Strauss v. Horton
Gay couples sue to block enforcement of California's Proposition 8 ban on same-sex marriage, saying it "strike[s] directly" at constitutional rights of equal protection.
Authors Guild v. Google
Google agrees to pay authors and publishers $125 million as part of a "historic" settlement of class action suits involving online access to books through Google Book Search.
Steele v. TBS
Boston-area musician sues Jon Bon Jovi and others for $400 billion, alleging the rocker's song "I Love This Town" is a ripoff of a "love song" he wrote for "his beloved Red Sox."
• Cookbook author Missy Chase Lapine, allegedly slandered by Jerry Seinfeld, says she has "never felt so frightened and vulnerable as the day my daughter, 7 years old, came home from school and asked, "Mom, what is an assassin?" Seinfeld had joked on the "David Letterman Show" that "if you read history, many of the three-name people do become assassins.” Lapine v. Seinfeld
• North Carolina Court of Appeals refuses to issue an injunction requiring pop singer Clay Aiken to endorse a book about him. "Our courts cannot be used to force celebrities or their family or friends into making endorsements for another person's profit." Holleman v. Aiken
• Iowa Court of Appeals affirms the liability of a school district for failing to take adequate steps to prevent the physically aggressive behavior of a high-school basketball player. Andrew McSorley struck an opposing player in the head with his elbow during a game in 2004.
Brokaw v. Winfield-Mt. Union Community
Sch. Dist.
• Illinois middle school student wants the termination of a teacher who allegedly told other students to slap her for being inattentive "and, in fact, the other students slapped the minor plaintiff in the head."
Torres v. Valley View Community Sch. Dist. 365U
• Florida Supreme Court declines to recognize the tort of false light invasion of privacy. "[T]he benefit of recognizing the tort, which only offers a distinct remedy in relatively few unique situations, is outweighed by the danger of unreasonably impeding constitutionally protected speech ..." Jews for Jesus v. Rapp
• Actor David Duchovny denies having any Californication with a tennis instructor and sues a British newspaper for saying he did. "Daily Mail has caused substantial harm to Duchovny, in complete disregard of the truth and of even a semblance of journalistic integrity." Duchovny v. Daily Mail
• Kentucky settles a political blogger's free-speech suit, agreeing to only block access to blogs on state-owned computers "if pursuant to a reasonable, viewpoint-neutral standard that applies equally to all websites, whether or not those websites can be described as 'blogs.'" Nickolas v. Fletcher
• News service researching a 1964 auto accident involving John McCain files a Freedom of Information Act suit seeking U.S. Navy hospital records. "The personal history and military career of a Presidential candidate are matters of high importance to the American public." National Security News Service v. U.S. Dept. of the Navy
• Civil liberties group challenges the new federal law shielding phone companies from liability for cooperating in warrantless wiretapping. "At stake are the privacy rights of every American ..." In re NSA Telecom Records Litigation
• Louisiana appeals court rules that a marriage between first cousins in Iran "is valid in Louisiana and is not a violation of a strong public policy." Ghassemi v. Ghassemi
Defamed by Dating Gossip Suit Resurfaces in Florida
A Pittsburgh attorney has relaunched his legal attack on DontDateHimGirl.com, alleging in a new federal suit that the operator of the dating gossip website “actively encourages” posters to submit defamatory information.
Todd Hollis's original suit, filed in Pennsylvania state court, was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction in April, leaving unresolved the issue of whether DontDateHimGirl was immune from liability for postings that accused him of having herpes, speculated he was gay or bisexual and described his home as “a dump.”
The Communications Decency Act protects Internet service providers that “passively” publish information from being sued for defamation over content posted by third parties. If a website operator “is responsible, in whole or in part, for creating or developing the information, it becomes a content provider and is not entitled to CDA immunity.”
Hollis, who is now representing himself, filed his new complaint Nov. 30 in Miami federal court, which should have jurisdiction since DontDateHimGirl is based in South Florida. And he portrays the operator of the site, Tasha Cunningham, as being much more than a “passive” publisher.
DontDateHimGirl allows women to submit profiles of men who allegedly cheated on them and, the suit says,
Plaintiff believes Cunningham actively encourages member users to submit false and derogatory information to the website, for the purpose of providing additional “titillation” for the readers of the profiles.
