Strauss v. Horton
Gay couples sue to block enforcement of California's Proposition 8 ban on same-sex marriage, saying it "strike[s] directly" at constitutional rights of equal protection.
Authors Guild v. Google
Google agrees to pay authors and publishers $125 million as part of a "historic" settlement of class action suits involving online access to books through Google Book Search.
Steele v. TBS
Boston-area musician sues Jon Bon Jovi and others for $400 billion, alleging the rocker's song "I Love This Town" is a ripoff of a "love song" he wrote for "his beloved Red Sox."
Courthouse News On Trial

On Point Search

On Point Day by Day

On Point News by Subject

On the Map

Extra Points

• Cookbook author Missy Chase Lapine, allegedly slandered by Jerry Seinfeld, says she has "never felt so frightened and vulnerable as the day my daughter, 7 years old, came home from school and asked, "Mom, what is an assassin?" Seinfeld had joked on the "David Letterman Show" that "if you read history, many of the three-name people do become assassins.” Lapine v. Seinfeld

• North Carolina Court of Appeals refuses to issue an injunction requiring pop singer Clay Aiken to endorse a book about him. "Our courts cannot be used to force celebrities or their family or friends into making endorsements for another person's profit."
Holleman v. Aiken

• Iowa Court of Appeals affirms the liability of a school district for failing to take adequate steps to prevent the physically aggressive behavior of a high-school basketball player. Andrew McSorley struck an opposing player in the head with his elbow during a game in 2004.
Brokaw v. Winfield-Mt. Union Community Sch. Dist.

• Illinois middle school student wants the termination of a teacher who allegedly told other students to slap her for being inattentive "and, in fact, the other students slapped the minor plaintiff in the head."
Torres v. Valley View Community Sch. Dist. 365U

• Florida Supreme Court declines to recognize the tort of false light invasion of privacy. "[T]he benefit of recognizing the tort, which only offers a distinct remedy in relatively few unique situations, is outweighed by the danger of unreasonably impeding constitutionally protected speech ..." Jews for Jesus v. Rapp

• Actor David Duchovny denies having any Californication with a tennis instructor and sues a British newspaper for saying he did. "Daily Mail has caused substantial harm to Duchovny, in complete disregard of the truth and of even a semblance of journalistic integrity."
Duchovny v. Daily Mail

• Kentucky settles a political blogger's free-speech suit, agreeing to only block access to blogs on state-owned computers "if pursuant to a reasonable, viewpoint-neutral standard that applies equally to all websites, whether or not those websites can be described as 'blogs.'" Nickolas v. Fletcher

• News service researching a 1964 auto accident involving John McCain files a Freedom of Information Act suit seeking U.S. Navy hospital records. "The personal history and military career of a Presidential candidate are matters of high importance to the American public."
National Security News Service v. U.S. Dept. of the Navy

• Civil liberties group challenges the new federal law shielding phone companies from liability for cooperating in warrantless wiretapping. "At stake are the privacy rights of every American ..."
In re NSA Telecom Records Litigation

• Louisiana appeals court rules that a marriage between first cousins in Iran "is valid in Louisiana and is not a violation of a strong public policy."
Ghassemi v. Ghassemi

Subscribe via


Featured in Alltop

 
Cop's Widow Wants More Than $5 Million Award

Sgt. Yancey

A day after winning a $5 million award in a civil-rights case, the widow of a Tennessee police officer slain by a colleague took the unusual step of asking the trial judge to refer the case to a criminal grand jury.

State prosecutors concluded in 2003 that the death of Scott County Sheriff's Sgt. Hubert "John-John" Yancey was accidental. He was shot by former Deputy Marty Carson during a raid on a suspected methamphetamine lab.

But last week, a federal jury in Knoxville, Tenn., found Carson liable for violating Yancey's right to life and awarded $5 million in damages to the sergeant's widow. And now Lori Yancey has filed a motion under a law which says federal crimes “may be brought to the attention of the grand jury by the court or by any attorney appearing on behalf of the United States.”

The civil verdict of liability against Carson “exceeds the probable cause standard for a criminal indictment,” the motion says. Lori Yancey wants him to be prosecuted for deprivation of rights under color of law.

John Yancey was shot Nov. 28, 2003 in a trailer home where he believed a meth lab was being operated. According to court testimony, two of the residents had been up doing meth for 20 straight days without sleep.

Carson testified he was approaching the back bedroom in the trailer when he saw through the partially open door the outline of a figure who appeared to be holding a gun. He then retreated into the bathroom and fired one shot at what he thought was a shotgun-wielding suspect advancing on him from the bedroom.

No one in the trailer was armed and Lori Yancey originally alleged that Carson lured her husband into a fatal trap for political reasons -– both John Yancey and Carson were candidates to succeed Carson's father as sheriff.

After Jim Carson was booted out of office in August 2006, two former Scott County jail inmates came forward to claim that Marty Carson killed Yancey because the sergeant was investigating allegations that he was involved in meth dealing.

In key trial testimony, a Tennessee Highway Patrol trooper corroborated those witnesses. “John-John and I spoke to an informant about Marty Carson being involved in the drug trade and accepting bribes," Mark Chitwood told the jury.

