Iseman v. New York Times
Washington, D.C., lobbyist sues the New York Times for falsely reporting that she had an illicit "romantic" and unethical relationship with Sen. John McCain.
Newdow v. Roberts
Atheists sue for a court order enjoining U.S. Supreme Court chief justice from including "so help me God" in the presidential oath he administers to Barack Obama.
Tyler v. California
California Atty. Gen. Jerry Brown says the Prop 8 ban on gay marriage is unconstitutional because it abrogates fundamental rights without a compelling interest.
Courthouse News On Trial

On Point Search

On Point Day by Day

On Point News by Subject

On the Map

Extra Points

• 8th Circuit finds that Arkansas counties cannot sue cold medicine manufacturers over the misuse of pseudoephedrine in their products by methamphetamine cooks. "[W]e are very reluctant to open Pandora's box to the avalanche of actions that would follow if we found this case to state a cause of action under Arkansas law."
Ashley County v. Pfizer

• Alabama appeals court declines to "recogniz[e] as a rule of law that alimony is terminated once a recipient former spouse enters into a homosexual relationship."
J.L.M. v. S.A.K.

• New York judge finds no copyright infringement in a scene from the movie "What Women Want" which used a "Silver Slugger" pinball machine as a background prop. The machine "appears so fleetingly that I conclude there is no plausible claim for copyright infringement here."
Gottlieb Development v. Paramount Pictures

• D.C. Circuit says a prison inmate cannot stop having his DNA extracted from tissue and fluid samples for a national database because of his religious beliefs. Russell Kaemmerling "alleges no religious observance that the DNA Act impedes, or acts in violation of his religious beliefs that it pressures him to perform."
Kaemmerling v. Lappin

• Former Delaware jail detainee blames the death of his "irreplaceable" pet parrot on jail staff who refused to provide him with a telephone so he could arrange for its safekeeping. With Thomas Goodrich unable to make bail for 11 days, the "wonderful and intelligent Blue & Gold macaw" died of starvation. Goodrich v. Danberg

• South Carolina judge strikes down a law authorizing the state to issue a special “Christian” license plate featuring a cross, a stained-glass window and the words “I Believe.” "Plaintiffs have made a strong showing that the legislation at issue is 'entirely motivated by a purpose to advance religion,' specifically Christianity." Summers v. Adams

• Florida Supreme Court publicly reprimands 1st District Court of Appeal Judge Michael Allen for questioning the ethics of a colleague in an opinion. "An appellate judge cannot use his opinion-writing power to inappropriately personally attack another appellate judge by accusing him of a crime."
Inquiry Concerning Judge Allen

• D.C. Court of Appeals affirms the defense judgment in Roy Pearson's $54 million lost pants case against a dry cleaner. "[W]e agree with the trial court that Pearson’s expansive interpretation of 'Satisfaction Guaranteed' is not supported by law or reason." Pearson v. Chung

• Former U.S. Marine sues the Treasury Department to block the bailout of AIG, alleging the insurance giant "engages in Shariah-based Islamic religious activities that are anti-Christian, anti-Jewish, and anti-American." Murray v. Paulson

Subscribe via
Featured in Alltop

 
"Dive Bar" Pub Review Lands Magazine in Deep Water

Being called a “dive bar” by Philadelphia Magazine might be considered a selling point for a drinking establishment. But the owners of the Irish Pub and Inn in Atlantic City, N.J., would beg to differ.

Richard and Cathy Burke claim the magazine's characterization of the pub as a “dive bar” patronized by “broken-down black jack addicts” and “self-professed black sheep of the family” is defamatory and could even expose the pub to an eminent domain action by the city.

The magazine included a review of the pub in last winter's edition of its “A.C. Now” supplement. “Defendants intended to and likely succeeded in causing the readers of the Publication to view the Irish Pub and Inn as a disreputable establishment to be avoided at all cost,” the Burkes say in their libel complaint.

UPDATE

  • Court records show the Burkes dismissed the case April 29, 2008.

  • One dictionary, indeed, defines the term “dive bar” as a “disreputable entertainment establishment,” while another says it represents a “cheap, dingy drinking establishment.”

    Libel cases over restaurant reviews don't normally get very far because of the strong protection for statements of opinion and the difficulty of proving actual malice. But the Burkes allege a sinister connection between the review and the advertising carried in “A.C. Now,” most of which came from the 11 casinos in Atlantic City.

    “The pecuniary harm [of the review] is certainly increased when one considers that the primary competition for Irish Pub and Inn is the casinos, who ... are the primary, if not exclusive advertisers for the Publication and, not coincidentally, the recipients of consistently glowing endorsements in the Publication,” the suit says.

    The plaintiffs also try to buttress their allegations with comments from a restaurant consultant who interpreted “dive bar” to mean

    An establishment ... that caters to low types of customers who are primarily heavy drinkers of cheap alcoholic beverages. This patronage may include real-time alcoholics, drug addicts, social misfits, troublemakers and those with a tendency for anti-social behavior.”

