Strauss v. Horton
Gay couples sue to block enforcement of California's Proposition 8 ban on same-sex marriage, saying it "strike[s] directly" at constitutional rights of equal protection.
Authors Guild v. Google
Google agrees to pay authors and publishers $125 million as part of a "historic" settlement of class action suits involving online access to books through Google Book Search.
Steele v. TBS
Boston-area musician sues Jon Bon Jovi and others for $400 billion, alleging the rocker's song "I Love This Town" is a ripoff of a "love song" he wrote for "his beloved Red Sox."
Courthouse News On Trial

On Point Search

On Point Day by Day

On Point News by Subject

On the Map

Extra Points

• Cookbook author Missy Chase Lapine, allegedly slandered by Jerry Seinfeld, says she has "never felt so frightened and vulnerable as the day my daughter, 7 years old, came home from school and asked, "Mom, what is an assassin?" Seinfeld had joked on the "David Letterman Show" that "if you read history, many of the three-name people do become assassins.” Lapine v. Seinfeld

• North Carolina Court of Appeals refuses to issue an injunction requiring pop singer Clay Aiken to endorse a book about him. "Our courts cannot be used to force celebrities or their family or friends into making endorsements for another person's profit."
Holleman v. Aiken

• Iowa Court of Appeals affirms the liability of a school district for failing to take adequate steps to prevent the physically aggressive behavior of a high-school basketball player. Andrew McSorley struck an opposing player in the head with his elbow during a game in 2004.
Brokaw v. Winfield-Mt. Union Community Sch. Dist.

• Illinois middle school student wants the termination of a teacher who allegedly told other students to slap her for being inattentive "and, in fact, the other students slapped the minor plaintiff in the head."
Torres v. Valley View Community Sch. Dist. 365U

• Florida Supreme Court declines to recognize the tort of false light invasion of privacy. "[T]he benefit of recognizing the tort, which only offers a distinct remedy in relatively few unique situations, is outweighed by the danger of unreasonably impeding constitutionally protected speech ..." Jews for Jesus v. Rapp

• Actor David Duchovny denies having any Californication with a tennis instructor and sues a British newspaper for saying he did. "Daily Mail has caused substantial harm to Duchovny, in complete disregard of the truth and of even a semblance of journalistic integrity."
Duchovny v. Daily Mail

• Kentucky settles a political blogger's free-speech suit, agreeing to only block access to blogs on state-owned computers "if pursuant to a reasonable, viewpoint-neutral standard that applies equally to all websites, whether or not those websites can be described as 'blogs.'" Nickolas v. Fletcher

• News service researching a 1964 auto accident involving John McCain files a Freedom of Information Act suit seeking U.S. Navy hospital records. "The personal history and military career of a Presidential candidate are matters of high importance to the American public."
National Security News Service v. U.S. Dept. of the Navy

• Civil liberties group challenges the new federal law shielding phone companies from liability for cooperating in warrantless wiretapping. "At stake are the privacy rights of every American ..."
In re NSA Telecom Records Litigation

• Louisiana appeals court rules that a marriage between first cousins in Iran "is valid in Louisiana and is not a violation of a strong public policy."
Ghassemi v. Ghassemi

Subscribe via


Featured in Alltop

 
Virtual Land Dispute Spills into Real-World Court

Second Life "property"

A Pennsylvania attorney has further blurred the lines between reality and cyberspace by filing a first-of-its-kind property rights lawsuit that alleges a multiplayer online gaming company illegally seized his “virtual real estate.”

Marc S. Bragg of West Chester, Pa., is seeking relief in a real-world court for an alleged “conversion” or theft of property from the 3-D virtual world of Second Life, a “massively multiplayer role-playing game” (MMPORG) that boasts some 200,000 “residents” and 12,000 “profitable in-world business owners.”

Linden Labs, the San Francisco-based creator of Second Life, “intentionally, without Plaintiff's consent and without lawful justification, interfered with and destroyed Plaintiff's right of property,” the complaint says.

Bragg, who joined Second Life in late 2005 and uses the online name “Marc Woebegone,” had accumulated about $2,000 worth of virtual land, goods and currency when Linden canceled his account in May and effectively, he argues, converted his virtual property.

The company, however, claims Bragg breached Second Life’s terms of service agreement by using an “exploit” in the game –- that is, he had discovered how to hold an unauthorized auction of a property that was not yet for sale.

“Plaintiff knowingly violated the rules governing the purchase of computer services simulating 'real estate' use in Second Life,” Linden Labs founder Philip Rosedale says in a court brief.

Second Life's three-dimensional platform allows a player to create a persona or “avatar,” who can then explore the digital world and take part in everything from adult encounters to commercial transactions. The virtual commerce is conducted in “linden” dollars, which can be converted into U.S. dollars at online currency exchanges.

There are no virtual courts in Second Life, however, so Bragg filed suit in Chester County Court of Common Pleas. The case was recently transferred to federal court in Philadelphia.

"Plaintiff held all title, interest and possessory rights to the virtual land ... that was acquired from Defendants," the suit says.

But one potential problem for Bragg is he does not appear to have a contract of sale confirming what property rights he actually had. Absent such a contract, he relies primarily on statements by Rosedale hyping Second Life property ownership to the media.

The property owned in Second Life, moreover, exists only in Linden's code and would therefore cease to exist if the company discontinued the game or went out of business.

If anything, Bragg blurs the lines between reality and cyberspace too much, at one point claiming that “no fine print provided by Defendants could possibly operate to suspend the laws of the United States inside of Second Life.” Does that mean those laws would apply in other MMPORGs like Ultima and World of Warcraft or, for that matter, in a game of Monopoly?

