's pretrial offer to settle the case for $1.2 million, plans to appeal –- and it may, at least, win a reduction in the judgment because of the nearly 10:1 ratio of punitive to compensatory damages.
“We believe [the] decision was made in error with respect to both the law and the facts in this case,” the company's general counsel, Daniel T. Lis, said.
For Marysville, Calif., Appeal-Democrat coverage of the trial, click here.
In a quirk of legal fate, Crystal Bear won a $6 million jury award against her sister in an SUV rollover case. Now she has accepted $200,000 from her sister's insurers as payment in full to heal their wounded relationship. more
Ex-Manager Sues Hilton Hotel over Orgy Viewing
A former manager of the upscale restaurant at the Hilton Minneapolis who allegedly walked in on upper management having an orgy has filed a lawsuit that probably stretches liability for “undirected” sexual harassment beyond its limits. more
Does Anti-Plagiarism Site Benefit the Public?
The 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals will hear a copyright infringement case next week that may turn on whether Turnitin, an Internet service designed to catch plagiarists, really provides a “substantial public benefit.” more
Soccer Mom Fires Gun Rights Suit at Sheriff
A pistol-packing soccer mom has sued a Pennsylvania sheriff for recklessly revoking her concealed-weapons permit after she openly wore a handgun at her 5-year-old daughter's soccer game. more
Dreadlocked Juror Case Ties S.C. Court in Knots
A divided South Carolina Supreme Court has ordered a new trial in an auto accident case because defense counsel did not offer a “race-neutral” reason for striking an African-American man with dreadlocks from the jury. more
'Douchebags' Suits Face Protection for Opinion
Two lawsuits involving the book “Hot Chicks with Douchebags” raise the novel question of whether calling someone a “douchebag” is a defamatory statement of fact or a mere vulgarity that cannot be proved true or false. more
'Known Risk' Makes U.S. Liable for Bear Attack?
The failure of wildlife officials in Utah to warn campers of the “known risk” of a specific bear makes them liable for the fatal mauling of an 11-year-old boy, the parents of Samuel Ives argue in court papers. more
Is There Room on Web for Two "Funky" Chicks?
In a colorful legal battle between “personal” bloggers, “Funky Brown Chick” will have to show more than surface similarities between her eponymous website and “funkyblackchick.com” to prevail on her trademark infringement claims. more
Manager Blames Movie for Use of Racial Slur
A former Wyeth Pharmaceuticals manager says she wasn't expressing racial bias when she described herself as the “head nigger in charge” in front of an African-American employee -– she just had the phrase “fresh in my mind” after seeing the movie “Lean on Me.”
more
Dirty Dancer Settles with Town -- to Tune of $275K
After a six-year legal battle over dirty dancing, a North Carolina town has agreed to pay $275,000 to a woman whom it had banned from its community center because of her “sexual gyrations.”
more
Careless Cart Loading Alleged in Death Case
Florida premises liability law appears to be generous enough toward plaintiffs that Home Depot could be held liable for the death of a customer who was allegedly struck by an overloaded shopping cart being pushed by another customer.
more
Chambers v. God Subject: Access to Courts Document: Notice of Appeal
Nelson v. American Apparel Subject: "Sham" Arbitration Document: Opinion