    The test, however, is how a reasonable reader of “A.C. Now” -– not a restaurant consultant -– would interpret “dive bar.” And Philadelphia Magazine editor Larry Platt has suggested it is now a term of endearment.

    “The contemporary definition of ‘dive' is not negative,” he told Philadelphia Weekly. “It's become another way of saying a place is kitschy or cool, which we think Atlantic City's Irish Pub is.”

    The reference to a clientele of “self-professed black sheep” could be more problematic -– unless customers actually professed themselves to the reviewer in that way. But if the magazine did have any malicious intent to benefit its advertisers at the pub's expense, why use language that is ambiguous at best?

    According to the Burkes' consultant, the review has endangered the Irish Pub's future because Atlantic City is using its eminent domain power to acquire “run-down properties” so they can be developed by the casinos.

    In two similar cases, a Port St. Lucie, Fla., restaurant is suing a local newspaper while the owner of Chops in Philadelphia is suing a critic who wrote that he ate a “miserably tough and fatty strip steak" at the steakhouse.

    By Peyton Burgess
    1/23/08



     
    Woman, 88, Arrested over Football Sues Neighbors

    A Cincinnati neighborhood that got stirred up when an 88-year-old woman was arrested after refusing to give the boy next door his ball back may not be returning to normal anytime soon. She is now suing the boy's parents for disturbing her peaceful enjoyment of her home.
    more


    Is $230K Deal to Cover
    up Sex Assault Legal?

    The enforceability of a “hush money” contract is at issue in the case of a casino host who alleges a Virginia businessman has reneged on an agreement to pay her $230,000 for not telling police that he sexually assaulted her.
    more


    Dissenter Has Beef with Cattle Burial Decision

    A divided Arkansas Court of Appeals has ruled that a truck driver involved in an accident which killed 38 cattle he was transporting cannot be held liable for the improper burial of the animals by a third party.
    more


    Adult Site Not Liable for User's Tryst with Minor

    Ruling in the case of an adult dating website which was sued for failing to prevent a minor from misrepresenting her age, the 6th Circuit has dodged the issue of whether SexSearch.com is immune from liability under federal law.
    more


    On Point's Ten Worst Decisions of 2008

    Two of the country's more reactionary federal appellate judges have made it into On Point's third annual Judicial Hall of Shame.
    more


    On Point's Ten Best Decisions of 2008

    Gray wolves, transgender job applicants, the terminally ill and members of a polygamous sect are among those who benefited from the decisions included in On Point's third annual Judicial Hall of Fame.
    more


    Judge OKs Claim That Brando Will a Forgery

    The ex-wife of Marlon Brando's son Christian appears to have made some headway in her attempt to prove that the executors of Brando's $22 million estate illegally obtained their power through a forged codicil to his will.
    more


    Jury Backs Arrest of 73-Year-Old Porn Viewer

    In a case of porn interrupted, a jury has ruled that two San Francisco police officers did not use excessive force in arresting a 73-year-old man after he allegedly got angry at his estranged wife for refusing to watch an X-rated movie with him.
    more


    Having Cellmate Means Woman Loses Alimony

    In a very literal reading of a divorce agreement, a Florida appeals court has ruled that a woman can no longer receive alimony from her ex-husband because of her “cohabitation” with another person in a prison cell.
    more


    Cable Company Sued for Exposing Family to Porn

    For five months, the Bourne family of Warwick, R.I., allegedly had an unwelcome intruder in their home –- the hardcore porn programming of the Playboy Channel. Now they are suing their cable provider for trespassing on their property.
    more


    P&G Satan Rumors Case Settles After Epic Battle

    Four Amway distributors who spread a rumor linking Procter & Gamble to Satanism have dropped their appeal of a $19.25 million jury award and reached a settlement with the consumer products giant.
    more


    Jeweler Awarded $3.8M for Pink Diamond Theft

    Julius Klein Diamonds insists the pink diamond it allegedly stole from an Ohio jeweler never existed. But the mysterious gem was real enough to a federal jury, which awarded John Stafford $6.9 million for his loss.
    more



    Sherman v. McDonald's
    Subject: Nude Photos
    Document: Complaint

    Baxter v. Montana
    Subject: Death with Dignity
    Document: Opinion

    Philippe v. Wal-Mart Stores
    Subject: "Black Friday" Stampede
    Document: Complaint

    Smith v. Hilton Hotels
    Subject: Orgy Viewing
    Document: Complaint

    Mattel v. MGA Entertainment
    Subject: Bratz Dolls
    Document: Order Granting Injunction

    more

    On Trial
    Metzler v. Kurtz
    Court: Sussex County (N.J.) Superior
    Subject: Groping dentist

    Donna West v. Tyler Perry
    Court: USDC, E. Texas
    Subject: Copyright infringement
    Verdict: Defense

    more

    A.B. v. St. Louis Cardinals
    Date: 1/5/09
    Court: St. Louis Circuit
    Hearing: Jury trial in electronic message board defamation case.

    Estate of Butler v. Maharishi University
    Date: 1/12/09
    Court: USDC, S. Iowa
    Hearing: Jury trial in wrongful-death case.

    more