Whatever happens to Bragg’s complaint, the issue of property ownership within these games will likely surface again. Business Week recently featured a Second Life “real estate developer” who has already accumulated $250,000 worth of virtual property and makes her living from her virtual real estate business. If investors are going to keep buying into the game, they’re going to want to know exactly what they’re buying.

By Josh Saltzman (CNS)
11/28/06



"Barney" Owner No Longer "Enemy" for Web Site

A New York doctor is now free to poke fun at “Barney” on his Web site without fear of being sued for copyright infringement by the owner of the children's dinosaur character.

Dr. Stuart Frankel responded to Lyons Partnerships' legal threats by filing a declaratory relief action seeking judicial confirmation that his Barney parodies qualify as fair use. The dustyfeet.com site describes Barney as an evil merchandising scheme and features a picture of the purple dinosaur under the heading, “This is the enemy.”

As part of a settlement filed Nov. 27, Lyons has agreed not to sue Frankel and to pay his legal fees. "Hopefully Lyons Partnership has learned its lesson and will have more respect for fair use in the future," Frankel attorney Corynne McSherry of the Electronic Frontier Foundation said in a statement.

Frankel tells On Point he would have removed the "Barney" material from his site "if the 'Barney' people had asked me nicely in the first place ... It's nothing I care very much about. I was just practicing HTML coding and put up something that popped into my head that I thought would be mildly amusing for about two seconds."

"I will continue to maintain a fully 100% legal website," he adds, "but don't know whether 'Barney' will feature in it."

A settlement had been in the works since Lyons filed a motion to dismiss in September, arguing the case was essentially moot because it promised not to “make any claim directly or indirectly against Stuart Frankel ... for infringing any copyright.”

As recently as June, a Lyons attorney told Frankel in an e-mail that the materials he was using “are the intellectual property of Lyons Partnership” and it was “unlawful” to use them without Lyons' permission.

Frankel would almost certainly have won injunctive relief from a judge because parodies such as his usually qualify as fair use. Lyons now has effectively enjoined itself.

By Matthew Heller
11/28/06



 

'Known Risk' Makes U.S. Liable for Bear Attack?

The failure of wildlife officials in Utah to warn campers of the “known risk” of a specific bear makes them liable for the fatal mauling of an 11-year-old boy, the parents of Samuel Ives argue in court papers.
more


Is There Room on Web
for Two "Funky" Chicks?

In a colorful legal battle between “personal” bloggers, “Funky Brown Chick” will have to show more than surface similarities between her eponymous website and “funkyblackchick.com” to prevail on her trademark infringement claims.
more


Manager Blames Movie for Use of Racial Slur

A former Wyeth Pharmaceuticals manager says she wasn't expressing racial bias when she described herself as the “head nigger in charge” in front of an African-American employee -– she just had the phrase “fresh in my mind” after seeing the movie “Lean on Me.”
more


Dirty Dancer Settles with Town -- to Tune of $275K

After a six-year legal battle over dirty dancing, a North Carolina town has agreed to pay $275,000 to a woman whom it had banned from its community center because of her “sexual gyrations.”
more


Careless Cart Loading Alleged in Death Case

Florida premises liability law appears to be generous enough toward plaintiffs that Home Depot could be held liable for the death of a customer who was allegedly struck by an overloaded shopping cart being pushed by another customer.
more


Parents, Hospital Clash over Meaning of Death

A legal showdown over the meaning of death pits an ultra-Orthodox Jewish couple who believe there is life while the heart still beats against the Washington, D.C., hospital which wants to remove their brain-dead son from life support.
more


Plaintiff in God Lawsuit Appeals to Higher Power

Despite having no earthly hope of prevailing, Nebraska State Sen. Ernie Chambers has appealed to a higher legal power in his lawsuit against God, which was dismissed because he has not served the defendant.
more


Staring at Breasts Not Harassment, Says Jury

The former administrator of Grafton, Mass., did not sexually harass his secretary by staring at her breasts, a jury has ruled, apparently agreeing with the defense that his eye movements were “normal mannerisms” caused by a medical condition.
more


Penis Pump Judge's Staff Settle Claims for $340K

The misconduct of former Creek County District Judge Donald Thompson, who masturbated with a penis pump while presiding over trials, has ended up costing Oklahoma taxpayers $340,000 in settlements of lawsuits filed by two of his employees.
more


No Coddling for Colleges That Coddle Athletes?

Civil rights plaintiffs have won another victory in a case involving the coddling of college athletes as a judge ruled that a rape victim can sue former Arizona State University football coach Dirk Koetter for putting her in danger she would otherwise not have faced.
more


Priest's Affair Said to Breach Duty as Confessor

As pickup lines go, “Your presence struck me like a thunderbolt” is passably original. But it was allegedly uttered by a priest who, according to a $125 million lawsuit, exploited the power of the confessional to seduce a female parishioner.
more



Nelson v. American Apparel
Subject: "Sham" Arbitration
Document: Opinion

Ernie Chambers v. God
Subject: Frivolous Lawsuits
Document: Order to Formalize Dismissal

Privette v. Booby Trap
Subject: Stripclub Injury
Document: Complaint

Peacock v. City Press
Subject: Stripper Defamation
Document: Complaint

Kerrigan v. Comm'r of Public Health
Subject: Same-Sex Marriage
Document: Opinion

more

On Trial
Gruver v. Hensley
Court: Meade County (Ky.) Circuit
Subject: Ku Klux Klan assault
Verdict: $2.5 million

Bowoto v. Chevron
Court: USDC, N. Calif.
Subject: Human rights

more

Francis v. U.S.
Date: 11/19/08
Court: USDC, Utah
Hearing: Motion to dismiss fatal bear attack case.

Jose Padilla v. John Yoo
Date: 12/5/08
Court: USDC, N. Calif.
Hearing: Motion to dismiss terror suspect torture case.

more