The profiles, Hollis alleges, include “content not provided or inferred by the member user” and Cunningham even “arbitrarily edits the content of certain profiles when requested by 3rd party women.”
UPDATE
Court records show the parties dismissed the case June 20, 2008.
The allegations appear to follow the lead of a recent federal appeals court decision which discussed whether a hypothetical website called harassthem.com could be sued for “providing a forum designed to publish sensitive and defamatory information.”
The CDA's protections would not apply “to those who actively encourage, solicit and profit from the tortious and unlawful communications of others,” the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said in Fair Housing Council v. Roommates.com, 489 F.3d 921 (2007).
Hollis no doubt will argue that DontDateHimGirl is exactly what Judge Alex Kozinski, who wrote the 2-1 majority opinion, had in mind. But in a dissent, Judge Sandra S. Ikuta said the majority view conflicted with precedent holding that a website operator does not “become[ ] an 'information content provider' if it intentionally selects, edits, and publishes defamatory information.”
The 9th Circuit, moreover, granted Roommates.com's petition for rehearing en banc, which argued that
There is no basis for an interpretation of the CDA that requires a court to evaluate the nature and purpose of a defendant's service and deny protection to those that gather and publish third-party content with an agenda.
The failure of wildlife officials in Utah to warn campers of the “known risk” of a specific bear makes them liable for the fatal mauling of an 11-year-old boy, the parents of Samuel Ives argue in court papers. more
Is There Room on Web for Two "Funky" Chicks?
In a colorful legal battle between “personal” bloggers, “Funky Brown Chick” will have to show more than surface similarities between her eponymous website and “funkyblackchick.com” to prevail on her trademark infringement claims. more
Manager Blames Movie for Use of Racial Slur
A former Wyeth Pharmaceuticals manager says she wasn't expressing racial bias when she described herself as the “head nigger in charge” in front of an African-American employee -– she just had the phrase “fresh in my mind” after seeing the movie “Lean on Me.”
more
Dirty Dancer Settles with Town -- to Tune of $275K
After a six-year legal battle over dirty dancing, a North Carolina town has agreed to pay $275,000 to a woman whom it had banned from its community center because of her “sexual gyrations.”
more
Careless Cart Loading Alleged in Death Case
Florida premises liability law appears to be generous enough toward plaintiffs that Home Depot could be held liable for the death of a customer who was allegedly struck by an overloaded shopping cart being pushed by another customer.
more
Parents, Hospital Clash over Meaning of Death
A legal showdown over the meaning of death pits an ultra-Orthodox Jewish couple who believe there is life while the heart still beats against the Washington, D.C., hospital which wants to remove their brain-dead son from life support.
more
Plaintiff in God Lawsuit Appeals to Higher Power
Despite having no earthly hope of prevailing, Nebraska State Sen. Ernie Chambers has appealed to a higher legal power in his lawsuit against God, which was dismissed because he has not served the defendant. more
Staring at Breasts Not Harassment, Says Jury
The former administrator of Grafton, Mass., did not sexually harass his secretary by staring at her breasts, a jury has ruled, apparently agreeing with the defense that his eye movements were “normal mannerisms” caused by a medical condition. more
Penis Pump Judge's Staff Settle Claims for $340K
The misconduct of former Creek County District Judge Donald Thompson, who masturbated with a penis pump while presiding over trials, has ended up costing Oklahoma taxpayers $340,000 in settlements of lawsuits filed by two of his employees. more
No Coddling for Colleges That Coddle Athletes?
Civil rights plaintiffs have won another victory in a case involving the coddling of college athletes as a judge ruled that a rape victim can sue former Arizona State University football coach Dirk Koetter for putting her in danger she would otherwise not have faced. more
Priest's Affair Said to Breach Duty as Confessor
As pickup lines go, “Your presence struck me like a thunderbolt” is passably original. But it was allegedly uttered by a priest who, according to a $125 million lawsuit, exploited the power of the confessional to seduce a female parishioner. more
Nelson v. American Apparel Subject: "Sham" Arbitration Document: Opinion
A Pittsburgh attorney has relaunched his legal attack on 