The statute of limitations on a criminal charge of civil-rights violations will expire in November 2008. “While ample time presently remains for a complete investigation, it is important that the Grand Jury have the opportunity to conduct such an investigation as soon as possible,” Lori Yancey says in her motion.

Carson has filed a response brief which contends U.S. District Judge Thomas A. Varlan would intrude on the authority of the executive branch if he granted the “extraordinary request of a private, civil litigant to intervene in the grand jury process.”

Lori Yancey, he also argues, “is judicially estopped to assert any interest she may have to seek a criminal prosecution” because, among other things, she repeatedly emphasized to the trial jury the distinction between the civil burden of proof –- a preponderance of the evidence –- and the standard of beyond a reasonable doubt in criminal cases.

UPDATE

  • Judge Varlan denied the motion in a Dec. 14 order, citing precedent holding that “[t]he decision whether to prosecute and what charge to file or bring before a grand jury are decisions that lay within a prosecutor’s discretion.”

  • By Matthew Heller
    11/18/07



     

    'Known Risk' Makes U.S. Liable for Bear Attack?

    The failure of wildlife officials in Utah to warn campers of the “known risk” of a specific bear makes them liable for the fatal mauling of an 11-year-old boy, the parents of Samuel Ives argue in court papers.
    more


    Is There Room on Web
    for Two "Funky" Chicks?

    In a colorful legal battle between “personal” bloggers, “Funky Brown Chick” will have to show more than surface similarities between her eponymous website and “funkyblackchick.com” to prevail on her trademark infringement claims.
    more


    Manager Blames Movie for Use of Racial Slur

    A former Wyeth Pharmaceuticals manager says she wasn't expressing racial bias when she described herself as the “head nigger in charge” in front of an African-American employee -– she just had the phrase “fresh in my mind” after seeing the movie “Lean on Me.”
    more


    Dirty Dancer Settles with Town -- to Tune of $275K

    After a six-year legal battle over dirty dancing, a North Carolina town has agreed to pay $275,000 to a woman whom it had banned from its community center because of her “sexual gyrations.”
    more


    Careless Cart Loading Alleged in Death Case

    Florida premises liability law appears to be generous enough toward plaintiffs that Home Depot could be held liable for the death of a customer who was allegedly struck by an overloaded shopping cart being pushed by another customer.
    more


    Parents, Hospital Clash over Meaning of Death

    A legal showdown over the meaning of death pits an ultra-Orthodox Jewish couple who believe there is life while the heart still beats against the Washington, D.C., hospital which wants to remove their brain-dead son from life support.
    more


    Plaintiff in God Lawsuit Appeals to Higher Power

    Despite having no earthly hope of prevailing, Nebraska State Sen. Ernie Chambers has appealed to a higher legal power in his lawsuit against God, which was dismissed because he has not served the defendant.
    more


    Staring at Breasts Not Harassment, Says Jury

    The former administrator of Grafton, Mass., did not sexually harass his secretary by staring at her breasts, a jury has ruled, apparently agreeing with the defense that his eye movements were “normal mannerisms” caused by a medical condition.
    more


    Penis Pump Judge's Staff Settle Claims for $340K

    The misconduct of former Creek County District Judge Donald Thompson, who masturbated with a penis pump while presiding over trials, has ended up costing Oklahoma taxpayers $340,000 in settlements of lawsuits filed by two of his employees.
    more


    No Coddling for Colleges That Coddle Athletes?

    Civil rights plaintiffs have won another victory in a case involving the coddling of college athletes as a judge ruled that a rape victim can sue former Arizona State University football coach Dirk Koetter for putting her in danger she would otherwise not have faced.
    more


    Priest's Affair Said to Breach Duty as Confessor

    As pickup lines go, “Your presence struck me like a thunderbolt” is passably original. But it was allegedly uttered by a priest who, according to a $125 million lawsuit, exploited the power of the confessional to seduce a female parishioner.
    more



    Nelson v. American Apparel
    Subject: "Sham" Arbitration
    Document: Opinion

    Ernie Chambers v. God
    Subject: Frivolous Lawsuits
    Document: Order to Formalize Dismissal

    Privette v. Booby Trap
    Subject: Stripclub Injury
    Document: Complaint

    Peacock v. City Press
    Subject: Stripper Defamation
    Document: Complaint

    Kerrigan v. Comm'r of Public Health
    Subject: Same-Sex Marriage
    Document: Opinion

    more

    On Trial
    Gruver v. Hensley
    Court: Meade County (Ky.) Circuit
    Subject: Ku Klux Klan assault
    Verdict: $2.5 million

    Bowoto v. Chevron
    Court: USDC, N. Calif.
    Subject: Human rights

    more

    Francis v. U.S.
    Date: 11/19/08
    Court: USDC, Utah
    Hearing: Motion to dismiss fatal bear attack case.

    Jose Padilla v. John Yoo
    Date: 12/5/08
    Court: USDC, N. Calif.
    Hearing: Motion to dismiss terror suspect torture case.

    more